RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Current guidance on the selection of appropriate contraception for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To address this gap, an expert-led consensus program developed recommendations to support clinicians in discussing family planning and contraception with women and men with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: A multidisciplinary steering committee (SC) of 13 international clinical experts led the program, supported by an extended faculty of 32 experts representing 18 countries. A modified Delphi methodology was used for decision-making and consensus-building. The SC drafted 15 clinical questions focused on patient-centered care, selection of contraception, and timing of stopping/starting contraception and disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Statements addressing each question were drafted based on evaluation of published evidence and the experts' clinical experience. Consensus was reached if ⩾75% of respondents agreed (scoring 7-9 on a 9-point scale) with each recommendation. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 24 of 25 proposed recommendations, including how and when to discuss contraception, types and safety of contraceptives, and how to evaluate the most appropriate contraceptive options for specific patient groups, including those with significant disability or being treated with DMTs. CONCLUSION: These expert recommendations provide the first practical, relevant, and comprehensive guidance for clinicians on the selection of contraception in PwMS.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Esclerose Múltipla , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Anticoncepção/métodos , Feminino , Consenso , Masculino , Técnica Delphi , Prova PericialRESUMO
In recent years a troubling trend has emerged in the medical research field, notably in reproductive medicine, manifesting an increased emphasis on quantity over quality in articles published. The pressure to collect copious publication records risks compromising meticulous expertise and impactful contributions. This tendency is exemplified by the rise of 'hyper-prolific researchers' publishing at an extraordinary rate (i.e. every 5 days), prompting a deeper analysis of the reasons underlying this behaviour. Prioritizing rapid publication over Galileo Galilei's systematic scientific principles may lead to a superficial approach driven by quantitative targets. Thus, the overreliance on metrics to facilitate academic careers has shifted the focus to numerical quantification rather than the real scientific contribution, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the evaluation systems. The Hamletian question is: are we scientist or journalist? Addressing these issues could necessitate a crucial re-evaluation of the assessment criteria, emphasizing a balance between quantity and quality to foster an academic environment that values meaningful contributions and innovation.
Assuntos
Editoração , Humanos , Pesquisa Biomédica , Bibliometria , Medicina Reprodutiva , Fator de Impacto de RevistasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) negatively affects the sexual well-being and quality of life of postmenopausal women, yet it is underreported and undertreated. AIM: The study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of a nonablative, noncoagulative multipolar radiofrequency (RF) and pulsed electromagnetic field-based device (PEMF) in treatment of symptoms related to VVA. METHODS: Seventy-six women ≥19 years of age with symptoms associated with VVA were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, multicenter clinical study. Subjects were randomized to receive 3 RF + PEMF treatments (active group) or sham treatments (sham group) delivered to vaginal tissue at monthly intervals. The Vaginal Health Index (VHI), along with the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), subject sexual satisfaction and vaginal laxity (VL) score, treatment-associated pain, and adverse events were assessed at 4 follow-up (FU) visits between 1 and 12 months after treatment. OUTCOMES: Changes from baseline VHI, pH, FSFI, VL, and sexual satisfaction scores between the active and sham groups were compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: Mean VHI scores in the active group were significantly better compared with the sham group after treatment at all but the last FU visit (P < .001). A greater decrease in pH (active over sham) was seen at 1 and 4 months after treatment (P < .05). FSFI improvement was shown in the active group; however, it was not significantly better than sham improvement at all FU visits. Subject sexual satisfaction in the active group showed better improvement over sham at all FU visits (P < .05), while VL evaluations saw greater improvement in the active group at 4, 6, and 12 months posttreatment (P < .05). Treatment satisfaction was greater in the active group and pain was minimal in both groups. No serious adverse effects were reported. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: As a noninvasive alternative to traditional surgical and topical procedures, 3 sessions of noninvasive combination RF/PEMF safely demonstrated improvement in symptoms related to VVA. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study was strengthened by the randomized, sham-controlled design; large sample size; and extended FU period. The study assessments were decreased at later FU visits due to the global COVID pandemic, and this was a key limitation to the study. CONCLUSION: Nonablative, noncoagulative multipolar RF/PEMF therapy was safe, improved symptoms associated with VVA, and improved female sexual function while yielding high subject satisfaction.
