Risk factors for local recurrence of upper extremity desmoid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Upper extremity (UE) desmoid tumors are locally aggressive neoplasms with high recurrence rates. Our study sought to analyze the demographics and treatment strategies of UE desmoid tumors and identify risk factors for recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 52 patients with histologically confirmed UE desmoid tumors treated at our institution between 1990 and 2015 was conducted. Survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model was used for risk factor analysis. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, median age was 40 (29-47) years, 75% were female, and 48% had local recurrence. The median tumor size was 45 (15-111) cm3 on imaging. Twenty-two patients had a previous resection. The most common treatments were surgery alone (50%) and surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy (21%). Tumor size ≥5 cm and tumor volume ≥40 cm3 on imaging were associated with increased recurrence (p = 0.006 and p = 0.005, respectively). Age and sex were not associated with local recurrence. Patients with a tumor size ≥5 cm were 2.6 times more likely to present with recurrence. At the 10-year mark, a lower local recurrence-free survival was seen in patients with tumors ≥5 cm (72.2% vs. 36.3%, p = 0.042) or ≥40 cm3 (67.2% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: In our study, only tumor dimensions appeared to modify recurrence risk.

What Factors Are Associated With Implant Revision in the Treatment of Pathologic Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Limiting reoperation or revision after operative stabilization or endoprosthetic reconstruction of a pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture reduces morbidity, but how best to achieve this remains controversial. Endoprosthetic reconstruction offers durable mechanical stability but may not be most appropriate in patients who are frail or who are not expected to survive more than a few months. For that reason, cumulative incidence survival (looking at the endpoint of reoperation or revision with death as a competing risk) and factors associated with revision after surgical stabilization or reconstruction-both of which remain poorly characterized to date-would help surgeons make better decisions on behalf of these patients. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We analyzed patients who were operatively treated for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture, and we asked: (1) What is the cumulative incidence of reoperation and revision at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture in patients undergoing each treatment type with death as a competing risk? (2) What are the factors associated with implant revision after operative treatment of pathologic subtrochanteric femur fracture? (3) What is the overall survival of patients in this population after surgery? (4) How do clinical and surgical factors along with the frequency of complications compare in this population by operative treatment? METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2020, 422 patients underwent surgery for completed proximal femur pathologic fractures. After excluding patients with non-subtrochanteric femur fractures (71% [301]), fractures caused by primary tumors of bone (< 1% [2]), and insufficient data (1% [6]), we included 113 patients who underwent operative treatment of completed pathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures. Our study period spanned 20 years because although implant trends may have shifted, the overall operative objective for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures-restoring function and alleviating pain, regardless of the extent of bony union-have remained relatively unchanged during this period. Median follow-up time was 6 months (range 1 month to 20.6 years). Intramedullary nailing (IMN) was performed in 68% (77) of patients, proximal femur replacement (PFR) was performed in 19% (22), and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed in 12% (14) of patients. IMN was performed in patients with a poor prognosis but in whom fracture stabilization was felt to be advantageous. In instances of complex fractures in which adequate reduction could not be achieved, ORIF was generally performed. PFR was generally performed in patients with a better prognosis in which long-term implant survival and patient function were prioritized. We found a higher proportion of women in the IMN group (73% versus 32% in PFR and 50% in ORIF; p = 0.001). Rapid growth tumors (Katagiri classification) were found in 25% of patients with IMN, 27% with PFR, and 43% with ORIF. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of reoperation or revision surgery after initial stabilization. Competing risk analysis with death as a competing event was performed to estimate the cumulative incidence for reoperation and revision. Factors associated with revision surgery were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model, which rendered HRs. All analyses were adjusted to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence for reoperation at 2 years was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4% to 6%) for IMN, 15% (95% CI 9% to 22%) for PFR, and 32% (95% CI 15% to 50%) for ORIF (p = 0.03). The cumulative incidence for revision at 2 years was 4% (95% CI 3% to 4%) for IMN, 4% (95% CI 2% to 6%) for PFR, and 33% (95% CI 15% to 51%) for ORIF (p = 0.01). Factors associated with revision surgery were radioresistant tumor histology (HR 8.5 [95% CI 1.2 to 58.9]; p = 0.03) and ORIF (HR 6.3 [95% CI 1.5 to 27.0]; p = 0.01). The 3-month, 1-year, and 2-year overall survival was 80% (95% CI 71% to 87%), 35% (95% CI 26% to 45%), and 28% (95% CI 19% to 36%), respectively. Thirty-day postoperative complications did not differ by fixation type, but 90-day readmission was highest after ORIF (3 of 14 versus 4 of 22 in PFR and 4% [3 of 77] in IMN; p = 0.03) Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) was more common after salvage PFR (2 of 6) than primary PFR (1 of 22) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Primary PFR may be preferred for pathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures arising from radioresistant tumor types, as the cumulative incidence of revision was no different than for IMN while restoring function, alleviating pain, and offering local tumor control, and it less commonly develops PJI than salvage PFR. In complex fractures not amenable to IMN, surgeons should consider performing a PFR over ORIF because of the lower risk of revision and the added benefit of replacing the pathologic fracture altogether and offering immediate mechanical stability with a cemented endoprosthesis. Future studies might evaluate the extent of bone loss from local tumor burden, and this could be quantified and analyzed in future studies as a covariate as it may clarify when PFR is advantageous in this population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Evaluation of MRI features of neuromas in oncological amputees, and the relation to pain.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of time on neuroma growth and morphology on pain intensity is unknown. This study aims to assess magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) differences between symptomatic and non-symptomatic neuromas in oncological amputees, and whether time influences MRI-detected neuroma dimensions and their association with pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Oncological patients who underwent traditional extremity amputation were included. Post-amputation MRIs were assessed before decision for neuroma surgery. Chart review was performed for residual limb pain (numeric rating scale, 0-10) and the presence of neuropathic symptoms. Neuromas were classified as symptomatic or non-symptomatic, with neuroma size expressed as radiological neuroma-to-nerve-ratio (NNR). RESULTS: Among 78 neuromas in 60 patients, the median NNR was 2.0, and 56 neuromas (71.8%) were symptomatic with a median pain score of 3.5. NNR showed no association with symptomatology or pain intensity but correlated with a longer time-to-neuroma-excision interval and a smaller nerve caliber. Symptomatic neuromas were associated with lower extremity amputation, T2 heterogeneity, and the presence of heterotopic ossification. Lower extremity amputation, T2 heterogeneity, perineural edema, and presence of heterotopic ossification were associated with more painful neuromas. CONCLUSION: MRI features associated with symptomatic neuromas and pain intensity were identified. Awareness of the potential clinical significance of these imaging features may help in the interpretation of MRI exams and may aid clinicians in patient selection for neuroma surgery in oncological amputees.

Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention (DAIR) Plus Offers Similar Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treatment Success Rates to Two-Stage Revision in Oncologic Megaprosthesis.

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) after megaprosthesis implantation are associated with high rates of treatment failure and amputation. Our study analyzed PJI treatment success rates by surgical strategy and assessed risks of reinfection and amputation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients diagnosed with PJI after undergoing megaprosthesis implantation for oncologic indications. The 2011 Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria were used to define PJI. Reinfection, reoperation, and amputation for PJI recurrence were assessed. A total of 67 patients with megaprosthesis PJIs were included. There were fourteen patients who were treated with debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR), 31 with DAIR plus (DAIR with modular component exchange and stem retention), and 21 with two-stage revisions. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards for risk factor analyses. RESULTS: The two-year reinfection-free survival was 25% for DAIR and 60% for DAIR plus or two-stage revision (P = .049). The five-year amputation-free survival was 84% for DAIR plus or two-stage revision, and 48% for DAIR (P = .13). Reinfection-free, reoperation-free, and amputation-free survival were similar between DAIR plus and two-stage revision at the 2- and 5-year marks. Body mass index ≥30 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.65) and chronic kidney disease (HR = 11.53) were risk factors for reinfection. Treatment with DAIR plus or two-stage revision (HR = 0.44) was a protective factor against reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: A DAIR was associated with high rates of treatment failure and higher amputation rates than DAIR plus or 2-stage surgery. A DAIR plus was not inferior to 2-stage revision clearing a PJI and might be performed in patients who cannot withstand two-stage revision surgery.

Clinical Implications and Treatment Strategies for ESR1 Fusions in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Case Series.

In hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC), endocrine resistance is commonly due to genetic alterations of ESR1, the gene encoding estrogen receptor alpha (ERα). While ESR1 point mutations (ESR1-MUT) cause acquired resistance to aromatase inhibition (AI) through constitutive activation, far less is known about the molecular functions and clinical consequences of ESR1 fusions (ESR1-FUS). This case series discusses 4 patients with HR+ MBC with ESR1-FUS in the context of the existing ESR1-FUS literature. We consider therapeutic strategies and raise the hypothesis that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) may be effective against ESR1-FUS with functional ligand-binding domain swaps. These cases highlight the importance of screening for ESR1-FUS in patients with HR+ MBC while continuing investigation of precision treatments for these genomic rearrangements.

Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Size of Dedifferentiation in Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma.

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma is rare, aggressive, and microscopically bimorphic. How pathologic features such as the amounts of dedifferentiation affect prognosis remains unclear. We evaluated the percentages and sizes of dedifferentiation in a consecutive institutional series of dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas from 1999 to 2021. The statistical analysis included cox proportional hazard models and log-rank tests. Of the 67 patients (26 women, 41 men; age, 39 to >89 [median 61] years; 2 with Ollier disease), 58 presented de novo; 9 were identified with conventional chondrosarcomas 0.6-13.2 years (median, 5.5 years) prior. Pathologic fracture and distant metastases were noted in 27 and 7 patients at presentation. The tumors involved the femur (n = 27), pelvis (n = 22), humerus (n = 7), tibia (n = 4), scapula/ribs (n = 4), spine (n = 2), and clivus (n = 1). In the 56 resections, the tumors ranged in size from 3.5 to 46.0 cm (median, 11.5 cm) and contained 1%-99.5% (median, 70%) dedifferentiated components that ranged in size from 0.6 to 24.0 cm (median, 7.3 cm). No correlation was noted between total size and percentage of dedifferentiation. The dedifferentiated components were typically fibrosarcomatous or osteosarcomatous, whereas the associated cartilaginous components were predominantly grade 1-2, rarely enchondromas or grade 3. The entire cohort's median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.8 and 5.4 months, respectively. In the resected cohort, although the total size was not prognostic, the percentage of dedifferentiation ≥20% and size of dedifferentiation >3.0 cm each predicted worse overall survival (9.9 vs 72.5 months; HR, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.27-11.14; P = .02; 8.7 vs 58.9 months; HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.21-7.57; P = .02, respectively) and progression-free survival (5.3 vs 62.1 months; HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.13-8.28; P = .03; 5.3 vs 56.6 months; HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.06-5.88; P = .04, respectively). In conclusion, both the percentages and sizes of dedifferentiation were better prognostic predictors than total tumor sizes in dedifferentiated chondrosarcomas, highlighting the utility of their pathologic evaluations.

Venous Thromboembolic Event Following Soft Tissue Sarcoma Diagnosis is Associated with the Development of Pulmonary Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) are clinically relevant predictors of pulmonary metastatic disease in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, we included patients with STS surgically treated for sarcoma between January 2002 and January 2020. The primary outcome of interest was development of pulmonary metastasis after non-metastatic STS diagnosis. Tumor depth, stage, type of surgical intervention, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, body mass index, and smoking status were collected. Episodes of VTEs following STS diagnosis, including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and other thromboembolic events, were also obtained. Univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify potential predictors for pulmonary metastasis. RESULTS: We included 319 patients with mean age of 54.9 ± 16 years. Thirty-seven patients (11.6%) had VTE after STS diagnosis, and 54 (16.9%) developed pulmonary metastasis. Univariate screening revealed pulmonary metastasis, pre- and postoperative chemotherapy, smoking history, and VTE after surgery as potential predictors of pulmonary metastasis. Multivariable logistic regression revealed smoking history [odds ratio (OR) 2.0, confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.9, P = 0.04] and VTE (OR 6.3, CI 2.9-13.6, P < 0.001) as independent risk factors for predicting pulmonary metastasis in patients with STS, after adjusting for the factors in the univariate screening as well as age, sex, stage of the tumor, and neurovascular invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with VTE after STS diagnosis have an odds ratio of 6.3 for developing metastatic pulmonary disease compared with patients without venous thromboembolic events. Smoking history was also associated with future pulmonary metastases.

