How do women comply with cancer screenings? A study in four regions of France.

BACKGROUND: This article looks at the behaviour of women facing different cancer screening options available to them from the age of 50 onward. The study was conducted in 2019 in four departments of the French territory with the objective of identifying the factors that influence acceptance of a population-based screening proposal. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to women who had received three invitations to organised screenings (OS) for both breast and colorectal cancer. The categories of participants in both OS were designed from data from the regional cancer screening coordination centres in each department. Participation in opportunistic cervical cancer screening was evaluated as self-reported data. RESULTS: 4,634 questionnaires were returned out of the 17,194 sent, giving a global return rate of 27%. The highest rate of return (73.5%) was obtained from women who had participated at least once in both breast and colorectal cancer OS. An intermediate rate was obtained from women participating in breast cancer OS only (18.7%). Poor levels of return came from women who had participated in colorectal cancer OS only (3.6%) and from non-participants (4.1%). Our results suggest that women with lower educational levels tend to be the most regular attendants at OS (50.3%), compared to highly educated women (39.7%). 11.8% of women were overdue in their opportunistic cervical cancer screening. This percentage rose to 35.4% in the category of non-participants. In addition, women's comments provide a better understanding of the reasons for irregular attendance and non-participation. CONCLUSION: Overall, similar behaviours towards screening were observed in the four departments. Our analysis suggests that participation in one cancer OS increases the likelihood of participating in others. This adhesion could be an interesting lever for raising women's awareness of other cancer screenings.

Methodological and ethical quality of surgical trials from 2016 to 2020.

PURPOSE: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard tool used to evaluate therapeutic interventions. The published results showed that progress still needs to be made not only from a methodological point of view but also from an ethical point of view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodological and ethical qualities of randomized clinical trials in surgery over the last few years. METHODS: All of the articles chosen for review reported on randomized controlled surgical trials and were published in 10 international journals between 2016 and 2020. Eligible studies were identified, selected, and then evaluated based on a broad set of predetermined criteria. Methodological quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and ethical quality was evaluated using the Berdeu score. RESULTS: The methodological quality score (Jadad scale) ranged from 5 to 13, with a mean of 10.0 ± 1.54. The methodological quality was insufficient (score ≤ 9) for 162 trials (31.2%). The ethical quality score ranged from 0.25 to 1, with a mean of 0.8 ± 0.11. Fifty-two articles (10%) did not state that informed consent was requested from the participants, and 21 articles (4%) did not report either research ethics committee or institutional committee protocol approval. CONCLUSION: The randomized clinical surgical trials analyzed showed that they had satisfactory methods in only 70% of the cases and that they had respected the fundamental ethical principles in 90% of the cases. However, less than 8% of the studies reported planned interim analysis, prospectively defined stopping rules, and independent monitoring committee.

Information et consentement sur l'épisiotomie : Comment améliorer les pratiques ?

Intro Context and subject of the study: While women are increasingly demanding to be actors of their birth and to participate in the choices concerning their care, a study showed in 2013 that the information they received concerning episiotomy had improved, but that consent was very rarely sought. The interest of our study was therefore to explore the practices of midwives a few years later, and to highlight the factors that may encourage or hinder them in the delivery room to inform women and obtain their consent. METHOD: We conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with midwives working in the delivery room in several maternity hospitals in the Ile-de-France region. A manual content analysis was carried out independently by two researchers who then compared their results. A complementary analysis using NVivo software confirmed the validity of the manual analysis. RESULTS: Information on episiotomy and collection of consent in the delivery room were respectively limited by the anxiety-inducing nature of the information and its temporality (labour and delivery are not appropriate times for information according to the professionals), and by the fear of refusal. Information given beforehand during pregnancy and the drafting of a birth plan would facilitate the collection of consent in the delivery room. CONCLUSION: A time dedicated to information and the distribution of an information leaflet on episiotomy to patients could help improve the practices of health professionals.

Perceptions et connaissances concernant la décision de réaliser le dépistage du cancer de la prostate.

