Relevance of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale to Urban Community-Dwelling Adults With Diagnosed Vestibular Dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how relevant the items on the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale are to patients living in an urban setting and to evaluate additional items relevant to urban populations but not included in the current version of the scale. DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical survey. SETTING: Urban, tertiary vestibular rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Vestibular rehabilitation clinic outpatients (N=103). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relevance of 16 day-to-day tasks on the ABC scale on a scale of 0 (not performed) to 10 (performed regularly); median relevancy score (MRS) for most relevant items. RESULTS: One hundred three participants (73.7% female, mean age 61.5± years) with vestibular disorders completed the survey. The items with the highest MRS were walking around a house (MRS=10), reaching for a shelved item eye level (MRS=9), taking the stairs (MRS=7), bending over and picking up a slipper (MRS=7), and stepping onto or off an escalator while holding the railing (MRS=7). Lowest MRS items to someone living in an urban environment included walking across a parking lot to the mall (MRS=0) and walking outside the house to a car parked in the driveway (MRS=0). The most common functional activities not addressed by ABC score included navigating the subway/public transit (35.9%) and walking through crowds (32.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed insights about important activities of daily living for those in an urban setting. Results show that the ABC scale should be modified to better reflect the specific activities of urban dwellers.

Does "Just in Time" teaching of ergonomic principles improve posture of trainees during otologic microscopic surgery?

PURPOSE: Musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among otolaryngologists and otologists with symptoms starting during residency. Prior data suggested that high-risk joint angles were often adopted at procedure onset, suggesting a detrimental "natural" operating position. Despite its importance, dedicated ergonomic teaching is not systematically introduced into residency training. The objective of this study was to compare initial ergonomic positioning during microscopic temporal bone surgery between those who receive "Just in Time" ergonomic teaching prior to starting dissection with those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a pilot, prospective trial in which otolaryngology residents at an urban, multicenter tertiary care academic institution (n = 14) wore ergonomic sensors (inertial measurement units) during microscopic temporal bone lab drilling. Prior to recording, participants were randomized to receive an instructional presentation on ergonomic principles (n = 8, intervention group) or not (n = 6, control group). The inertial measurement units analyzed neck and back angles for the initial 5 min of drilling. RESULTS: Of 14 trainees, 78.6 % had prior experience with otologic microscopic cases and 14.3 % reported prior surgical ergonomic training or instruction. The groups were matched in trainee height (P = 0.54), handedness (P = 0.83), stage of otolaryngology training (P = 0.64), prior otologic microscopic surgery experience (P = 0.35), prior temporal bone drilling experience (P = 0.35), and prior teaching in ergonomic principles (P = 0.47). Junior trainees (PGY 1-3) who did not receive "Just in Time" teaching adopted a posture with significantly higher risk back flexion compared to junior trainees who received the training (25.3° vs. 5.7°, P = 0.04). There was no difference in back positioning among senior trainees (12.6° vs. -5.7°, P = 0.13). While there was a trend towards those in the intervention group adopting safer procedural posture, there was no significant difference in the overall cohort between the intervention and control groups in both neck positioning (-11.0° vs. -19.1°, P = 0.17) and back positioning (8.6° vs. 19.1°, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal related pain is prevalent among otolaryngologists and otologists with data suggesting that symptoms begin during residency. Targeted "Just in Time" teaching of ergonomic principles is feasible and may be effective for development of healthy postural habits, especially among junior trainees.

Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcomes of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. DATA SOURCE: An electronic search of Medline and Embase articles. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was performed with a search strategy developed by a licensed librarian to identify studies of adult patients with SSD who underwent ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Articles were managed in Covidence and evaluated by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed and data were extracted, including patient demographics, etiology of deafness, duration of deafness, and postoperative change in speech recognition, tinnitus, sound localization, and quality of life (QoL). A meta-analysis was performed, and pooled mean differences were calculated for each outcome of interest via random effects models by each outcome, as well as subgroup analyses by the individual clinical score used. RESULTS: Of 2309 studies identified, 185 full texts were evaluated, and 50 were ultimately included involving 674 patients. Speech perception scores in quiet and noise, tinnitus control, sound localization, and QoL all significantly improved after implantation. Pooled outcomes demonstrated score improvements in speech perception (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.8 [95% CI, 2.16-3.43]), QoL (SMD, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45-0.91]), sound localization (SMD, -1.13 [95% CI, -1.68 to -0.57]), and tinnitus score reduction (SMD, -1.32 [95% CI, -1.85 to -0.80]). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation in adults with SSD results in significant improvements in speech perception, tinnitus control, sound localization, and QoL.