Endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke with large infarct, short- and long-term outcomes: a meta-analysis of 6 randomised control trials.

Endovascular Thrombectomy (EVT) as first-line treatment of patients with large core ischemic infarct is a subject of debate. A systematic literature search was conducted in four electronic databases for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing EVT to best medical treatment (BMT) for large core infarcts (ASPECTS ≤ 5). Relevant studies were added after screening for titles, abstracts, and complete text. Meta-analysis was performed. The continuous outcomes were analyzed using the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI, while the binary outcomes were analyzed using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A funnel plot was used to visually evaluate publication bias, and if feasible, Egger's test was used to validate. We included 1918 patients from six RCTs that compared EVT plus BMT and BMT alone in patients with large core infarct due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. There were 946 patients in the EVT group and 972 patients in the BMT group. The one-year outcomes are available for 314 patients in the EVT group and 292 patents in the BMT group from two RCTs. EVT group had statistically significant higher rate of 90-day mRS 0-1 (RR = 3.1, P-value < 0.0001), mRS 0-2 (RR = 2.64, P-value < 0.0001), mRS 0-3 (RR = 1.80, P-value < 0.0001), lower 90-day mean mRS score (SMD = -0.29, P-value < 0.0001), lower 90-day mortality rate (RR = 0.85, P-value = 0.015), and greater early neurological improvement (RR = 2.16, P-value < 0.00001) compared to the BMT group. However, the rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) (RR = 1.76, P-value = 0.01) and any ICH (RR = 2.18, P-value < 0.00001) were higher in EVT group. Our finding showed that EVT plus BMT led to in an absolute improvement of 5%, 12%, and 16% in 90-day mRS 0-1, 0-2, and 0-3, respectively. In addition, patients in EVT plus BMT group had a 3% increased probability of experiencing sICH and were 32% more susceptible to any ICH. Moreover, the one-year mRS 0-2 (RR = 2.16, P-value < 0.00001) and mRS 0-3 (RR = 1.80, P-value < 0.0001) was significantly favor the EVT plus BMT over BMT alone. Although, the one-year mortality rate was not significantly differed between two groups (RR = 0.91, P-value = 0.31). There was no statistically significant difference observed between the EVT plus BMT group and the BMT group concerning new stroke, decompressive craniectomy, and serious adverse events. Combined data from six RCTs shows that EVT plus BMT provides significantly better short- and long-term functional outcomes with minimal increase in symptomatic hemorrhage over BMT in patient with large core infarcts.

Safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: A subgroup based meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a significant hematological malignancy in the United States, with a high mortality rate and limited treatment options. CAR T-cell therapy, a new and promising treatment, is being investigated for its efficacy and safety in AML. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in AML, considering various subgroups such as study location, study design, prior transplantation status, conditioning regimen, and CAR T-cell source. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review across multiple databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines and focusing on studies concerning CAR T-cell therapy in AML. We included original articles in English and excluded non-original reviews, abstracts, and non-English studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool. Statistical analysis involved meta-analysis with Cochrane's Q-test and I² statistic, using both fixed-effect and random-effects models, and assessed for publication bias. RESULTS: Our search yielded studies encompassing 57 AML patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. The meta-analysis revealed a 48% incidence of complete remission with CAR T-cell therapy, varying significantly across subgroups based on study design, location, prior transplantation, conditioning regimen, and CAR T-cell source. The highest complete remission rates were observed in patients from China, those who had undergone prior hematopoietic cell transplantation, and those treated with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide conditioning regimen. Adverse events included graft-versus-host disease (7%) and cytokine release syndrome (53%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis highlights the potential of CAR T-cell therapy in AML treatment, especially when integrated with certain prior treatments and conditioning regimens. The findings suggest a higher efficacy in patients with previous hematopoietic cell transplantation and specific conditioning regimens. Further large-scale, randomized trials are essential to confirm these findings and establish CAR T-cell therapy as a standard treatment for AML.

Venous sinus stenting for idiopathic intracranial hypertension: An updated Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is characterized by elevated intracranial pressure and primarily affects obese women of reproductive age. Venous sinus stenting (VSS) is a surgical procedure used to treat IIH, but its safety and efficacy are still controversial. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Multiple databases were searched for studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of VSS in IIH patients and meta-analysis was performed to pool the data. RESULTS: A total of 36 studies involving 1066 patients who underwent VSS were included. After VSS, a significant reduction in trans-stenotic gradient pressure was observed. Patients also showed significantly lower cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure. Clinical outcomes demonstrated improvement in tinnitus (95%), papilledema (89%), visual disturbances (88%), and headache (79%). However, 13.7% of patients experienced treatment failure or complications. The treatment failure rate was 8.35%, characterized by worsening symptoms and recurrence of IIH. The complications rate was 5.35%, including subdural hemorrhage, urinary tract infection, stent thrombus formation, and others. CONCLUSION: VSS appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for IIH patients who are unresponsive to medical therapy or have significant visual symptoms. However, long-term outcomes and safety of the procedure require further investigation.

Screening for metabolic liver diseases crucial to increase SVR to patients with CHC.

Liver diseases and its complications is common health problem worldwide. The emergence of metabolic disorders as a cause after exclusion of viral hepatitis nowadays is important. This is retrospective study on 200 patient's age range from 6months to 18 years old (50 females and 150 males). The patients divided into 2 groups according to age < 5 years & >5 years and all investigations done was collected and statistically processed. Abdominal enlargement was observed in 166/200 of all patients, 48/166 (67.6%) in patients <5 years old and 118/166 (91.5%) in patients >5 years old with statistical significant, jaundice was present in 34/200 of patients, 23/34 (32.4%) in patients <5 years old and 11/34(8.5%) in patients >5 years old, with statistical significant difference, CBC was normal in 58/200 of all age groups. 10/58 (14.1%) in patients <5 years old, 48/58 (73.2%) in patients <5 years old, with statistical significant difference and abnormal CBC in 142/200 (61/142, 62.8%) in age group > 5 years old, 81/142 (85.9%) in age group <5 years. Metabolic disorders was normal in 124/200 of all age groups, 23/124 (32.4%) in patients <5 years old. Metabolic disorders was abnormal in 76/200 of all, 48/76(67.6%) in patients >5 years old and 28/76 (21.7%) in patients < 5 years old, with statistical significant difference & for both age groups. The sensitivity of modalities used in the diagnosis of liver disease was as follow for US, study of metabolic profile, abnormal liver functions and abnormal CBC, 83.1%, 65.2%, 61.6% and 66.1% consequently.