Understanding suboptimal insulin use in type 1 and 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers who treat people with diabetes.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to understand the healthcare provider (HCP) perspective on the extent of suboptimal insulin dosing in people with diabetes (PwD), as well as specific challenges and solutions to insulin management. METHODS: An online survey of general practitioners and specialists (N = 640) who treat PwD in Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States was conducted. Responses regarding HCP background and their patients, HCP perceptions of suboptimal insulin use, and challenges associated with optimal insulin use were collected. Categorical summary statistics were presented. RESULTS: Overall, for type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), most physicians indicated < 30% of PwD missed or skipped a bolus insulin dose in the last 30 days (T1D: 83.0%; T2D: 74.1%). The top 3 reasons (other than skipping a meal) HCPs believed caused the PwD to miss or skip insulin doses included they "forgot," (bolus: 75.0%; basal: 67.5%) "were too busy/distracted," (bolus: 58.8%; basal: 48.3%), and "were out of their normal routine" (bolus: 57.8%; basal: 48.6%). HCPs reported similar reasons that they believed caused PwD to mistime insulin doses. Digital technology and improved HCP-PwD communication were potential solutions identified by HCPs to optimize insulin dosing in PwD. CONCLUSIONS: Other studies have shown that PwD frequently experience suboptimal insulin dosing. Conversely, results from this study showed that HCPs believe suboptimal insulin dosing among PwD is limited in frequency. While no direct comparisons were made in this study, this apparent discrepancy could lead to difficulties in HCPs giving PwD the best advice on optimal insulin management. Approaches such as improving the objectivity of dose measurements for both PwD and HCPs may improve associated communications and help reduce suboptimal insulin dosing, thus enhancing treatment outcomes.

Health state utilities associated with weight loss: preferences of people with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan.

AIMS: Health state utilities associated with weight change are needed for cost-utility analyses (CUAs) examining the value of treatments for type 2 diabetes and obesity. Previous studies have estimated the utility benefits associated with various amounts of weight reduction in the US and Europe, but preferences for weight change in Asian cultures may differ from these published values. The purpose of this study was to estimate utilities associated with reductions in body weight based on preferences of individuals with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan. METHODS: Health state vignettes represented type 2 diabetes with respondents' own current weight and weight reductions of 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5%, 15%, and 20%. Utilities were elicited in time trade-off interviews with a sample of respondents in Japan with type 2 diabetes and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (the cutoff for obesity in Japan). RESULTS: Analyses were conducted with data from 138 respondents (84.8% male; mean age = 58.0 years; mean BMI = 29.4 kg/m2) from all eight regions of Japan. Utility gains gradually increased with rising percentage of weight reductions ranging from 2.5% to 15%. Weight reductions of 2.5% to 15% resulted in utility increases of 0.013 to 0.048. The health state representing a 20% weight reduction yielded a wide range of preferences (mean utility increase of 0.044). Equations are recommended for estimating utility change based on any percentage of weight reduction (up to 20%) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes and obesity. LIMITATIONS: This study was conducted in a sample with limited representation of patients with BMI >35 kg/m2 (n = 13) and relatively few women (n = 21). CONCLUSION: Results may be used to provide inputs for CUAs examining the value of treatments that are associated with weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity in Japan.

The Burden of Suboptimal Insulin Dosing in People with Diabetes in Spain: Barriers and Solutions from the Physician Perspective.

Background: This study aimed to determine physicians' perceptions of the extent of suboptimal insulin dosing and the barriers and solutions to optimal dosing in people with diabetes (PwD) treated with insulin. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in four countries with primary care physicians and endocrinologists treating PwD using insulin pens, which included 53 questions on physicians' characteristics and their perceptions of the behaviors of PwD in relation to insulin dosing routines, unmet needs and potential solutions. Analyses were descriptive. Results: Of the 160 physicians (80 primary care physicians, 80 specialists) surveyed in Spain, 58.1% were male and 88.8% had been qualified to practice for more than five years. Most physicians (>65%) indicated that 0-30% of PwD missed or skipped, mistimed, or miscalculated an insulin dose in the last 30 days. Common reasons for these actions were that PwD forgot, were out of their normal routine, were too busy or distracted, or were unsure of how much insulin to take. To optimize insulin dosing, over 75% of physicians considered it very helpful for PwD to have real-time insulin dosing calculation guidance, mobile app reminders, a device automatically recording glucose measurements and/or insulin, having insulin and glucose data in one place, and having the time for more meaningful conversations about insulin dosing routines. Conclusion: According to physicians' perspectives, suboptimal insulin dosing remains common among PwD. This survey highlights the need for integrated and automated insulin dosing support to manage the complexity of insulin treatment, improve communications between PwD and physicians, and ultimately improve outcomes for PwD.

