Three-Dimensional Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVES: To compare participant performance and preference in the use of three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) endoscopy. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Medline, ClinicalKey, BMJ Case Reports, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for English-language articles published between 2005 and 2020. Studies reporting comparisons of outcomes between 3D and 2D endoscopes were identified. Data relating to performance-related outcomes, as well as the participants' preferred endoscope were extracted, and pooled using meta-analysis models. RESULTS: Ten studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. Six studies reported results of participants completing simulated tasks with endoscopes, while four reported full procedures. Peg transfer tasks (n = 4 cohorts) were found to be completed significantly faster with the 3D versus 2D endoscope (pooled mean difference 6.8 seconds, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-11.3), while no significant difference in times taken was observed for touch tasks (n = 4; pooled mean difference 3.7 seconds, 95% CI: -1.9 to 9.2). The secondary outcome of participant preference was reported by five studies, in which a significant preference for the 3D endoscope was observed (P = .010), with a pooled total of 72% (95% CI: 59-83) of participants preferring this to the 2D endoscope. CONCLUSIONS: There is a growing body of evidence in support of 3D visualization in endoscopy. We have demonstrated 3D endoscopy to be associated with a significantly shorter time to performing simulated, reproducible and controlled tasks, and to be the preference of participants. This study provides grounds for further evaluation of the technology, and the potential for a greater widespread use. Laryngoscope, 132:1895-1903, 2022.

Metal-Working Fluids Exposure and a Rare Frontoethmoid Lesion.

This case report describes a unique nasal mass that was difficult to diagnose clinically and histologically. The patient was a middle-aged man employed as a metalworker, and he presented with a unilateral nasal obstruction and a mass arising from the right middle meatus. After a series of investigations, he underwent right-sided sphenoethmoidectomy with excision of a nasal lesion. The surgical specimen presented a major diagnostic challenge for the pathologists and clinicians involved. A series of discussions amongst two different head and neck expert teams combined with detailed clinicopathological correlation resulted in a diagnosis of a granulomatous lesion or pseudotumour related to the ingestion of water-soluble cutting oils, or "Suds oil," as they are more commonly called. Although occupational exposures to certain inhalants, such as wood dust and formaldehyde, are well-known risk factors for sinonasal lesions, here we present a rare association between a sinonasal lesion and another inhalant, Suds oil, that has not been previously reported in the literature.

Vocal fold medialization-A 5-year series of single surgeon consecutive medialization with review of literature.

INTRODUCTION: ENT UK released guidelines in 2010 detailing the requisite structure for the creation of a laryngeal intervention clinic. The senior author's practice is the only one regionally that offers this service, and our objective was to review this to determine whether vocal cord medialization injections were showing an improvement in quality of voice for patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were reviewed in a specialist voice clinic prior to being offered vocal cord injection under local anaesthetic in a separate dedicated weekly clinic. They would be assessed by the senior author and a dedicated voice specialist speech and language therapist (SALT). This would include a preinjection grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS), Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10, and the measuring of maximum phonation time (MPT) with the aid of Opera Vox Apple iPad application. RESULTS: Data were available for 186 injections, on patients with a median age of 66 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-75), of whom 61% were male. VHI-10 score improved significantly, from a mean of 26.7 to 12.5 (P < .001). A significant improvement in MPT was also observed, from a median of 3.0 to 6.3 (N = 66, P < .001). Improvements in all components of the GRBAS score were also observed (all P < .001), with between 43% and 88% of cases reporting reductions after the procedure. Patients receiving a repeat procedure saw a significantly smaller improvement in VHI-10 than those where it was the primary treatment (mean reduction: 9.8 vs 15.5, P = .018). Analysis of MPT found a significant correlation between the quantity of injection material used and the degree of improvement observed (rho = 0.355, P = .004). CONCLUSION: Vocal Cord local anaesthetic medialization injection is a swift, safe, and effective short-term method of improving dysphonia.

Riedel's Procedure: A Modification to Obliterate Step Defect.

Sinus surgery was first introduced by the ancient Egyptians. In 1750 was the first modern description of frontal sinus surgery. In 1898, Riedel advocated complete removal of the anterior table and floor of the frontal sinus while simultaneously stripping the mucosa. The major postoperative issue involved gross forehead deformity. We aim to provide a modification to reduce the postoperative "step" defect. Riedel's procedure is an effective way of managing frontal sinus disease when endoscopic surgery has repetitively failed. Use of a pedicled pericranial/galeal soft tissue flap can effectively reduce cosmetic deformity postoperatively.