Assuntos
Campos Eletromagnéticos , Qualidade de Vida , Feminino , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Prospectivos , Atrofia , DorRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of fezolinetant treatment on health-related quality of life using pooled data from SKYLIGHT 1 and 2 studies. DESIGN: Prespecified pooled analysis. SETTING: USA, Canada, Europe; 2019-2021. POPULATION: 1022 women aged ≥40 to ≤65 years with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms (VMS; minimum average seven hot flushes/day), seeking treatment for VMS. METHODS: Women were randomised to 12-week double-blind treatment with once-daily placebo or fezolinetant 30 or 45 mg. Completers entered a 40-week, active extension (those receiving fezolinetant continued that dose; those receiving placebo re-randomised to fezolinetant received 30 or 45 mg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean changes from baseline to weeks 4 and 12 on Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQoL) total and domain scores, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire specific to VMS (WPAI-VMS) domain scores, Patient Global Impression of Change in VMS (PGI-C VMS); percentages achieving PGI-C VMS of 'much better' (PGI-C VMS responders). Mean reduction was estimated using mixed model repeated measures analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Fezolinetant 45 mg mean reduction over placebo in MENQoL total score was -0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.75 to -0.39) at week 4 and -0.47 (95% CI -0.66 to -0.28) at week 12. Reductions were similar for 30 mg. MENQoL domain scores were also reduced and WPAI-VMS scores improved. Twice as many women receiving fezolinetant reported VMS were 'much better' than placebo based on PGI-C VMS assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Fezolinetant treatment was associated with improvement in overall QoL, measured by MENQoL, and work productivity, measured by WPAI-VMS. A high proportion receiving fezolinetant felt VMS were 'much better' based on PGI-C VMS responder analysis.
Assuntos
Fogachos , Menopausa , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , Menopausa/fisiologia , Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Menopausa/psicologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Idoso , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The increasing prevalence of obesity imposes significant health challenges, particularly in women undergoing menopause. Effective obesity management is essential to mitigate associated comorbidities and improve quality of life. The pillars of obesity treatment encompass lifestyle modifications, pharmacotherapy and surgical interventions. Pharmacotherapy may be considered for women who do not achieve adequate weight loss through lifestyle changes alone and have obesity or overweight with risk factors. Bariatric surgery is reserved for individuals with severe obesity or those with obesity-related complications. During menopause, hormonal changes contribute to weight gain and fat redistribution, complicating obesity management. Tailored treatment strategies are necessary to address the unique challenges faced by this population. The role of physicians and gynecologists is pivotal in the multidisciplinary approach to obesity management during menopause. Gynecologists are often the primary health-care providers for menopausal women and are in a unique position to offer guidance on weight management. They can provide personalized counseling, coordinate with nutritionists, endocrinologists and bariatric specialists, and monitor the effects of obesity and its treatment on reproductive health. By integrating obesity management into routine gynecological care, gynecologists can significantly impact the overall health and well-being of menopausal women.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica , Menopausa , Obesidade , Humanos , Feminino , Menopausa/fisiologia , Obesidade/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Redução de Peso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ginecologia , Estilo de VidaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine physicians' and patients' perceptions regarding symptom burden and impact in women experiencing natural vasomotor symptoms (nVMS) or vasomotor symptoms induced by endocrine therapy for breast cancer (iVMS). METHODS: The cross-sectional survey based on real-world clinical consultations was conducted in the USA and five European countries. Obstetrician-gynecologists, primary-care physicians and oncologists provided demographic and symptom data for patients experiencing VMS; patients optionally self-reported their experiences via questionnaires, including their symptom profile and work/activity burden through the Menopause Quality of Life (MENQOL) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) tools. RESULTS: Physicians completed survey forms on 2451 consulting patients; patients completed 1029 questionnaires. nVMS and iVMS severity was significantly associated with the severity of mood symptoms and sleep disturbances (p < 0.0001). However, around half of the patients with mild nVMS/iVMS also experienced moderate-severe mood changes (55.4%/43.7%) or sleep disturbances (42.4%/40.4%). Presence of mood/sleep disturbances alongside nVMS increased MENQOL vasomotor scores (p = 0.004/p < 0.001). Presence of sleep disturbances increased WPAI activity impairment (p < 0.001) but mood changes did not. Similar findings were reported for iVMS patients. CONCLUSION: Significant burden from the triad of natural or induced menopausal symptoms, sleep disturbances and mood changes affected women's daily activities, work and quality of life more than vasomotor symptoms alone.