Myocardial preservation methods in isolated minimal invasive mitral valve surgery: Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Minimal invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a commonly used approach for mitral valve surgery. Several techniques of myocardial preservation were described in patients undergoing MIMVS. We aim to evaluate preservation technique and short term outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent isolated MIMVS and were included in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. RESULTS: The final cohort included 4976 patients. Mean age was 63.1 years (SD, 12.5) and 42.6% were females. Antegrade delivery method (71.3% of the patients) was the most common, follow by antergrade/retrograde (19.9%). Blood, crystalloid solution, and combination of blood-crystalloid were used in 62.4%, 13.2%, and 13.7%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, cardioplegia technique was associated with mortality (P = .011), pleural effusion (P = .045), and length of ICU stay (P < .001). Antegrade-crystalloid (OR, 3.37; 95%CI, 1.70-6.68) and antegrade/retrograde-blood/crystalloid (OR, 3.28; 95%CI, 1.15-9.38) were associated with increased risk for mortality compared with antegrade-blood cardioplegia. Data on postoperative ejection fraction (EF), CPK-MB, and Troponin was available only in 30%, 9%, and 5% of the patients, respectively, and were not included in the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Ante-grade-blood was the most common preservation technique in MIMVS. Ante-grade-crystalloid and ante-grade/retrograde-blood/crystalloid are associated with increased risk for mortality. The results suggest that using crystalloid solutions for cardioplegia should be carefully considered. The STS database as a source for MIMVS outcome analysis is lacking, both in detailed specification of different surgical technique aspects, and in actual data collection of already existing categories.

Adverse Cerebral Outcomes after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery-More Than a Decade of Experience in a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Nonfatal strokes, transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), and reversible ischemic neurological deficits (RIND) after elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are devastating clinical problems. The anesthesiologist, surgical and intensive care teams in a community hospital adopted a strategy developed in an effort to minimize these adverse outcome events.The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of and predictors for perioperative adverse neurologic events. METHODS: A historical cohort study of 1,108 consecutive CABG patients operated between 2002 and 2014. Outcomes were defined as (1) a new neurologic damage (a new stroke, TIA, or RIND) and (2) a new neurologic damage or 30 days mortality. RESULTS: Adverse cerebral outcomes occurred in 16 patients (1.4 percent). Nine patients had postoperative stroke, six suffered TIAs, and one had postoperative RIND.In multivariate analysis, older age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.14), congestive heart failure (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.22-10.49) and prior stroke (OR 6.27, 95% CI 1.78-22.03) were significantly associated with increased risk of new neurologic damage. These parameters were also significantly associated with increased risk of the combined outcome (new neurologic damage/mortality). CONCLUSIONS: A low incidence rate of adverse cerebral outcomes after CABG in community hospital can be achieved with the use of the suggested surgical intensive care, and anesthetic strategy. Advanced age, congestive heart failure, and prior stroke are associated with adverse outcomes.

Should bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting be used in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting?

BACKGROUND: Although bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is associated with improved survival, the use of this technique in the elderly is controversial because of their increased surgical risk and shorter life expectancy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of age on outcome of patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1996 and 2001, 1714 consecutive patients underwent skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting, of whom 748 were ≤65 years of age, 688 were between 65 and 75 years of age, and 278 were ≥75 years of age. Operative mortality of the 3 age groups (1.2%, 4.1%, and 5.8%, respectively) was lower than the logistic EuroSCORE predicted mortality (3.9%, 6.5%, and 9.3%, respectively; P<0.001). There were no significant differences among the groups in occurrence of sternal infection (1.3%, 2.6%, and 1.4%, respectively; P=0.171). Mean follow-up was 11.5 years. Kaplan-Meier 10-year survival for patients ≤65, 65 to 75, and >75 years of age was 85%, 65%, and 40%, respectively (P<0.001). These rates were better than the corresponding predicted Charlson Comorbidity Index survival rates (68%, 37%, and 20%, respectively; P<0.001 for all age groups), approaching survival of the sex- and age-matched general population (90%, 70%, and 41%, respectively). Age ≤65 years (hazard ratio, 0.232; 95% confidence interval, 0.188-0.288) and age 65 to 75 years (hazard ratio, 0.499; 95% confidence interval, 0.414-0.602) were independent predictors of improved survival (Cox model). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting should be considered in patients >65 years of age because of the significant survival benefit obtained with this surgical technique with no additional risk of sternal wound infection related to age.

Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with impaired renal function.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal strategy for surgical revascularization in patients with impaired renal function is inconclusive. We compared early and late outcomes between bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) and single ITA (SITA) grafting in patients with renal dysfunction. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all the patients with multivessel disease and impaired renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60mL/min/1.73m2) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in our center during 1996-2011, utilizing either BITA or SITA revascularization. RESULTS: Of the 5301 patients with multivessel disease who underwent surgical revascularization during the study period, 391 were with impaired renal function: 212 (54.2%) underwent BITA, 179 (45.8%) underwent SITA. Patients who underwent BITA were less likely to have comorbidities. Statistically significant differences were not observed between the BITA and SITA groups in 30-day mortality (5.6% vs. 9.0%, p = 0.2) and in rates of early stroke, myocardial infarction, and sternal infection (4.5% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.467; 1.7% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.517; and 2.2% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.088, respectively). Long-term survival of the BITA group was better: median 8.36 vs. 4.14 years, p<0.001. In multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality (HR = 0.704, 95% CI: 0.556-0.89, p = 0.003). In analysis of a matched cohort (134 pairs), early outcomes did not differ between the groups; however, in multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was associated with decreased late mortality (HR = 0.35 (95%CI 0.18-0.68), p = 0.002) . CONCLUSIONS: BITA revascularization did not impact early outcome in patients with CRF, but demonstrated a significant protective effect on long-term survival in the unmatched and matched cohorts.

Saphenous Vein vs Arterial Graft to the Right System in Left-Sided Arterial Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: To investigate clinical outcomes of various arterial grafts (AGs) vs saphenous vein grafts (VGs) to the right coronary system in patients who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization. METHODS: We compared short- and long-term outcomes of all the patients operated in our center during 1996-2011, who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery (left anterior descending and left circumflex) grafting and either a VG or an AG to the right coronary system. RESULTS: Of 1691 patients, 983 received a VG and 708 received an AG to the right coronary system: 387 gastroepiploic arteries and 321 internal thoracic artery grafts. The median follow-up was 15.7 ± 0.32 years. For the VG and AG groups, early mortality (1.6% for VG and 1.3% for AG, P = .55) and other early adverse outcomes did not differ. Long-term (up to 20 years) survival was similar (34.1% ± 3.4% for VG vs 36.0% ±2% for AG, P = .86). In multivariable analysis, VG to the right coronary artery was not found to be a predictor of inferior survival (hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.836-1.194, P = .99). Comparing 2 propensity-matched groups of 349 pairs with a VG or an AG, and accounting for the severity of the right coronary lesion, did not demonstrate differences in early outcome or late survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early outcomes and long-term survival were comparable among patients who received left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization, between various graft types to the right coronary system.

All-cause Readmission after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in a Community Hospital - Long Term Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Post-procedure readmissions are associated with lower quality of life and increased economic burden. The study aimed to identify predictors for long-term all-cause readmissions in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a community hospital. METHODS: A Historical cohort study of all adults who underwent TAVR at Cape-Cod hospital between June 2015 and December 2017 was performed and data on readmissions was collected up-to May 2020 (median follow up of 3.3 years). Pre-procedure, procedure and in-hospital post-procedure parameters were collected. Readmission rate was evaluated, and univariate and multivariable analyses were applied to identify predictors for readmission. RESULTS: The study included 262 patients (mean age 83.7±7.9 years, 59.9% males). The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) probability of mortality (PROM) score was 4.9 (IQR, 3.1-7.9). Overall, 120 patients were readmitted. Ten percent were readmitted within 1-month, 20.8% within 3-months, 32.0% within 6-months and 44.5% within 1-year. New readmissions after 1-year were rare. STS PROM 5% or above (HR 1.50, p = 0.039), pre-procedure anemia (HR 1.63, p = 0.034), severely decreased pre-procedure renal function (HR 1.93, p = 0.040) and procedural complication (HR 1.65, p = 0.013) were independent predictors for all-cause readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated procedural risk, anemia, renal dysfunction and procedural complication are important predictors for readmission. Pre-procedure and ongoing treatment of the patient's background diseases and completion of treatment for complications prior to discharge may contribute to a reduction in the rate of readmissions.

