Axillary lymph node recurrence following wire-directed sentinel lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients with biopsy-proven axillary metastases prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy at a safety net medical center.

BACKGROUND: Although sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is feasible, axillary management for patients with pretreatment biopsy-proven axillary metastases and who are clinically node-negative after NAC (ycN0) remains unclear. This retrospective study was performed to determine the rate of axillary lymph node recurrence for such patients who had wire-directed (WD) SLND. METHODS: Patients treated with NAC from 2015 to 2020 had axillary nodes evaluated by pretreatment ultrasound. Core biopsies were done on abnormal nodes, and microclips were placed in nodes during biopsy. For patients with biopsy-proven node metastases who received NAC and were ycN0 by clinical exam, WD SLND was done. Patients with negative nodes on frozen section had WD SLND alone; those with positive nodes had WD SLND plus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). RESULTS: Of 179 patients receiving NAC, 62 were biopsy-proven node-positive pre-NAC and ycN0 post-NAC. Thirty-five (56%) patients were node-negative on frozen section and had WD SLND alone. Twenty-seven (43%) patients had WD SLND + ALND. Forty-seven patients had postoperative regional node irradiation. With median follow-up of 40 months, there were recurrences in 4 (11%) of 35 patients having WD SLND and 5 (19%) of 27 having WD SLND + ALND, but there was only one axillary lymph node recurrence, identified by CT scan. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary node recurrence was very uncommon after WD SLND for patients who had pretreatment biopsy-proven node metastases and were ypN0 after NAC. These patients would be unlikely to derive clinical benefit from the addition of completion ALND to SLND.

Are we overtreating intraductal papillomas?

BACKGROUND: The management of intraductal papillomas (IDPs) diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB) remains controversial regarding whether excision is required. We evaluated whether excision of IDPs might be overtreatment based on a consecutive patient population where all IDPs were routinely excised. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients treated with excision of IDPs at our institution from 2009 to 2016. We evaluated the rate of upgrade of IDPs on CNB and factors predicting for malignant upgrade. RESULTS: Of 153 CNB specimens, 136 (88.9%) were IDPs without atypia and 14 (9.2%) showed atypia. The overall upgrade rate on final pathology was 7.3% with 1.3% for invasive cancer, 2.7% for ductal carcinoma in situ, and 3.3% for atypical ductal hyperplasia. Of the 14 patients with atypia on CNB, two of these patients (14.2%) were found to have ductal carcinoma in situ. In the absence of atypia on CNB, upgrade rates were 1.5% for invasive and 1.5% for in situ carcinoma. Personal history of breast cancer and magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy predicted for malignant upgrade. CONCLUSIONS: IDPs on CNB have a low chance of harboring an occult malignancy. Given the low probability of upgrade to invasive breast cancer, it is reasonable to consider watchful surveillance in the absence of a prior personal history of breast cancer or atypia on CNB.

Comparison of nodal metastasis between BRCA mutation carriers and non-BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates whether nodal status differs between breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations and those confirmed not to harbor mutations. METHODS: A prospective database identified patients with breast cancer who underwent genetic testing and axillary staging. Comparative variables included age, as well as tumor characteristics such as size, grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2-neu), and nodal status. RESULTS: Overall, 235 patients with breast cancer underwent genetic testing for BRCA mutations from June 2000 to May 2012. Of these patients, 74 (31.4 %) were found to express BRCA 1 and/or 2 mutations, and 161 (68.5 %) patients were verified to have no detectable BRCA mutation. Among the entire 235 patients tested, 92 (39.1 %) were found to have nodal disease. In univariable analysis, only LVI and tumor size correlated with presence of nodal metastasis. Of the 74 BRCA mutation carriers, 34 (45.9 %) had nodal metastasis compared with 58 of the 161 (36 %; p = 0.15) patients without a BRCA mutation. BRCA mutation carriers with nodal disease were more likely to have poorly differentiated tumors than those without mutations who had nodal disease (24/33 [72.7 %] vs. 27/57 [47.4 %]; p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: BRCA mutations are not themselves predictive of nodal metastasis. Patients with BRCA mutations did not have a statistically significant higher prevalence of nodal metastasis than those without mutations.

