The Impact of Chronic Endometritis on Infertility: Prevalence, Reproductive Outcomes, and the Role of Hysteroscopy as a Screening Tool.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of chronic endometritis (CE) in infertile women, its impact on reproductive outcomes, and the accuracy of hysteroscopy as a screening tool for CE. DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants involved in this study were 514 asymptomatic patients with infertility. SETTING: The review was conducted in a tertiary care center. METHODS: The participants underwent a hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). Antibiotics were given for cases of CE. We investigated the prevalence of CE in patients starting assisted reproductive technologies (ART) as a primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in the ART cycle after hysteroscopy, EMB, and antibiotic treatment in cases of CE; the cumulative CPR in the subsequent 2 years after hysteroscopy and EMB; the sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy as a screening tool compared to EMB as the "gold standard" for diagnosing CE. RESULTS: CE was identified in 2.8% of patients starting ART (11/393). CPRs did not differ significantly between patients with CE and the entire cohort of patients without CE in the subsequent ART cycle (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.09-2.02) or in the 2 years after EMB (OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.16-1.97). In a matched control comparison (with matching for age, basal FSH, and cause of infertility), CPR in patients with CE did not differ in the subsequent ART cycle (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.09-1.61); however, their CPR in the 2 years after EMB was significantly lower (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.13-0.38). The sensitivity and specificity of hysteroscopy as a screening tool for diagnosing CE were 8.3% and 90.1%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Due to our cohort's low CE prevalence, we could not detect significant differences in CPRs. CONCLUSION: CE is rare in our studied population of asymptomatic patients starting ART. Hysteroscopy cannot replace EMB for diagnosing CE.

Is There a Correlation between the Number of Follicular Flushings, Oocyte/Embryo Quality and Pregnancy Rate in Assisted Reproductive Technology Cycles? Results from a Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the mean number of follicular flushings needed to retrieve the maximal number of oocytes and to investigate the correlation between the number of flushings and oocyte/embryo quality as well as reproductive outcome. METHODS: This prospective study included 154 oocyte retrieval cycles in 138 patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. During oocyte retrieval, aspirate and flushes were collected in four separate collections (A, F1, F2, F3) and inspected for the presence of an oocyte-cumulus complex (OCC). Outcome variables included oocyte recovery rate, percentage of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, day 2/day 3/day 5 embryo quality and clinical pregnancy rate/live birth rate. RESULTS: Out of 1,495 OCCs collected, 91% were obtained in collections A or F1. Significantly more mature oocytes were obtained in collection A (p = 0.03). The fertilization rate was similar for oocytes obtained in the four separate collections (p = 0.50). The proportion of good-quality day 2/day 3/day 5 embryos was similar (p = 0.93, p = 0.85 and p = 0.14, respectively). Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were not significantly affected by the first two flushes. No live birth emanated from oocytes obtained from the third flush onwards. CONCLUSION: More than 90% of all recovered OCCs were obtained after follicular aspiration followed by follicular flushing up to two times (collections A and F1). Follicular flushing may increase the oocyte recovery rate and does not have a negative influence on fertilization rate, day 2/day 3/day 5 embryo quality or pregnancy rate.