What Are the Functional and Surgical Outcomes of Tibial Turnup-plasty for Salvage in Patients With Chronic Lower Extremity Infection?

BACKGROUND: Tibial turnup-plasty is a rarely performed surgical option for large bone defects of the distal or entire femur and can serve as an alternative to hip disarticulation or high above-knee amputation. It entails pedicled transport of the ipsilateral tibia with or without the proximal hindfoot for use as a vascularized autograft. It is rotated 180° in the coronal or sagittal plane to the remaining proximal femur or pelvis, augmenting the functional length of the thigh. Prior reports consist of small case series with heterogeneous surgical techniques. Patient-reported outcome measures after the procedure have not been reported, and ambulatory status after the procedure is also unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What proportion of patients underwent reoperation after tibial turnup-plasty? (2) What is the ambulatory status and what proportion of patients used a prosthesis after tibial turnup-plasty? (3) What are the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global-10 mental and physical function scores after tibial turnup-plasty? METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 11 patients who underwent tibial turnup-plasty between 2003 and 2021 by a single orthopaedic oncology division in collaboration with a reconstructive plastic surgery team. Nine patients were men, with a median age of 55 years (range 34 to 75 years). All had chronic infections after arthroplasty or oncologic reconstructions, with a median number of 13 surgeries before turnup-plasty. All were considered to have no other surgical options other than hip disarticulation or high transfemoral amputation. All patients who were offered this possibility accepted it. Data of interest included patient demographics and comorbidities, surgical history that led to limb compromise, medical and surgical perioperative complications, date of prosthesis fitting, and functional capacity at the most recent follow-up interval based on ambulatory status and PROMIS Global-10 mental and physical function scores. The statistical analysis was descriptive. RESULTS: The median number of reoperations after turnup-plasty was one (range 0 to 11). Of the six patients who underwent at least one reoperation, indications for surgery included wound infection (four patients), nonunion of the osteosynthesis site (two), heterotopic ossification (one), tumor recurrence (one), and flap hypoperfusion treated with local tissue revision (one). One patient underwent conversion to external hemipelvectomy for tumor recurrence. Ten of the 11 patients were ambulatory at the final follow-up interval with standard above-knee amputation prostheses. Two ambulated unassisted, four used a single crutch or cane, and four used two crutches or a walker. Of the nine patients for whom scores were available, the median PROMIS Global-10 physical and mental health scores were 48 (range 30 to 68) and 53 (range 41 to 68), both within the standard deviation of the population mean of 50. CONCLUSION: The tibial turnup-plasty is a complex surgical option for patients with large bone defects of the femur for whom there are no alternative surgeries capable of producing residual extremities with acceptable functional length. This should be viewed as a procedure of last resort to avoid a hip disarticulation or a high transfemoral amputation in patients who have typically undergone numerous prior operations. Although ambulation with a prosthesis within 1 year can be expected, almost all patients will require an assistive device to do so, and reoperations are frequent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Assessing the Safety and Utility of Wound VAC Temporization of the Sarcoma or Benign Aggressive Tumor Bed Until Final Margins Are Achieved.

BACKGROUND: Local recurrence of microinvasive sarcoma or benign aggressive pathologies can be limb- and life-threatening. Although frozen pathology is reliable, tumor microinvasion can be subtle or missed, having an impact on surgical margins and postoperative radiation planning. The authors' service has begun to temporize the tumor bed after primary tumor excision with a wound vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) pending formal margin analysis, with coverage performed in the setting of final negative margins. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included all patients managed at a tertiary referral cancer center with VAC temporization after soft tissue sarcoma or benign aggressive tumor excision from 1 January 2000 to 1 January 2019 and at least 2 years of oncologic follow-up evaluation. The primary outcome was local recurrence. The secondary outcomes were distant recurrence, unplanned return to the operating room for wound/infectious indications, thromboembolic events, and tumor-related deaths. RESULTS: For 62 patients, VAC temporization was performed. The mean age of the patients was 62.2 ± 22.3 years (median 66.5 years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 61.7-72.5 years), and the mean age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index was 5.3 ± 1.9. The most common tumor histology was myxofibrosarcoma (51.6%, 32/62). The mean volume was 124.8 ± 324.1 cm3, and 35.5% (22/62) of the cases were subfascial. Local recurrences occurred for 8.1% (5/62) of the patients. Three of these five patients had planned positive margins, and 17.7% (11/62) of the patients had an unplanned return to the operating room. No demographic or tumor factors were associated with unplanned surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that VAC-temporized management of microinvasive sarcoma and benign aggressive pathologies yields favorable local recurrence and unplanned operating room rates suggestive of oncologic and technical safety. These findings will need validation in a future randomized controlled trial.

