World Health Organization repository of systematic reviews on interventions in environment, climate change and health: a new resource for decision makers, intervention implementers, and researchers.

To facilitate the use of the mounting evidence on how human health is inextricably linked to the health of the planet and the urgent need for measures against the escalating triple planetary crisis, the WHO has developed a repository of systematic reviews on interventions in the area of environment, climate change and health (ECH). This commentary introduces the repository, describes its rationale and development, and points to potential future evolutions. The repository aims to provide a user-friendly tool for quickly finding systematic reviews and meta-analyses on specific ECH topics. The spreadsheet includes details on each systematic review, such as population, intervention type, control group, outcomes, and location, among other information. This supports effective assessment of the available evidence, potentially informing policy decisions across various sectors. The repository is a resource for anyone interested in the interlinkages between health and environment and is also targeted at decision makers, intervention implementers and researchers in order to identify priority issues and support evidence-based action. Furthermore, it can be used to identify areas in need of greater research. Additionally, systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness are often used for setting general guidelines and standards, for choosing the most promising intervention in a certain situation and for calculating the disease burden attributable to a specific environmental risk.

A life-course approach to health: synergy with sustainable development goals.

A life-course approach to health encompasses strategies across individuals' lives that optimize their functional ability (taking into account the interdependence of individual, social, environmental, temporal and intergenerational factors), thereby enabling well-being and the realization of rights. The approach is a perfect fit with efforts to achieve universal health coverage and meet the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Properly applied, a life-course approach can increase the effectiveness of the former and help realize the vision of the latter, especially in ensuring health and well-being for all at all ages. Its implementation requires a shared understanding by individuals and societies of how health is shaped by multiple factors throughout life and across generations. Most studies have focused on noncommunicable disease and ageing populations in high-income countries and on epidemiological, theoretical and clinical issues. The aim of this article is to show how the life-course approach to health can be extended to all age groups, health topics and countries by building on a synthesis of existing scientific evidence, experience in different countries and advances in health strategies and programmes. A conceptual framework for the approach is presented along with implications for implementation in the areas of: (i) policy and investment; (ii) health services and systems; (iii) local, multisectoral and multistakeholder action; and (iv) measurement, monitoring and research. The SDGs provide a unique context for applying a holistic, multisectoral approach to achieving transformative outcomes for people, prosperity and the environment. A life-course approach can reinforce these efforts, particularly given its emphasis on rights and equity.

Une approche sanitaire fondée sur le parcours de vie englobe des stratégies tout au long de la vie des individus qui optimisent leur capacité fonctionnelle (en prenant en compte l'interdépendance de facteurs individuels, sociaux, environnementaux, temporels et intergénérationnels), assurant ainsi le bien-être et l'exercice des droits. Cette approche s'inscrit parfaitement dans les efforts déployés pour parvenir à une couverture sanitaire universelle et atteindre les objectifs de développement durable (ODD). Lorsqu'elle est correctement appliquée, une approche fondée sur le parcours de vie peut accroître l'efficacité de la première et aider à concrétiser l'ambition des seconds, en assurant notamment la santé et le bien-être pour tous à tous les âges. Sa mise en œuvre exige une compréhension commune par les individus et les sociétés de la manière dont la santé est façonnée par de multiples facteurs tout au long de la vie et d'une génération à l'autre. La plupart des études réalisées ont porté sur des maladies non transmissibles et le vieillissement des populations dans les pays à revenu élevé, ainsi que sur des aspects épidémiologiques, théoriques et cliniques. L'objectif de cet article est de montrer que l'approche sanitaire fondée sur le parcours de vie peut être élargie à toutes les tranches d'âge, toutes les questions de santé et tous les pays en s'appuyant sur une synthèse des données scientifiques existantes, les expériences de différents pays et l'avancement des stratégies et programmes en matière de santé. Un cadre conceptuel de l'approche est présenté ainsi que les conséquences de sa mise en œuvre sur: (i) la politique et l'investissement; (ii) les services et systèmes de santé; (iii) les actions locales, multisectorielles et multipartites; et (iv) les mesures, la surveillance et la recherche. Les ODD fournissent un contexte unique pour l'application d'une approche globale et multisectorielle en vue d'obtenir des résultats porteurs de transformation pour les individus, la prospérité et l'environnement. Une approche fondée sur le parcours de vie peut renforcer ces efforts, notamment parce qu'elle met l'accent sur les droits et l'équité.