Three-dimensional endoscopy: The future of nasoendoscopic training.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy is an emerging tool in surgery that provides real-time depth perception. Its benefits have been investigated in surgical training, but the current literature lacks significant objective outcome data. We aimed to objectively compare the efficacy of two-dimensional (2D) versus 3D high-definition endoscopes in novice users. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized crossover study. METHODS: Ninety-two novice medical students who used both 2D and 3D endoscopes to complete two validated tasks in a box trainer participated in the study. Time taken and error rates were measured, and subjective data were collected. RESULTS: Wilcoxon tests showed 3D technology was significantly faster than 2D (78 vs. 95 seconds, P = .004), and errors per task were significantly lower (3 vs. 5, P < .001). Sixty-nine percent of participants preferred the 3D endoscope. CONCLUSIONS: 3D high-definition endoscopy could be instrumental in training the next generation of endoscopic surgeons. Further research is required in a clinical setting. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 129:1280-1285, 2019.

Correction of the Over-resected Nose.

Overzealous reduction during rhinoplasty may result in manifold functional as well as aesthetic injuries to the nose and is a prevailing antecedent of revision rhinoplasty. Although challenges for the revision rhinoplasty surgeon abound, careful assessment of the anatomic deficiencies of the nose, accurate evaluation and management of a patient's expectations, and precise planning and execution of surgical technique serve to facilitate a successful result. Contemporary techniques for correction of the over-resected nose are discussed, with special attention directed toward costal cartilage grafting and diced cartilage fascia techniques.

Breadth and Depth: Three-Dimensional Endoscopic Field of View: Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Endoscopic Field of View.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) endoscopy is an emerging tool in ear-nose-throat (ENT) and skull base surgery with the benefit of providing real-time depth perception. Several investigators have reported that the field of view (FOV) is reduced in 3D endoscopes compared with regular 2-dimensional (2D) endoscopes. Thus, we objectively compared the FOV of 2D and 3D endoscopes. METHODS: Using a standard 2D and 2 different 3D ENT endoscopes, images were captured of 1-mm graph paper from a set distance of 6 cm. The FOV was calculated from these images and compared among the endoscopes. RESULTS: The VisionSense 3D endoscope had a slightly smaller FOV (9.1 cm vs. 10.1 cm; -9.9%), and the Karl Storz 3D endoscope showed a slightly larger FOV (10.4 cm vs. 10.1 cm; +3.0%). However, the results were complicated by the different-shaped images produced by the 3D endoscopes. CONCLUSION: The differences in the FOV between the 2D and 3D endoscopes used in ENT surgery were not clinically significant. Thus, the FOV should not be considered a limitation of 3D technology.

Endoscopic training-is the future three-dimensional?

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic surgery has a distinct disadvantage compared to direct vision: loss of binocular vision. Three-dimensional endoscopy has been welcomed due to the promise of improving stereopsis. METHODS: Prospective randomized study of junior doctors with minimal endoscopic experience, using both two-dimensional and three-dimensional, zero-degree, 4-mm Storz endoscopes. Data was collected using validated, standardized training models, both objectively and subjectively. Paired comparisons between variables relating to the endoscopes were performed using Wilcoxon's tests. Operators were then split into groups based on their endoscope preference, with comparisons made using Mann-Whitney tests for Likert scale responses, Kendall's tau for ordinal variables, and Fisher's exact tests for nominal variables. RESULTS: Reduction of field of vision of three-dimensional endoscopy by 2%. Significant findings included decreased past-pointing, improved depth and perception and image quality. CONCLUSION: The use of an endoscopic endonasal approach with three-dimensional technology has measurable advantages for novice users, and highlights potential tailoring of future surgical training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.

Capsular contracture - What are the risk factors? A 14 year series of 1400 consecutive augmentations.

The modern era of breast augmentation and reconstruction began in 1963, with the introduction of silicone implants by Cronin and Gerow. To date, the demand for cosmetic augmentation continues to increase exponentially. However, whilst the surgical techniques and quality of mammary prosthesis have improved dramatically in recent years, patients are still confronted with significant potential complications. We performed a retrospective study of 1400 consecutive primary breast augmentations performed between March 1995 and March 2009 by a single surgeon. We specifically examined the incidence of capsular contracture and the possible causative factors. Follow up ranged from 1 to 16 years. The mean age at the time of surgery was 32.8 years and fill volume was between 195 ml and 800 ml. Our capsular contracture rate was in the order of 26.9%. BMI >30, fill volumes >350 ml, smoking and alcohol consumption did not significantly increase capsular contracture rate. Implant type, pregnancy, infection and delayed haematoma significantly increased the risk of capsular contracture. Our series has given us a unique insight into the frequency of capsular contracture and identified several risk factors. To our knowledge, this is the first report of pregnancy having a significant effect on capsular contracture. We now counsel patients thoroughly into the detrimental effects of pregnancy on the implant.