RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) are handheld electronic vaping devices which produce an aerosol by heating an e-liquid. People who smoke, healthcare providers and regulators want to know if ECs can help people quit smoking, and if they are safe to use for this purpose. This is a review update conducted as part of a living systematic review. OBJECTIVES: To examine the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of using electronic cigarettes (ECs) to help people who smoke tobacco achieve long-term smoking abstinence, in comparison to non-nicotine EC, other smoking cessation treatments and no treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group's Specialized Register to 1 February 2023, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO to 1 July 2023, and reference-checked and contacted study authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included trials in which people who smoke were randomized to an EC or control condition. We also included uncontrolled intervention studies in which all participants received an EC intervention as these studies have the potential to provide further information on harms and longer-term use. Studies had to report an eligible outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed standard Cochrane methods for screening and data extraction. Critical outcomes were abstinence from smoking after at least six months, adverse events (AEs), and serious adverse events (SAEs). We used a fixed-effect Mantel-Haenszel model to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous outcomes. For continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences. Where appropriate, we pooled data in pairwise and network meta-analyses (NMA). MAIN RESULTS: We included 88 completed studies (10 new to this update), representing 27,235 participants, of which 47 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of the included studies, we rated ten (all but one contributing to our main comparisons) at low risk of bias overall, 58 at high risk overall (including all non-randomized studies), and the remainder at unclear risk. There is high certainty that nicotine EC increases quit rates compared to nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.93; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 2544 participants). In absolute terms, this might translate to an additional four quitters per 100 (95% CI 2 to 6 more). There is moderate-certainty evidence (limited by imprecision) that the rate of occurrence of AEs is similar between groups (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.17; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 2052 participants). SAEs were rare, and there is insufficient evidence to determine whether rates differ between groups due to very serious imprecision (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.60; I2 = 32%; 6 studies, 2761 participants; low-certainty evidence). There is moderate-certainty evidence, limited by imprecision, that nicotine EC increases quit rates compared to non-nicotine EC (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.96; I2 = 4%; 6 studies, 1613 participants). In absolute terms, this might lead to an additional three quitters per 100 (95% CI 1 to 7 more). There is moderate-certainty evidence of no difference in the rate of AEs between these groups (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.11; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 1840 participants). There is insufficient evidence to determine whether rates of SAEs differ between groups, due to very serious imprecision (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.79; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 1412 participants; low-certainty evidence). Due to issues with risk of bias, there is low-certainty evidence that, compared to behavioural support only/no support, quit rates may be higher for participants randomized to nicotine EC (RR 1.88, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.25; I2 = 0%; 9 studies, 5024 participants). In absolute terms, this represents an additional four quitters per 100 (95% CI 2 to 5 more). There was some evidence that (non-serious) AEs may be more common in people randomized to nicotine EC (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.32; I2 = 41%, low-certainty evidence; 4 studies, 765 participants) and, again, insufficient evidence to determine whether rates of SAEs differed between groups (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.34; I2 = 23%; 10 studies, 3263 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Results from the NMA were consistent with those from pairwise meta-analyses for all critical outcomes, and there was no indication of inconsistency within the networks. Data from non-randomized studies were consistent with RCT data. The most commonly reported AEs were throat/mouth irritation, headache, cough, and nausea, which tended to dissipate with continued EC use. Very few studies reported data on other outcomes or comparisons, hence, evidence for these is limited, with CIs often encompassing both clinically significant harm and benefit. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is high-certainty evidence that ECs with nicotine increase quit rates compared to NRT and moderate-certainty evidence that they increase quit rates compared to ECs without nicotine. Evidence comparing nicotine EC with usual care/no treatment also suggests benefit, but is less certain due to risk of bias inherent in the study design. Confidence intervals were for the most part wide for data on AEs, SAEs and other safety markers, with no difference in AEs between nicotine and non-nicotine ECs nor between nicotine ECs and NRT. Overall incidence of SAEs was low across all study arms. We did not detect evidence of serious harm from nicotine EC, but the longest follow-up was two years and the number of studies was small. The main limitation of the evidence base remains imprecision due to the small number of RCTs, often with low event rates. Further RCTs are underway. To ensure the review continues to provide up-to-date information to decision-makers, this review is a living systematic review. We run searches monthly, with the review updated when relevant new evidence becomes available. Please refer to the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for the review's current status.
Assuntos
Sistemas Eletrônicos de Liberação de Nicotina , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Nicotina/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Substituição da Nicotina , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Metanálise em RedeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Most patients with CKD are managed in the community. Whether nurse-led CKD management programs improve outcomes in patients with CKD in primary care is unclear. METHODS: To assess the effect of such a program on the rate of renal function decline in patients with CKD (stages 3-5) in primary care in the United Kingdom, we conducted a cluster randomized trial, the Primary-Secondary Care Partnership to Improve Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease study. A software program designed for the study created a data file of patients with CKD in participating practices. In 23 intervention practices (11,651 patients), a CKD nurse practitioner worked with nominated practice leads to interpret the data file and implement guideline-based patient-level CKD management interventions. The 23 control practices (11,706 patients) received a data file but otherwise, continued usual CKD care. The primary outcome was defined at the cluster (practice) level as the change from baseline of the mean eGFR of the patients with CKD at 6-month intervals up to 42 months. Secondary outcomes included numbers of patients coded for CKD, mean BP, numbers of patients achieving National Institute for Health and Care Excellence BP targets for CKD, and proteinuria measurement. RESULTS: After 42 months, eGFR did not differ significantly between control and intervention groups. CKD- and proteinuria-related coding improved significantly along with the number of patients achieving BP targets in the intervention group versus usual care. CONCLUSIONS: CKD management programs in primary care may not slow progression of CKD, but they may significantly improve processes of care and potentially decrease the cardiovascular disease burden in CKD and related costs.
Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/terapia , Atenção Secundária à Saúde , Análise por Conglomerados , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Profissionais de Enfermagem , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic resection (ER) is safe and effective for Barrett's esophagus (BE) containing high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or mucosal adenocarcinoma (T1A). The risk of metachronous neoplasia is reduced by ablation of residual BE by using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or argon plasma coagulation (APC). These have not been compared directly. We aimed to recruit up to 100 patients with BE and HGD or T1A confirmed by ER over 1 year in 6 centers in a randomized pilot study. METHODS: Randomization was 1:1 to RFA or APC (4 treatments allowed at 2-month intervals). Recruitment, retention, dysplasia clearance, clearance of benign BE, adverse events, healthcare costs, and quality of life by using EQ-5D, EORTC QLQ-C30, or OES18 were assessed up to the end of the trial at 12 months. RESULTS: Of 171 patients screened, 76 were randomized to RFA (n = 36) or APC (n = 40). The mean age was 69.7 years, and 82% were male. BE was <5 cm (n = 27), 5 to 10 cm (n = 45), and >10 cm (n = 4). Sixty-five patients completed the trial. At 12 months, dysplasia clearance was RFA 79.4% and APC 83.8% (odds ratio [OR] 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2-2.6); BE clearance was RFA 55.8%, and APC 48.3% (OR 1.4; 95% CI, 0.5-3.6). A total of 6.1% (RFA) and 13.3% (APC) had buried BE glands. Adverse events (including stricture rate after starting RFA 3/36 [8.3%] and APC 3/37 [8.1%]) and quality of life scores were similar, but RFA cost $27491 more per case than APC. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests similar efficacy and safety but a cost difference favoring APC. A fully powered non-inferiority trial is appropriate to confirm these findings. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01733719.).
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Coagulação com Plasma de Argônio , Esôfago de Barrett/cirurgia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Ablação por Radiofrequência , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Coagulação com Plasma de Argônio/efeitos adversos , Coagulação com Plasma de Argônio/economia , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Projetos Piloto , Qualidade de Vida , Ablação por Radiofrequência/efeitos adversos , Ablação por Radiofrequência/economia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The 'Surviving Crying' study was designed to develop and provisionally evaluate a support service for parents of excessively crying babies, including its suitability for use in the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS). The resulting service includes three materials: a website, a printed booklet, and a Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) programme delivered to parents by a qualified professional. This study aimed to measure whether parents used the materials and to obtain parents' and NHS professionals' evaluations of whether they are fit for purpose. Parents were asked about participating in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the materials fully in health service use. METHODS: Participants were 57 parents with babies they judged to be crying excessively and 96 NHS Health Visitors (HVs). Parental use and parents' and HVs' ratings of the Surviving Crying materials were measured. RESULTS: Thirty four parents reported using the website, 24 the printed booklet and 24 the CBT sessions. Parents mostly accessed the website on mobile phones or tablets and use was substantial. All the parents and almost all HVs who provided data judged the materials to be helpful for parents and suitable for NHS use. If offered a waiting list control group, 85% of parents said they would have been willing to take part in a full RCT evaluation of the Surviving Crying package. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The findings identify the need for materials to support parents of excessively crying babies within national health services in the UK. The Surviving Crying support package appears suitable for this purpose and a full community-level RCT of the package is feasible and likely to be worthwhile. Limitations to the study and barriers to delivery of the services were identified, indicating improvements needed in future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Study Registration no. ISRCTN84975637 .
Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Choro/psicologia , Pais/psicologia , Apoio Social , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Internet , Masculino , Folhetos , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/psicologia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Satisfação do Paciente , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Telemedicina/métodos , Reino UnidoRESUMO
AIMS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common and severe complication of cardiac surgery. There is no effective prevention or treatment. Sildenafil citrate (Revatio® , Pfizer Inc.), a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, prevents post cardiac surgery AKI in pre-clinical studies, however its use is contraindicated in patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous sildenafil in cardiac surgery patients. METHODS: We conducted an open label, dose escalation study with six patients per dose level. The six doses were 2.5 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg as a bolus, either alone or followed by an additional 2 h infusion of 2.5 mg sildenafil. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients entered the trial, of which 33 completed it. The mean age was 69.9 years. One patient died during surgery, two others were removed from the trial before dosing (all at dose level 5 mg + 2.5 mg). The pharmacokinetic profile of sildenafil was similar to previously published studies. For a dose of 10 mg administered as a bolus followed by 2.5 mg administered over 2 h the results were AUC∞ 537 ng h ml-1 , Cmax 189.4 ng ml-1 and t1/2 10.5 h. The drug was well tolerated with no serious adverse events related to drug administration. Higher sildenafil doses stabilized post-surgery nitric oxide bioavailability. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetics of sildenafil during cardiopulmonary bypass were comparable to those of other patient groups. The drug was well tolerated at therapeutic plasma levels. These results support the further evaluation of sildenafil for the prevention of AKI in cardiac surgery.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/administração & dosagem , Citrato de Sildenafila/administração & dosagem , Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Fosfodiesterase 5/farmacocinética , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Citrato de Sildenafila/efeitos adversos , Citrato de Sildenafila/farmacocinéticaRESUMO
Importance: Complaints and malpractice claims by families on the care of their babies are pertinent issue. Beyond just the financial implications, it involves harm to babies and distress to parents. Objective: The aim was to review published reports of complaints by families on the care of their babies in the neonatal units in order to understand the nature of these complaints and the areas of care that they relate to. Methods: We considered articles in English, which report on complaints made by families to organisations providing neonatal care. We performed our structured search on AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, EMCARE, SCOPUS and MEDLINE from January 2000 to December 2020. A total of 378 articles were appraised using eligibility criteria. Results: A total of 12 articles were included. The most common category of complaint was delayed/incorrect diagnosis. Communication issues were highlighted as a significant category of complaints. The majority of such claims were between the physicians and families. Factors implicated for clinician's errors that resulted in complaints were lack of clinical and communication training, inadequate supervision of junior clinicians, work culture and hierarchy, not listening to families' concerns and system failure. Conclusions: The most frequent categories of complaint reported in our systematic review were delayed/incorrect diagnosis and delayed/incorrect treatment. Organisations should be encouraged to share complaints data as it can facilitate shared learning. An understanding of human factor principles and its role in patient safety is also emphasised in this report in order to optimise patient outcomes and improve experience for families requiring neonatal care.
Assuntos
Imperícia , Médicos , Comunicação , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Segurança do PacienteRESUMO
We tested the hypothesis that reducing hydrogen ion accumulation during training would result in greater improvements in muscle oxidative capacity and time to exhaustion (TTE). Male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to one of three groups (CON, PLA, and BIC). CON served as a sedentary control, whereas PLA ingested water and BIC ingested sodium bicarbonate 30 min prior to every training session. Training consisted of seven to twelve 2-min intervals performed five times/wk for 5 wk. Following training, TTE was significantly greater in BIC (81.2 +/- 24.7 min) compared with PLA (53.5 +/- 30.4 min), and TTE for both groups was greater than CON (6.5 +/- 2.5 min). Fiber respiration was determined in the soleus (SOL) and extensor digitorum longus (EDL), with either pyruvate (Pyr) or palmitoyl carnitine (PC) as substrates. Compared with CON (14.3 +/- 2.6 nmol O(2).min(-1).mg dry wt(-1)), there was a significantly greater SOL-Pyr state 3 respiration in both PLA (19.6 +/- 3.0 nmol O(2).min(-1).mg dry wt(-1)) and BIC (24.4 +/- 2.8 nmol O(2).min(-1).mg dry wt(-1)), with a significantly greater value in BIC. However, state 3 respiration was significantly lower in the EDL from both trained groups compared with CON. These differences remained significant in the SOL, but not the EDL, when respiration was corrected for citrate synthase activity (an indicator of mitochondrial mass). These novel findings suggest that reducing muscle hydrogen ion accumulation during running training is associated with greater improvements in both mitochondrial mass and mitochondrial respiration in the soleus.