Un enfoque basado en la salud para toda la vida engloba estrategias durante la vida de las personas, que optimizan su capacidad funcional (teniendo en cuenta la interdependencia de los factores individuales, sociales, ambientales, temporales e intergeneracionales), permitiendo así el bienestar y la realización de los derechos. El enfoque encaja perfectamente con los esfuerzos por lograr una cobertura sanitaria universal y cumplir los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS). Si se aplica correctamente, un enfoque para toda la vida puede aumentar la eficacia del primero y ayudar a alcanzar la visión de este último, especialmente para garantizar la salud y el bienestar en todas las edades. Su aplicación requiere una comprensión compartida entre individuos y sociedades sobre cómo la salud depende de múltiples factores presentes a lo largo de la vida y entre generaciones. La mayoría de los estudios se han centrado en las enfermedades no contagiosas, en el envejecimiento de la población en los países con ingresos altos y en cuestiones epidemiológicas, teóricas y clínicas. El objetivo de este artículo es mostrar cómo el enfoque basado en la salud para toda la vida se puede extender a todos los grupos de edades, temas de salud y países, mediante la creación de una síntesis de las pruebas científicas existentes, la experiencia en diferentes países y los avances en estrategias y programas de salud. Se presenta un marco conceptual del enfoque junto con las implicaciones para la aplicación en los siguientes campos: (i) política e inversión; (ii) servicios y sistemas de salud; (iii) acción local, multisectorial y de varias partes interesadas; y (iv) medición, supervisión e investigación. Los ODS proporcionan un contexto único para aplicar un enfoque holístico y multisectorial a fin de alcanzar unos resultados transformadores para las personas, la prosperidad y el medio ambiente. Un enfoque para toda la vida puede intensificar estos esfuerzos, sobre todo por su énfasis en los derechos y la equidad.

Development and validation of a multivariate prediction model for patients with acute pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Development and validation of a multivariate prediction model for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) admitted in Intensive Care Units (ICU). METHODS: A prospective multicenter observational study, in 1 year period, in 46 international ICUs (EPAMI study). PATIENTS: adults admitted to an ICU with AP and at least one organ failure. INTERVENTIONS: Development of a multivariate prediction model, using the worst data of the stay in ICU, based in multivariate analysis, simple imputation in a development cohort. The model was validated in another cohort. RESULTS: 374 patients were included (mortality of 28.9%). Variables with statistical significance in multivariate analysis were age, no alcoholic and no biliary etiology, development of shock, development of respiratory failure, need of continuous renal replacement therapy, and intra-abdominal pressure. The model created with these variables presented an AUC of ROC curve of 0.90 (CI 95% 0.81-0.94) in the validation cohort. We developed a multivariable prediction model, and AP cases could be classified as low mortality risk (between 2 and 9.5 points, mortality of 1.35%), moderate mortality risk (between 10 and 12.5 points, 28.92% of mortality), and high mortality risk (13 points of more, mortality of 88.37%). Our model presented better AUC of ROC curve than APACHE II (0.91 vs 0.80) and SOFA in the first 24 h (0.91 vs 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a multivariate prediction model, which can be applied in any moment of the stay in ICU, with better discriminatory power than APACHE II and SOFA in the first 24 h.

Indicators linking health and sustainability in the post-2015 development agenda.