BACKGROUND: Because of the benefit-risk ratio, the French health authorities recommend that patients make an informed choice concerning prostate cancer screening. The aim of this study was to investigate men's decision process. The process was explored by assessing information-seeking behavior, knowledge on prostate cancer, and men's involvement in screening decisions. METHODS: Nineteen men aged 50 to 75 years old were included in the study in 2018. Semi structured face-to-face interviews were performed. Interviews were audio-recorded and then transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: In some cases, men's knowledge about prostate anatomy, prostate physiology, and prostate cancer screening modalities (procedure and risks) was poor. Moreover, despite international recommendations about shared decision-making, several GPs (General Practitioner) prescribed prostate cancer screening without discussing the matter with their patients. CONCLUSION: French men should receive better information so that they can make an informed choice about prostate cancer screening and share the decision with their GP.

Multidisciplinary team meetings: are all patients presented and does it impact quality of care and survival - a registry-based study.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs) are part of the standard cancer care process in many European countries. In France, they are a mandatory condition in the authorization system for cancer care administration, with the goal to ensure that all new patients diagnosed with cancer are presented in MDTMs. AIM: Identify the factors associated with non-presentation or unknown presentation in MDTMs, and study the impact of presentation in MDTMs on quality of care and survival in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: 3999 CRC patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2014 in the area covered by the "Calvados Registry of Digestive Tumours" were included. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression was used to assess the factors associated with presentation in MDTMs. Univariate analyses were performed to study the impact of MDTMs on quality of care. Multivariate Cox model and the Log-Rank test were used to assess the impact of MDTMs on survival. RESULTS: Non-presentation or unknown presentation in MDTMs were associated with higher age at diagnosis, dying within 3 months after diagnosis, unknown metastatic status, non-metastatic cancer and colon cancer. Non-presentation was associated with a diagnosis after 2010. Unknown presentation was associated with a diagnosis before 2007 and a longer travel time to the reference care centres. Presentation in MDTMs was associated with more chemotherapy administration for patients with metastatic cancer and more adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colon cancer. After excluding poor prognosis patients, lower survival was significantly associated with higher age at diagnosis, unknown metastatic status or metastatic cancer, presence of comorbidities, rectal cancer and non-presentation in MDTMs (HR = 1.5 [1.1-2.0], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly and poor prognosis patients were less presented in MDTMs. Geriatric assessments before presentation in MDTMs were shown to improve care plan establishment. The 100% objective is not coherent if MDTMs are only to discuss diagnosis and curative cares. They could also be a place to discuss therapeutic limitations. MDTMs were associated with better treatment and longer survival. We must ensure that there is no inequity in presentation in MDTMs that could lead to a loss of chance for patients.

Éthique et dépistages organisés des cancers en France.

Cancer screening has been among the priorities of the French Cancer Plans since 2003. However, participation in screening programs remains below expectations. The predominance of the value of autonomy in today's society may compromise the legitimacy of a public health action if it does not gain the adhesion of individuals. The Group of Reflection on the Ethics of Screening (GRED) set up by the French National Cancer Institute has brought together experts from different disciplines around this issue. The aim of the present article is to summarize the work of the group, which successively focused on breast and colorectal cancer screening programs, followed by reflection on the implementation of organized cervical cancer screening. Information and health education appear to be key levers to enable individuals to understand the collective interest of public health policies and thus to be able to adhere to the proposed actions in an informed manner. This should be made possible by providing complete and high quality information, addressing the limits of each screening including benefits and risks. Valuing the collective dimension of public health, which calls for solidarity, must make it possible to raise awareness of the proper use of public services.

[The refusal of care, complex situations]. / Le refus de soins, des situations complexes.

Over the last three decades, the evolution of medical care and the reorganization of our health care system have completely changed the relationship between health care professionals, patients and their families. The demand for patient participation in the healthcare process has been growing, raising the question of patients' freedom of choice and increasingly questioning the areas where this would be denied.

[Refusal of care, a discriminatory act?] / Le refus de soins, un acte discriminatoire ?

If a patient can refuse care, health professionals may refuse to treat a person, an act often considered discriminatory. Investigations have been carried out to shed light on this practice. This notion calls for a philosophical and ethical point of view.