Late Outcomes of In Situ Versus Composite Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: We compared 2 configurations for revascularization of the internal thoracic arteries to the anterior and lateral walls. In the "in situ" configuration, an in situ right internal thoracic artery supplies the left anterior descending territory, and an in situ left internal thoracic artery is grafted to the left circumflex territory. In the "composite" configuration, an in situ left internal thoracic artery is grafted to the left anterior descending artery and a free right internal thoracic artery is attached end-to-side to the left internal thoracic artery and supplies the lateral wall. METHODS: We compared outcomes of all the patients treated in our center by the described strategies during 1996 through 2011. RESULTS: Of 2951 patients, 1220 underwent composite grafting and 1731 underwent in situ grafting; the median follow-up was 15.1 years (interquartile range, 11.2-18.6 years). Early mortality (2.2% vs 2.0%, P = .787) and other early adverse outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Long-term (15-year) survival was marginally significant in favor of the in situ group (53.5% vs 49.5%, P = .05); this difference disappeared after 20 years. Configuration strategy was not a predictor for better 15-year survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.09; P = .568). An additional analysis compared matched groups of 995 patients each who underwent the 2 configuration strategies and found no differences in early outcome or late survival between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of 2 strategies for bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization to the left side, with comparable early outcomes and long-term survival.

Early and late outcomes of single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery revascularization for patients in critical condition.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal surgical approach for critically ill patients with complex coronary disease remains uncertain. We compared outcomes of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) versus single ITA (SITA) revascularization in critical patients. METHODS: We evaluated 394 consecutive critical patients with multi-vessel disease who underwent CABG during 1996-2001. Outcomes measured were early mortality, strokes, myocardial-infarctions, sternal infections, revisions for bleeding, and late survival. The critical preoperative state was acknowledged concisely by one or more of the following: preoperative ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, aborted sudden cardiac death, or the need for mechanical ventilation or for preoperative insertion of intra-aortic-balloon counter-pulsation. RESULTS: During the study period, 193 of our patients who underwent SITA and 201 who underwent BITA were in critical condition. The SITA group was older (mean 68.0 vs. 63.3 years, p = 0.001) and higher proportions were females (28.5% vs. 18.9% p = 0.025), after recent-MI (69.9% vs. 57.2% p = 0.009) and with left-main disease (38.3% vs. 49.3% p = .029); the median logistic EuroSCORE was higher (0.2898 vs. 0.1597, p<0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed between the SITA and BITA groups in 30-day mortality; and in rates of early CVA, MI and sternal infections (13.0% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.148; 4.1% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.49; 6.7% vs. 4.5%, p = 0.32 and 2.1% vs. 2.5%, p>0.99, respectively). Long-term survival (median follow-up of 15 years, interquartile-range: 13.57-15) was better in the BITA group (median 14.39 vs. 9.31± 0.9 years, p = 0.001). Propensity-score matching (132 matched pairs) also yielded similar early outcomes and improved long-term survival (median follow-up of 15 years, interquartile-range: 13.56-15) for the BITA group (median 12.49±1.71 vs. 7.63±0.99 years, p = 0.002). In multivariable analysis, BITA revascularization was found to be a predictor for improved survival (hazard-ratio of 0.419, 95%CI 0.23-0.76, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated long-term survival benefit for BITA revascularization in patients in a critical pre-operative state who presented for surgical revascularization.

