Hemodynamic response to heated water immersion in older individuals with hypertension.

The aim of this study was to evaluate blood pressure (BP), heart rate, arterial stiffness and endothelial reactivity responses to heated water immersion in older individuals with hypertension. Thirty-five sedentary individuals (67 ± 5 years) under treatment for hypertension were randomly assigned to water-based [n = 20; 30 min of seated resting in a heated swimming pool (30-32 °C)] or land-based group [n = 15; 30 min of seated resting in a quiet room with controlled temperature (21-23 °C)]. BP, heart rate, arterial stiffness and endothelial reactivity were measured before, immediately after (post) and 45 min after (recovery) each session. Heart rate reduced (P < 0.05) during the land-based session, and the reduction was maintained at post (~7 bpm) and recovery (~9 bpm), but no heart rate changes occurred during and after the water-based session. Systolic/diastolic BP increased (P = <0.001) at post (~29/10 mmHg) and recovery (~10/7 mmHg) in the water-based group, but not in the land-based group. No significant changes in pulse wave velocity and endothelial reactivity occurred in both groups. These results suggest that the hemodynamic response to heated water immersion should be taken into account when assessing the effect of heated water-based exercise on postexercise hypotension in older individuals with hypertension.

Prescribing high-intensity interval exercise by rating of perceived exertion in young individuals.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that the 6 to 20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is a cost-effective tool similar to heart rate (HR) response to cardiopulmonary exercise test for prescribing and self-regulating high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE). In this context, we analyzed if health-related responses to exercise are similar between HIIE prescribed and self-regulated by RPE (HIIERPE) and HIIE prescribed and regulated by HR response to cardiopulmonary exercise test (HIIEHR). METHODS: Twelve young (21±2 years) sedentary or insufficiently active individuals (weekly levels ˂150 minutes or 75 minutes of moderate- or vigorous-intensity physical activity, respectively) were randomly assigned to perform HIIERPE (25 minutes), HIIEHR (25 minutes) and control session (25 minutes of seated resting). Blood pressure, HR, and arterial stiffness (pulse wave velocity) were measured before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after each intervention. HR, speed, and distance were measured during exercise sessions. 24-hours ambulatory blood pressure was measured after each intervention. RESULTS: Exercise HR, speed, and distance, as well as blood pressure response to exercise were not different between HIIERPE and HIIEHR. Pulse wave velocity reduced (P<0.05) at postintervention in both HIIERPE (0.28±0.17 m/s) and HIIEHR (0.27±0.11 m/s). However, pulse wave velocity at recovery was lower than pre-intervention only during HIIERPE (0.30±0.10 m/s). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that RPE is a cost-effective tool for prescribing self-regulating HIIE and improving health-related variables in young individuals.