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Fogachos , Menopausa , Qualidade de Vida , Humanos , Feminino , Europa (Continente) , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Menopausa/fisiologia , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Sistema Vasomotor/fisiopatologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Among postmenopausal women, oral, ultra-low-dose continuous combined estradiol (E0.5 mg) plus dydrogesterone (D2.5 mg) reduces vasomotor symptoms (VMS). METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of data from two phase 3, double-blind studies. Postmenopausal women were randomized 2:1:2 to receive E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, E1 mg/D5 mg (not included in this analysis) or placebo for 13 weeks (European study), or randomized 1:1 to receive E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (Chinese study). Endpoints assessed in ethnicity subgroups (European and Chinese) included changes from baseline in number of hot flushes, number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes and Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) score. RESULTS: Overall, 579 women were included in the analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 288; placebo, n = 291). European and Chinese women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg experienced greater reductions from baseline in mean daily number of hot flushes and mean daily number of moderate-to-severe hot flushes at week 4, week 8 and end of treatment versus those receiving placebo. Significant improvements in the 'hot flushes, sweating' MRS item score were reported in both European and Chinese women. CONCLUSION: Oral, ultra-low-dose continuous combined 0.5 mg 17ß-estradiol and 2.5 mg dydrogesterone improved VMS compared with placebo in European and Chinese postmenopausal women, with a positive impact on health-related quality of life.
RESUMO
Many women seek treatment to improve menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS). The selection of women most likely to benefit from menopause hormone therapy (MHT) is crucial in clinical practice. There is general agreement that women younger than 60 years or who initiate MHT within the first 10 years of menopause, with no contraindications, have greater benefits considering symptomatic relief and additional advantages. This group may have the advantage of protection from osteoporosis and from other chronic diseases that affect postmenopausal women, namely cardiovascular disease (CVD). Cumulating evidence supports MHT for symptomatic women. However, inadequate use according to the needs of symptomatic women led to a burden of suffering worldwide. In recent years, the emergent use of non-regulated body-identical hormones (non-rBHT) can expose patients to potential harms. These hormone preparations are not regulated through the same tests of safety, efficacy or dosing consistency as regulated-BHT (r-BHT). The POESIT (Portugal + Spain + Italy) recommendations highlight the use of 17ß-estradiol (E2) and micronized progesterone (P4) as the real r-BHT. In addition, the group emphasizes as an example the data from the REPLENISH study with 1 mg E2/100 mg P4. The combination of the two hormones in one convenient pill showed a clear reduction or elimination of hot flashes and an improvement in sleep quality and, consequently, quality of life. At the same time, this combination has shown high rates of amenorrhea and no significant impact on lipid, glucose or coagulation parameters. Both the REPLENISH study and a real-life retrospective study pointed to the possibility of a lower risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with this formulation than with other combinations.
Assuntos
Estradiol , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios , Fogachos , Menopausa , Progesterona , Humanos , Feminino , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológico , Estradiol/administração & dosagem , Progesterona/administração & dosagem , Progesterona/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Espanha , ItáliaRESUMO
Obesity is not a choice or a result of lack of willpower, but a multifactorial, chronic, progressive, and relapsing disease. During menopause, hormonal and body composition changes lead to greater visceral adiposity, that aggravates women's health at a cardiometabolic, mechanic and mental level. Adiposity has been identified as an important modifier of reproductive hormones. During female midlife, obesity has been associated with menstrual cycle alterations (anovulatory cycles ending with abnormal bleedings), menopausal symptoms including hot flashes, poor quality of sleep, aches and joint pain, genitourinary symptoms, and reduced quality of life. However, the relationships between weight, the menopausal process, aging, and hormone levels remain poorly understood. Women with obesity have an increased risk of thromboembolic disease when using menopause hormone therapy (MHT), and it is probably the main medical condition to prescribe or not MHT. However, this risk depends on the route and type of MHT. The use of estrogen-only or combined transdermal MHT does not increase the risk of a thrombotic event in women with obesity.