Single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in patients with low ejection fraction.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the standard of care for the treatment of complex coronary artery disease. However, the optimal surgical treatment for patients with reduced left ventricular function with low ejection fraction (EF) is inconclusive. In our center, left-sided coronary grafting with bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) is generally the preferred method for surgical revascularization, also for patients with low EF. We compared early and long-term outcomes between BITA grafting and single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in patients with low EF.We evaluated short- and long-term outcomes of all patients who underwent surgical revascularization in our center during 1996 to 2011, according to EF ≥30% and <30%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. In addition, patients who underwent BITA and SITA grafting were matched using propensity score matching.In total, 5337 patients with multivessel disease underwent surgical revascularization during the study period. Of them, 394 had low EF. Among these, 188 underwent SITA revascularization and 206 BITA grafting. Those who underwent SITA were more likely to have comorbidities such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, and a critical preoperative condition including preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump insertion.Statistically significant differences were not observed between the SITA and BITA groups in 30-day mortality (8.5% vs 6.8%, P = .55), sternal wound infection (2.7% vs 1.0%, P = .27), stroke (3.7% vs 6.3%, P = .24), and perioperative myocardial infarction (5.9% vs 2.9%, P = .15). Long-term survival (median follow up of 14 years, interquartile range, 11.2-18.9) was also similar between the groups. Propensity score matching (129 matched pairs) yielded similar early and long-term outcomes for the groups.This study did not demonstrate any clinical benefit for BITA compared with SITA revascularization in individuals with low EF.

Open heart reoperations after coronary artery bypass grafting: the role of preoperative imaging with multidetector computed tomography.

BACKGROUND: Injury to patent grafts or cardiac chambers may occur during reoperation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Preoperative spatial localization of bypass grafts with computed tomography may improve the safety of these procedures. OBJECTIVES: To characterize patients who undergo CT before repeat operations after previous coronary artery bypass grafting, and evaluate its benefit in terms of surgical outcome. METHODS: We compared 28 patients who underwent cardiac gated CT angiography before reoperation (CT group) to 45 redo patients who were not evaluated with CT (no-CT group). RESULTS: The two groups were similar in most preoperative and operative characteristics. The CT group, however, included more patients with patent saphenous vein grafts and fewer with emergency operations, acute myocardial infarction and need for intraaortic balloon pump support. During mid-sternotomy, there was no injury to grafts in the CT group, while there were two patent grafts and three right ventricular injuries in the no-CT group. There was no significant difference in perioperative mortality (3.6% vs. 8.9%). The overall complication rate in the CT group was 21.4% compared to 42.2% in the no-CT group (P = 0.07). The only independent predictors of postoperative complications were diabetes mellitus, preoperative stroke and preoperative acute MI. CONCLUSIONS: The patency and proximity of patent grafts to the sternum are well demonstrated by multidetector CT and may provide the surgeon with an important roadmap to avoid potential graft injury. A statistical trend towards reduced complications rate was demonstrated among patients who underwent CT angiography before their repeat cardiac operation. Larger series are required to demonstrate a statistically validated complication-free survival benefit of preoperative CT before repeat cardiac surgery.

A simple-to-use nomogram to predict long term survival of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting technique.

BACKGROUND: Several risk scores have been created to predict long term mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Several studies demonstrated a reduction in long-term mortality following bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) compared to single internal thoracic artery. However, these prediction models usually referred to long term survival as survival of up to 5 years. Moreover, none of these models were built specifically for operation incorporating BITA grafting. METHODS: A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent isolated BITA grafting between 1996 and 2011 at Tel-Aviv Sourasky medical center, a tertiary referral university affiliated medical center with a 24-bed cardio-thoracic surgery department. Study population (N = 2,935) was randomly divided into 2 groups: learning group which was used to build the prediction model and validation group. Cox regression was used to predict death using pre-procedural risk factors (demographic data, patient comorbidities, cardiac characteristics and patient's status). The accuracy (discrimination and calibration) of the prediction model was evaluated. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The learning (1,468 patients) and validation (1,467 patients) groups had similar preoperative characteristics and similar survival. Older age, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal failure, old MI, ejection fraction ≤30%, pre-operative use of intra-aortic balloon, and peripheral vascular disease, were significant predictors of mortality and were used to build the prediction model. The area under the ROC curves for 5, 10, and 15-year survival ranged between 0.742 and 0.762 for the learning group and between 0.766 and 0.770 for the validation group. The prediction model showed good calibration performance in both groups. A nomogram was built in order to introduce a simple-to-use tool for prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: A simple-to-use validated model can be used for a prediction of 5, 10, and 15-year mortality after CABG using the BITA grafting technique.