[Ethics of organized cancer screening in France] / Éthique et dépistages organisés des cancers en France.

Cancer screening has been among the priorities of the French Cancer Plans since 2003. However, participation in screening programs remains below expectations. The predominance of the value of autonomy in today's society may compromise the legitimacy of a public health action if it does not gain the adhesion of individuals. The Group of Reflection on the Ethics of Screening (GRED) set up by the French National Cancer Institute has brought together experts from different disciplines around this issue. The aim of the present article is to summarize the work of the group, which successively focused on breast and colorectal cancer screening programs, followed by reflection on the implementation of organized cervical cancer screening. Information and health education appear to be key levers to enable individuals to understand the collective interest of public health policies and thus to be able to adhere to the proposed actions in an informed manner. This should be made possible by providing complete and high quality information, addressing the limits of each screening including benefits and risks. Valuing the collective dimension of public health, which calls for solidarity, must make it possible to raise awareness of the proper use of public services.

[Ethical considerations in the evolution of organised cancer screening programs]. / Apport de la réflexion éthique dans l'évolution des programmes de dépistage organisé des cancers.

Ethical considerations in the evolution of organised cancer screening programs Since 2009, the French National Cancer Institute has set up a working group on the ethics of screening programs for breast, colon and cervical cancer. Collective and individual interest, equity and respect for autonomy are the values addressed in the respective reports. Ethical analysis has highlighted issues that are specific to each programme: the importance of the information provided by health professionals in a context of uncertainty for breast cancer screening; health professionals as a relay of information, access to test and support in the colorectal cancer screening process and, for cervical cancer screening, the implementation of an organisation adapted to women populations concerned. A public health policy whose efficiency depends on the public's adhesion of screening proposals must respect a fundamental ethical principle, namely the assessment of the benefit/risk balance.

Apport de la réflexion éthique dans l'évolution des programmes de dépistage organisé des cancers Depuis 2009, l'Institut national du cancer a mis en place un groupe de réflexion sur l'éthique des programmes de dépistage des cancers du sein, du côlon et du col de l'utérus. L'intérêt collectif et individuel, l'équité et le respect de l'autonomie sont les valeurs abordées dans les rapports respectifs. L'analyse éthique a fait émerger des enjeux spécifiques à chaque programme : l'importance de l'information délivrée par les professionnels de santé dans un contexte d'incertitude, pour le dépistage du cancer du sein ; les professionnels de santé comme relais d'information, d'accès au test et d'accompagnement dans le parcours de dépistage du cancer colorectal et pour le dépistage du cancer du col de l'utérus, la mise en place d'une organisation adaptée aux populations de femmes concernées. Une politique de santé publique dont l'efficience dépend de l'adhésion de la population aux propositions de dépistage doit respecter un principe éthique fondamental qui est l'évaluation de la balance bénéfices-risques.

Towards equity in organised cancer screening: the case of cervical cancer screening in France.

BACKGROUND: The French national cancer institute (INCa) conducted a series of studies to assist decision-making in view of the implementation of organised cervical cancer screening that will be launched in 2018. The programme will concern all women aged 25-65 and targeted interventions will be developed for underscreened populations. This is an evolution from an equality-based approach to a step-by-step strategy of equity aiming to tackle health cancer inequalities that are avoidable and represents unfair differences. Here we present the work of the expert-group in ethics drafted by INCa to review the ethical issues prior to the programme implementation. DISCUSSION: We discuss the value of such a strategy and presents reflections with regard to issues of stigmatization, respect for individual freedom and autonomy. Indeed, the balance has to be found between the search for beneficence and the potential occurrence of perverse effects, which should be considered with particular attention. CONCLUSION: Moving toward an equity-oriented policy under a strategy of proportionate universalism faces a number of challenges, thus an overview of ethics and social sciences must be an integral part of the process.