Assuntos
Menopausa , Qualidade de Vida , Feminino , Humanos , Saúde da Mulher , Fogachos/etiologia , Obesidade/complicações , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of ultra-low dose estradiol and dydrogesterone (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg) among postmenopausal women. Methods: This pooled analysis of data from three clinical studies assessed the effects of continuous combined ultra-low-dose estradiol and dydrogesterone among postmenopausal women. Participants received E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 13 weeks (double-blind, randomized, European study), E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, randomized, Chinese study), or E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg for 52 weeks (open-label, European study). Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs), treatment discontinuation due to a TEAE, and adverse events of special interest (AESIs). Results: Overall, 1027 women were included in the pooled analysis (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg, n = 736; placebo, n = 291). Mean treatment exposure was 288.9 days in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group and 86.6 days in the placebo group. The proportion of women experiencing ≥1 TEAE was similar in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and placebo groups (50.1% vs 49.5%, respectively). TESAEs occurred in 12 (1.6%) women receiving E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg and 9 (3.1%) women receiving placebo. Discontinuation of study treatment was infrequent in both groups (E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg: 1.5%; placebo: 2.4%). The occurrence of breast pain was more common in the E0.5 mg/D2.5 mg group than in the placebo group (2.0% vs 0.3%) as was uterine hemorrhage (6.5% vs 2.4%). The incidence of acne, hypertrichoses and weight increased was similar between groups. Conclusions: Across three studies, ultra-low-dose estradiol plus dydrogesterone was well tolerated among postmenopausal women, with no increase in TEAEs or TESAEs compared with placebo.
Assuntos
Didrogesterona , Estradiol , Pós-Menopausa , Humanos , Didrogesterona/administração & dosagem , Didrogesterona/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Estradiol/administração & dosagem , Estradiol/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Método Duplo-Cego , Idoso , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/métodos , Terapia de Reposição de Estrogênios/efeitos adversos , Progestinas/administração & dosagem , Progestinas/efeitos adversos , Fogachos/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Importance: Safe and effective nonhormonal treatments for menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are needed. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of moderate to severe menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two randomized double-blind phase 3 trials (OASIS 1 and 2) included postmenopausal participants aged 40 to 65 years experiencing moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (OASIS 1: 77 sites in the US, Europe, and Israel from August 27, 2021, to November 27, 2023, and OASIS 2: 77 sites in the US, Canada, and Europe from October 29, 2021, to October 10, 2023). Intervention: Once daily oral elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 26 weeks or matching placebo for 12 weeks followed by elinzanetant, 120 mg, for 14 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points included mean change in frequency and severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms from baseline to weeks 4 and 12, measured by the electronic hot flash daily diary. Secondary end points included Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b total T score and Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire total score from baseline to week 12. Results: Eligible participants (mean [SD] age, OASIS 1: 54.6 [4.9] years; OASIS 2: 54.6 [4.8] years) were randomized to elinzanetant (OASIS 1: n = 199; OASIS 2: n = 200) or placebo (OASIS 1: n = 197; OASIS 2: n = 200). A total of 309 (78.0%) and 324 (81.0%) completed OASIS 1 and 2, respectively. For the elinzanetant and placebo groups, the baseline mean (SD) VMS per 24 hours were 13.4 (6.6) vs 14.3 (13.9) (OASIS 1) and 14.7 (11.1) v 16.2 (11.2) (OASIS 2). Baseline VMS severity was 2.6 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 1) and 2.5 (0.2) vs 2.5 (0.2) (OASIS 2). Elinzanetant