Sclerostin immunohistochemical staining in surgically treated giant cell tumor of bone.

BACKGROUND: Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a destructive lesion with a high potential for recurrence. RANK-ligand targeted therapy has provided promising, yet mixed results. Sclerostin (SOST) inhibition results in a net anabolic response and is currently used in the treatment of osteoporosis. The application to GCTB is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if GCTB stained for SOST on immunohistochemistry and correlate its expression with predictor variables. METHODS: All patients at a single institution undergoing surgery for GCTB between 1993 and 2008 with a minimum of 6 months follow-up were included. Primary outcomes included the presence of SOST staining, secondary outcomes included the correlation of patient and tumor-specific predictor variables. RESULTS: SOST antibody staining of any cell type was present in 47 of 48 cases (97.9%). Positivity of the stromal cells was present in 39 of 48 cases (81.3%) and was associated with radiographic aggressiveness (p = 0.023), symptomatic presentation (p = 0.032), prior surgery (p = 0.005), and patient age (p = 0.034). Positivity of giant cells was present in 41 of 48 cases (85.4%) and was not significant with predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerostin staining in GCTB is a novel finding and warrants further research to define the role of sclerostin as a prognostic factor and therapeutic target.

Sclerostin Immunohistochemical Staining in Aggressive Maxillofacial Giant Cell Lesions: Initial Results and Potential Therapeutic Target.

INTRODUCTION: Maxillofacial (MF) giant cell lesions (GCLs) are benign, often locally aggressive lesions with potential for recurrence. Systemic treatments have included interferon alpha, calcitonin, bisphosphonates, and denosumab. Sclerostin (SOST) is typically thought to be a negative regulator of bone metabolism and anti-SOST agents have been used to treat osteoporosis; however, its role in central giant cell granuloma is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of SOST in MF GCLs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with MF GCLs treated at a single institution between 1993 and 2008 with a minimum follow-up of 6 months. Representative tissue was used to create a tissue microarray and SOST immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and grading was performed. The primary outcomes were IHC staining of the stromal cells and giant cells. The secondary outcomes included correlation of IHC staining and patient predictor variables including clinically benign and aggressive lesions. All analyses were completed using univariate statistical tests. RESULTS: A total of 37 subjects were included (29 clinically aggressive and 8 clinically benign). Sclerostin staining was present in 30 of 37 subjects (81%). Of these, 22 (60%) had stromal cell staining and 28 (76%) had giant cell staining. The presence or absence of staining, of either cell type, was not associated with aggressiveness, presence of clinical symptoms, tumor size, previous interferon therapy, previous surgery, or the race or age of the patient. DISCUSSION: Maxillofacial GCLs have an overall high level of SOST staining; however, the role of SOST in treatment and prognosis is unknown and warrants further study.

Temporizing Wound VAC Dressing Until Final Negative Margins are Achieved Reduces Myxofibrosarcoma Local Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: The microinvasive nature of suprafascial myxofibrosarcoma reduces the accuracy of intraoperative margin assessment, and tumor bed resections after soft-tissue reconstruction are unreliable. In 2017, we began temporizing the excised tumor bed with a wound VAC, delaying soft-tissue coverage until final negative margins were achieved. We compare the oncologic/surgical outcomes of suprafascial myxofibrosarcomas managed with VAC temporization (VT) with single-stage excision/reconstruction (SS). METHODS: We retrospectively studied suprafascial myxofibrosarcomas managed from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019 for patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation and had at least 2 years of oncologic follow-up at a tertiary referral cancer center. Our primary outcome was local recurrence. Comparisons were performed by using Fisher's exact test or Student's t test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (18 VAC temporized, 35 single stage) were included. While VT patients were older (74.9 ± 10.2 vs. 63.9 ± 13.6, p = 0.003), treatment groups did not significantly differ with respect to comorbidity, tumor volume, stage and grade. VT patients had significantly fewer local recurrences (5.6% vs. 28.6% after SS, p = 0.048) and R1 resections that required an unplanned readmission for tumor bed reexcision (0% vs. 37.1% after SS, p = 0.002). VT required more total surgeries (2.8 ± 0.9 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 for SS, p = 0.0002). Postoperative infectious and wound complications were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: Our VAC temporization strategy had a significantly lower LR than SS treatment. While high quality multi-institutional validation is required, VT may represent a paradigm shift in the management of myxofibrosarcoma.

