RESUMO
PURPOSE: Previous studies have reported the benefit of dual HER2-targeting combined to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-amplified breast cancer (HER2 + BC). Moreover, besides the cardiac toxicity following their association to Trastuzumab, anthracyclines chemotherapy may not profit all patients. The NeoTOP study was designed to evaluate the complementary action of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab, and the relevance of an anthracycline-based regimen according to TOP2A amplification status. METHODS: Open-label, multicentre, phase II study. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 18 with untreated, operable, histologically confirmed HER2 + BC. After centralized review of TOP2A status, TOP2A-amplified (TOP2A+) patients received FEC100 for 3 cycles then 3 cycles of Trastuzumab (8 mg/kg then 6 mg/kg), Pertuzumab (840 mg/kg then 420 mg/kg), and Docetaxel (75mg/m2 then 100mg/m2). TOP2A-not amplified (TOP2A-) patients received 6 cycles of Docetaxel (75mg/m2) and Carboplatin (target AUC 6 mg/ml/min) plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab. Primary endpoint was pathological Complete Response (pCR) using Chevallier's classification. Secondary endpoints included pCR (Sataloff), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS: Out of 74 patients, 41 and 33 were allocated to the TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups respectively. pCR rates (Chevallier) were 74.4% (95%CI: 58.9-85.4) vs. 71.9% (95%CI: 54.6-84.4) in the TOP2A + vs. TOP2A- groups. pCR rates (Sataloff), 5-year PFS and OS were 70.6% (95%CI: 53.8-83.2) vs. 61.5% (95%CI: 42.5-77.6), 82.4% (95%CI: 62.2-93.6) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1-100), and 90% (95%CI: 69.8-98.3) vs. 100% (95%CI: 74.1-100). Toxicity profile was consistent with previous reports. CONCLUSION: Our results showed high pCR rates with Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab associated to chemotherapy. They were similar in TOP2A + and TOP2A- groups and the current role of neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy remains questioned. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02339532 (registered on 14/12/14).
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Mama , Carboplatina , DNA Topoisomerases Tipo II , Docetaxel , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Receptor ErbB-2 , Trastuzumab , Humanos , Feminino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Trastuzumab/administração & dosagem , Trastuzumab/efeitos adversos , Trastuzumab/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Adulto , DNA Topoisomerases Tipo II/genética , DNA Topoisomerases Tipo II/metabolismo , Docetaxel/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel/efeitos adversos , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fluoruracila/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Ligação a Poli-ADP-Ribose/genética , Antraciclinas/administração & dosagem , Antraciclinas/uso terapêutico , Epirubicina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer screening is currently predominantly based on mammography, tainted with the occurrence of both false positivity and false negativity, urging for innovative strategies, as effective detection of early-stage breast cancer bears the potential to reduce mortality. Here we report the results of a prospective pilot study on breast cancer detection using blood plasma analyzed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy - a rapid, cost-effective technique with minimal sample volume requirements and potential to aid biomedical diagnostics. FTIR has the capacity to probe health phenotypes via the investigation of the full repertoire of molecular species within a sample at once, within a single measurement in a high-throughput manner. In this study, we take advantage of cross-molecular fingerprinting to probe for breast cancer detection. METHODS: We compare two groups: 26 patients diagnosed with breast cancer to a same-sized group of age-matched healthy, asymptomatic female participants. Training with support-vector machines (SVM), we derive classification models that we test in a repeated 10-fold cross-validation over 10 times. In addition, we investigate spectral information responsible for BC identification using statistical significance testing. RESULTS: Our models to detect breast cancer achieve an average overall performance of 0.79 in terms of area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). In addition, we uncover a relationship between the effect size of the measured infrared fingerprints and the tumor progression. CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides the foundation for further extending and evaluating blood-based infrared probing approach as a possible cross-molecular fingerprinting modality to tackle breast cancer detection and thus possibly contribute to the future of cancer screening.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/sangue , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Espectroscopia de Infravermelho com Transformada de Fourier/métodos , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Impressões Digitais de DNA , Progressão da Doença , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Biópsia Líquida/métodos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Máquina de Vetores de SuporteRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer frequently develop CNS metastases. The metastases that progress after brain radiotherapy and HER2-targeted systemic therapy are a difficult therapeutic challenge. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib, an irreversible blocker of the ErbB protein family, alone or combined with vinorelbine, compared with treatment of the investigator's choice in women with HER2-positive breast cancer with progressive brain metastases during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both. METHODS: We did this randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial in 40 hospitals in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, South Korea, and the USA. Women older than 18 years with histologically confirmed HER2-overexpressing breast cancer and CNS recurrence or progression as determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST version 1.1) during or after treatment with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or both, were eligible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1:1) centrally to afatinib 40 mg orally once per day, afatinib 40 mg per day plus intravenous vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) once per week, or investigator's choice of treatment in cycles of 3 weeks until disease progression, patient withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. Treatment assignment was not masked for clinicians or patients, but the trial team was masked until database lock to reduce bias. The primary endpoint, assessed in the intention-to-treat population, was patient benefit at 12 weeks, defined by an absence of CNS or extra-CNS disease progression, no tumour-related worsening of neurological signs or symptoms, and no increase in corticosteroid dose. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of a study drug. This completed trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01441596. FINDINGS: Between Dec 22, 2011, and Feb 12, 2013, we screened 132 patients, of whom 121 were eligible and randomly assigned to treatment: 40 to afatinib alone, 38 to afatinib plus vinorelbine, and 43 to investigator's choice. All patients discontinued study treatment before the data collection cutoff on Oct 16, 2014. Patient benefit was achieved in 12 (30·0%; 95% CI 16·6-46·5) patients given afatinib alone (difference vs investigator's choice: -11·9% [95% CI -32·9 to 9·7], p=0·37), 13 (34·2%; 19·6-51·4) given afatinib plus vinorelbine (difference vs investigator's choice: -7·6% [-28·9 to 14·2], p=0·63), and 18 (41·9%; 27·0-57·9) given investigator's choice. The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were diarrhoea (seven [18%] of 40 patients in the afatinib only group vs nine [24%] of 37 patients in the afatinib plus vinorelbine group vs two [5%] of 42 patients in the investigator's choice group) and neutropenia (none vs 14 [38%] vs four [10%]). INTERPRETATION: Patient benefit with afatinib-containing treatments was not different from that in patients given investigator's choice of treatments; however, adverse events were frequent and afatinib-containing treatments seemed to be less well tolerated. No further development of afatinib for HER2-positive breast cancer is currently planned. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/antagonistas & inibidores , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Quinazolinas/uso terapêutico , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inibidores , Vimblastina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Afatinib , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias Encefálicas/química , Neoplasias Encefálicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundário , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Canadá , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Lapatinib , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas/efeitos adversos , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , República da Coreia , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Trastuzumab/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Vimblastina/efeitos adversos , Vimblastina/uso terapêutico , VinorelbinaRESUMO
To find metastatic recurrence biomarkers of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-EGFR antibodies (NAT), we evaluated tumor genomic, transcriptomic, and immune features, using MSK-IMPACT assay, gene arrays, Nanostring technology, and TIL assessment on H&E. Six patients experienced a rapid fatal recurrence (RR) and other 6 had later non-fatal recurrences (LR). Before NAT, RR had low expression of 6 MHC class I and 13 MHC class II genes but were enriched in upregulated genes involved in the cell cycle-related pathways. Their TIL number before NAT in RR was very low (<5%) and did not increase after treatment. In post-NAT residual tumors, RR cases showed high expression of SOX2 and CXCR4. Our results indicate that high expression of cell cycle genes, combined with cold immunological phenotype, may predict strong TNBC resistance to NAT and rapid progression after it. This biomarker combination is worth validation in larger studies.