The epidemiology of coronary artery bypass surgery in a community hospital: A comparison between 2 periods.

During the last decades, the increased number of percutaneous interventions procedures causes a significant change in the profile of patients referred to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to study changes in patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients referred to CABG in a community hospital during the first 15 years of the millennium.A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent CABG in Cape Cod Hospital was performed. The period was divided into 2 sub-periods, 2000 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014. Patients' characteristics and procedure outcomes were compared. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, Society of Thoracic Surgery risk scores and surgical adverse outcomes (stroke, coma, and 30-days mortality) were collected.During the study period, 1108 patients underwent CABG; 612 were operated before 2009 and 496 after. Age and sex were similar in the 2 periods. The patients in the later period presented lower risk for mortality and stroke (P <.001). Diabetes (DM) was more common in the later period (P <.001) while peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (P <.001) and left main disease (LM) (P = .017) were more common in the earlier period. Mortality rates were similar between the 2 periods. Post-operative stroke (1.8%) and coma (0.8%) were presented only in the later period. In conclusion, a significant change in CABG patients' characteristics was observed.In conclusion, patients in the later period had lower risk score and were more likely to present with DM and less with PVD and LM. Despite the lower risk, the mortality rate was similar.

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one? An analysis of 5301 cases.

OBJECTIVES: Although bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting is associated with improved survival, many surgeons are reluctant to use this technique due to its greater complexity and the potentially increased risk of sternal infection. This observational study examined if BITA grafting provides improved outcomes compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting in patients with multivessel coronary disease. METHODS: Patients in our institution who underwent BITA grafting during 1996-2011 were compared to those who underwent SITA grafting during the same period. To adjust for differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, patients were matched by propensity score. The Cox model was used to identify predictors of decreased survival and the Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, both for the entire cohort and for the matched cohort. RESULTS: SITA patients were older than BITA patients, included more females, and were more likely to have chronic obstructive lung disease, an ejection fraction <30%, diabetes, renal insufficiency, peripheral vascular disease and emergency and repeat operations. Three-vessel and left main diseases were more common among BITA patients, and operative mortality was reduced (2.1% vs 3.6% for SITA, P = 0.002). Sternal infection and stroke rates were similar for the groups. Ten-year Kaplan-Meier survival of BITA patients was better (71.2% vs 56.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). BITA grafting was found to be a predictor of better survival in the analysis of the matched cohort (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the routine use of BITA grafting in patients who undergo myocardial revascularization.

Left anterior descending artery revascularization with the right internal thoracic artery T-graft: the 'reverse composite' configuration.

OBJECTIVES: The use of bilateral internal thoracic artery graft for myocardial revascularization has improved the long-term survival and decreased the rate of repeat interventions in patients. A key technical factor for complete arterial revascularization is sufficient length of the internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft. The purpose of this study was to compare early and long-term outcomes of 'standard composite' grafting and 'reverse composite' grafting. In the former, the left ITA (LITA) is connected to the left anterior descending artery, and the right ITA is connected end-to-side to the LITA for revascularization of the left circumflex artery. In 'reverse composite' grafting, the LITA is connected to the left circumflex artery, and the right ITA is connected end-to-side to the LITA, for revascularization of the left anterior descending artery. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of 1365 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Centre, using bilateral ITA as standard composite versus 'reverse composite' grafts, between January 1996 and December 2011. A propensity score matching analysis compared 132 pairs of patients who underwent bilateral ITA by the 2 modes. RESULTS: Twelve hundred and thirty patients underwent standard 'composite' grafts and 135 underwent 'reverse composite' grafts. Early mortality and early adverse effects did not differ significantly between the groups. After matching, the difference in late mortality between the groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that revascularization of the left anterior descending with the right ITA, arising from an in situ LITA, is safe and provides early outcomes and long-term survival that are not significantly different from those of the standard composite grafting technique. However, there was evidence of better survival in the standard composite group.