Do Cohabitants Reliably Complete Questionnaires for Patients in a Terminal Cancer Stage when Assessing Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety?

BACKGROUND: Patients with bone metastases often are unable to complete quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, and cohabitants (such as spouses, domestic partners, offspring older than 18 years, or other people who live with the patient) could be a reliable alternative. However, the extent of reliability in this complicated patient population remains undefined, and the influence of the cohabitant's condition on their assessment of the patient's QoL is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do QoL scores, measured by the 5-level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) version and the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) version 1.0 in three domains (anxiety, pain interference, and depression), reported by patients differ markedly from scores as assessed by their cohabitants? (2) Do cohabitants' PROMIS-Depression scores correlate with differences in measured QoL results? METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients and cohabitants older than 18 years of age. Patients included those with presence of histologically confirmed bone metastases (including lymphoma and multiple myeloma), and cohabitants must have been present at the clinic visit. Patients were eligible for inclusion in the study regardless of comorbidities, prognosis, prior surgery, or current treatment. Between June 1, 2016 and March 1, 2017 and between October 1, 2017 and February 26, 2018, all 96 eligible patients were approached, of whom 49% (47) met the selection criteria and were willing to participate. The included 47 patient-cohabitant pairs independently completed the EQ-5D-5L and the eight-item PROMIS for three domains (anxiety, pain, and depression) with respect to the patients' symptoms. The cohabitants also completed the four-item PROMIS-Depression survey with respect to their own symptoms. RESULTS: There were no clinically important differences between the scores of patients and their cohabitants for all questionnaires, and the agreement between patient and cohabitant scores was moderate to strong (Spearman correlation coefficients ranging from 0.52 to 0.72 on the four questionnaires; all p values < 0.05). However, despite the good agreement in QoL scores, an increased cohabitant's depression score was correlated with an overestimation of the patient's symptom burden for the anxiety and depression domains (weak Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.33 [95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.58]; p = 0.01 and moderate Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.52 [95% CI 0.29 to 0.74]; p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSION: The present findings support that cohabitants might be reliable raters of the QoL of patients with bone metastases. However, if a patient's cohabitant has depression, the cohabitant may overestimate a patient's symptoms in emotional domains such as anxiety and depression, warranting further research that includes cohabitants with and without depression to elucidate the effect of depression on the level of agreement. For now, clinicians may want to reconsider using the cohabitant's judgement if depression is suspected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that a cohabitant's impressions of a patient's quality of life are, in most instances, accurate; this is potentially helpful in situations where the patient cannot weigh in. Future studies should employ longitudinal designs to see how or whether our findings change over time and with disease progression, and how specific interventions-like different chemotherapeutic regimens or surgery-may factor in.

Diagnoses, treatment, and oncologic outcomes in patients with calcaneal malignances: Case series, systematic literature review, and pooled cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Malignant tumors of the calcaneus are rare but pose a treatment challenge. AIMS: (1) describe the demographics of calcaneal malignancies in a large cohort; (2) describe survival after amputation versus limb-salvage surgery for high-grade tumors. METHODS: Study group: a "pooled" cohort of patients with primary calcaneal malignancies treated at two cancer centers (1984-2015) and systematic literature review. Kaplan-Meier analyses described survival across treatment and diagnostic groups; proportional hazards modeling assessed mortality after amputation versus limb salvage. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients (11 treated at our centers and 120 patients from 53 published studies) with a median 36-month follow-up were included. Diagnoses included Ewing sarcoma (41%), osteosarcoma (30%), and chondrosarcoma (17%); 5-year survival rates were 43%, 73% (70%, high grade only), and 84% (60%, high grade only), respectively. Treatment involved amputation in 52%, limb salvage in 27%, and no surgery in 21%. There was no difference in mortality following limb salvage surgery (vs. amputation) for high-grade tumors (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.14-1.05), after adjusting for Ewing sarcoma diagnosis (HR 5.15; 95% CI 1.55-17.14), metastatic disease at diagnosis (HR 3.88; 95% CI 1.29-11.64), and age (per-year HR 1.04; 95% CI 1.02-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Limb salvage is oncologically-feasible for calcaneal malignancies.

PROMIS Function Scores Are Lower in Patients Who Underwent More Aggressive Local Treatment for Desmoid Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Desmoid tumors of the extremities often present with pain and functional limitation, but treatment can lead to morbidity and recurrence is common. The impact of treatment with respect to traditional "oncologic" metrics (such as recurrence rate) has been studied extensively, with a shift in recent years away from local therapies as first-line management; however, little is known about the association between treatment modality and long-term functional outcomes for patients with this benign disease. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated at two institutions, we asked: (1) Is event-free survival (EFS) different between patients who undergo local treatment and those who do not for primary as well as for recurrent desmoid tumors? (2) What treatment-related factors are associated with worse Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) function scores at a minimum of 1 year after treatment? METHODS: Between 1991 and 2017, 102 patients with desmoid tumors of the extremities (excluding those of the hands and feet) were treated at two institutions; of those, 85 patients with 90 tumors were followed clinically for at least 1 year (median [range] 59 months follow-up [12 to 293]) and were included in the present analysis. We attempted to contact all patients for administration of PROMIS function (Physical Function Short Form [SF] 10a and Upper Extremity SF v2.0 7a) and Pain Interference (SF 8a) questionnaires. Complete survey data (minimum 1 year follow-up) were available for 46% (39 of 102) of patients with 40 tumors at a median of 125 months follow-up; only these patients were included in PROMIS data analyses. Though there was no formal institutional treatment algorithm in place during the study period, surgical resection typically was the preferred modality for primary tumors; radiation therapy and systemic treatments (including cytotoxic or hormonal agents earlier in the study period, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors later) were often added for recurrent or very symptomatic disease. We coded treatment for each patient into discrete episodes, each defined by a particular treatment strategy: local treatment only (surgery and/or radiation), systemic treatment only, local plus systemic treatment, or observation; treatment episodes rendered at other institutions (that is, before referral) were not included in the analyses. Treatment failure was defined as recurrence after surgical resection, or clinically significant radiologic and/or symptomatic progression after systemic treatment, and EFS was defined as time from treatment initiation to treatment failure or final follow-up. Episodes of treatment for recurrent tumors were analyzed in a pooled fashion, wherein discrete treatment episodes for patients with multiple recurrences were included separately as independent events. We analyzed 56 primary tumors (54 patients), and 101 discrete treatment episodes for recurrent tumors (88 patients). Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed separately for the primary and recurrence cohorts, both comparing EFS among patients who received any local treatment (local treatment and local plus systemic treatment groups) versus those who did not (systemic treatment and observation groups). PROMIS function data were analyzed on the bases of patient- and treatment-specific variables, including the PROMIS Pain Interference score as a potential explanatory variable. RESULTS: Within both the primary and recurrence cohorts, there were no differences between the local treatment, systemic treatment, and local plus systemic treatment groups with respect to gender, age, axillary/hip girdle location, or tumor volume. Among primary tumors, 5-year EFS was 44% (95% CI 24 to 80) for the systemic-only group versus 15% (95% CI 5 to 44) for the local treatment group (p = 0.087). Within the pooled recurrence treatment episode cohort, 5-year EFS after systemic-only treatment was 70% (95% CI 52 to 94) versus 56% among patients receiving any local treatment (95% CI 44 to 70; p = 0.46). PROMIS function scores were lowest among patients who underwent two or more resections (39 versus 51 versus 47 for ≥2, 1, and 0 resections, respectively; p = 0.025); among those who received both surgery and radiation at any point, either concurrently or in separate treatment episodes, as compared with those who did not (39 versus 46; p = 0.047); and among those with higher levels of pain interference (38 versus 47 for pain interference scores > 50 versus < 50; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with local modalities (surgery and/or radiation, with or without additional systemic therapy) did not experience improved EFS as compared with those treated without local modalities; this was the case for both the primary and the recurrent tumor cohorts. However, PROMIS function scores were lowest among patients who underwent two or more surgical interventions and among those treated with surgery and radiation at any time, suggesting that more aggressive local treatment may be associated with poorer long-term functional outcomes. Prospective collection of patient-reported outcomes data at multiple time points will allow for more direct correlations between treatment modality and impact on function and will help to elucidate the ideal management strategy for these benign but often-symptomatic tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Timing of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an undesirable outcome following total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but risk factors for, and optimal timing of, MUA remain unclear. METHODS: Primary TKAs performed at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical variables were compared between patients who underwent MUA and those who did not; variables that differed were utilized to identify an appropriately matched control group of non-MUA patients. The MUA group was divided into early (MUA ≤6 weeks from index) and late (>6 weeks) subgroups. Flexion values at multiple time points were compared. RESULTS: In total, 1729 TKA patients were reviewed; MUA was performed in 62 patients. Patients undergoing MUA were younger (55.2 vs 65.3 years, P < .001) and had higher rates of current smoking (21.0% vs 7.3%, P < .001) and prior procedure (59.7% vs 40.4%, P = .002), most commonly arthroscopy; a control group of patients not requiring MUA, matched on the basis of these variables, was identified. While no difference in pre-TKA flexion existed across groups, final flexion in the early MUA group (106.7°) was equivalent to that of controls (115.6°), while final flexion in the late MUA group was not (101.3°, P = .001). CONCLUSION: TKA patients undergoing MUAs were younger, more likely to be current smokers, and more likely to have undergone prior knee surgery. Even in patients with severe initial postoperative limitations in range of motion, MUA within 6 weeks may allow for final outcomes that are equivalent to those experienced by similar patients not requiring manipulation.