Assuntos
Adaptação Fisiológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Mitocôndrias Musculares/fisiologia , Condicionamento Físico Animal/fisiologia , Bicarbonato de Sódio/farmacologia , Animais , Peso Corporal/fisiologia , Citrato (si)-Sintase/metabolismo , Dieta , Ingestão de Líquidos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Masculino , Mitocôndrias Musculares/efeitos dos fármacos , Mitocôndrias Musculares/metabolismo , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/classificação , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/metabolismo , Fibras Musculares Esqueléticas/fisiologia , Músculo Esquelético/citologia , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Consumo de Oxigênio/fisiologia , Fosfofrutoquinase-1/metabolismo , Ratos , Ratos WistarRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Around 20% of 1- to 4-month-old infants cry for long periods without an apparent reason. Traditionally, this was attributed to gastrointestinal disorder ('colic'), but evidence shows that just 5% of infants cry a lot because of organic disturbances; in most cases, the crying is attributable to normal developmental processes. This has led to a focus on the impact of the crying on parents. Parental vulnerabilities influence how parents evaluate and respond to the crying and predict adverse outcomes. By developing evidence-based services that support parents, this study was designed to take the first steps towards national health services that enhance the coping and well-being of parents whose babies excessively cry. Related aims were to improve these infants' outcomes and how NHS money is spent. OBJECTIVES: To develop a novel intervention package to support parents of excessively crying infants and to examine the feasibility of delivering and evaluating it in the NHS. DESIGN: Stage 1 of this study aimed to (1) complete a literature review to identify example support materials, (2) obtain parents' guidance on the support needed when a baby cries excessively, together with their evaluation of the example materials, and (3) develop a support package based on the results. Stage 2 aimed to (1) recruit 60 parents whose babies were currently excessively crying, (2) assess parents' and NHS professionals' willingness to complete a study of the support package, (3) measure the use and evaluation of the package components, (4) estimate the package component costs and (5) provide evidence on the feasibility and methods for a large-scale trial. SETTING: Primary health care. PARTICIPANTS: Stage 1: 20 parents of previously excessively crying infants and 55 health visitors (HVs) or specialist community public health nurses (SCPHNs). Stage 2: 57 parents of currently excessively crying infants and 124 HVs/SCPHNs. INTERVENTIONS: The support package included a website, a printed booklet and a programme of cognitive-behavioural therapy-based sessions delivered to parents by a qualified practitioner. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Demographic data, (2) figures for parents' use of the package components and continuation in the study, (3) parents' and HVs'/SCPHNs' ratings of the package components and suitability for NHS use, (4) questionnaire measures of parental well-being and infant health and (5) costs. RESULTS: Most parents (95%) accessed the website or printed materials and half (51%) attended the practitioner sessions. All 52 parents and 85% of HVs/SCPHNs providing data would support the inclusion of the package in the NHS. It was associated with reduced parental frustration, anxiety, depression, reported infant crying and contacts with health professionals and increased knowledge about crying. Methods for a full trial and figures for the cost of excessive infant crying for the NHS and each package element were identified. LIMITATIONS: No control group was included. Most of the recruited parents were white, well educated and in stable relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Parents and HVs/SCPHNs recognise the need for NHS provisions that support parents of excessively crying babies and consider the materials developed to meet that need. A full-scale randomised controlled trial is feasible and desirable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN84975637. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 56. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
INTRODUCTION: This study is a first step in developing evidence-based NHS services to support parents whose babies cry excessively. BACKGROUND: Around one-fifth of babies cry a lot without an apparent reason. This 'excessive' infant crying used to be known as 'colic' and was blamed on indigestion pain. Recent evidence suggests that only 5% of infants taken to the doctor because of excessive crying are actually unwell. The crying peak and 'unsoothable' crying bouts that alarm parents in early infancy usually stop by themselves once the baby is 5 months old and are probably attributable to normal developmental processes. Although most babies who cry a lot are well, the crying can distress parents and lead to poor consequences; these include overfeeding, stopping breastfeeding, maternal depression, poor parentchild relationships, problems with child development and, in extreme cases, infant abuse. By developing NHS services that support parents to manage excessive infant crying, this project aimed to improve parents' well-being, long-term outcomes and how NHS money is spent. FINDINGS: In stage 1 of the study (development of an intervention package), the research evidence was reviewed and parents whose babies previously cried excessively and NHS health visitors (HVs) and specialist community public health nurses (SCPHNs) were involved to develop evidence-based support materials. These included a website, a printed booklet and support sessions with a qualified practitioner. In stage 2 (a feasibility study of package implementation in the NHS), HVs/SCPHNs helped to recruit 57 parents whose babies were currently excessively crying. On average, these babies cried for 6.9 hours per day. Most parents accessed the website or booklet and half attended the practitioner sessions. The package was associated with reduced parental anxiety and depression, and all 52 parents and 85% of HVs/SCPHNs who gave an opinion considered that it should be included in the NHS. Findings for the cost of each package element and suggestions for future services were provided.
