Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the survival of adhesive restorations after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin in primary molars. METHODS: This two-arm randomized clinical trial included 62 subjects (5.9 years ± 1.7) and 144 primary molars presenting deep active dentin carious lesions. The sample was randomly assigned based on restorative material: universal adhesive (Scotchbond Universal) plus bulk fill resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative) and resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer). Two operators performed all restorative procedures. Restorations were evaluated at 6, 12, and 18 months using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria. Survival estimates for restorations' longevity were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate Cox regression analysis with shared frailty was used to assess the factors associated with failures (P< 0.05). RESULTS: Restorative material did not influence the restorations' survival (HR 1.56 95% CI 0.78-3.13; P= 0.12). The survival rates at 18 months of follow-up were 62.9% and 76.8% (AFR: 26.6% and 16.1%) for resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and bulk fill resin composite restorations, respectively (long-rank P= 0.14). Boys had higher risk of failure in their restorations (HR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.29-5.40). Restorations performed by a less experienced operator had 3.26 times more risk of failure (P= 0.001). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The effectiveness of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer) and bulk fill resin composite (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative) restorations after selective removal of carious tissue to soft dentin in primary molars was similar at 18 months of follow-up.

Virtual learning object for developing knowledge about the diagnosis and management of molar incisor hypomineralization.

AIM: To develop, apply, and evaluate a virtual learning object (VLO) for teaching undergraduate dental students and paediatric dentists to diagnose and manage molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH). DESIGN: This controlled educational intervention included 170 undergraduate dental students and 50 paediatric dentists. The student intervention group (VLOG) was trained by the VLO, the control group of students (CG) received a synchronous virtual class, and the group of paediatric dentists (PDG) was trained by the VLO. Pre-test and post-test data were analyzed with a mixed one-way and Tukey's post hoc ANOVA test (α = 0.05). The answers to the questionnaire were analyzed with the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: The values obtained in the pre-test were significantly lower than those obtained in the post-test for all groups. The specialists showed a higher level of knowledge before and after the MIH training compared with the students (p < .001). Similarly, statistical differences were found in the level of knowledge, which increased after MIH training (p < .001). There were no differences between the CG and VLOG. CONCLUSIONS: The level of knowledge increased in all groups after training regardless of the method used. VLOG works similar to traditional teaching approaches.