A dynamic microRNA profile that tracks a chemotherapy resistance phenotype in osteosarcoma. Implications for novel therapeutics.

Osteosarcoma is a rare primary bone tumor for which no significant therapeutic advancement has been made since the late 1980s despite ongoing efforts. Overall, the five-year survival rate remains about 65%, and is much lower in patients with tumors unresponsive to methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin therapy. Genetic studies have not revealed actionable drug targets, but our group, and others, have reported that epigenomic biomarkers, including regulatory RNAs, may be useful prognostic tools for osteosarcoma. We tested if microRNA (miRNA) transcriptional patterns mark the transition from a chemotherapy sensitive to resistant tumor phenotype. Small RNA sequencing was performed using 14 patient matched pre-chemotherapy biopsy and post-chemotherapy resection high-grade osteosarcoma frozen tumor samples. Independently, small RNA sequencing was performed using 14 patient matched biopsy and resection samples from untreated tumors. Separately, miRNA specific Illumina DASL arrays were used to assay an independent cohort of 65 pre-chemotherapy biopsy and 26 patient matched post-chemotherapy resection formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. mRNA specific Illumina DASL arrays were used to profile 37 pre-chemotherapy biopsy and five post-chemotherapy resection FFPE samples, all of which were also used for Illumina DASL miRNA profiling. The National Cancer Institute Therapeutically Applicable Research to Generate Effective Treatments dataset, including PCR based miRNA profiling and RNA-seq data for 86 and 93 pre-chemotherapy tumor samples, respectively, was also used. Paired differential expression testing revealed a profile of 17 miRNAs with significantly different transcriptional levels following chemotherapy. Genes targeted by the miRNAs were differentially expressed following chemotherapy, suggesting the miRNAs may regulate transcriptional networks. Finally, an in vitro pharmacogenomic screen using miRNAs and their target transcripts predicted response to a set of candidate small molecule therapeutics which potentially reverse the chemotherapy resistance phenotype and synergize with chemotherapy in otherwise treatment resistant tumors. Importantly, these novel therapeutic targets are distinct from targets identified by a similar pharmacogenomic analysis of previously published prognostic miRNA profiles from pre chemotherapy biopsy specimens.