significantly reduced VMS frequency at week 4 (OASIS 1: -3.3 [95% CI, -4.5 to -2.1], P < .001; OASIS 2: -3.0 [95% CI, -4.4 to -1.7], P < .001) and at week 12 (OASIS 1: -3.2 [95% CI, -4.8 to -1.6], P < .001; OASIS 2: -3.2 [95% CI, -4.6 to -1.9], P < .001). Elinzanetant also improved VMS severity at week 4 (OASIS 1: -0.3 [95% CI, -0.4 to -0.2], P < .001; OASIS 2: -0.2 [95 CI, -0.3 to -0.1], P < .001) and week 12 (OASIS 1: -0.4 [95% CI, -0.5 to -0.3], P < .001; OASIS 2: -0.3 [95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1], P < .001). Elinzanetant improved sleep disturbances and menopause-related quality of life at week 12, and the safety profile was favorable. Conclusions and Relevance: Elinzanetant was well tolerated and efficacious for moderate to severe menopausal VMS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: OASIS 1: NCT05042362, OASIS 2: NCT05099159.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Scrutinizing, among potential providers and users, the perceived claim and interest for over the counter (OTC) accessibility of a progestogen-only pill (POP). METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive study based on an online survey of 1000 women and 100 pharmacists in Italy, part of a larger sample including Germany and Spain. RESULTS: Hormonal contraceptive methods are used by 35%; 5% of women reported currently not using contraception, 40% using a barrier method, and 20% a method considered less effective than male condoms (including 16% withdrawal and 4% natural methods and fertility/contraceptive applications). Almost 80% of women felt knowledgeable about the different contraceptive method, but about 1/3 had experienced difficulty accessing their oral contraceptive (OC) in the past two years. Women reacted positively to the proposition of an OTC-POP and 85% agreed that they would discuss the decision to buy it with their doctor; 75% reported they would continue to see their doctor for other reproductive health issues, including screening. The most frequent barrier is cost (reported by 25-33% of women) followed by long waiting times for doctor appointments and lack of personal time to schedule an appointment.Pharmacists (66%) would be likely/fairly likely to recommend the POP after appropriate training, agreeing that the benefits of an OTC-POP included improved access for women, saving them time and giving them more independence. CONCLUSIONS: Potential users of contraception in Italy have a positive attitude toward OTC-POP, with doctors continuing to have a relevant role. Following training, pharmacists are also positive.
Assuntos
Farmacêuticos , Progestinas , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais Orais , ItáliaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the attitudes to change the frequency of menstrual bleeding by using combined hormonal contraception (CHC). Personality characteristics were also explored. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in two university hospitals in northern Italy. Current, past and never CHC users (n = 545; age 18-44 years) completed a self-administered semi-structured questionnaire and the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). RESULTS: Forty-five percent of responders (n = 301) would prefer to change their bleeding frequency by using CHC. A flexible regimen was the preferred choice (n = 80; 33%) followed by extended regimens to bleed every 3 months (n = 54; 22%) or to never bleed (n = 43; 18%). The main positive reasons were to avoid dysmenorrhea (43%) and have more freedom in sexual (36%) and active (35%) life, whereas the main reason for a negative attitude was 'menstrual rhythm is natural' (59%). Age had a significant influence on women's willingness to change menstrual frequency by using CHC [>39 years (57%), 30-39 years (31%) and <30 years (46%)] (χ2: 9.1; p = 0.01). Never users significantly reported a more negative attitude (71%) in comparison with past (51%) and current users (49%) (χ2: 18.7; p = 0.001). Personality traits played a role, with higher scores of openness (p = 0.005) and extraversion (p = 0.001) in women with a positive attitude. CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of our study sample reported a preference for changing their menstrual pattern by using CHC. Flexibility was the preferred choice across age and use of CHC. Personality characteristics (openness and extroversion) might influence attitudes toward CHC-induced menstrual bleeding changes.