What ethics for case managers? Literature review and discussion.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about case managers' ethical issues and professional values. OBJECTIVES: This article presents an overview of ethical issues in case managers' current practice. Findings are examined in the light of nursing ethics, social work ethics and principle-based biomedical ethics. RESEARCH DESIGN: A systematic literature review was performed to identify and analyse empirical studies concerning ethical issues in case management programmes. It was completed by systematic content analysis of case managers' national codes of ethics. FINDINGS: Only nine empirical studies were identified, eight of them from North America. The main dilemmas were how to balance system goals against the client's interest and client protection against autonomy. Professional codes of ethics shared important similarities, but offered different responses to these two dilemmas. DISCUSSION: We discuss the respective roles of professional and organizational ethics. Further lines of research are suggested.

Disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest in phase III surgical trials: survey of ten general surgery journals.

BACKGROUND: Discussions regarding disclosure of funding sources and conflicts of interest (COI) in published peer-reviewed journal articles are becoming increasingly more common and intense. The aim of the present study was to examine whether randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in leading surgery journals report funding sources and COI. METHODS: All articles reporting randomized controlled phase III trials published January 2005 through December 2010 were chosen for review from ten international journals. We evaluated the number of disclosed funding sources and COI, and the factors associated with such disclosures. RESULTS: From a review of 657 RCT from the ten journals, we discovered that presence or absence of a funding source and COI was disclosed by 47 % (309) and 25.1 % (165), respectively. Most articles in "International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)-affiliated journals" did not disclose COI. Disclosure of funding was associated with a journal impact factor >3 (51.7 vs 41.6 %; p < 0.01), statistician/epidemiologist involvement (64.2 vs 43.7 %; p < 0.001), publication after 2008 (52.9 vs 41.1 %; p < 0.01), and the journal being ICMJE-affiliated (49.3 vs 40 %; p < 0.05). Conflict of interest disclosure was associated with publication after 2008 (38.7 vs 11.3 %; p < 0.001), and with the journal not being affiliated with ICMJE (36.9 vs 21.3 %; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Of the published studies we investigated, over half did not disclose funding sources (i.e., whether or not there was a funding source), and almost three quarters did not disclose whether COI existed. Our findings suggest the need to adopt best current practices regarding disclosure of competing interests to fulfill responsibilities to readers and, ultimately, to patients.

Reporting of ethical requirements in phase III surgical trials.

BACKGROUND: Disclosure of obtaining informed consent from patients (ICP) and research ethics committee (REC) approval in published reports is sometimes omitted. To date, no disclosure data are available on surgical research. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess whether REC approval and ICP were documented in surgical trials. STUDY DESIGN: Overall, 657 randomised trials, published between 2005 and 2010 in 10 international journals, were included. We collected the report rate of REC approval and ICP and contacted the corresponding author when ethical information was lacking. RESULTS: Among the 657 randomised controlled trials (RCT), 576 (87.7%) stated that an REC had approved the research, and 606 (92.2%) stated that ICP had been requested. Furthermore, 28 RCTs (4.3%) reported neither REC nor ICP. CONCLUSIONS: The phase III randomised surgical trials that were analysed were shown to have respected fundamental ethical principles in approximately 90% of the cases examines.

Women's participation in breast cancer screening in France--an ethical approach.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a major public health challenge. Organized mammography screening (OS) is considered one way to reduce breast cancer mortality. EU recommendations prone mass deployment of OS, and back in 2004, France introduced a national OS programme for women aged 50-74 years. However, in 2012, participation rate was still just 52.7%, well short of the targeted 70% objective. In an effort to re-address the (in) efficiency of the programme, the French National Cancer Institute has drafted an expert-group review of the ethical issues surrounding breast cancer mammography screening. DISCUSSION: Prompted by emerging debate over the efficiency of the screening scheme and its allied public information provision, we keynote the experts' report based on analysis of epidemiological data and participation rate from the public health authorities. The low coverage of the OS scheme may be partly explained by the fact that a significant number of women undergo mammography outside OS and thus outside OS criteria. These findings call for further thinking on (i) the ethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance underpinning this public health initiative, (ii) the reasons behind women's and professionals' behavior, and (iii) the need to analyze how information provision to women and the doctor-patient relationship need to evolve in response to scientific controversy over the risks and benefits of conducting mammographic screening. SUMMARY: This work calls for a reappraisal of the provision of screening programme information. We advocate a move to integrate the points sparking debate over the efficiency of the screening scheme to guarantee full transparency. The perspective is to strengthen the respect for autonomy allowing women to make an informed choice in their decision on whether or not to participate.