Surgical versus trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (SAVR vs TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis: Experience in a community hospital.

Trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in high and intermediate risk patients with aortic stenosis. TAVR programs are spreading from large referral centers and being established in community based institutions. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of TAVR to those of SAVR in a community hospital.A historical cohort study of patients with aortic stenosis and pre-post procedure echocardiography data who underwent SAVR or TAVR in Cape Cod Hospital between January 2014 and December 2016. Patient characteristics and procedure outcomes were compared between the two procedures.The study included 230 patients, of them 111 underwent SAVR and 119 underwent TAVR. None of the patients died during the 30 days after the procedure. TAVR patients had higher rates of postoperative mild+ aortic regurgitation (AR) (29.4% vs 12.6%, P = .002), postoperative atrial ventricular blocks (11.8% vs 0.9%, P = .001), and more often need an implantation of pacemaker (16.8% vs 0.9%, P < .001). Postoperative mean gradient of SAVR patients was higher (median 14 vs 11 mm Hg, P = .001) and atrial fibrillation postoperatively was more frequent (18.9% vs 2.5%, P < .001). Length of stay after procedure was shorter in TAVR patients (median 2 vs 4 days, P < .001).After controlling for confounders, the use of TAVR was associated with an increased risk for postoperative pacemaker implantation (OR = 16.3, 95%CI 1.91-138.7, P = .011), lower mean gradient (-4.327, 95%CI -7.68 to -0.98, P = .011), and lower risk for atrial fibrillation (OR = 0.11, 95%CI 0.03-0.38, P = .001), but not with postoperative AR (OR = 0.84, 95%CI 0.22-3.13, P = .789).In conclusion, short-term mortality was not reported in SAVR or TAVR patients. However, TAVR was associated with an increased risk for postoperative pacemaker implantation but with a lower risk for atrial fibrillation. Aortic valves implanted through a trans-catheter approach are also associated with a better hemodynamic performance.

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with peripheral vascular disease?

BACKGROUND: The use of two bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) was shown to lead to survival benefit. However, operators are reluctant to use BITA with peripheral vascular disease (PVD) because of concerns of increased rates of sternal wound infection and lack of studies supporting survival benefit compared with single internal thoracic artery (SITA) grafting. The aim of this study is to compare outcome BITA grafting versus of SITA and vein grafts in PVD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six hundred and twenty-one PVD patients who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 372 patients who underwent SITA. RESULTS: SITA patients were older and more likely more likely to have comorbidities (female, insulin-dependent diabetes, chronic obstructive lung disease, congestive heart failure, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, renal insufficiency, cerebrovascular disease, and emergency operation). Operative mortality (5.1 vs. 4.5%, in the SITA and BITA, respectively, P=0.758), rate of sternal wound infection (5.1 vs. 3.9%, P=0.421), and strokes (4.8 vs. 7.4%, P=0.141) were not significantly different between groups. BITA patients did not have significantly better 10-year survival (52.6 vs. 45.9%, P=0.087) and after propensity score matching (302 well-matched pairs), BITA was not associated with improved survival (hazard ratio: 0.902; 95% confidence interval: 0.742-1.283; P=0.784) (Cox model). CONCLUSION: The routine use of BITA versus SITA in PVD patients does not improve long-term survival. Selective use of BITA in lower risk patients might unmask the benefits of BITA.

Trans-catheter aortic valve replacement program in a community hospital - Comparison with US national data.