Assuntos
Contracepção Hormonal , Menstruação , Feminino , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Itália/epidemiologia , Personalidade , AnticoncepçãoRESUMO
Oral contraceptives are among the most commonly used contraceptive methods. However, Italian women underused reliable hormonal contraceptives as compared with other European women. There is a need to streamline access to oral contraception, with expected benefits on emotional well-being of women and potential savings for health system in Italy. Indeed, women can only access to oral contraceptives through mandatory medical prescription. This is one of the most important barrier experienced by women. We hereby provide an expert opinion on the potential reclassification, extending pharmacy services to include responsible and appropriate use of POP, as an opportunity also in Italy to increase the use of safe and effective contraceptive methods.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Prova Pericial , Feminino , Humanos , Anticoncepcionais Orais , Itália , EmoçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to identify women likely to be severely impacted by vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), based on their experience of symptoms and non-clinical factors. METHODS: Multivariate statistics and machine-learning algorithms were used to develop models using data from a cross-sectional, observational, multinational European survey. A set of independent variables were chosen to assess subjective VVA severity and its impact on daily activities. RESULTS: A final composite model was selected that included three categories of variables: clinical severity, patient demographics/clinical characteristics and Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging (DIVA) variables related to emotion/mood, impact on lifestyle and frequency of sex. The model accurately classified 71% of women. Three DIVA variables (feeling bad about yourself, desire/interest in sex, physical comfort related to sitting) explained much of the variation in the dependent variable of the model. Over 90% of the impact of VVA relates to certain psychosocial and behavioral aspects that can be identified without the need to consider physical signs/symptoms. CONCLUSION: Non-clinical factors can contribute significantly to the overall VVA burden.Questions used in developing the composite model could form the basis of an instrument to help screen women prior to clinical consultation and improve VVA management.
Assuntos
Pós-Menopausa , Doenças Vaginais , Feminino , Humanos , Atrofia/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Pós-Menopausa/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Vagina/patologia , Doenças Vaginais/diagnóstico , Doenças Vaginais/patologia , Vulva/patologiaRESUMO
Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) has a strong genetic component, but, in most cases, the etiology remains unidentified. PSMC3IP is an autosomal recessive gene for POI and ovarian dysgenesis, and so far, biallelic mutations in this gene have been described in only four independent families, with all affected members showing primary amenorrhea. Here, we report on the first family with recessive variants in the PSMC3IP gene and POI in a patient with secondary amenorrhea. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on a 29-year-old woman with secondary amenorrhea and POI; she was found to carry compound heterozygous variants in the PSMC3IP gene: c.206_208delAGA and c.189 G > T. Her younger sister, who also presented with a suspect of POI due to infertility and very low levels of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH), was found to carry the same PSMC3IP variants. Our case report shows the importance to include PSMC3IP in designed POI NGS panels or in WES/WGS studies in patients with either primary or secondary amenorrhea.
Assuntos
Amenorreia , Insuficiência Ovariana Primária , Adulto , Amenorreia/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Mutação , Proteínas Nucleares/genética , Insuficiência Ovariana Primária/genética , Transativadores/genética , Sequenciamento do ExomaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Available evidence highlights unmet needs in contraceptive counselling practices. This study aimed to understand current practises and clinician behaviour across Europe. METHODS: A novel, online approach was used to simulate contraceptive counselling discussions based on three, predefined patient types with a hidden need: poor compliance (patient X), headaches (Y) or desire for a hormone-free option (Z). Clinicians were asked to provide guidance about a contraceptive method for their randomly assigned patient at two time points: (1) after a simulated discussion, (2) after seeing a full patient profile. Descriptive statistical analyses included evaluation of the clinicians' counselling approach and a change in contraceptive recommendation thereof. RESULTS: Out of 661 clinicians from 10 participating European countries, including obstetricians/gynaecologists, midwives and general practitioners, most failed to uncover patient X and Y's hidden needs (78.8% and 70.5%, respectively), whereas, 63.4% of clinicians uncovered patient Z's hidden need. Clinicians who uncovered their patients' hidden needs asked significantly more questions than those who did not (range of mean, 5.1-7.8 vs 1.5-2.2 respectively). Clinicians were more likely to recommend a change of prescription after seeing the full patient profile than after the simulated discussion (increase in prescription change, range: 12.3-30.2%), indicating that clinicians rely on patients speaking up proactively about any concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient existing counselling practices result in missed opportunities for shared decision-making and discussion. Clinicians and contraceptive counselling services should empower women by introducing more in-depth contraceptive counselling, incorporating clear, open-ended questions, to improve patient adherence and enhance reproductive planning.
Assuntos
Anticoncepção , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar , Anticoncepção/métodos , Anticoncepcionais , Aconselhamento/métodos , Serviços de Planejamento Familiar/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To explore the perceived need and enthusiasm for over the counter (OTC) progestogen-only pills (POP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey of 1000 sexually active women (16-45) and 100 pharmacists in Germany, Italy and Spain. RESULTS: Despite not wanting to conceive, 5-6% of women in each country were not using contraception and 8-20% were using methods less effective than condoms. At least 74% of respondents felt knowledgeable about the different contraceptives available but at least 1/3 had experienced difficulty accessing oral contraceptive (OCs) in the past two years. The cost of contraceptives, the need to see a doctor and long waits for appointments were cited as barriers for not using OCs. The majority agreed they would discuss with their doctor the decision to buy the POP, consult about side effects and other reproductive health issues. Over 2/3 of pharmacists in each country would be very, or fairly, likely to recommend the POP, agreeing that the benefits included improved access for women, and offered them more independence. CONCLUSIONS: Asked directly, women in Germany, Spain and Italy currently using contraception are positive about a POP OTC. Pharmacists are also positive, with the overwhelming majority in favour of providing POPs.
Assuntos
Farmacêuticos , Progestinas , Feminino , Humanos , Espanha , Anticoncepcionais Orais , Alemanha , Medicamentos sem Prescrição , Inquéritos e Questionários , ItáliaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Vulvo-Vaginal Atrophy (VVA) affects about fifty percent of postmenopausal women, contributing more vulnerable sexual and psycho-relational equilibrium. To date, no psychometric instruments have been designed to assess the impact of coital pain associated with VVA on sexual quality of life. AIM: To validate a new psychometric tool, the Gynogram, able to investigate coital pain and to quantify its impact on sexual well-being in menopause. METHODS: 214 sexually active postmenopausal women were enrolled in the study during clinical consultations in gynecological outpatient clinics in Italy. After gynecological examination and evaluation of the presence of VVA, the study sample was divided in a clinical group (103 women with certified diagnosis of VVA) and in a control group (111 women without certified diagnosis of VVA) according to the Vaginal Health Index (VHI) cut-off. Factor, Reliability and Receiving Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis were performed in order to validate our newly created Gynogram. OUTCOMES: A structured questionnaire, named Gynogram, to assess coital pain and its impact, and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). RESULTS: The factor analysis performed on the original form (80 items) reduced the Gynogram to 24 items. Reliability analysis conducted with Cronbach's Alpha coefficients showed high values in all the components (ranging from .813 to .972), both in the long and in the short form. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the Gynogram, with a cut-off ≤93, is able to recognize a clinically significant coital pain. With respect to the FSFI, statistically significant differences were found for all the domains. In addition, statistically significant differences were found for all the twelve factors of the Gynogram, showing that VVA profoundly affects the sexual quality of life of women in post-menopause. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: The utility of this tool consists in the possibility to improve prognosis, compliance/adherence and treatment outcomes. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The Gynogram is able to evaluate and to quantify the impact of coital pain associated with VVA. Moreover, it can also recognize the areas of biopsychosocial functioning being more affected by this clinical condition. The main limit of the study is the impossibility to evaluate both mental health and partner's general and sexual health. CONCLUSIONS: The Gynogram is a new and validated psychometric tool able to detect the impact of symptomatic VVA on sexual quality of life among post-menopausal women, with a specific focus on the different areas of sexual functioning. Nappi RE, Graziottin A, Mollaioli A, et al. The Gynogram: A Multicentric Validation of a New Psychometric Tool to Assess Coital Pain Associated With VVA and Its Impact on Sexual Quality of Life in Menopausal Women. J Sex Med 2021;18:955-965.