Surgeon Recommendations for Physical Activity in Patients With Pediatric Hip Conditions.

BACKGROUND: While physical activity (PA) is important during youth, it is unclear if children and adolescents with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD), or slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) are expected or encouraged to return to PA once they have healed. This study examines the orthopaedic surgeons' role in advising pediatric hip patients on the PA they should engage in, assessing their practice, opinions, and consensus when making recommendations. METHODS: Orthopaedic surgeons were invited from member lists of 4 hip study groups. The survey included demographics, opinions regarding PA, and 10 case scenarios that queried respondents on the duration and intensity of PA as well as the restrictions on activity type that they would recommend for DDH, LCPD, or SCFE patients. Consensus was evaluated on a scale ranging from 0 to 1, with a value of 0 indicating no agreement among respondents and a value of 1 indicating complete agreement. RESULTS: A total of 51 orthopaedic surgeons responded. While 94% agreed that it is important for school-aged hip patients to return to PA after they have healed, 53% believed that PA may compromise the hip and contribute to the development of osteoarthritis. Average standardized consensus was 0.92 for suggesting the patient engage in some amount of PA, 0.44 for suggesting the recommended daily minimum of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and 0.33 for suggesting restrictions on activity type. The most frequently selected restrictions included avoiding impact activities (93%, 235/254) and contact activities (58%, 147/254), followed by weight-bearing activities (24%, 62/254). Respondents were not aware of existing PA guidelines, although 57% expressed interest in following guidelines and 39% were uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: While there is consensus among orthopaedic surgeons that children with chronic hip conditions should engage in PA, there is considerable variation when recommending the recommended daily MVPA minimum and placing restrictions on activity type. This study suggests interest among orthopaedic surgeons in developing PA guidelines that optimize outcomes for pediatric hip patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-Survey study.

Early Investigation and Bracing in DDH Impacts Maternal Wellbeing and Breastfeeding.

BACKGROUND: The outcomes of Pavlik Harness (PH) management for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip (DDH) are equivalent regardless of the initiation timing, if it is within the first 6 weeks of life. A PH may be a physical barrier to breastfeeding, which is important for nutrition, immunity, and normal child development. The diagnosis of DDH and early management with a PH may also negatively affect the maternal psychosocial wellbeing and the infant-maternal relationship. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of the diagnosis of DDH and the management with a PH has on maternal wellbeing and maintenance of breastfeeding, compared with being screened for but not diagnosed with DDH. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of the mothers of infants who were diagnosed with DDH and treated with a PH brace was compared with the mothers of infants who were screened for DDH only. The Hip Worries Inventory and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale were completed by the mothers in both groups. The PH group also completed an in-house questionnaire specific to PH and breastfeeding. RESULTS: Eighty completed surveys were included, 50 from the treatment group. The mean age of the PH initiation was 6.2 weeks. The modified Hip Worries Inventory score was higher in the treatment group, with a mean difference (MD) of 9.7 out of 50 (95% confidence interval, CI, 6.8, 12.5). The MD of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale was 2.0 out of 30 (CI -0.5, 4.5). Although there was no difference in the breastfeeding ease before and after the PH initiation (MD-0.2, CI-0.7, 0.2), 83% of mothers found breastfeeding more difficult with a PH and 11% of mothers stopped breastfeeding earlier than planned because of the PH. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers of infants with DDH worry more about their child's hips and the PH. Screening alone may contribute to maternal psychological dejection and negative thoughts. The presence of a PH makes breastfeeding more difficult. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, level III.

The Effect of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy on Hip Displacement in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Long-term Follow-up Study.

BACKGROUND: Hip displacement is common in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Spasticity in the hip adductor muscles, hip flexors, and medial hamstrings has been identified as a possible cause of progressive hip displacement. Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) aims to reduce lower extremity spasticity in children with CP. Here, we investigate the influence of SDR on hip displacement in children with CP at long-term follow-up, a minimum of 5 years post-SDR. METHODS: A retrospective review of children undergoing SDR at a Canadian pediatric hospital was completed. Migration percentage (MP) was measured on pelvis radiographs taken in the 6 months before SDR and minimum 5 years post-SDR or before hip surgery. The number of hips with displacement, defined as MP >30%, and the number of children with at least 1 hip displaced were determined. A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess potential risk factors for poor outcome post-SDR, defined as having MP >40% or surgical intervention for hip displacement. RESULTS: Ninety children [50 males, 40 females, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I to V: 1/13/24/43/9] with a mean follow-up of 8.5 years (SD 5.1) were included. The mean age at SDR was 4.9 years (SD 1.5); more than half of children (52%) had hip displacement at the time of SDR. Post-SDR, MP exceeded 30% in 0 (0%) of children at GMFCS level I, 1 (8%) at II, 11 (46%) at III, 31 (72%) at IV, and 7 (78%) at V. A poor outcome was associated with preoperative MP, age, and GMFCS level. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hip displacement post-SDR was consistent with population-based studies when evaluated by GMFCS. Our findings suggest that SDR has neither a positive nor negative effect on hip displacement when assessed at least 5 years postintervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Caregiver Experiences Using Orthotic Treatment Options for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children.

BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common condition affecting 5 in 1000 newborns. The standard first line of treatment is the use of an orthotic, which has generally high success rates, but can pose substantial difficulties and put undue burden on caregivers. The general experience of caregivers using these orthotics has not been well documented on an orthotic-specific basis. The purpose of this study was to investigate caregiver experience using prescribed DDH orthotics to identify challenges, differences between treatment options, and areas of improvement. METHODS: A survey assessing treatment prescription, respondent demographics, and caregiver experience was distributed online to caregivers whose child/children were treated for DDH with an orthotic. Seven-point positively phrased Likert scale statements and open-ended questions were included to assess caregiver experience. The results were analyzed using summary statistics and orthotics with more than 30 responses were selected for more in-depth analysis. RESULTS: A total of 530 survey responses were collected with 63% (334/530) of respondents using a Pavlik harness, 45% (236/530) a Rhino brace, and 13% (67/530) a Denis Browne Bar. The overall weighted average score across all Likert Scale statements was positive for the Pavlik harness, Rhino brace, and Denis Browne Bar at 4.19 (95% CI, 3.83 to 4.54), 4.63 (95% CI, 4.27 to 4.99) and 4.91 (95% CI, 4.58 to 5.24), respectively. In the open-ended responses, all 3 orthotics were perceived as easy to use and not hindering child-caregiver bonding, but raised concerns of discomfort and skin irritation, as well as preventing the ability to cuddle their child the way they desired. The Pavlik harness respondents consistently brought up concerns regarding cleanability. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the DDH orthotics analyzed are generally easy to use and perceived positively by caregivers, but have orthotic-specific challenges that should be a focus of future improvement work. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study evaluated opinions and attitudes of caregivers for children being treated with DDH orthotics, revealing experiences, concerns, and challenges associated with the use of commonly prescribed options.

A Prospective, Multicenter Study of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: What Can Patients Expect After Open Reduction?

BACKGROUND: Although there are several predominantly single-center case series in the literature, relatively little prospectively collected data exist regarding the outcomes of open hip reduction (OR) for infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of this prospective, multi-center study was to determine the outcomes after OR in a diverse patient population. METHODS: The prospectively collected database of an international multicenter study group was queried for all patients treated with OR for DDH. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Proximal femoral growth disturbance (PFGD) was defined by consensus review using Salter's criteria. Persistent acetabular dysplasia was defined as an acetabular index >90th percentile for age. Statistical analyses were performed to compare preoperative and operative characteristics that predicted re-dislocation, PFGD, and residual acetabular dysplasia. RESULTS: A cohort of 232 hips (195 patients) was identified; median age at OR was 19 months (interquartile range 13 to 28) and median follow-up length was 21 months (interquartile range 16 to 32). Re-dislocation occurred in 7% of hips (n=16/228). The majority (81%; n=13/16) occurred in the first year after initial OR. Excluding patients with repeat dislocation, 94.5% of hips were IHDI 1 at most recent follow-up. On the basis of strict radiographic review, some degree of PFGD was present in 44% of hips (n=101/230) at most recent follow-up. Seventy-eight hips (55%) demonstrated residual dysplasia compared with established normative data. Hips that had a pelvic osteotomy at index surgery had about half the rate of residual dysplasia (39%; n=32/82) versus those without a pelvic osteotomy with at least 2 years follow-up (78%; n=46/59). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest prospective, multicenter study to date, OR for infantile DDH was associated with a 7% risk of re-dislocation, 44% risk of PFGD, and 55% risk of residual acetabular dysplasia at short term follow-up. The incidence of these adverse outcomes is higher than previous reports. Patients treated with concomitant pelvic osteotomy had lower rates of residual dysplasia. These prospectively collected, multicenter data provide better generalizable information to improve family education and appropriately set expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: An Examination of Care Practices of Pediatricians.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the decision making processes of pediatricians regarding diagnosis and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by conducting a survey of pediatricians in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: An electronic survey was sent to multiple American Academy of Pediatrics state chapters and academic pediatrics groups, and responses were received from pediatricians in 10 states. The survey included demographics, guideline use, clinical scenarios, and referrals/imaging practices. The number of responses to each survey question and their relative frequencies were calculated. RESULTS: We received 139 responses and included 126 in our analyses. Only 50% of the responding pediatricians (63 of 126) practiced in an institution that endorses a care pathway for DDH. Only 5.6% of the pediatricians (7 of 125) have referred patients at 12-18 months between diagnosis and management to a specialist for suspected DDH, and 9.5% (12 of 125) have referred patients between 6 and 9 months. Almost one-quarter of the pediatricians (23%; 29 of 126) cited "hip click" as an abnormality that would prompt them to refer a patient to a specialist, and 72.2% (91 of 126) indicated that family history of DDH warrants an ultrasound regardless of the physical examination findings. Moreover, 10.3% of the surveyed pediatricians (13 of 126) reported being only "somewhat" or "moderately" familiar with the Barlow and Ortolani maneuvers. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that there is an opportunity to better distribute and implement DDH guidelines. The large number of pediatrician respondents who would not refer patients to a specialist or order imaging studies appropriately represents an opportunity for education. The implementation of a care map with standard referral and imaging practices could improve the care of patients with DDH.

Cerebral palsy diagnosis and the impact on hip surveillance enrollment.

AIM: To investigate the diagnosis at enrollment in the Child Health British Columbia Hip Surveillance Program for Children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) and review the etiologies of children enrolled without a CP diagnosis. METHOD: Data from 959 children (543 males, 416 females; mean [SD] age at enrollment 6 years 8 months [4 years 2 months]) enrolled in the program between September 2015 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Enrollment diagnosis, Gross Motor Function Classification System level, migration percentage, and age at enrollment were included. Chart reviews were completed to confirm diagnoses for all children. Etiologies were compared to a list of conditions that are included and excluded from CP registries. RESULTS: Diagnosis at enrollment was CP for 612 (64%), possible CP for 120 (13%), and 'other' for 220 (23%). No diagnosis was provided for seven (<1%). CP was confirmed for 700 (73%), including 106 (11.1%) enrolled as 'possible CP' or 'other'; 56 (5.8%) did not have CP due to progressive conditions. Migration percentage was similar across all groups at enrollment. INTERPRETATION: One in four children were enrolled in hip surveillance without a diagnosis of CP or possible CP. Encouraging participation in hip surveillance when children meet the clinical criteria for CP but do not have a confirmed CP diagnosis can improve access to care.

A Review of Radiology Reports From Hip Surveillance Radiographs for Children With Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of migration percentage (MP) is fundamental to successful hip surveillance for children with cerebral palsy (CP). In British Columbia, Canada, children enrolled in the province's hip surveillance program get radiographs at the province's tertiary care pediatric hospital or their local community hospital. This study aimed to review the radiology reporting of images completed as part of hip surveillance. METHODS: Pelvis radiographs completed between September 2015 and December 2019 of 960 children enrolled in the province's hip surveillance program were included. MP values measured by the program coordinator and corresponding value measured by the facility's radiologist, when present, were retrieved. Agreement in MP between the program coordinator and the radiologist was measured using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients. Radiology reports for images completed at community facilities that prompted a referral to a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon, when reviewed by the hip surveillance team, were further reviewed for qualitative comments. RESULTS: In total, 1849 radiographs were reviewed with 69.3% (1282) completed at the pediatric hospital and 30.7% (567) at 64 different hospitals or clinics. MP was reported for 20.6% (264/1282) of radiographs completed at the pediatric hospital and 3.0% (17/567) of the radiographs completed at community hospitals. Bland-Altman plot analyses found a MP mean difference of 1.2% (95% confidence interval=0.6%-1.8%) between the program coordinator and all radiologist reports with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.88 (95% confidence interval=0.86-0.90). There were 47 radiographs completed at community hospitals that resulted in a referral to a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon after review by the hip surveillance team. Eleven of these reports stated normal or unremarkable findings. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologic reporting of images completed for hip surveillance for children with CP was inadequate to allow for the detection of hip displacement. Reporting of MP was rare, particularly in community hospitals. If radiology reporting will be utilized for hip surveillance in children with CP, education of radiologists is required.

Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability in the Salter Classification of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a concerning complication that can result from treatments for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). AVN can lead to degenerative osteoarthritis, persistent acetabular dysplasia, reduced function, and continuing hip pain. The incidence of AVN reported in the DDH literature is widely varied (0% to 73%). This variability may arise from lack of consensus on what constitutes true AVN in this patient population, and lack of clear criteria provided in studies reporting incidence rates. METHODS: A multicentre, prospective database of infants diagnosed with DDH between 2010 and 2014 from 0 to 18 months of age was analyzed for patients treated by closed reduction (CR). Twelve pediatric orthopaedic surgeons completed 2 rounds of AVN assessments. Deidentified anteroposterior radiographs at most recent follow-up were provided to surgeons along with patient age at radiographic assessment, length of follow-up, ands affected hip. Ten of 12 surgeons completed a third round of assessments where they were provided with 1 to 2 additional radiographs within the follow-up period. Radiographic criteria for total AVN described by Salter and colleagues were used. Surgeons rated the presence of AVN as "yes" or "no" and kappa values were calculated within and between rounds. RESULTS: A total of 69 hips in 60 patients were assessed for AVN a median of 22 months (range: 12 to 36) post-CR. Interobserver kappa values for rounds 1, 2, and 3 were 0.52 (range: 0.11 to 0.90), 0.61 (range: 0.21 to 0.90), and 0.53 (range: 0.10 to 0.79), respectively. Intraobserver agreement for AVN diagnosis was an average of 0.72 (range: 0.31 to 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Despite using the most commonly referenced diagnostic criteria, radiographic diagnosis of AVN following CR in DDH patients demonstrated only moderate agreement across surgeons. The addition of sequential radiographs did not improve cross-observer reliability, and while substantial agreement was seen within observers, the range of intraobserver kappa values was large. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I-diagnostic study.

A Global Survey of Patient and Caregiver Experiences Throughout Care for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis and treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) varies greatly depending on condition severity, age at diagnosis, and professional opinion. Little is known about patient experiences across the globe. We aimed to characterize global patient and caregiver experiences during DDH care and to highlight patient-identified priorities. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional survey in collaboration with 7 DDH outreach organizations. DDH patients and/or their caregivers (above 18 y old) were invited to complete an international online survey about their experiences. Participants were recruited through web media of all collaborating organizations. Data collection took place over 3 months. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze quantitative results. Qualitative content analysis was used to categorize open-ended responses. RESULTS: A total of 739 participants completed the survey, representing 638 (86.3%) parents/guardians of DDH patients, and 101 (13.7%) patients. Three hundred eighty-six (52.2%) participants received diagnosis by 3 months of age; mean age of diagnosis was 15.96 months (90% confidence interval=12.04, 19.91). Of 211 participants with family history of DDH, 68 (32.3%) did not receive DDH screening. Of 187 patients born breech, 82 (43.9%) did not receive DDH screening. In total, 36/94 (38.3%) participants with both family history and breech birth did not receive DDH screening. Most participants reported treatment (696/730, 95.3%), including bracing (n=461) surgery (n=364), and/or closed reduction (n=141). A total of 144 patients reported >1 surgery; 82 reported >3 surgeries. Participants reported a range of 1 to 400 visits to health care professionals for DDH care across 1 to 66 years. Lack of information and resources on treatment practicalities and timelines, along with emotional burden of diagnosis, were greatest challenges reported. CONCLUSION: Results demonstrate that DDH diagnosis and treatment can pose significant burden on patients and caregivers. Reliable public information is needed to support those affected. Global educational efforts are needed to raise awareness of DDH risk factors, signs, and symptoms among care providers, to increase awareness and improve identification, screening, and monitoring of at-risk children.