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer represents the most common subtype of breast malignancies. Neoadjuvant strategies of operable breast cancer are mostly based on chemotherapy, whereas it is not completely understood which patients might benefit from neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SAFIA trial is a prospective multicenter, international, double-blind, neoadjuvant phase III trial, using upfront 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score assay (recurrence score [RS] < 31) to select operable luminal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative patients, for induction hormonal therapy HT (fulvestrant 500 mg with or without goserelin) before randomly assigning responding patients to fulvestrant 500 mg (with or without goserelin) plus either palbociclib (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) or placebo. The objectives of this interim analysis were to assess the feasibility of upfront RS determination on core biopsies in the Middle-East and North Africa region and evaluate the efficacy of induction NAHT in patients with an RS < 31. RESULTS: At the time of this interim analysis, 258 patients with relative risk were accrued, including 202 patients (RS < 31% to 78.3%) treated with induction NAHT and 182 patients evaluable so far for response. The feasibility of performing the Oncotype DX assays on core biopsy specimens was optimal in 96.4% of cases. Overall, 93.4% of patients showed hormone sensitivity and no difference in NAHT efficacy was noticed between RS 0-10, 11-25, and 26-30. Interestingly, patients with high RS (26-30) showed a trend toward a higher major response rate (P = .05). CONCLUSION: The upfront 21-gene assay performed on biopsies is feasible in our population and has allowed us to select patients with high hormone sensitivity (RS < 31). This approach could be an alternative to upfront surgery without significant risk of progression, particularly during pandemic times.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Terapia Neoadjuvante , África do Norte , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Oriente Médio , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de EstrogênioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Differences in the efficacy of various chemotherapies in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)(+) metastatic breast cancer are not well understood. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy of docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer according to ER expression. METHODS: The efficacy of docetaxel in terms of the response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) time was analyzed according to ER expression in four randomized trials comparing a docetaxel-based regimen with a nontaxane regimen that included a total of 1,631 patients. The odds ratio for tumor response was estimated with logistic regression and a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was estimated with Cox proportional hazards models. FINDINGS: ER expression was assessable in 1,037 patients included in these trials (64%). ER was expressed in 601 tumors (58%). Docetaxel was associated with a similarly higher response rate in both patients with ER(+) (odds ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-4.87) and patients with ER(-) (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.44-4.51) disease. The lower hazard for disease progression with docetaxel was also similar in ER(+) (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.00) and ER(-) (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07) cancers. The effect of docetaxel was not different in ER(+) and ER(-) disease, in terms of both the response rate and PFS time (interaction test, p = .77 and p = .93). INTERPRETATION: Docetaxel produces a higher response rate and lower risk for disease progression to a statistically similar extent in both patients with ER(+) and patients with ER(-) metastatic breast cancer.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Receptor alfa de Estrogênio/biossíntese , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
This study compares the outcome of 76 patients with N0 breast carcinoma, node-negative at axillary lymph node dissection (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NeoCT), treated with (RLNI+, 39 patients) or without (RLNI-, 37 patients) elective regional lymph node areas irradiation. For RLNI- and RLNI+ groups respectively at 10 years, survival without local-regional recurrence was 95% and 91% (p = .59), survival without distant metastasis was 97% and 78% (p = .018) and overall survival was 96% and 75% (p = .013). Clinical size < 4 cm was a strong pronostic factor.