Assuntos
Choro , Pais/psicologia , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial , Adulto , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) affects up to 4% of the general population. Symptoms include frequent, loose, or watery stools with associated urgency, resulting in marked reduction of quality of life and loss of work productivity. Ondansetron, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, has had an excellent safety record for over 20 years as an antiemetic, yet is not widely used in the treatment of IBS-D. It has, however, been shown to slow colonic transit and in a small randomised, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot study, benefited patients with IBS-D. METHODS: This trial is a phase III, parallel group, randomised, double-blind, multi-centre, placebo-controlled trial, with embedded mechanistic studies. Participants (n = 400) meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS-D will be recruited from outpatient and primary care clinics and by social media to receive either ondansetron (dose titrated up to 24 mg daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. Throughout the trial, participants will record their worst abdominal pain, worst urgency, stool frequency, and stool consistency on a daily basis. The primary endpoint is the proportion of "responders" in each group, using Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. Secondary endpoints include pain intensity, stool consistency, frequency, and urgency. Mood and quality of life will also be assessed. Mechanistic assessments will include whole gut transit, faecal tryptase and faecal bile acid concentrations at baseline and between weeks 8 and 11. A subgroup of participants will also undergo assessment of sensitivity (n = 80) using the barostat, and/or high-resolution colonic manometry (n = 40) to assess motor patterns in the left colon and the impact of ondansetron. DISCUSSION: The TRITON trial aims to assess the effect of ondansetron across multiple centres. By defining ondansetron's mechanisms of action we hope to better identify patients with IBS-D who are likely to respond. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN17508514 , Registered on 2 October 2017.
Assuntos
Antidiarreicos/uso terapêutico , Diarreia/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/tratamento farmacológico , Ondansetron/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas do Receptor 5-HT3 de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Antidiarreicos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Diarreia/diagnóstico , Diarreia/etiologia , Diarreia/fisiopatologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/complicações , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/diagnóstico , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/fisiopatologia , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ondansetron/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Antagonistas do Receptor 5-HT3 de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino UnidoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women with symptomatic uterine leiomyomas (fibroids) may have iron-deficiency anemia (IDA); therefore, surgery places them at risk of blood-borne morbidity from perioperative transfusions. Such women might benefit from a preoperative treatment that restores hematologic normality and alleviates fibroid symptoms. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a single preoperative depot injection of goserelin acetate plus iron treatment compared with iron monotherapy, in premenopausal women with IDA due to uterine leiomyomas. METHODS: This Phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, controlled trial (12 weeks of treatment plus a 24-week follow-up period) was conducted from October 1997 to August 1999. Patients received an injection of goserelin acetate 10.8 mg (3-month formulation) or a sham, with both groups receiving PO iron (ferrous sulfate) 325-mg tablets TID during the 12-week treatment period. Surgery (hysterectomy or myomectomy) was planned for week 12. Hemoglobin (Hb) level, symptoms of uterine leiomyomas, requirement for blood transfusion throughout, ability to donate blood for autologous transfusion, and leiomyoma and uterine volume were assessed for efficacy. The tolerability assessment included bone mineral density measurements and subjective symptomatology (ie, menstrual bleeding [uterine hemorrhage], fatigue, pelvic pain, and pelvic pressure). RESULTS: A total of 110 women received treatment (n = 54, goserelin acetate 10.8 mg; n = 56, sham). The majority of patients (69.1%) were black and the mean age at study entry was 39.9 years, with a mean weight of 80.1 kg. At approximately 12 weeks, Hb levels were significantly higher in the goserelin group compared with the sham group (difference of least squares mean, 1.17 g/dL; 95% CI, 0.68-1.66; P < 0.001), and significantly more patients in the goserelin group had an increase in Hb concentration of >or=2 g/dL (odds ratio 6.36; 95% CI, 2.00-20.18; P < 0.001). A nonsignificant decrease in both uterine and leiomyoma volume was experienced by patients who administered goserelin compared with increases in the sham group. Uterine hemorrhage was also experienced numerically less often by goserelin-treated patients compared with those given the sham injection (9.3% vs 28.6%, respectively). One or more adverse events (AEs) were reported by 89% of patients in each treatment group. Goserelin acetate 10.8 mg was generally well tolerated by patients, with no serious drug-related AEs reported during this 36-week trial. CONCLUSION: A single, preoperative injection of goserelin acetate 10.8 mg in addition to PO iron 325 mg TID was associated with improved Hb levels in these premenopausal women with IDA due to uterine leiomyomas.
Assuntos
Anemia Ferropriva/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Compostos Ferrosos/uso terapêutico , Gosserrelina/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Leiomioma/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Medicação , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Anemia Ferropriva/sangue , Anemia Ferropriva/etiologia , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Compostos Ferrosos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Ferrosos/efeitos adversos , Gosserrelina/administração & dosagem , Gosserrelina/efeitos adversos , Hematínicos/administração & dosagem , Hematínicos/efeitos adversos , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Injeções Subcutâneas , Leiomioma/sangue , Leiomioma/complicações , Leiomioma/cirurgia , América do Norte , Pré-Menopausa , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/sangue , Neoplasias Uterinas/complicações , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the extent to which cluster sizes vary in stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials (SW-CRT) and whether any variability is accounted for during the sample size calculation and analysis of these trials. SETTING: Any, not limited to healthcare settings. PARTICIPANTS: Any taking part in an SW-CRT published up to March 2016. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the variability in cluster sizes, measured by the coefficient of variation (CV) in cluster size. Secondary outcomes include the difference between the cluster sizes assumed during the sample size calculation and those observed during the trial, any reported variability in cluster sizes and whether the methods of sample size calculation and methods of analysis accounted for any variability in cluster sizes. RESULTS: Of the 101 included SW-CRTs, 48% mentioned that the included clusters were known to vary in size, yet only 13% of these accounted for this during the calculation of the sample size. However, 69% of the trials did use a method of analysis appropriate for when clusters vary in size. Full trial reports were available for 53 trials. The CV was calculated for 23 of these: the median CV was 0.41 (IQR: 0.22-0.52). Actual cluster sizes could be compared with those assumed during the sample size calculation for 14 (26%) of the trial reports; the cluster sizes were between 29% and 480% of that which had been assumed. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster sizes often vary in SW-CRTs. Reporting of SW-CRTs also remains suboptimal. The effect of unequal cluster sizes on the statistical power of SW-CRTs needs further exploration and methods appropriate to studies with unequal cluster sizes need to be employed.
Assuntos
Análise por Conglomerados , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Humanos , Tamanho da AmostraRESUMO
PURPOSE: The long duration of phase III clinical trials of overall survival (OS) slows down the treatment-development process. It could be shortened by using surrogate end points. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most studied biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa). This study attempts to validate PSA end points as surrogates for OS in advanced PCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual data from 2,161 advanced PCa patients treated in studies comparing bicalutamide to castration were used in a meta-analytic approach to surrogate end-point validation. PSA response, PSA normalization, time to PSA progression, and longitudinal PSA measurements were considered. RESULTS: The known association between PSA and OS at the individual patient level was confirmed. The association between the effect of intervention on any PSA end point and on OS was generally low (determination coefficient, < 0.69). CONCLUSION: It is a common misconception that high correlation between biomarkers and true end point justify the use of the former as surrogates. To statistically validate surrogate end points, a high correlation between the treatment effects on the surrogate and true end point needs to be established across groups of patients treated with two alternative interventions. The levels of association observed in this study indicate that the effect of hormonal treatment on OS cannot be predicted with a high degree of precision from observed treatment effects on PSA end points, and thus statistical validity is unproven. In practice, non-null treatment effects on OS can be predicted only from precisely estimated large effects on time to PSA progression (TTPP; hazard ratio, < 0.50).
