Acute and Short-Term Effects of Dry Needling in Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain and Hamstring Tightness: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (LBP) is one of the common health issues. Hamstring tightness contributes to the development of LBP. This study aimed to investigate the acute and short-term effects of deep dry needling (DN) in patients with chronic nonspecific LBP and hamstring muscle tightness. METHODS: A single-group pretest-posttest clinical study design was followed. The outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS), passive knee extension (PKE) test, finger-floor distance (FFD) test, and functional rating index (FRI). Patients underwent one session of deep DN of three points on both hamstring muscles, each point for one minute. Patients were assessed before (T0), immediately after (T1), and one week after DN (T2). The FRI was assessed at T0 and T2. RESULTS: Ten women with a mean age of 21.1 years (SD = 1.6) participated in the study. Significant large effect sizes in VAS pain reduction (d = 1.25) and PKE hamstring tightness were obtained (hamstring: right, d = 0.82; left, d = 0.88) at T2. Medium effect sizes were obtained for FFD (d = 0.45) and FRI (d = 0.72) at T2. CONCLUSION: A single session of deep DN improved pain and function and increased hamstring flexibility. This pilot study supports the use of DN in patients with LBP and hamstring tightness; however, future research with a rigorous study design of randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the findings. This trial is registered with IRCT20180511039612N1.

Comparison of Therapeutic Ultrasound and Radial Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Plantar Flexor Spasticity After Stroke: A Prospective, Single-blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the effects of therapeutic ultrasound (US) and radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) in the treatment of plantar flexor spasticity after stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, single-blind, randomized clinical trial, 32 patients (age range 42-78 years; male 19) with stroke were randomly divided into two groups: The US group (n = 16) received the continuous ultrasound, intensity 1.5 w/cm2, frequency 1 MHz, and duration 10 minutes. The rESWT group (n = 16) was treated with rESWT, 0.340 mJ/mm2, 2000 shots. Both groups received the treatments for 1 session. The H-reflex tests of Hmax/Mmax ratio and H-reflex latency, the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS), active range of motion (AROM), passive range of motion (PROM), passive plantar flexor torque (PPFT), and the timed "up and go" test (TUG) were blinded assessed at baseline (T0), immediately post-treatment (T1), and one hour follow-up (T2). RESULTS: The H-reflex tests did not improve across the groups. However, the MMAS spasticity scores, AROM and PROM, PPFT, and TUG improved significantly within groups. The results found no significant differences between groups for all outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: The US and rESWT had similar effects, and the rESWT was not more effective than the US in improving ankle plantar flexor spasticity after stroke.

Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the modified modified ashworth scale in the assessment of muscle spasticity in cerebral palsy: A preliminary study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) in the assessment of lower extremity spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP). METHODS: Fifteen children (10 boys) with a mean age of 8.7±3.4 years participated. Two physiotherapists rated the spasticity of the hip adductors, knee extensors, and ankle plantar flexors for inter-rater reliability. Each child was examined again by one of the physiotherapists (same physiotherapist for all of the children) for intra-rater reliability (mean interval = 7 days). A random sequence of raters and muscles tested was applied. RESULTS: The reliability of the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for individual muscle groups ranged between good to excellent (ICCagreement of 0.60-0.83). The ICC values for overall inter-rater (ICCagreement = 0.82) and intra-rater reliability (ICCagreement  = 0.85) were excellent. CONCLUSION: The MMAS showed excellent reliability for the assessment of lower extremity muscle spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. However, an interpretation should be made with caution due to the small sample size and wide range of confidence interval values.

The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: A validation of the Persian-language version.

Background: Valid and reliable tools are required to measure patient satisfaction with physical therapy care. The aim of this study was to translate the MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care (MRPS) into Persian language and to evaluate its measurement properties.Methods: A cross-sectional and prospective validation study design was adopted. The development of the Persian MRPS (MRPSp) followed the standard guidelines with "forward"-"backward" translation, consensus agreement of expert panel, and pilot testing. The final MRPSp was evaluated for reliability and validity.Results: A total of 114 patients (mean age 52.14 years, 72 females) participated in this study. The patients' satisfaction was high as reflected in the ceiling effect (25.4%). The overall Cronbach's α was 0.91. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.88. Principal component analysis suggested a 7-item "internal" factor (alpha = 0.95) and a 3-item "external" factor (alpha = 0.74). The correlations of factors with two global measures of satisfaction were significant ranging from 0.247 to 0.789. Individual items of MRPSp had significant positive correlations with two global measures (r = 0.233-0.736). The standard error of measurement was between 0.97 and 2.14. The smallest detectable change was between 2.7 and 5.93.Conclusion: The Persian version of the MRPS is a two-factor reliable and valid instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care.