Symptomatic aortic stenosis remains a surgical disease, with aortic valve replacement resulting in symptom reduction and improvement in survival. For patients who are deemed a higher surgical risk, Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) is a viable, less invasive and increasingly common alternative. The study compares early outcomes in patients treated within one year of the commencement of TAVR program in a community hospital against outcomes of TAVR patients from nationwide reported data (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/ American College of Cardiology TVT registry). Preoperative characteristics and standardized procedural outcomes of all patients who underwent TAVR in Cape Cod Hospital between June 2015 and May 2016 (n = 62, CCH group) were compared using standardized data format to those of TAVR patients operated during the same time period in other centers within the United States participating in the STS/ACC TVT Registry (n = 24,497, USA group). Most preoperative patient characteristics were similar between groups. However, CCH patients were older (age≥80 years: 77.4% versus 64.3%, p = 0.032) and more likely to be non-elective cases (37.1% versus 9.7%, p<0.001). All 62 TAVR procedures in CCH were performed in the catheterization laboratory unlike most (89.7%) of the procedures in the USA group that were performed in hybrid rooms. A larger proportion of patients in the USA registry underwent TAVR under general anesthesia (78.2% vs.37.1%, P<0.001). Early aortic valve re- intervention rate was 0/62 (0%) in the CCH group VS. 74/ 24,497 (0.3%) in the USA group. In hospital mortality, which was defined as death of any cause during thirty days from date of operation, (CCH: 0% vs. USA: 2.5%, p = 0.410) and occurrence of early adverse events (including postoperative para-valvular leaks, conduction defects requiring pacemakers, neurologic and renal complications) were similar in the two groups. The study concludes that with specific team training and co-ordination, and with active support of experienced personnel, high risk patients with severe aortic valve stenosis can be managed safely with a TAVR procedure in a community hospital.

Correction: Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease? Analysis of 387 cases between 1996-2011.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201227.].

Are two internal thoracic grafts better than one in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease? Analysis of 387 cases between 1996-2011.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting is associated with improved survival. However, potential survival benefit of using two ITA`s in patients with chronic lung disease (CLD) is questionable due to their increased risk of sternal wound infection (SWI) compared to operations incorporating single ITA (SITA). The purpose of this study is to compare early and long-term outcome of bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting to that of grafting with single internal thoracic grafts and vein grafts or radial artery (SITA) in CLD patients with multi-vessels coronary disease. METHODS: One hundred and forty eight CLD patients who underwent BITA between 1996 and 2011 were compared with 239 who underwent SITA at the same period. RESULTS: SITA patients were more often female, more likely to have insulin treated diabetes (DM), DM with end organ damage, neurologic dysfunction and unstable angina. Despite of the difference in preoperative characteristics, early mortality (5.4% vs. 5.4%, in the SITA and BITA respectively, p = 0 < .999) and occurrences of SWI (6.3% vs 9.5%, p = 0.320) and strokes (3.8% vs 5.4%,p = 0.611) were not significantly different between groups. BITA patients did not have better Kaplan-Meier 10 year survival (52.8% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.088) and after matching, BITA and SITA had similar adjusted survival (HR 0.983[95%CI 0.755-1.280] p = 0.901) (cox model). CONCLUSION: Our study results suggest that in patients with CLD, the choice of BITA grafting technique did not provide survival benefit compared to SITA with other conduits.

Automated fastener (Core-Knot) versus manually tied knots in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: Impact on cross-clamp time and short-term echocardiographic results.

The Core-Knot device is an automatic fastener used mainly in minimally invasive heart valve surgery procedures, to facilitate knot tying. The purpose of this report is to compare ischemic time and outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) utilizing the Core-Knot device compared with manually tied knots.Between January, 2014 and December, 2016, 119 patients underwent SAVR in Cape Cod Hospital. We compared patient's characteristics, cross-clamp time, and outcomes of 75 patients who underwent SAVR using Core-Knot to those of 44 operated using manually tied knots.Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the Core-Knot group had higher preoperative aortic valve area and higher ejection fraction. The use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced aortic cross-clamp time (median 70 vs 84 minutes; P < .001). Patients undergoing SAVR using Core-Knot were less likely to have postoperative aortic regurgitation (P < .001). Early mortality, and also the rates of early adverse events (including all cardiac, neurologic, and renal complications), and the immediate postprocedure echo findings were similar in the 2 groups. In multivariate analysis, the use of Core-Knot was associated with reduced postoperative mean gradient across the aortic valve and reduced occurrence of postoperative aortic regurgitation. Older age and larger valve size were other predictors of reduced postoperative mean gradients.The use of an automatic fastener (Core-Knot) in surgical aortic valve replacement cases reduce aortic cross-clamp time and help eliminate postoperative paravalvular aortic regurgitation.