Optimizing and validating a pediatric screening tool to more efficiently test and identify children living with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a screening tool to improve testing efficiency and increase case finding of children living with HIV. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Between November 2020 and September 2021, children 18 months to 14 years presenting at outpatient departments in 30 health facilities in Zambia were administered a 14-question pediatric HIV screening tool and then tested for HIV. Data were analyzed using a randomly extracted 'validation' dataset and multivariable logistic regression to determine the highest performing and optimal number of screening questions. The final tool was then evaluated in the 'test' dataset. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for both datasets. The final tool was then also implemented in 12 additional facilities to determine operational feasibility and uptake. RESULTS: A total of 9902 children were included in the final analysis. HIV prevalence was 1.3%. Six questions were significantly associated with HIV-positivity. The optimal screening cutoff score was to answer 'yes' to one or more of the six questions; using this cutoff sensitivity was 92.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7-96.7%] and specificity was 62.9% (95% CI 61.9-64%). In the test dataset, the same tool had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI 65.1-95.6%) and specificity of 64.6% (95% CI 62.4-66.7%). Uptake was 89%. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show sensitivity and acceptable specificity in a six-question validated HIV screening tool. Implementing this screening tool in settings where universal testing is not feasible should more efficiently accelerate identification of children living with HIV (CLHIV) and their timely initiation onto life-saving drugs.

Integrating isoniazid preventive therapy into the fast-track HIV treatment model in urban Zambia: A proof-of -concept pilot project.

Most people living with HIV (PLHIV) established on treatment in Zambia receive multi-month prescribing and dispensing (MMSD) antiretroviral therapy (ART) and are enrolled in less-intensive differentiated service delivery (DSD) models such as Fast Track (FT), where clients collect ART every 3-6 months and make clinical visits every 6 months. In 2019, Zambia introduced Isoniazid Preventive Therapy (IPT) with scheduled visits at 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months. Asynchronous IPT and HIV appointment schedules were inconvenient and not client centered. In response, we piloted integrated MMSD/IPT in FT HIV treatment model. We implemented and evaluated a proof-of-concept project at one purposively selected high-volume facility in Lusaka, Zambia between July 2019 and May 2020. We sensitized stakeholders, adapted training materials, standard operating procedures, and screened adults in FT for TB as per national guidelines. Participants received structured TB/IPT education, 6-month supply of isoniazid and ART, aligned 6th month IPT/MMSD clinic appointment, and phone appointments at 2 weeks and months 1-5 following IPT initiation. We used descriptive statistics to characterize IPT completion rates, phone appointment keeping, side effect frequency and Fisher's exact test to determine variation by participant characteristics. Key lessons learned were synthesized from monthly meeting notes. 1,167 clients were screened with 818 (70.1%) enrolled, two thirds (66%) were female and median age 42 years. 738 (90.2%) completed 6-month IPT course and 66 (8.1%) reported IPT-related side effects. 539 clients (65.9%) attended all 7 telephone appointments. There were insignificant differences of outcomes by age or sex. Lessons learnt included promoting project ownership, client empowerment, securing supply chain, adapting existing processes, and cultivating collaborative structured learning. Integrating multi-month dispensing and telephone follow up of IPT into the FT HIV treatment model is a promising approach to scaling-up TB preventive treatment among PLHIV, although limited by barriers to consistent phone access.