Differences between selective termination of pregnancy and fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy: a narrative review.

Although selective termination of pregnancy and fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy both involve the termination in utero of the development of live fetuses, these two procedures are different in several aspects. Nevertheless, several authors tend to amalgamate and confuse their psychosocial consequences and the ethical issues they raise. Therefore, this narrative review, derived from a comparative analysis of 91 articles, shines a light on these amalgamations and confusions, as well as on the medical, contextual, experiential and ethical differences specific to selective termination and fetal reduction.

Ethical issues in presymptomatic genetic testing for minors: a dilemma in Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

In 2001, a French expert panel recommended that presymptomatic tests should not be carried out on minors in families affected by Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS), flying in the face of possible parental demands for such testing. We decided to investigate the legitimacy of such a recommendation. We conducted a national multicenter survey using self-administered questionnaires mailed to French oncogeneticists in 33 regional centers in France. We aimed to (1) determine the extent to which these doctors were confronted with parental requests for TP53 testing, (2) study how they responded to these requests and the arguments used and (3) assess the attitude of oncogeneticists concerning the normative framework regulating the prescription of tests for minors. Twenty oncogeneticists stated that they had managed at least one LFS family. Eleven of these doctors had been confronted with parental requests for testing and three had prescribed such tests on at least one occasion. The oncogeneticists gave balanced medical, psychological and ethical arguments, highlighting the dilemma they face in the decision-making process. This dilemma is due to the lack of a consensus concerning this recommendation, which aims to protect the minor by limiting presymptomatic tests to cases in which a clear medical benefit can be demonstrated but which prevents the unique situation of particular families from being taken into account. In conclusion, the recommendation has a normative status but first, from a clinical stance, it is difficult to dissociate it from the evaluation of individual family situations, and second, the benefit of a specific medical follow-up for TP53 mutation carriers is currently being investigated.

[Ethics of biomedical research: questions about patient information]. / Éthique de la recherche biomédicale - Quelles questions sur l'information des patients ?

All recommendations and laws concerning biomedical research, including the most recent in France in 2012, emphasize the quality of patient information to justify its participation. To optimize practices, it is important to take into account the central issues: what limits of information? What role for the relatives and family in the decision in case of disability or vulnerability of a patient? What need for specific information for long protocol and follow-up cohort? What information about research results?

Severe adult burn survivors. What information about skin allografts?

During the acute phase of a severe burn, surgery is an emergency. In this situation, human skin allografts constitute an effective temporary skin substitute. However, information about the use of human tissue can not be given to the patients because most of the allografted patients are unconscious due to their injury. This study explored the restitution of information on skin donation to patients who have been skin allografted and who have survived their injury. A qualitative study was conducted due to the limited number of patients in ability to be interviewed according to our medical and psychological criteria. 12 patients who had been treated between 2002 and 2008 were interviewed. Our results show that 10 of them ignored that they had received skin allografts. One of the two patients who knew that they had received allografts knew that skin had been harvested from deceased donor. All patients expressed that there is no information that should not be delivered. They also expressed their relief to have had the opportunity to discuss their case and at being informed during their interview. Their own experience impacted their view in favor of organ and tissue donation.

Ethical issues in the introduction of case management for elderly people.

As case management is under development in France for elderly people, this study sets out to identify and analyse key situations responsible for ethical dilemmas for French case managers. We based our study on the analyses of individual interviews made with case managers and focus-group discussions, bringing together all case managers working in local organisations running for at least a year. We identified three situations giving rise to ethical dilemmas: in the order of importance, the refusals of care, the practicalities of collecting and sharing personal data and the allocation of resources. These three situations can lead to conflict between the principle of beneficence and those of respect for autonomy, non-maleficence and justice. We describe here how French case managers practically deal with these situations.