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Metástase Linfática/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Análise de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since the approval of the first poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi; olaparib [Lynparza™]) for platinum-sensitive relapsed high grade ovarian cancer, with either germline or somatic BRCA1/2 deleterious variants, the strategies for BRCA1/2 are dynamically changing. Along with germline testing within the context of familial or sporadic ovarian cancer, patients are now being referred for BRCA1/2 genetic assay above all for treatment decisions: in this setting tumour BRCA assay can allow to identify an estimated 3-9% of patients with peculiar somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. These women could also benefit from PARPi therapy. This new type of approach is really challenging, in particular due to the technical and analytical difficulties regarding low quality DNA deriving from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens. AIM: in this manuscript, we try to a) underline many issues related to BRCA1/2 analysis by next generation sequencing technologies (NGS), b) provide some responses to many questions regarding this new paradigm related to OvCa patients' management. Some considerations for incorporating genetic analysis of ovarian tumour samples into the patient pathway and ethical requirements are also provided. METHODS: we used our retrospective data based on thousands of ovarian cancer women sequenced for BRCA1/2 genes. DISCUSSION: tumor BRCA1/2 assay should be rapidly introduced in routine laboratory practice as first line testing by using harmonized pipelines based on consensus guidelines.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cardiac toxicity with a decrease of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the main side effect induced by trastuzumab. This study reports the fluctuation of LVEF over the 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in PHARE trial (NCT00381901). METHODS: LVEF assessment was performed every 3 months while patients received trastuzumab and after completion of treatment over the first 2 years and then every 6 months afterwards. The fluctuations of LVEF over time were described and a logistic regression model was performed investigating associated factors to LVEF perfect recovery at baseline value. RESULTS: A total of 1631 patients who received 12 months of trastuzumab from PHARE trial, were considered in the analysis. A total of 13â¯881 LVEF measurements were assessed. Baseline mean LVEF was 66.08% (standard error (SE): 0.15) and the mean relative LVEF decrease observed at 12-month was 3.61% (SE: 0.31). No clinical characteristic was significantly associated to LVEF fluctuation. After completion of trastuzumab, the relative difference progressively disappeared with beyond 30 months a relative difference value of 0.08% (SE: 0.42). Nevertheless, at 30 months, 48.53% of patients with available measures (379/781) did not fully recover their baseline LVEF value. CONCLUSION: The LVEF decreased during treatment with trastuzumab and rose up after the completion of treatment without coming back to the initial values for a substantial subset. These results would suggest investigating some strategies aimed to improve the ability to achieve a full recovery.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/administração & dosagem , Função Ventricular Esquerda/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Cardiotoxicidade/etiologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Trastuzumab/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease entity constituting about 15% of breast cancer cases worldwide. TNBC is associated with poor prognosis and lack of sustained response to conventional chemotherapeutic agents. Tumoral heterogeneity and the presence of several subtypes of TNBC such as Basal like (BL)-1, BL-2, immune-modulatory, luminal androgen receptor, mesenchymal, and mesenchymal/stem like subtype and claudin low subtype, may explain some of the difficulties faced in managing this challenging disease subgroups. Although no approved targeted therapy is available for TNBCs, molecular-profiling efforts have revealed promising molecular targets such as the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), polyadenosine ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and DNA repair pathway, androgen pathway, and NOTCH pathway. TNBC is subject to intense research activities aiming at dissecting potential pathways, identifying potential molecular signatures and biomarkers in order to properly develop new targeted biologic modifiers. Despite this, there is a lack of approved predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and keeping in view the complexity of TNBC biology, research should be targeted towards identifying multi-factorial signatures rather than single markers. This review aims to summarize the current evidence, ongoing research and discuss future strategies for the treatment of patients with TNBC. In addition we have reviewed the recent advances in detecting predictive and prognostic biomarkers and identifying surrogate markers for early identification of potential responders to the new therapies.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos/química , Reparo do DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Proteínas Hedgehog/metabolismo , Humanos , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/química , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/farmacologia , Receptores Androgênicos/metabolismo , Receptores Notch/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/irrigação sanguínea , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologiaRESUMO
The immunobiology of breast cancer (BC) subtypes, including luminal cancer, remains unclear. Cluster of differentiation (CD)8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) are essential components of tumor-specific cellular adaptive immunity. However, only few studies have addressed the significance of cluster of differentiation 8+(CD8+) TIL in patients with luminal BC. The present study aimed to evaluate the predictive and prognostic significance of CD8+ TIL in patients with luminal B/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER 2)-negative BC treated with anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC). A total of 31 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy post-NC were enrolled. Immunostaining for CD8+ TIL was performed using rabbit monoclonal antibodies against human CD8+. Intra- and peritumoral CD8+ TIL expression levels were classified into high and low, based on the median value of each. CD8+ TIL expression data were demonstrated to be correlated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), using Kaplan-Meier and Cox's proportional hazards regression tests. The results revealed that, among all clinicopathological characteristics, only pathological complete response (pCR) was significantly correlated with intratumoral CD8+ TIL expression (P=0.016). A total of 9/16 patients (56%) with high intratumoral CD8+ TIL expression achieved pCR, in contrast with 2 out of 15 patients (13.3%) with low expression (P=0.016). High expression of intratumoral CD8+ TIL was significantly associated with OS (log-rank test, P=0.023). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that intratumoral expression of CD8+ TIL was an independent prognostic factor for OS [hazard ratio (HR)=2.82; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.911-4.833, P=0.007], but not for DFS (HR=1.11; 95% CI=0.282-2.078; P=0.508). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggested that high intratumoral CD8+ TIL expression was significantly predictive of pCR post-NC, and represented an independent prognostic factor for improved OS. In contrast, low intratumoral CD8+ TIL expression was a strong predictor of lack of pCR to NC, as well as an independent prognostic factor for poor OS. Assessment of the immune response in conjunction with the usual parameters may aid in the further stratification of patients with luminal B/HER 2-negative BC regarding the prediction of pCR post-NC and overall prognosis.
RESUMO
Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now being used for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer, and are challenging tamoxifen, the previous 'gold standard' of care, in this setting. This review evaluates the potential clinical impact of anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane on the cardiovascular (CV) system of postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Some data for CV safety are available for AIs from the advanced disease setting; however, most derive from patients being treated for early disease. CV data on anastrozole for the treatment of early breast cancer were taken from the ATAC trial, in which anastrozole was compared with tamoxifen in the primary adjuvant setting, and the ABCSG trial 8/ARNO 95 combined analysis, in which switching to 3 years of anastrozole after 2 years of tamoxifen was compared with the standard 5 years of tamoxifen adjuvant therapy. Letrozole has been studied in the primary adjuvant setting and the adjuvant sequencing setting in the BIG 1-98 study, as well as in extended adjuvant endocrine therapy after 5 years of tamoxifen in the MA-17 trial. For exemestane, results were reviewed from the IES trial, in which switching to exemestane following 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen was compared with continued tamoxifen treatment. All these trials clearly confirmed that all three AIs significantly reduce the risk of thromboembolic events compared with tamoxifen. Data on anastrozole versus tamoxifen from the ATAC trial (68 months' follow-up) showed a similar incidence of myocardial infarctions (MIs), CV deaths and overall deaths for both therapies; however, anastrozole appeared to be associated with a lower incidence of cerebrovascular events compared with tamoxifen. In addition, the ABCSG trial 8/ARNO 95 study reported no difference in terms of MIs for patients switching to anastrozole compared with patients continuing tamoxifen treatment. Data from BIG 1-98 (26 months' follow-up) suggested that primary adjuvant treatment with letrozole may be associated with a significantly greater incidence of CV events and a numerical increase of cerebrovascular and cardiac deaths compared with tamoxifen. However, no increase in CV events with letrozole was reported from the MA-17 trial. In the IES, updated data at 55 months' median follow up showed no significant difference in the incidence of MIs and cardiac deaths between patients who switched to exemestane compared with those who continued tamoxifen. In conclusion, a significantly reduced risk of thromboembolic disease was observed for all three AIs compared with tamoxifen. Anastrozole is, at this point, the only AI with a detailed benefit-risk profile from over 5 years' follow-up in the adjuvant setting. Thus far, no apparent CV-safety concerns have emerged. Preliminary data on letrozole and exemestane suggest that longer follow-up is needed for these two AIs before being able to fully assess their respective long-term CV toxicity profile. The present differences in CV-safety profiles suggest that third-generation AIs should not be considered as equivalents in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Inibidores da Aromatase/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Sistema Cardiovascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores da Aromatase/farmacologia , Sistema Enzimático do Citocromo P-450 , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Polimorfismo Genético , Pós-Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