Glycemic Control and Obesity Among People With Type 2 Diabetes in Europe and Australia: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D) who also have obesity, efforts targeting weight loss, including lifestyle, medication and surgical interventions, are recommended. The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between glycemic control and obesity among PwT2D in Europe and Australia using recent real-world data and applying consistent methodology across countries. METHODS: Retrospective study utilizing IQVIA electronic medical records (EMR) databases grouped into panels based on specialty of contributing physicians. General practitioner (GP) and endocrinologist/diabetologist (E/D) panels were used in Germany and France, while GP panels were used in Italy, UK and Australia. The Spanish database included all physician specialties. The sample included PwT2D with glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) values measured within 90 days of each other between January 2015 and December 2018 (second record termed the 'index date'). PwT2D had a 1-year baseline period and a recorded HbA1c at the end of the 1-year post-index period. RESULTS: The final sample comprised 194,729 PwT2D. At baseline, across countries/panels, 36.8-58.0% were above HbA1c target (HbA1c ≥ 7%) and 39.4-56.7% had obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2). Mean HbA1c ranged from 6.9 to 7.6% and mean BMI ranged from 29.3-31.6 kg/m2. At baseline, a higher proportion of PwT2D with obesity (40.8-64.2%) were above HbA1c target compared to their counterparts without obesity (32.2-52.4%). A higher proportion of patients with obesity at baseline (38.1-60.6%) had post-index HbA1c above target compared to their counterparts without obesity (30.9-56.0%). In logistic regression, patients with obesity had substantially lower odds of post-index HbA1c below target compared to those without obesity in all countries/panels except for France (E/D), Spain and Australia. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents data on HbA1c and BMI among type 2 diabetes (T2D) populations in Europe and Australia. A notable proportion of PwT2D had obesity and were above HBA1c target. Higher BMI was associated with poorer glycemic control.

Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization among patients with alopecia areata: A real-world chart review in South Korea.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a clinically heterogeneous, immune-mediated, non-scarring hair loss disorder. This real-world chart review sought to characterize treatment patterns and healthcare resource use among patients with severe AA in South Korea. A web-based chart review of 40 dermatologists was conducted in which the medical charts of 151 adult patients diagnosed with severe AA between May 2019 and April 2021 were reviewed. Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the date of severe disease diagnosis until the date of data collection (September-November 2022). Sixty-six percent of patients were diagnosed with severe disease at initial presentation, while 34% were re-classed to severe during the disease course. Mean estimated patient age at the time of diagnosis of severe AA was 37.1 (range 22-68) years. Fifty-three percent of patients were male. Most patients (93.4%) received pharmacological treatment for their condition; 45.5% received ≥2 lines of treatment with a mean duration of 24 months. First-line treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy occurred in 46.0% of cases. Hair regrowth occurred in 71.0% of patients, 59.2% of whom experienced major regrowth (≥60%) during the follow-up period. Median (95% confidence interval) time to regrowth was 13.7 (11.0-20.6) months. Treatment visit rates per person-year ranged from two (phototherapy) to 10 (topical treatment), dermatologist visits occurred at a rate of 12.9 per person-year and 6.0% of patients were hospitalized due to alopecia areata. The majority of hospitalizations were related to treatment and occurred in patients who received pulse systemic corticosteroid therapy. The patient and economic burden of AA in South Korea is high and there remains a critical unmet need among patients with severe AA with respect to the effectiveness of commonly used treatment strategies.

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Healthcare Resource Utilization Study of Patients With Alopecia Areata in Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and resource utilization in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in Taiwan using the National Health Insurance Research Database. AA severity was determined by treatment use and diagnostic codes in the year after enrollment (including corticosteroids, systemic immunosuppressants, topical immunotherapy, and phototherapy). METHODS: The cross-sectional analysis was conducted to estimate the incidence and prevalence of AA from 2016 to 2020. For the longitudinal analysis, 2 cohorts were identified: mild/moderate and severe. The cohorts were matched based on age, gender, and comorbidities. Patients were enrolled upon their first claim with an AA diagnosis during the index period of 2017-2018. RESULTS: The number of patients with AA increased from 3221 in 2016 to 3855 in 2020. The longitudinal analysis identified 1808 mild/moderate patients and 452 severe patients. Mild/moderate patients used higher levels of topical corticosteroids (82.41%) than severe patients (73.45%). Conversely, severe patients used more topical nonsteroids (41.81%) and systemic therapies (51.77%) than mild/moderate patients (0.44% and 16.15%, respectively). Oral glucocorticoids use was higher in severe patients (47.57%) relative to mild/moderate patients (14.88%), whereas the use of injectable forms was similar. The most used systemic immunosuppressants were methotrexate, cyclosporin, and azathioprine. Topical immunotherapy utilization decreased with subsequent treatment lines for severe patients. Treatment persistence at 6 months was low for all treatments. Severe patients had higher annual AA-related outpatient visits than the mild/moderate cohort. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the need for additional innovations and therapies to address the clinical and economic burden of AA.