Factors associated with relapse-free survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer at a safety net medical center.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess prognostic factors associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective analysis was performed including clinical, radiographic, and pathologic parameters for all breast cancer patients treated with NAC from 2015 to 2018. All patients had pre-and post-NAC MRI. RESULTS: For 102 patients, median follow-up was 47.4 months, and the five-year RFS was 74%. The 41 (40%) patients who achieved pathologic complete response (pCR) after NAC had a significantly higher five-year RFS than the 61 not achieving pCR. For 31 patients with triple-negative cancers, the five-year RFS was significantly higher in those achieving pCR vs. no pCR. The 44 (43%) patients who achieved radiographic complete response (rCR) after NAC had similar five-year RFS to the 58 (57%) not achieving rCR. CONCLUSION: pCR, node-negativity after NAC, and triple-negative subtype were prognostic factors associated with relapse-free survival after NAC.

JAK2 V617F in myeloid disorders: what do we know now, and where are we headed?

Activating tyrosine kinase (TK) mutations disrupt cellular proliferation and survival pathways and are increasingly recognized as a fundamental cause of human cancers. Until very recently, the only TK mutations widely observed in myeloid neoplasia were the BCR/ABL1 fusions characteristic of chronic myeloid leukemia and some acute leukemias, and FLT3 activating mutations in a minority of acute myeloid leukemias. Several rare TK mutations are found in various atypical myeloproliferative disorders, but big pieces of the pathobiological puzzle were glaringly missing. In the first half of 2005, one gap was filled in: 7 studies identified the same acquired amino acid substitution (V617F) in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) TK in large numbers of patients with diverse clonal myeloid disorders. Most affected patients suffer from the classic BCR/ABL1-negative myeloproliferative disorders (MPD), especially polycythemia vera (74% of n = 506), but a subset of people with essential thrombocythemia (36% of n = 339) or myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (44% of n = 127) bear the identical mutation, as do a few individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or an atypical myeloid disorder (7% of n = 556). This long-sought common mutation in BCR/ABL1-negative MPD raises many provocative biological and clinical questions, and demands re-evaluation of prevailing diagnostic algorithms for erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis. JAK2 V617F may provide novel molecular targets for drug therapy, and suggests other places to seek cooperating mutations or mutations associated with similar phenotypes. The story of this exciting finding will unfold rapidly in the years ahead, and ongoing developments will be important for all hematologists to understand.

A novel 5' ATRX mutation with splicing consequences in acquired alpha thalassemia-myelodysplastic syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Acquired alpha thalassemia (hemoglobin H (HbH) disease) is a rare complication of neoplastic chronic myeloid disorders, especially myelodysplastic syndrome. Acquired HbH has recently been associated with mutations in an X-linked gene, ATRX, previously linked to inherited ATR-X syndrome (alpha thalassemia-retardation-X linked). DESIGN AND METHODS: A Swiss man with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia complicated by various autoimmune disorders and by strikingly microcytic, hypochromic anemia was analyzed for the presence of acquired HbH. After HbH detection, we sought an underlying genetic cause. We used denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography to screen for an ATRX mutation, and measured ATRX expression by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: The patient had 50% HbH-containing cells on supravital staining. Marrow karyotype and the alpha globin cluster were normal. A clonally-restricted ATRX point mutation was detected in the conserved splice donor motif in intron 4 (IVS 4 +2 T-->C). Plasmid vector cloning of patient ATRX cDNA demonstrated both exon 4 skipping and partial intron retention with activation of a cryptic splice site, both outcomes resulting in frameshifts with premature stop codon generation in exon 5 and near-decimation of ATRX expression in myeloid cells. Normal exon 6 alternative splicing was retained. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Intronic ATRX mutations with splicing consequences, uncommon in inherited ATR-X syndrome because of their devastating effect on expression of functional protein, should be routinely sought when undertaking molecular analysis of acquired HbH disease. Detection of an acquired ATRX mutation can help support clonality in karyotypically normal ambiguous myeloid disorders with HbH.