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/sangue , Determinação de Ponto Final , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Metástase Neoplásica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Tailoring is a frequent component of approaches for implementing clinical practice guidelines, although evidence on how to maximise the effectiveness of tailoring is limited. In England, overweight and obesity are common, and national guidelines have been produced by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. However, the guidelines are not routinely followed in primary care. METHODS: A tailored implementation intervention was developed following an analysis of the determinants of practice influencing the implementation of the guidelines on obesity and the selection of strategies to address the determinants. General practices in the East Midlands of England were invited to take part in a cluster randomised controlled trial of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of overweight or obese patients offered a weight loss intervention. Secondary outcomes were the proportions of patients with (1) a BMI or waist circumference recorded, (2) record of lifestyle assessment, (3) referred to weight loss services, and (4) any change in weight during the study period. We also assessed the mean weight change over the study period. Follow-up was for 9 months after the intervention. A process evaluation was undertaken, involving interviews of samples of participating health professionals. RESULTS: There were 16 general practices in the control group, and 12 in the intervention group. At follow-up, 15.08 % in the control group and 13.19 % in the intervention group had been offered a weight loss intervention, odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (0.72, 1.89). BMI/waist circumference measurement 42.71 % control, 39.56 % intervention, OR 1.15 (CI 0.89, 1.48), referral to weight loss services 5.10 % control, 3.67 % intervention, OR 1.45 (CI 0.81, 2.63), weight management in the practice 9.59 % control, 8.73 % intervention, OR 1.09 (CI 0.55, 2.15), lifestyle assessment 23.05 % control, 23.86 % intervention, OR 0.98 (CI 0.76, 1.26), weight loss of at least 1 kg 42.22 % control, 41.65 % intervention, OR 0.98 (CI 0.87, 1.09). Health professionals reported the interventions as increasing their confidence in managing obesity and providing them with practical resources. CONCLUSIONS: The tailored intervention did not improve the implementation of the guidelines on obesity, despite systematic approaches to the identification of the determinants of practice. The methods of tailoring require further development to ensure that interventions target those determinants that most influence implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN07457585.
Assuntos
Sobrepeso/terapia , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Índice de Massa Corporal , Análise por Conglomerados , Atenção à Saúde/normas , Inglaterra , Feminino , Medicina Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Estilo de Vida Saudável , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Obesidade/terapia , Folhetos , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Circunferência da Cintura , Programas de Redução de PesoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVE: A range of patient-reported outcomes were used to measure disability due to low back pain. There is not a single back pain disability measurement commonly used in all randomized controlled trials. We report here our assessment as to whether different disability measures are sufficiently comparable to allow data pooling across trials. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: We used individual patient data from a repository of data from back pain trials of therapist-delivered interventions. METHODS: We used data from 11 trials (n=6089 patients) that had at least 2 of the following 7 measurements: Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Chronic Pain Grade disability score, Physical Component Summary of the 12- or 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, Patient Specific Functional Scale, Pain Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, and Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Within each trial, the change score between baseline and short-term follow-up was computed for each outcome and this was used to calculate the correlation between the change scores and the Cohen's κ for the 3-level outcome of change score of less than, equal to, and more than zero. It was considered feasible to pool 2 measures if they were at least moderately correlated (correlation>0.5) and have at least moderately similar responsiveness (κ>0.4). RESULTS: Although all pairs of measures were found to be positively correlated, most correlations were less than 0.5, with only 1 pair of outcomes in 1 trial having a correlation of more than 0.6. All κ statistics were less than 0.4 so that in no cases were the criteria for acceptability of pooling measures satisfied. CONCLUSION: The lack of agreement between different outcome measures means that pooling of data on these different disability measurements in a meta-analysis is not recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Avaliação da Deficiência , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Medição da Dor , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Dor Crônica/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Dor Lombar/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/psicologia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Poor nutrition in the first months after oesophago-gastric resection is a contributing factor to the reduced quality of life seen in these patients. The aim of this pilot and feasibility study was to ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to evaluate routine home enteral nutrition in these patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy were randomised to either six weeks of home feeding through a jejunostomy (intervention), or treatment as usual (control). Intervention comprised overnight feeding, providing 50 % of energy and protein requirements, in addition to usual oral intake. Primary outcome measures were recruitment and retention rates at six weeks and six months. Nutritional intake, nutritional parameters, quality of life and healthcare costs were also collected. Interviews were conducted with a sample of participants, to ascertain patient and carer experiences. RESULTS: Fifty-four of 112 (48 %) eligible patients participated in the study over the 20 months. Study retention at six weeks was 41/54 patients (76 %) and at six months was 36/54 (67 %). At six weeks, participants in the control group had lost on average 3.9 kg more than participants in the intervention group (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.6 to 6.2). These differences remained evident at three months (mean difference 2.5 kg, 95 % CI -0.5 to 5.6) and at six months (mean difference 2.5 kg, 95 % CI -1.2 to 6.1). The mean values observed in the intervention group for mid arm circumference, mid arm muscle circumference, triceps skin fold thickness and right hand grip strength were greater than for the control group at all post hospital discharge time points. The economic evaluation suggested that it was feasible to collect resource use and EQ-5D data for a full cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis of 15 interviews identified three main themes related to the intervention and the trial: 1) a positive experience, 2) the reasons for taking part, and 3) uncertainty of the study process. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that home enteral feeding by jejunostomy was feasible, safe and acceptable to patients and their carers. Whether home enteral feeding as 'usual practice' is a cost-effective therapy would require confirmation in an appropriately powered, multi-centre study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UK Clinical Research Network ID 12447 (main trial, first registered 30 May 2012); UK Clinical Research Network ID 13361 (qualitative substudy, first registered 30 May 2012); ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01870817 (first registered 28 May 2013).
Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagectomia/reabilitação , Junção Esofagogástrica/cirurgia , Gastrectomia/reabilitação , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Idoso , Cuidadores , Análise Custo-Benefício , Inglaterra , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Enteral/economia , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/economia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patologia , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Esofagectomia/economia , Junção Esofagogástrica/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrectomia/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar/economia , Humanos , Jejunostomia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação Nutricional , Estado Nutricional , Satisfação do Paciente , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias Gástricas/economia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of prophylactic breast irradiation in reducing the incidence and severity of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In all, 106 men with prostate cancer (T1b-T4/Nx/M0) and no current gynecomastia/breast pain were enrolled in this randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group multicenter trial. Patients received either a single dose of electron beam radiotherapy (10 Gy) or sham radiotherapy. Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150 mg/day was administered for 12 months from the day of radiotherapy. Every 3 months, patients underwent physical examination and questioning about gynecomastia and breast pain. RESULTS: The incidence of investigator-assessed gynecomastia was significantly lower with radiotherapy vs. sham radiotherapy (52% vs. 85%; odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04, 0.38; p < 0.001); direct questioning showed similar results. Fewer radiotherapy patients had >/=5 cm gynecomastia (measured by calipers; 11.5% vs. 50.0% for sham radiotherapy), and fewer cases were moderate-to-severe in intensity (21% vs. 48%). Similar proportions of radiotherapy and sham radiotherapy patients experienced breast pain (83% vs. 91%; OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.05, 1.27; p = 0.221); patients receiving radiotherapy experienced some reduction in its severity (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.97; p = 0.0429). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic breast irradiation is an effective and well-tolerated strategy for prevention of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Anilidas/efeitos adversos , Elétrons/uso terapêutico , Ginecomastia/radioterapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Mama/efeitos da radiação , Doenças Mamárias/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Mamárias/radioterapia , Intervalos de Confiança , Método Duplo-Cego , Ginecomastia/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Dor/induzido quimicamente , Dor/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Compostos de TosilRESUMO
The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) offers a unique model of comprehensive care for frail, elderly people. To date, all of the PACE programs have been located in urban areas. Rural advocates and policymakers, however, believe the program may hold great promise for use in rural areas, which have higher percentages of elderly residents than urban areas. In 2002, the National Rural Health Association and the National PACE Association convened a meeting that brought together PACE experts, policymakers, and rural health care providers to examine PACE and its applicability for rural communities. The meeting participants concluded that there were many rural communities where the PACE model might not only be appropriate but also highly successful in caring for rural, frail, elderly people. This article examines the notion of expanding the PACE model to rural communities, including some of the barriers and some of the possible solutions that might make PACE a viable part of the rural health care delivery system.
Assuntos
Assistência Integral à Saúde/organização & administração , Política de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/organização & administração , Serviços de Saúde Rural/organização & administração , Idoso , Congressos como Assunto , Comportamento Cooperativo , Humanos , Relações Interinstitucionais , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Changes in the health care system, medicine, and technology as well as in the characteristics of rural communities raise issues that impact the responsiveness of the rural public health system to emerging threats to health. These issues, which are systemic in nature and primarily involve the infrastructure of public health, include the capacity of rural public health to manage population health, utilize information technology, monitor performance of the essential public health functions, develop leadership and the public health workforce, and promote the interaction and integration of public health and health care. This article provides an overview of policy and research implications, and it suggests that each of these issues contributes to the capacity of public health to effectively improve the outcomes of health in rural communities.
Assuntos
Política de Saúde , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Administração em Saúde Pública , Saúde da População Rural , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Liderança , Informática Médica , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The authors present the case of a child with a colloid cyst of the velum interpositum. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case in the pediatric literature and only the second reported case to date. The patient was of an 11-year-old boy in whom this lesion was found after a minor head injury. He had a 6-month history of memory deficits. A lesion consistent with a colloid cyst was seen in the region of the velum interpositum, in the roof of the third ventricle. This lesion was excised successfully via a transcallosal interfornical approach. There were no new postoperative deficits and the child made a full recovery of time.