The UN-led discussion about the post-2015 sustainable development agenda provides an opportunity to develop indicators and targets that show the importance of health as a precondition for and an outcome of policies to promote sustainable development. Health as a precondition for development has received considerable attention in terms of achievement of health-related Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), addressing growing challenges of non-communicable diseases, and ensuring universal health coverage. Much less attention has been devoted to health as an outcome of sustainable development and to indicators that show both changes in exposure to health-related risks and progress towards environmental sustainability. We present a rationale and methods for the selection of health-related indicators to measure progress of post-2015 development goals in non-health sectors. The proposed indicators show the ancillary benefits to health and health equity (co-benefits) of sustainable development policies, particularly those to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase resilience to environmental change. We use illustrative examples from four thematic areas: cities, food and agriculture, energy, and water and sanitation. Embedding of a range of health-related indicators in the post-2015 goals can help to raise awareness of the probable health gains from sustainable development policies, thus making them more attractive to decision makers and more likely to be implemented than before.

Comparison Between Revised Atlanta Classification and Determinant-Based Classification for Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine. Why Do Not Use a Modified Determinant-Based Classification?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the classification performance of the Revised Atlanta Classification, the Determinant-Based Classification, and a new modified Determinant-Based Classification according to observed mortality and morbidity. DESIGN: A prospective multicenter observational study conducted in 1-year period. SETTING: Forty-six international ICUs (Epidemiology of Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine study). PATIENTS: Admitted to an ICU with acute pancreatitis and at least one organ failure. INTERVENTIONS: Modified Determinant-Based Classification included four categories: In group 1, patients with transient organ failure and without local complications; in group 2, patients with transient organ failure and local complications; in group 3, patients with persistent organ failure and without local complications; and in group 4, patients with persistent organ failure and local complications. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were included (mortality rate of 28.9%). When modified Determinant-Based Classification was applied, patients in group 1 presented low mortality (2.26%) and morbidity (5.38%), patients in group 2 presented low mortality (6.67%) and high morbidity (60.71%), patients in group 3 presented high mortality (41.46%) and low morbidity (8.33%), and patients in group 4 presented high mortality (59.09%) and morbidity (88.89%). The area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of modified Determinant-Based Classification for mortality was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.77-0.85), with significant differences in comparison to Revised Atlanta Classification (0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.81; p < 0.01), and Determinant-Based Classification (0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81; p < 0.01). For morbidity, the area under the curve of modified Determinant-Based Classification was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86), with significant differences in comparison to Revised Atlanta Classification (0.63, 95% CI, 0.57-0.70; p < 0.01), but not in comparison to Determinant-Based Classification (0.81, 95% CI, 0.74-0.88; nonsignificant). CONCLUSION: Modified Determinant-Based Classification identified four groups with different clinical presentation in patients with acute pancreatitis in ICU, with better discriminatory power in comparison to Determinant-Based Classification and Revised Atlanta Classification.

Assessing the impact of drinking water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings: systematic review and meta-regression.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of inadequate water and sanitation on diarrhoeal disease in low- and middle-income settings. METHODS: The search strategy used Cochrane Library, MEDLINE & PubMed, Global Health, Embase and BIOSIS supplemented by screening of reference lists from previously published systematic reviews, to identify studies reporting on interventions examining the effect of drinking water and sanitation improvements in low- and middle-income settings published between 1970 and May 2013. Studies including randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised trials with control group, observational studies using matching techniques and observational studies with a control group where the intervention was well defined were eligible. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Ottawa-Newcastle scale. Study results were combined using meta-analysis and meta-regression to derive overall and intervention-specific risk estimates. RESULTS: Of 6819 records identified for drinking water, 61 studies met the inclusion criteria, and of 12,515 records identified for sanitation, 11 studies were included. Overall, improvements in drinking water and sanitation were associated with decreased risks of diarrhoea. Specific improvements, such as the use of water filters, provision of high-quality piped water and sewer connections, were associated with greater reductions in diarrhoea compared with other interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that inadequate water and sanitation are associated with considerable risks of diarrhoeal disease and that there are notable differences in illness reduction according to the type of improved water and sanitation implemented.

Burden of disease from inadequate water, sanitation and hygiene in low- and middle-income settings: a retrospective analysis of data from 145 countries.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of diarrhoeal diseases from exposure to inadequate water, sanitation and hand hygiene in low- and middle-income settings and provide an overview of the impact on other diseases. METHODS: For estimating the impact of water, sanitation and hygiene on diarrhoea, we selected exposure levels with both sufficient global exposure data and a matching exposure-risk relationship. Global exposure data were estimated for the year 2012, and risk estimates were taken from the most recent systematic analyses. We estimated attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by country, age and sex for inadequate water, sanitation and hand hygiene separately, and as a cluster of risk factors. Uncertainty estimates were computed on the basis of uncertainty surrounding exposure estimates and relative risks. RESULTS: In 2012, 502,000 diarrhoea deaths were estimated to be caused by inadequate drinking water and 280,000 deaths by inadequate sanitation. The most likely estimate of disease burden from inadequate hand hygiene amounts to 297,000 deaths. In total, 842,000 diarrhoea deaths are estimated to be caused by this cluster of risk factors, which amounts to 1.5% of the total disease burden and 58% of diarrhoeal diseases. In children under 5 years old, 361,000 deaths could be prevented, representing 5.5% of deaths in that age group. CONCLUSIONS: This estimate confirms the importance of improving water and sanitation in low- and middle-income settings for the prevention of diarrhoeal disease burden. It also underscores the need for better data on exposure and risk reductions that can be achieved with provision of reliable piped water, community sewage with treatment and hand hygiene.

Climate change and health: three grand challenges.

Climate change may be the greatest health threat of the twenty-first century, impacting lives both directly and indirectly, through undermining the environmental and social determinants of health. Rapid action to decarbonize economies and build resilience is justified on health, human rights, environmental and economic grounds. While the necessary health response is wide ranging, it can largely be encapsulated within three grand challenges: (i) promote actions that both reduce carbon emissions and improve health; (ii) build better, more climate-resilient and low-carbon health systems; and (iii) implement public health measures to protect from the range of climate risks to health. The health community can make a unique and powerful contribution, applying its trusted voice to climate leadership and advocacy, providing evidence for action, taking responsibility for climate resilience and decarbonization of healthcare systems, and guiding other sectors whose actions impact substantially on health, carbon emissions and climate resilience.

Suprahepatic Cava Thrombus Due to Wilms Tumor: Technique Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Wilms tumor is a frequent malignant neoplasia in pediatric population. Extension to the inferior vena cava is a complication that occurs in approximately 4%-15% of cases. Surgical techniques derived from the field of adult transplant surgery allow the resection of the tumor with its thrombus extension. In the case of a 6-year-old male patient with a stage III Wilms tumor that originated from the left renal vein, thrombectomy and left radical nephroureterectomy were accomplished without extracorporeal circulation. Surgical technique applied in adult transplant surgery for removal of advanced renal tumors, could be a safe and feasible technique in pediatric population.

Validation of the Modified Determinant-Based Classification for Patients With Acute Pancreatitis in Intensive Care Medicine.

OBJECTIVES: To validate the Modified Determinant-Based Classification (MDBC) system, and compare it with the Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC) and the Determinant-Based Classification (DBC). METHODS: Prospective observational research was conducted in 35 international intensive care units, on patients with acute pancreatitis, and at least 1 organ failure (OF). Patient classification according to the MDBC was as follows: group 1 (transient OF, without local complications [LCs]), group 2 (transient OF and LC), group 3 (persistent OF, without LC), and group 4 (persistent OF and LC). RESULTS: A total of 316 patients were enrolled (mortality of 25.6%). In group 1, patients presented with low mortality (3.31%) and low morbidity (13.68%); in group 2, low mortality (5.26%) and moderate morbidity (55.56%); in group 3, high mortality (32.18%) and moderate morbidity (54.24%); and in group 4, high mortality (53.93%) and high morbidity (97.56%). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for mortality was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.84), with significant differences in comparison to RAC (0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.80) and DBC (0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.83) (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MDBC identified 4 groups with differentiated clinical evolutions. Its tiered mortality rating provided it with better discriminatory power than the DBC and the RAC.