Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg ; : 101924, 2024 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802061

RESUMO

PURPOSE: During follow-up, patients in remission after oral or oropharyngeal cancer are few to express pain, depression or anxiety, their chief complain are dry mouth and difficulties to chewing. The aim of the study is to estimate prevalence of pain, quality of life and their evolution over four years. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 21 patients between June and September 2017. Clinical examination, neurosensory examination and questionnaires (using visual analogic scale DN4, PCS-CF, HADS EORTC QLQ30 and H&N 35) were performed and a second time 4 years later. RESULTS: After 4 years, 17 patients could be reviewed. In 2017 as in 2021, two patients (11.8 %) experience neuropathic pain. In 2017, 14 (82.3 %) reported paresthesia or dysesthesia or hypo/anesthesia, none of them have provoked pain to a mechanical or thermal stimulus. In 2021, only 9 (53 %) still report those symptoms. Global analysis of the questionnaire QLQC30 reveals a significant increase quality of life of all 17 patients (p = 0.0003). For the two questionnaires QLQC30 and QLQ-H&N 35, dry mouth, sticky saliva, difficulties for eating and relation with food, are strong grievances which an absence of amelioration or a degradation. CONCLUSIONS: Neurosensory disturbance is a frequent symptom but pain concerns only 11.8 % of patients. Quality of life increase globally, yet difficulties concerning oral cavity functions endure. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: For remission patients, pain is an unfrequent situation unlike neurosensory disturbance. Support care improve life quality. In case of onset of pain, recurrence and osteoradionecrosis should be mentioned immediately.

2.
Neurology ; 103(5): e209662, 2024 Sep 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141880

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: People with multiple sclerosis (MS) have an increased risk of severe coronavirus infection due to their level of motor disability or exposure to certain immunosuppressive treatments. Thus, patients with MS have had priority access to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination. However, relapses after vaccination have been reported, leading some patients to not seek the recommended booster doses. The main objective was to estimate the risk of severe relapse after 1, 2, and 3 (booster) doses of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with MS. The secondary objectives were to assess the risk of relapse in clinically meaningful subgroups according to the type of vaccine, the characteristics of the patients, and the use of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs). METHODS: We conducted a nationwide study using data from the French National Health Data System. Patients with MS were identified according to ICD codes, specific treatments, and reimbursement data up to March 31, 2022. Relapses requiring treatment with high-dose corticosteroids were identified. A self-controlled case series method was used to evaluate the risk of relapse associated with COVID-19 vaccines in the 45 days after vaccination. The associated risk was evaluated after 1, 2, or 3 (booster) doses and is expressed as overall incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and in subgroups of interest. RESULTS: Overall, 124,545 patients with MS were identified on January 1, 2021, and 82% received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine (n = 102,524) until December 31, 2021, for a total of 259,880 doses. The combined IRR for MS relapse was 0.97 (0.91-1.03, p = 0.30). The same absence of risk was confirmed in various subgroups (age younger than 50 years, duration of MS < 10 years, use of DMT). A small increase in the relapse risk cannot be excluded after a booster dose (IRR 1.39 [1.08-1.80]) for patients with high MS activity, especially when not treated. DISCUSSION: There is no increased risk of relapse requiring corticosteroid therapy after COVID-19 vaccination for almost all patients. We cannot exclude an increased risk after the booster dose for patients who have had at least 2 relapses in the previous 2 years. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that COVID-19 vaccination does not increase the risk of severe relapse in patients with MS.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Esclerose Múltipla , Recidiva , Humanos , França/epidemiologia , Feminino , Masculino , Vacinas contra COVID-19/administração & dosagem , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Vacinação , SARS-CoV-2
3.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 11(1)2024 Mar 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548372

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular comorbidities are increasingly being recognised in early stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) yet complete cardiorespiratory functional assessments of individuals with mild COPD or presenting with COPD risk factors are lacking. This paper reports on the effectiveness of the cardiocirculatory-limb muscles oxygen delivery and utilisation axis in smokers exhibiting no, or mild to moderate degrees of airflow obstruction using standardised cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). METHODS: Post-bronchodilator spirometry was used to classify participants as 'ever smokers without' (n=88), with 'mild' (n=63) or 'mild-moderate' COPD (n=56). All underwent CPET with continuous concurrent monitoring of oxygen uptake (V'O2) and of bioimpedance cardiac output (Qc) enabling computation of arteriovenous differences (a-vO2). Mean values of Qc and a-vO2 were mapped across set ranges of V'O2 and Qc isolines to allow for meaningful group comparisons, at same metabolic and circulatory requirements. RESULTS: Peak exercise capacity was significantly reduced in the 'mild-moderate COPD' as compared with the two other groups who showed similar pulmonary function and exercise capacity. Self-reported cardiovascular and skeletal muscle comorbidities were not different between groups, yet disease impact and exercise intolerance scores were three times higher in the 'mild-moderate COPD' compared with the other groups. Mapping of exercise Qc and a-vO2 also showed a leftward shift of values in this group, indicative of a deficit in peripheral O2 extraction even for submaximal exercise demands. Concurrent with lung hyperinflation, a distinctive blunting of exercise stroke volume expansion was also observed in this group. CONCLUSION: Contrary to the traditional view that cardiovascular complications were the hallmark of advanced disease, this study of early COPD spectrum showed a reduced exercise O2 delivery and utilisation in individuals meeting spirometry criteria for stage II COPD. These findings reinforce the preventive clinical management approach to preserve peripheral muscle circulatory and oxidative capacities.


Assuntos
Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Humanos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Pulmão , Exercício Físico , Hemodinâmica , Oxigênio
4.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(3): 291-296, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212165

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to assess the medico-economic impact of the MACD Coupler™ system in comparison with HSA for end to end veno-venous anastomosis during free flap transfer. A retrospective case-control study was performed in an academic institution, from March 2019 through July 2021, to analyze medical and economic outcomes of patients managed for head and neck reconstruction with free flap transfer. 43 patients per group were analyzed. Rates of initial success, re-intervention, complications and flap transfer failure were not different between groups. Use of MACD increased the cost of medical devices between Coupler and Control groups with respectively K€ 0.7 [0.5; 0.8] and K€ 0.1 [0.5; 0.8] (p = 0.001) and decreased the cost for operating staff with respectively K€ 4.0 [3.4; 5.2] and K€ 5.1 [3.8; 5.4] (p = 0.03). The total management costs were not different between groups with respectively a total median cost of K€ 18.4 [14.3; 27.2] and K€ 17.3 [14.1; 23.7] (p = 0.03). In conclusion, the cost of the Coupler™ is significant but is partly offset by the decrease in operating staff costs. The choice of one or the other technique can be left to the discretion of the surgeon.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Humanos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/cirurgia , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/irrigação sanguínea , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Microcirurgia/métodos , Suturas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa