Radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastases initially greater than 25 mm but downsized by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased rate of local tumor progression.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a valid treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRLM) smaller than 25 mm and unsuitable for surgical resection. Tumor size is predictive for local tumor progression (LTP). The aim of this study was to evaluate whether RFA is indicated for lesions >25 mm at presentation but <25 mm after chemotherapy. METHOD: Patients who underwent RFA for CRLM after chemotherapy (January 2004-December 2012) were reviewed. Metastases were classified according to their size. Group 1: ≤25 mm before and after chemotherapy. Group 2A: >25 mm before but ≤25 mm after chemotherapy. Group 2B: >25 mm before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS: 133 CRLM were ablated in 83 patients (median follow-up 56 months). At 1-year, the LTP rate was higher in group 2A than in group 1 (32% vs. 16%, p ≤ 0.001). The highest rate of 1-year LTP was 64% in group 2B. Time to LTP (TLTP) was shorter in group 2A than in group 1 (HR: 2.89; 95% CI [1.04-8.01]; p = 0.004). Following multivariate analysis, the group type was the only predictive factor for TLTP (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RFA is not the optimal treatment for CRLM > 25 mm at presentation.

Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983): long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Previous results of the EORTC intergroup trial 40983 showed that perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) increases progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery alone for patients with initially resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Here we present overall survival data after long-term follow-up. METHODS: This randomised, controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study recruited patients from 78 hospitals across Europe, Australia, and Hong Kong. Eligible patients aged 18-80 years who had histologically proven colorectal cancer and up to four liver metastases were randomly assigned (1:1) to either perioperative FOLFOX4 or surgery alone. Perioperative FOLFOX4 consisted of six 14-day cycles of oxaliplatin 85mg/m(2), folinic acid 200 mg/m(2) (DL form) or 100 mg/m(2) (L form) on days 1-2 plus bolus, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) (bolus) and 600 mg/m(2) (continuous 22 h infusion), before and after surgery. Patients were centrally randomised by minimisation, adjusting for centre and risk score and previous adjuvant chemotherapy to primary surgery for colorectal cancer, and the trial was open label. Analysis of overall survival was by intention to treat in all randomly assigned patients. FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2000, and July 5, 2004, 364 patients were randomly assigned to a treatment group (182 patients in each group, of which 171 per group were eligible and 152 per group underwent resection). At a median follow-up of 8·5 years (IQR 7·6-9·5), 107 (59%) patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group had died versus 114 (63%) in the surgery-only group (HR 0·88, 95% CI 0·68-1·14; p=0·34). In all randomly assigned patients, median overall survival was 61·3 months (95% CI 51·0-83·4) in the perioperative chemotherapy group and 54·3 months (41·9-79·4) in the surgery alone group. 5-year overall survival was 51·2% (95% CI 43·6-58·3) in the perioperative chemotherapy group versus 47·8% (40·3-55·0) in the surgery-only group. Two patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group and three in the surgery-only group died from complications of protocol surgery, and one patient in the perioperative chemotherapy group died possibly as a result of toxicity of protocol treatment. INTERPRETATION: We found no difference in overall survival with the addition of perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 compared with surgery alone for patients with resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. However, the previously observed benefit in PFS means that perioperative chemotherapy with FOLFOX4 should remain the reference treatment for this population of patients. FUNDING: Norwegian and Swedish Cancer Societies, Cancer Research UK, Ligue Nationale Contre Cancer, US National Cancer Institute, Sanofi-Aventis.

Multicenter validation study of pathologic response and tumor thickness at the tumor-normal liver interface as independent predictors of disease-free survival after preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: To validate pathologic markers of response to preoperative chemotherapy as predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM). METHODS: One hundred seventy-one patients who underwent resection of CLM after preoperative chemotherapy at 4 centers were studied. Pathologic response-defined as the proportion of tumor cells remaining (complete, 0%; major, <50%; minor, ≥50%) and tumor thickness at the tumor-normal liver interface (TNI) (<0.5 mm, 0.5 to <5 mm, ≥5 mm)-was assessed by a central pathology reviewer and local pathologists. RESULTS: Pathologic response was complete in 8% of patients, major in 49% of patients, and minor in 43% of patients. Tumor thickness at the TNI was <0.5 mm in 21% of patients, 0.5 to <5 mm in 56% of patients, and ≥5 mm in 23% of patients. On multivariate analyses, using either pathologic response or tumor thickness at TNI, pathologic response (P = .002, .009), tumor thickness at TNI (P = 0.015, <.001), duration of preoperative chemotherapy (P = .028, .043), number of CLM (P = .038, . 037), and margin (P = .011, .016) were associated with DFS. In a multivariate analysis using both parameters, tumor thickness at TNI (P = .004, .015), duration of preoperative chemotherapy (P = .025), number of nodules (P = .027), and margin (P = .014) were associated with DFS. Tumor size by pathology examination was the predictor of pathologic response. Predictors of tumor thickness at the TNI were tumor size and chemotherapy regimen. There was near perfect agreement for pathologic response (κ = .82) and substantial agreement (κ = .76) for tumor thickness between the central reviewer and local pathologists. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologic response and tumor thickness at the TNI are valid predictors of DFS after preoperative chemotherapy and surgery for CLM.

Systemic cytotoxic and biological therapies of colorectal liver metastases: expert consensus statement.

Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) has undergone significant development in the past 15 years. Therapy regimens consisting of combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents have demonstrated greater efficacy and contributed to a significant survival improvement. As the majority of patients who undergo resection for liver-only CRLM are at risk of disease recurrence and cancer-related death, combining resection with systemic therapy appears sensible. However, trial-based evidence is sparse to support this concept. Peri-operative FOLFOX has demonstrated a progression-free survival benefit in a single Phase III trial; the safety of chemotherapy and subsequent operations was acceptable and only a few patients showed initial progression. Chemotherapy-associated liver injury (CALI), including sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and steatohepatitis, has been observed after cytotoxic therapy, and should have implications for chemotherapy plans prior to hepatectomy. In general, pre-operative chemotherapy should not extend beyond 3 months. For patients with unresectable liver-only CRLM, a response to chemotherapy could establish resectability and should be considered an initial treatment goal. In patients with unresectable CRLM, oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-containing combinations represent the standard options, although single-agent choices may be appropriate for individual patients. The addition of bevacizumab carries the potential for a greater response and possibly for reduced CALI risks. In tumours without K-ras mutations, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) agents are also reasonable choices for a greater response and improved survival outcomes. It is crucial that all systemic CRLM treatment decisions include proper definitions of treatment goals and endpoints, and are derived based on appropriate multidisciplinary considerations for other potentially applicable local or regional modalities.

Evaluation of predictive models in daily practice for the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome.

The optimal strategy for identifying patients with Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) is still debated. Several predictive models (e.g., MMRpredict, PREMM1,2 and MMRpro) combining personal and familial data have recently been developed to quantify the risk that a given patient with CRC carries a Lynch syndrome-causing mutation. Their clinical applicability to patients with CRC from the general population requires evaluation. We studied a consecutive series of 214 patients with newly diagnosed CRC characterized for tumor microsatellite instability (MSI), somatic BRAF mutation, MLH1 promoter methylation and mismatch repair (MMR) gene germline mutation status. The performances of the models for identifying MMR mutation carriers (8/214, 3.7%) were evaluated and compared to the revised Bethesda guidelines and a molecular strategy based on MSI testing in all patients followed by the exclusion of MSI-positive sporadic cases from mutational testing by screening for BRAF mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation. The sensitivities of the three models, at the lowest thresholds proposed, were identical (75%), with similar numbers of probands eligible for further MSI testing (almost half the patients). In our dataset, the prediction models gave no better discrimination than the revised Bethesda guidelines. Both approaches failed to identify two of the eight mutation carriers (the same two patients, aged 67 and 81 years, both with no family history). Thus, like the revised Bethesda guidelines, predictive models did not identify all patients with Lynch syndrome in our series of consecutive CRC. Our results support systematic screening for MMR deficiency in all new CRC cases.

Predictive factors for the benefit of perioperative FOLFOX for resectable liver metastasis in colorectal cancer patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983).

OBJECTIVE: In EORTC study 40983, perioperative FOLFOX increased progression-free survival (PFS) compared with surgery alone for patients with initially 1 to 4 resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted an exploratory retrospective analysis to identify baseline factors possibly predictive for a benefit of perioperative FOLFOX on PFS. METHODS: The analysis was based on 237 events from 342 eligible patients. Cox proportional hazards regression models with a significance level of 0.1 were used to build up univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: After adjustment for identified prognostic factors, moderately (5.1-30 ng/mL) and highly (>30 ng/mL) elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels were both predictive for the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy (interaction P = 0.07; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58 and HR = 0.52 for treatment benefit). For patients with moderately or highly elevated CEA (>5 ng/mL), the 3-year PFS was 35% with perioperative chemotherapy compared to 20% with surgery alone. Performance status (PS) 0 and BMI lower than 30 were also predictive for the benefit of perioperative chemotherapy (interaction P = 0.04 and P = 0.02). However, the number of patients with PS 1 and BMI 30 or higher were limited. The benefit of perioperative therapy was not influenced by the number of metastatic lesions (1 vs 2-4, interaction HR = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative FOLFOX seems to benefit in particular patients with resectable liver metastases from CRC when CEA is elevated and when PS is unaffected, regardless of the number of metastatic lesions.ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00006479.

Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in relation to surgery for colorectal liver metastases.

Liver resection is associated with prolonged survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. At diagnosis, 15-20% of patients have resectable colorectal liver metastases whereas other patients have too advanced disease to enable surgical treatment and receive chemotherapy. In patients undergoing resection of colorectal liver metastases, disease relapse occurs in up to 70%. Therefore, a combined approach including preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy or both has been tested to improve outcome after surgery. In patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases, chemotherapy is initially the sole treatment option. The considerable improvement of the efficacy of anticancer agents has contributed to increase the response rate in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. In case of major response to chemotherapy, surgery with curative intent can be offered to patients with initially unresectable liver metastases.

Surgical strategies to synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Synchronous colorectal liver metastases include a wide variety of clinical presentation depending on the location and the extent of the primary tumor, the extent of metastatic disease in the liver, and the presence of extrahepatic disease. Only a minority of patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases and an intact primary tumor can be candidates for a curative treatment approach. In the past two decades, considerable progress with both antitumor agents and surgical strategies has contributed to increase the number of patients that can achieve complete resection of primary tumor and liver metastases. Optimal treatment of colorectal resectable liver metastases includes preoperative chemotherapy that can be administered after resection of the primary tumor and before resection of liver metastases in a 'classical' fashion, before combined resection of the primary tumor and liver metastases, and before liver resection of liver metastases followed by resection of the primary tumor in the reverse strategy. With regard to the large variety of clinical presentations in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases, none of these treatment strategies can be recommended in all patients. The complexity and the multiplicity of available treatment options underline the need for a multidisciplinary approach to this disease.

Preoperative systemic chemotherapy alters the histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases.

Histopathological growth patterns (HGPs) are a reliable, reproducible, and strong prognostic biomarker that can be assessed on haematoxylin and eosin-stained sections of resected colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Assessment estimates the relative fraction of the tumour-liver interface for each of the three growth patterns; the desmoplastic HGP reflects good prognosis. Whether preoperative chemotherapy affects the HGP is currently unclear. The present international multicentre study evaluates this in an original cohort of 877 consecutive patients treated in the Netherlands, an external validation cohort of 1,203 consecutive patients treated in the USA, and a post hoc analysis from the phase III randomised controlled European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 40983 trial (n = 70). All patients underwent resection of CRLM with or without preoperative systemic chemotherapy. Trial patients were randomised between perioperative chemotherapy and resection or resection alone. HGPs were determined according to consensus guidelines and compared for preoperative treatment status. Data from three separate tumour regression grading systems were available for the trial cohort. These were correlated with HGP stratified for treatment arm. In the original cohort, the average presence of desmoplastic HGP was 43% for chemo-naïve versus 67% for preoperatively treated patients (p < 0.001). A significant association between chemotherapy and desmoplastic HGP was found on multivariable analysis (ß [95% confidence interval, CI]: 24.57 [18.28-30.87], p < 0.001). In the validation cohort, the average presence of desmoplastic HGP was 40% for chemo-naïve versus 63% for preoperatively treated patients (p < 0.001). This association remained on multivariable analysis (ß [95% CI]: 24.18 [18.70-29.66], p < 0.001). In the EORTC 40983 trial, the average desmoplastic HGP presence was 33% in the resection arm versus 61% in the chemotherapy arm (p = 0.005). Chemotherapy was independently associated with an increase in desmoplastic HGP (ß [95% CI]: 23.29 [1.78-44.79], p = 0.022). All three tumour regression gradings were significantly associated with the desmoplastic HGP in the chemotherapy arm (all p < 0.04). None were associated in the resection arm (all p > 0.11). Preoperative chemotherapy induces histopathological changes that alter the HGP of CRLM.

Colorectal cancer.

Substantial progress has been made in colorectal cancer in the past decade. Screening, used to identify individuals at an early stage, has improved outcome. There is greater understanding of the genetic basis of inherited colorectal cancer and identification of patients at risk. Optimisation of surgery for patients with localised disease has had a major effect on survival at 5 years and 10 years. For rectal cancer, identification of patients at greatest risk of local failure is important in the selection of patients for preoperative chemoradiation, a strategy proven to improve outcomes in these patients. Stringent postoperative follow-up helps the early identification of potentially radically treatable oligometastatic disease and improves long-term survival. Treatment with adjuvant fluoropyrimidine for colon and rectal cancers further improves survival, more so in stage III than in stage II disease, and oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy is now routinely used for stage III disease, although efficacy must be carefully balanced against toxicity. In stage II disease, molecular markers such as microsatellite instability might help select patients for treatment. The integration of targeted treatments with conventional cytotoxic drugs has expanded the treatment of metastatic disease resulting in incremental survival gains. However, biomarker development is essential to aid selection of patients likely to respond to therapy, thereby rationalising treatments and improving outcomes.

A model of primary culture of colorectal cancer and liver metastasis to predict chemosensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Prediction of chemosensitivity is a major goal of modern oncology. The aim of this study was to establish a simple and effective model of primary culture of colorectal cancer fragments and to test whether it allows prediction of chemosensitivity. METHODS: Colorectal cancer fragments (primary tumors or liver metastases) of 94 consecutive and previously untreated patients were obtained, prepared, and cultured in polyHEMA. For each fragment cultured, a proliferative index (PI) was calculated after immunostaining at d 0 and after 7 d in culture with media alone or supplemented for 24h with the topoisomerase I inhibitor metabolite SN-38. The correlation between in vitro response (decrease in PI after exposure to the drug) and in vivo response (RECIST criteria) was studied in a subset of patients who had measurable metastases and were treated with a topoisomerase I inhibitor. RESULTS: PolyHEMA allowed three-dimensional culture of tumor fragments up to 7 d without fibroblastic invasion and with a slight but significant decrease of PI (59% at d 0 versus 51% after 7 d in culture, P < 0.001). In vitro drug efficacy was tested in 67 fragments, the mean PI after culture with SN-38 dropped to 22% (P < 0.001). In a subset of 12 patients, there was no statistically significant correlation between in vitro and in vivo response (P = 0.13). CONCLUSION: Primary culture in polyHEMA was easy to perform successfully in 71% of cases. On this model, the antiproliferative effect of SN-38 could be measured and results correlated to clinical data.

Preservation of an intra-pancreatic hepatic artery during duodenopancreatectomy for melanoma metastasis.

We describe the case of a hepatic artery originating from a hepato-mesenteric trunk and traveling through the head of the pancreas, found preoperatively in a 44-year-old woman presenting two metachrone intra-pancreatic metastasis of a skin melanoma. Few cases with this anatomic variation have been found in the published literature consulted and this is the first case of duodenopancreatectomy for melanoma metastasis associated with this anatomic variant. In this patient, multidetector CT image with angiography and 3-D reconstruction demonstrated that the common hepatic artery arose from the superior mesenteric artery without any other arterial supply to the liver. Pancreatoduodenectomy with arterial conservation and without reconstruction was performed. Routine preoperative computerized tomographic angiography helps to recognize the hepatic vascular anatomy and thereby prepares the surgeon to better deal with at risk vascular variants intraoperatively. During pancreatic resection, every attempt should be made to preserve the variant hepatic vessels, particularly if they irrigate the entire liver. Increased alertness of the vascular anatomy would decrease the probability of intraoperative vascular injury and consequent postoperative complications such as biliary necrosis, biliary anastomotic leaks or hemorrhage.

Pre- and Postoperative Capecitabine Without or With Oxaliplatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: PETACC 6 Trial by EORTC GITCG and ROG, AIO, AGITG, BGDO, and FFCD.

PURPOSE: The PETACC 6 trial investigates whether the addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation and postoperative capecitabine improves disease-free survival (DFS) in locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS: Between November 2008 and September 2011, patients with rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from the anal verge, T3/4 and/or node positive, were randomly assigned to 5 weeks preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation (45-50.4 Gy) followed by six cycles of adjuvant capecitabine, both without (control arm, 1) or with (experimental arm, 2) oxaliplatin. The primary end point was improvement of 3-year DFS by oxaliplatin from 65% to 72% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.763). RESULTS: A total of 1,094 patients were randomly assigned (intention to treat), and 1,068 eligible patients started their allocated treatment (arm 1, 543; arm 2, 525), with completion of protocol treatment in 68% (arm 1) v 54% (arm 2). A higher rate of grade 3/4 adverse events was reported in the experimental arm (14.4% v 37.3% and 23.4% v 46.6% for neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment, respectively). At a median follow-up of 68 months (interquartile range, 58-74 months), 157 and 156 DFS events were observed in arms 1 and 2, respectively (adjusted HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.28; P = .835). Three-year DFS rate was not different, with 76.5% (95% CI, 72.7% to 79.9%) in arm 1, which is higher than anticipated, and 75.8% (95% CI, 71.9% to 79.3%) in arm 2. The 7-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were not different as well, with DFS of 66.1% v 65.5% (HR, 1.02) and OS of 73.5% v 73.7% (HR, 1.19) in arms 1 and 2, respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed heterogeneity in treatment effect according to German versus non-German site location, without detectable confounding factors in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The addition of oxaliplatin to preoperative capecitabine-based chemoradiation and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy impairs tolerability and feasibility and does not improve efficacy.

Impaired mobility, ASA status and administration of tramadol are risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients aged 75 years or more after major abdominal surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to determine incidence, duration, and risk factors for postoperative delirium (PD) in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The incidence and risk factors of PD after major abdominal surgery in elderly patients are not well documented. METHODS: From May 2006 to May 2008, 118 patients aged 75 years or more without severe preoperative cognitive dysfunction (mini mental state examination score >10/30) and undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were included. The preoperative geriatric assessment battery consisted of 4 tests evaluating physical (instrumental activities of daily living and timed get up and go test score) and cognitive function (mini mental state examination score), and detecting the presence of an underlying depression (Short-GDS). After the operation, geriatric patients were assessed for PD by the Confusion Assessment Method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors for PD. RESULTS: Overall, PD occurred in 28 patients (24%). Multivariate analysis showed that an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3-4 (P = 0.02), impaired mobility (timed get up and go test score >20 seconds) (P = 0.009) and postoperative tramadol administration (P = 0.0009) were risk factors for PD. The mortality rate was 14% in 28 patients with PD and 3.3% in 90 patients without PD (P = 0.051). The morbidity rate was 35.5% in 28 patients with PD and 32% in 90 patients without PD (NS). The mean hospital stay was 19 +/- 11 days for patients with PD and 14 +/- 8 for patients without PD (P = 0.01). Fifteen of 24 (62.5%) surviving patients with PD and 28 of 87 (32%) surviving patients without PD were discharged to geriatric rehabilitation unit (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: PD is a frequent and severe postoperative event in elderly patients after major abdominal surgery. A perioperative geriatric assessment should be recommended to patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3-4 and preoperative impaired mobility to facilitate the management of PD. In these patients, the postoperative administration of tramadol should be avoided.

Neoadjuvant therapy of colorectal liver metastases: lessons learned from clinical trials.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used to improve outcome in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). In patients with unresectable CLM, recent clinical trials evaluate the ability of chemotherapy to increase the resectability rate. In patients with resectable CLM, the objective is to decrease the risk of recurrence after hepatectomy that still remains elevated despite the improvement of the surgical technique. A multidisciplinary approach of patients with CLM is desirable whatever the initial status of resectability.

Shanghai international consensus on diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2019).

The liver is the most common anatomical site for hematogenous metastases from colorectal cancer. Therefore effective treatment of liver metastases is one of the most challenging elements in the management of colorectal cancer. However, there is rare available clinical consensus or guideline only focusing on colorectal liver metastases. After six rounds of discussion by 195 clinical experts of the Shanghai International Consensus Expert Group on Colorectal Liver Metastases (SINCE) from 29 countries or regions, the Shanghai Consensus has been finally completed, based on current research and expert experience. The consensus emphasized the principle of multidisciplinary team, provided detailed diagnosis approaches, and guided precise local and systemic treatments. This Shanghai Consensus might be of great significance to standardized diagnosis and treatment of colorectal liver metastases all over the world.