Inter-rater and Intrarater Reliabilities of the Identification of a "Gothic Arch" in the Acetabulum of Children With Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Progressive hip displacement in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is monitored by measuring migration percentage (MP) on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Accurate measurement of MP requires the lateral margin of the ossified acetabulum to be identified for the placement of Perkin's line. It has been suggested that when there is an erosion of the acetabular rim, described as a gothic arch, the midpoint of the arch be used for the placement of Perkin's line. However, this requires that there be agreement on what constitutes a gothic arch. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the inter-rater and intrarater reliabilities of identifying a gothic arch on pelvis radiographs. METHODS: An online survey with 100 AP pelvis images (200 hips) of children with CP was sent to international experts. Participants were asked to identify which hip(s) had a gothic arch (left, right, both, and neither). The Fleiss κ statistic for inter-rater reliability was calculated. Eight weeks later, the images were shuffled and redistributed to calculate intrarater reliability. RESULTS: The initial survey was completed by 10 participants with 9 participants completing the second survey. The average inter-rater κ value was 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-0.23] and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.14-0.24) for the 2 surveys, respectively. Among the pediatric orthopaedic surgeons subgroup, the κ values were 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.1) and 0.08 (95% CI, 0.03-0.13). The average intrarater reliability κ value was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.2-1), ranging from 0.32 to 0.86. CONCLUSIONS: There were poor inter-rater and moderate intrarater reliabilities in identifying a gothic arch on AP pelvis radiographs in children with CP. Further characterization and clarification of what constitutes a gothic arch are required. The lack of agreement on the identification of a gothic arch may negatively impact the measurement of MP and referrals to a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon.

Variability in Postoperative Immobilization and Rehabilitation Following Reconstructive Hip Surgery in Nonambulatory Children With Cerebral Palsy.

BACKGROUND: Despite being a common procedure, there are no standard protocols for postoperative immobilization and rehabilitation following reconstructive hip surgery in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The purpose of this study was to investigate variability in postoperative management and physical therapy (PT) recommendations among orthopaedic surgeons treating hip displacement in children with CP. METHODS: An invitation to participate in an anonymous, online survey was sent to 44 pediatric orthopaedic surgeons. The case of a child undergoing bilateral femoral varus derotation osteotomies and adductor tenotomies was presented. Surgeons were asked to consider their typical practice and the case scenario when answering questions related to immobilization, weight-bearing, and rehabilitation. Recommendations with increasingly complex surgical interventions and different age or level of motor function were also assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight orthopaedic surgeons from 9 countries with a mean 21.3 years (range: 5 to 40 y) of experience completed the survey. Postoperative immobilization was recommended by 86% (24/28) of respondents with 7 different methods of immobilization identified. All but 1 (23/24) reported immobilizing full time. Most (20/23) reported using immobilization for 4 to 6 weeks. Return to weight-bearing varied from 0 to 6 weeks for partial weight-bearing and 0 to 12 weeks for full weight-bearing. PT in the first 1 to 2 weeks postoperatively was reported as unnecessary by 29% (8/28) of surgeons. PT for range of motion, strengthening, and return to function was recommended by 96% (27/28) of surgeons, starting at a mean of 2.6 weeks postoperatively (range: 0 to 16 wk). Only 48% (13/27) reported all of their patients would receive PT for these goals in their practice setting. Inpatient rehabilitation was available for 75% (21/28) but most surgeons (17/21) reported this was accessed by 20% or fewer of their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative immobilization and PT recommendations were highly variable among surgeons. This variability may influence surgical outcomes and complication rates and should be considered when evaluating procedures. Further study into the impact of postoperative immobilization and rehabilitation is warranted.

Survey of the Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons Globally.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required rapid, global health care shifts to prioritize urgent or pandemic-related care and minimize transmission. Little is known about impacts on pediatric orthopaedic surgeons during this time. We aimed to investigate COVID-19-related changes in practice, training, and research among pediatric orthopaedic surgeons globally. METHODS: An online survey was administered to orthopaedic surgeons with interest in pediatrics in April 2020 and a follow-up was administered in February 2021. The surveys captured demographics and surgeons' self-reported experiences during the pandemic. Participants were recruited from web media and available email lists of orthopaedic societies over a 2-month period. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze results, stratified by the severity of local COVID-19-related measures. RESULTS: A total of 460 responses from 45 countries were collected for initial survey. Of these, 358 (78.5%) respondents reported lockdown measures in their region at time of survey. Most (n=337, 94.4%) reported pausing all elective procedures. Surgeons reported a reduction in the average number of surgeries per week, from 6.89 (SD=4.61) prepandemic to 1.25 (SD=2.26) at time of survey (mean difference=5.64; 95% confidence interval=5.19, 6.10). Average number of elective outpatient appointments per week decreased from 67.89 (SD=45.78) prepandemic to 11.79 (SD=15.83) at time of survey (mean difference=56.10, 95% confidence interval=5.61, 60.58). In total, 177 (39.4%) surgeons reported using virtual modes of outpatient appointments for the first time. Of 290 surgeons with trainees, 223 (84.5%) reported implementation of systems to continue training such as webinars or virtual rounds. Of 192 respondents with research, 149 (82.8%) reported continuing research activities during the pandemic with most reporting either cessation (n=75, 64.15%), or reduction (n=25, 29.9%) in participant recruitment. A total of 111 responses from 28 countries were collected during follow-up. Surgeons described policy and circumstantial changes that facilitated resumption of clinical work. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and its related counter measures have had significant impacts on pediatric orthopaedic practice and increased uptake of technology to provide care continuity. Rigorous epidemiological studies are needed to assess impacts of delayed and virtual care on patient outcomes.

Physical Therapists Are Key to Hip Surveillance for Children with Cerebral Palsy: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Knowledge Translation to Support Program Implementation.

AIMS: Physical and occupational therapists play a key role in the implementation of hip surveillance for children with cerebral palsy (CP) in British Columbia, Canada. We aimed to develop and assess a knowledge translation strategy to support the implementation of a provincial hip surveillance program. METHODS: Pediatric therapists were invited to participate in an anonymous survey assessing hip surveillance knowledge and learning needs. Based on these results, educational materials were developed. Two years later, one year following the launch of the hip surveillance program, the survey was repeated to assess learning, knowledge use, and barriers to enrollment. RESULTS: The initial survey was completed by 102 therapists; 74 therapists completed the second survey. Multifaceted educational strategies, including web-based learning, in-person education, email notifications, and print materials that targeted knowledge gaps were developed. Upon re-evaluation, knowledge increased on all questions. At follow-up, 45 therapists had enrolled a child, indicating knowledge use. Barriers to enrollment included lack of a CP diagnosis, parents or physicians not agreeing to enrollment, time requirements, and lack of space to complete the clinical exam. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted knowledge translation strategies were successful in meeting the educational requirements of a large group of therapists in a vast geographic area.

Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: An Examination of Care Practices of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons in North America.

BACKGROUND: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common condition, affecting 1% to 2% of full-term infants. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) and American Academy of Pediatrics have published guidelines detailing best practices for DDH screening and treatment. The purpose of this survey was to determine DDH treatment practices of pediatric orthopaedic surgeons in North America. METHODS: We queried orthopaedic surgeon members of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America (POSNA) about referral patterns, treatment practices, and use of DDH guidelines. The survey included demographics, clinical scenarios, referrals patterns, and ultrasound practices. RESULTS: Of the 1392 members of POSNA, we received 432 total responses and included 353 in statistical analyses. Results show that 68% (233/342) of surgeons practice in an institution that does not endorse a standard care pathway for DDH. Of surgeons who personally use a DDH care pathway, the AAOS guidelines were most cited (143/353, 41%). The majority (94%, 316/337) of surgeons do not believe that universal ultrasound screening should be adopted in the United States. Responses regarding ultrasound screening for "high risk" infants as outlined by AAOS varied based on risk factor. Many (57%, 200/353) surgeons have performed initial evaluations for patients over 12 months of age. While 80% (260/327) of orthopaedic surgeons believe that primary care providers are referring patients appropriately, only 57% (183/323) believe that primary care providers are ordering imaging studies appropriately. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this survey of POSNA membership indicate an opportunity to better distribute and implement DDH guidelines. In addition, the implementation of a care map with a focus on standard referral and imaging practices could improve the care of patients with DDH by: (1) reducing the total cost of care, (2) increasing the use of appropriate imaging, (3) increasing timely referral for DDH care, and (4) reducing the presentation rate of walking age DDH patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: The level of evidence rating for this survey-based study is level IV.

Should I Plan to Open? Predicting the Need for Open Reduction in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction is generally attempted on children under 18 months of age who present as older infants or who fail nonoperative management for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). However, many of these patients will not achieve concentric reduction by closed means and will ultimately require open reduction (OR). Limited evidence exists to predict which patients can be adequately closed reduced versus those who will need open treatment. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 4 select centers of an international multicenter study group sharing a common treatment approach were reviewed for all DDH infants under 18 months old that required operative management. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those whose hips were successfully closed reduced or those who ultimately required OR. Factors were compared between the closed reduction and OR groups for 2 separate cohorts-those presenting early in life with ultrasound (US) data, and those presenting later with radiographic data. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients (166 hips) were included in the analysis. Overall, 87.3% were female. In the early-presenting cohort, purposeful entry multivariate regression revealed that patients with Graf IV hips on US had 3.8 times higher odds of requiring an OR. For the later cohort, hips that were clinically irreducible (ie, negative Ortolani sign) had 3.3 times higher odds of requiring OR. Patients with International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) grade IV hips had 2.5 times higher odds of needing an OR versus those with grade III hips and 15.4 times higher odds than those with grade II hips. Children with an IHDI grade IV hip and a negative Ortolani sign had 4.4 times higher odds of needing OR. CONCLUSION: Children younger than 18 months with dislocated hips who require OR are more likely to have a high-grade radiographic dislocation (IHDI grade IV), negative preoperative Ortolani sign, and a Graf IV classification on initial US. This information may help surgeons budget the use of operating room time and better counsel parents about intraoperative expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Prognostic.

Even Experts Can Be Fooled: Reliability of Clinical Examination for Diagnosing Hip Dislocations in Newborns.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of clinical screening examination in newborns with dislocated hips compared with ultrasound scan (USS). METHODS: Newborns, up to 3 months of age, with confirmed hip dislocations on USS were prospectively enrolled in a multinational observational study. Data from 2010 to 2016 were reviewed to determine pretreatment clinical examination findings of the treating orthopaedic surgeon as well as baseline ultrasound indices of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). All infants had been referred to specialist centres with expertise in DDH, due to abnormal birth examination or risk factor. RESULTS: The median age of the study population was 2.3 weeks and 84% of patients were female. Of the total 515 USS-confirmed dislocated hips included in the study, 71 (13.8%) were incorrectly felt to be reduced on clinical examination by the treating orthopaedist (P<0.001). Full hip abduction was documented in 106 hips. Of the hips correctly identified as dislocated, 322 hips were further analyzed based on clinical reducibility. Thirty-three of 322 (10.2%) were incorrectly thought to be reducible when in fact they were irreducible or vice versa. CONCLUSIONS: Expert examiners missed a significant number of frankly dislocated hips on clinical examination and their ability to classify hips based on clinical reducibility was only moderately accurate. This study provides evidence that, even in experienced hands, physical examination findings in DDH are often too subtle to elicit clinically in the first few months of life. This may explain the persistent and measurable rate of late presenting dislocations in countries with screening programmes reliant on clinical examination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1-testing of previously developed diagnostic criteria in series of consecutive patients (with universally applied reference "gold" standard).

Ultrasound Characteristics of Clinically Dislocated But Reducible Hips With DDH.

BACKGROUND: Although ultrasound (US) is frequently used in diagnosis and management of infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip, precise ultrasonographic parameters of what constitutes a dislocation, subluxation etc remain poorly defined. The purpose of this study was (1) to describe the ultrasonographic characteristics of a large cohort of clinically dislocated but reducible hips and (2) to begin to develop ultrasonographic definitions for what constitutes a hip dislocation. METHODS: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data from an international multicenter study group on developmental dysplasia of the hip was conducted on all patients under 6 months of age with hip(s) that were dislocated at rest but reducible based on initial physical examination (ie, Ortolani positive). Femoral head coverage (FHC), alpha angle (α), and beta angle (ß) were measured on pretreatment US by the individual treating surgeon, and were recorded directly into the database. RESULTS: Based on 325 Ortolani positive hips, the median FHC on presentation was 10% with an interquartile range of 0% to 23%. A total of 126 of the 327 hips (39%) demonstrated 0% FHC. The 90th percentile was found to be at 33% FHC. Of 264 hips with sufficient α data, the median α was 43 degrees with an interquartile range from 37 to 49 degrees. The 90th percentile for α was at 54 degrees. A total of 164 hips had documented ß with a median of 66 degrees and an interquartile range of 57 to 79 degrees; the 90th percentile was at 94 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of a large cohort of patients with dislocated but reducible hips reveals a median percent FHC of 10%, a median α of 43 degrees, and a median ß of 66 degrees on initial US. Using a threshold at the 90th percentile, a sensible ultrasonographic definition of a dislocated hip seems to be FHC≤33%, implying that FHC between 34% and 50% may be reasonably termed a subluxation. Although these findings are consistent with previous, smaller reports, further prospective research is necessary to validate these thresholds. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-diagnostic study.

Management of Irreducible Hip Dislocations in Infants With Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Diagnosed Below 6 Months of Age.

BACKGROUND: Infants with dislocated irreducible (D/I) hips can be substantially harder to treat than infants with dislocated but reducible hips. The purpose of this study was to compare treatment methods and outcomes for infants with D/I hips in order to optimize management of this difficult patient cohort. METHODS: A multicenter prospective hip dysplasia study database was analyzed from 2010 to 2016. Infants aged below 6 months with clinically and radiologically confirmed D/I hips were included in the study. Teratological hips (syndromic/neuromuscular) were excluded. RESULTS: In total, 59 hips in 52 patients were included. All hips were clinically Ortolani negative and radiologically dislocated but irreducible on presentation and had at least 20 months of follow-up. Mean age at diagnosis was 1.9 months (range, 0.1 to 5.9 mo). There were 33 left hips, 12 right hips, and 14 bilateral hips (7 patients). In total, 48 of 59 hips were treated in Pavlik harness. The remainder were treated by alternative braces or primary closed or open reductions. Pavlik treatment was successful in 27 of 48 hips. Pavlik treatment was abandoned in 21 D/I hips, 3 due to femoral nerve palsy and the remainder due to failure to achieve reduction. There was no statistical correlation between Pavlik success and age at diagnosis (P=0.22), patient sex (P=0.61), or bilateral compared with unilateral D/I hips (P=0.07). Left hips were more likely to be successfully reduced in Pavlik harness than right hips (P=0.01). Five complications occurred: 3 patients developed femoral nerve palsy in Pavlik harness, while 2 patients developed avascular necrosis, both after failed Pavlik treatment and subsequent surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Pavlik harness treatment has been demonstrated to be a safe and sensible first-line treatment for infants with D/I hips. Left hips were more likely to be successfully reduced in Pavlik harness than right hips, but age, sex, and bilaterality were not correlated. The outcomes demonstrated from this multicentre prospective database inform management of this complex patient cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prognostic study: less-quality prospective study.

Closed Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Early-term Results From a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Closed reduction (CR) is a common treatment for infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip. The purpose of this observational, prospective, multicenter study was to determine the early outcomes following CR. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from an international multicenter study group was analyzed for patients treated from 2010 to 2014. Baseline demographics, clinical exam, radiographic/ultrasonographic data, and history of previous orthotic treatment were assessed. At minimum 1-year follow-up, failure was defined as an IHDI grade 3 or 4 hip and/or need for open reduction. The incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN), residual dysplasia, and need for further surgery was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients undergoing CR for 87 hips were evaluated with a median age at initial reduction of 8 months (range, 1 to 20 mo). Of these, 8 hips (9%) were unable to be closed reduced initially. At most recent follow-up (median 22 mo; range, 12 to 36 mo), 72/79 initially successful CRs (91%) remained stable. The likelihood of failure was unaffected by initial clinical reducibility of the hip (P=0.434), age at initial CR (P=0.897), or previous treatment in brace (P=0.222). Excluding those hips that failed initial CR, 18/72 hips (25%) developed AVN, and the risk of osteonecrosis was unaffected by prereduction reducibility of the hip (P=0.586), age at CR (P=0.745), presence of an ossific nucleus (P=0.496), or previous treatment in brace (P=0.662). Mean acetabular index on most recent radiographs was 25 degrees (±6 degrees), and was also unaffected by any of the above variables. During the follow-up period, 8/72 successfully closed reduced hips (11%) underwent acetabular and/or femoral osteotomy for residual dysplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Following an initially successful CR, 9% of hips failed reduction and 25% developed radiographic AVN at early-term follow-up. History of femoral head reducibility, previous orthotic bracing, and age at CR did not correlate with success or chances of developing AVN. Further follow-up of this prospective, multicenter cohort will be necessary to establish definitive success and complication rates following CR for infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective observational cohort.