PURPOSE: This randomized, multicenter, phase III study compared doxorubicin and docetaxel (AT) with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) as first-line chemotherapy (CT) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 429) were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (n = 214) or doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (n = 215) on day 1, every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. RESULTS: Time to progression (TTP; primary end point) and time to treatment failure (TTF) were significantly longer with AT than AC (median TTP, 37.3 v 31.9 weeks; log-rank P =.014; median TTF, 25.6 v 23.7 weeks; log-rank P =.048). The overall response rate (ORR) was significantly greater for patients taking AT (59%, with 10% complete response [CR], 49% partial response [PR]) than for those taking AC (47%, with 7% CR, 39% PR) (P =.009). The ORR was also higher with AT in patients with visceral involvement (58% v 41%; liver, 62% v 42%; lung, 58% v 35%), three or more organs involved (59% v 40%), or prior adjuvant CT (53% v 41%). Overall survival (OS) was comparable in both arms. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was frequent in both groups, although febrile neutropenia and infections were more frequent for patients taking AT (respectively, 33% v 10%, P <.001; 8% v 2%, P =.01). Severe nonhematologic toxicity was infrequent in both groups, including grade 3/4 cardiac events (AT, 3%; AC, 4%). CONCLUSION: AT significantly improves TTP and ORR compared with AC in patients with MBC, but there is no difference in OS. AT represents a valid option for the treatment of MBC.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Paclitaxel/análogos & derivados , Taxoides , Adulto , Idoso , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Docetaxel , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Doenças Hematológicas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with that of a common salvage regimen (comparator) in patients with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following failure of a first- or second-line taxane-containing regimen for metastatic disease, 301 women were randomly assigned to receive PLD (50 mg/m(2) every 28 days); or comparator-vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2) weekly) or mitomycin C (10 mg/m(2) day 1 and every 28 days) plus vinblastine (5 mg/m(2) day 1, day 14, day 28, and day 42) every 6 to 8 weeks. Patients were stratified before random assignment based on number of previous chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease and presence of bone metastases only. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar for PLD and comparator (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.62; P =.11; median, 2.9 months [PLD] and 2.5 months [comparator]; OS: HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.33; P =.71; median, 11.0 months [PLD] and 9.0 months [comparator]). In anthracycline-naïve patients, PFS was somewhat longer with PLD, relative to the comparator (n = 44; median PFS, 5.8 v 2.1 months; HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.95; P =.01). Most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (23% to 31%), vomiting (17% to 20%), and fatigue (9% to 20%) and were similar among treatment groups. PLD-treated patients experienced more palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (37%; 18% grade 3, 1 patient grade 4) and stomatitis (22%; 5% grades 3/4). Neuropathy (11%), constipation (16%), and neutropenia (14%) were more common with vinorelbine. Alopecia was low in both the PLD and vinorelbine groups (3% and 5%). CONCLUSION: PLD has efficacy comparable to that of common salvage regimens in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic breast cancer, thereby representing a useful therapeutic option.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Hidrocarbonetos Aromáticos com Pontes/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/uso terapêutico , Mitomicina/uso terapêutico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Vimblastina/análogos & derivados , Vimblastina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Doxorrubicina/efeitos adversos , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Humanos , Lipossomos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mitomicina/efeitos adversos , Metástase Neoplásica , Terapia de Salvação , Vimblastina/efeitos adversos , VinorelbinaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This article reports, the cardiac toxicity according to 6- versus 12-month durations of adjuvant trastuzumab in PHARE randomised trial (NCT00381901). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cardiac follow-up and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) assessment by echocardiography or multigated acquisition scan were performed every 3 months while patients received trastuzumab and after completion of treatment over the first 2 years and every 6 months afterwards. The primary cardiac end-point was Cardiac Heart Failure (CHF) defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV. The secondary cardiac end-points were: cardiac events, cardiac dysfunctions defined by NYHA class I and II; LVEF decreases, cardiac recoveries. The cardiac subcommittee reviewed cardiac events and assessed if patients had favourable outcomes or not on the basis of trends from LVEF measurements. RESULTS: Among 3380 patients the cardiac dysfunction assessment included 14,055 and 13,218 LVEF measurements in the 12- and 6-month arms. The overall incidences of CHF were 0.65% (11/1690) and 0.53% (9/1690) in the 12 and 6 month arms, respectively (p>0.05). Cardiac dysfunction occurred in 5.9% (100/1690) and 3.4% (58/1690) of patients in the 12 and 6 month arms, respectively (p=0.001). Recoveries were observed for the majority patients and 0.79% (27/3380) of patients experienced an unfavourable cardiac outcome. CONCLUSION: PHARE confirm that the incidence of cardiac end-points remains low and mostly reversible after trastuzumab. Identification at baseline of cardiac risk categories of patients should be of interest to provide an optimal adaptation of adjuvant modalities and a shorter duration might be an option.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Trastuzumab/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/enzimologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Incidência , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Volume Sistólico/efeitos dos fármacos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Breast cancer is heterogeneous in clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and biological features, as reflected by several different prognostic subgroups. Neoadjuvant approaches are currently used for the "in vivo" efficacy assessment of treatments. Pathological complete response (pCR) has been reported as a reliable predictive factor of survival in that setting. However, pCR remains a subject of controversy in terms of definition and its evaluation methods. In addition, its predictive value for patient outcome in various breast cancer biological subtypes has been under debate. In this review, we will present the existing definitions of pCR, the impact of its evaluation methods on its rate and the assessment of its predictive value for patient outcome in the molecular subtypes of breast cancer (luminal A and B, Triple Negative and HER2-positive).
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Mama/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Prognóstico , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Recently there has been great interest in developing combination regimens involving taxanes and anthracyclines for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Docetaxel in particular has substantial activity when combined with doxorubicin. In one randomized trial, the combination of doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) showed significantly greater activity than doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC), producing a higher response rate (60% v 47%) and longer time to progression. In a second study, 484 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) or 5-florouracil plus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. The response rate was significantly higher in the TAC arm (54% v 42%), including patients with unfavorable prognostic factors. Febrile neutropenia occurred more frequently in patients receiving TAC, but the incidence of infection and septic death was low and no greater than in the 5-florouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide arm. TAC was not associated with an increased risk of cardiotoxicity. Data on time to progression and survival are not yet available. The TAC and doxorubicin/docetaxel regimens have been compared with non-docetaxel-containing programs in randomized adjuvant trials which have completed accrual but are not yet mature. A second generation of adjuvant trials compares sequential versus synchronous docetaxel-based polychemotherapy. In addition, based on preclinical data suggesting a synergistic interaction between docetaxel, platinum salts, and trastuzumab, as well as preliminary data from pilot studies in patients with HER2-positive metastatic disease showing tolerability and activity, adjuvant studies of this novel three-agent combination are in progress in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/análogos & derivados , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Taxoides , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , TrastuzumabRESUMO
Among the novel chemotherapeutic drugs introduced in the 1990s, the taxanes have emerged as the most powerful compounds in breast cancer. Paclitaxel and docetaxel have been evaluated in the metastatic setting before proceeding with adjuvant trials. The adjuvant strategies of development of both taxanes have been different, mostly as a result of pharmacokinetic differences and dose-schedule issues. As a consequence, paclitaxel was studied nearly exclusively in sequential programs such as AC (doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) followed by paclitaxel or doxorubicin, followed by paclitaxel, followed by cyclophosphamide. In contrast, docetaxel has been investigated in sequence (AC followed by docetaxel) and in combination chemotherapy (doxorubicin/docetaxel and docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide). Available results of large-scale phase III trials confirm that the taxanes have the potential to change the natural history of early-stage breast cancer. It is becoming clear that sequential chemotherapy and polychemotherapy approaches with taxanes are to be considered in the treatment of patients with node-positive breast cancer. Further results are eagerly awaited to fully understand the role of taxanes and to optimize their impact on early-stage breast cancer. It is our opinion that the real pending issue is no longer whether taxanes will make a difference in the adjuvant setting (the answer is most likely yes), but the definition of their optimal strategic use for maximum patient benefit.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Docetaxel , Feminino , Humanos , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como AssuntoRESUMO
HER2 gene amplification occurs in approximately 20% of primary breast cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis. Recently, trastuzumab, a humanized murine monoclonal antibody directed against the extracellular domain of HER2, was introduced for the treatment of patients with HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer. Trastuzumab has activity as both a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. However, trastuzumab in conjunction with anthracyclines produces an unacceptably high rate of cardiac toxicity, which has prompted the search for alternative regimens. Docetaxel and the platinum salts are logical candidates to be combined with trastuzumab since these agents exhibit potent synergy with the antibody in preclinical experiments. Furthermore, the available phase II clinical data using the TCH (docetaxel/platinum/trastuzumab) regimen suggest this combination has significant activity. The Breast Cancer International Research Group (BCIRG) 006 trial is a 3-arm adjuvant study comparing doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel, the same regimen with trastuzumab administered with docetaxel (TH), and TCH in 3150 women with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. BCIRG 007 compares TH and TCH as first-line therapy in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In both trials, entry is restricted to patients whose tumors are positive for HER2 gene amplification as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The data from these trials, in addition to the results from other ongoing randomized studies, will help define the optimal way to utilize trastuzumab in the management of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/análogos & derivados , Receptor ErbB-2/análise , Taxoides , Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Docetaxel , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Platina/administração & dosagem , Trastuzumab , Regulação para CimaRESUMO
This randomized, double-blind, phase III trial compared granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) and leridistim (formerly myelopoietin), a chimeric dual agonist that binds both G-CSF and interleukin-3 receptors, for the prevention of neutropenic complications in patients with breast cancer receiving TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy. Patients with metastatic (44%) or localized breast cancer (56%) were randomized to G-CSF 5 microg/kg subcutaneously (s.c.) daily (n = 135), leridistim 5 microg/kg s.c. daily (n = 139), or leridistim 10 microg/kg s.c. every other day alternating with placebo (n = 139). Following administration of TAC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2) on day 1, patients received growth factor beginning on day 2 until the postnadir absolute neutrophil count exceeded 1500 cells/ microL. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 21 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 7% in the G-CSF arm, 19% in the daily leridistim arm (P = 0.003 for comparison with G-CSF) and 22% in the alternate-day leridistim arm (P < 0.001 for comparison with G-CSF). There was no significant difference between treatment arms in the cumulative percentage of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia at some point during therapy (85%-88%). However, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 53% of cycles in the G-CSF cohort, 61% of cycles in the daily leridistim group (P = 0.063 for comparison with G-CSF), and 63% of cycles in the alternate-day leridistim group (P = 0.015 for comparison with G-CSF). We conclude that G-CSF is superior to leridistim in the prevention of febrile neutropenia in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving TAC chemotherapy. The up-front prophylactic use of G-CSF is a reasonable supportive therapy for patients treated with docetaxel/anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy.