Feasibility of text message follow-up for pediatric asthma care after an emergency department visit.

Background: Many children seen in the Emergency Department (ED) for asthma do not follow-up with their primary care provider. Text messaging via short message service (SMS) is a ubiquitous, but untested means of providing post-ED asthma follow-up care.Objective: To evaluate responses to an asthma assessment survey via SMS following an ED visit and estimate the likelihood of response by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: We recruited 173 parents of children 2-17 years-old presenting for ED asthma care to receive a follow-up text (participation rate: 85%). One month later, parents received via SMS a 22-item survey that assessed asthma morbidity. We assessed response rates overall and by various sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including age, parental education, and indicators of asthma severity.Results: Overall, 55% of parents (n = 95) responded to the SMS survey. In multivariable logistic regression (MLR), parents who graduated high school had a four-fold higher response rate compared to parents with less than a high school degree (OR: 4.05 (1.62, 10.13)). More parents of children with oral steroid use in the prior 12 months responded to survey items (OR: 2.53 (1.2, 5.31)). Reported asthma characteristics included: 48% uncontrolled, 22% unimproved/worse, 21% with sleep disruption, and 10% who were hospitalized for asthma.Conclusions: Text messaging may be a viable strategy to improve post-ED asthma assessment and to identify children with persistent symptoms in need of enhanced care or modification of care plans.

Use of a validated asthma questionnaire to increase inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in the pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend assessment of asthma control and treatment with an ICS when appropriate. Children seen for asthma in the ED often have poorly controlled asthma. Validated questionnaires are rarely used in the ED and ICS are prescribed at less than 5% of ED asthma encounters, leaving many children at risk for continued poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if use of a validated asthma questionnaire can increase the proportion of children who receive an ICS prescription during an ED asthma visit. METHODS: We administered a validated asthma questionnaire (Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version [PACCI-ED]) to parents of children 2 - 17 years old presenting for asthma care at a large, urban, academic pediatric ED. Based on national asthma guidelines, the PACCI-ED results were used to determine ICS dose recommendations. ED physicians reviewed the PACCI-ED results and ICS dose recommendations and chose whether to prescribe an ICS upon discharge. ICS prescribing rates during the intervention period were assessed via medical record review and compared to historical controls. We also surveyed parents to examine the association of sociodemographic factors with receipt of an ICS prescription, and surveyed physicians regarding their prescribing decisions. RESULTS: Thirteen physicians and seventy-nine children participated. Historically, the ICS prescribing rate for asthma exacerbations discharged from the ED was 13%. The intervention increased ICS prescribing to 56% (p < 0.001). Children with ≥2 asthma exacerbations in the prior year (p < 0.02) and those with moderate-severe persistent asthma (p < 0.02) were more likely to receive an ICS prescription. There were no statistically significant differences in ICS prescribing by sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: A validated asthma questionnaire increased ICS prescribing for children presenting for to the ED for asthma care. Additional strategies are needed to promote prescribing in this setting and ensure that all eligible children receive guideline-based asthma care.

Children with under-diagnosed asthma presenting to a pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed asthma in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for respiratory illnesses might be associated with subsequent asthma morbidity and repeat ED visits. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of undiagnosed asthma among children presenting for ED care, and explore associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We surveyed parents of children ages 2-17 years seeking ED care for respiratory symptoms (including asthma) regarding sociodemographic characteristics, asthma symptoms, prior asthma care and morbidity, and prior asthma diagnosis. Undiagnosed asthma was defined as a positive screening for asthma and no prior diagnosis. We compared sociodemographic and clinical factors of those with diagnosed versus undiagnosed asthma using chi-square, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 362 children, 36% had undiagnosed asthma. Undiagnosed children were younger, had younger parents, and had parents less likely to speak English versus diagnosed children (all p < 0.05). Among undiagnosed children, 42% had moderate or severe asthma and 66% reported ≥1 exacerbation in the prior 12 months. Parent-reported controller medication use was higher among diagnosed versus undiagnosed children (60% vs. 21%, p=.001). In a multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for insurance, education, income and preferred language), no controller usage (aOR 4.26), no asthma exacerbations in the prior year (aOR 2.41) and younger age (aOR 0.76) were significantly associated with undiagnosed asthma. CONCLUSION: Children presenting to the ED with undiagnosed asthma commonly experience significant prior asthma morbidity. Strategies to improve asthma diagnosis and messaging to their parents may reduce future morbidity.

Racial Inequities in Asthma Care.

Racial inequities in asthma care are evolving as a recognized factor in long-standing inequities in asthma outcomes (e.g., hospitalization and mortality). Little research has been conducted regarding the presence or absence of racial inequities among patients seen in asthma specialist settings, this is an important area of future research given that asthma specialist care is recommended for patients experiencing the poor asthma outcomes disproportionately experienced by Black and Hispanic patients. This study provides a systematic review of racial asthma care inequities in asthma epidemiology, clinical assessment, medication prescription, and asthma specialist referral practices.

Structural Inequities in Medicine that Contribute to Racial Inequities in Asthma Care.

Structural inequities in medicine have been present for centuries in the United States, but only recently are these being recognized as contributors to racial inequities in asthma care and asthma outcomes. This chapter provides a systematic review of structural factors such as racial bias in spirometry algorithms, the history of systemic racism in medicine, workforce/pipeline limitations to the presence of underrepresented minority health care providers, bias in research funding awards, and strategies to solve these problems.

Parental preferences for survey mode of administration, interview versus self-administered, with an asthma management questionnaire.

Background: National asthma guidelines encourage use of patient surveys to aid clinical assessment. Little is known about how these should be administered in acute care settings such as the emergency department (ED).Objective: Evaluate if parents have a preference for interview versus self-administered surveys in an ED, understand the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by choice of survey mode of administration, and assess if there is a difference by mode in the parent's perception of an asthma management tool.Methods: A research assistant (RA) surveyed parents of children 2-17 years of age seeking ED asthma care. Parents chose to either self-administer or have an RA-administered survey that included the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version (PACCI-ED). We compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and perceptions about the PACCI-ED by mode of survey administration.Results: Of 174 parent participants, 60% chose interviewer-administered surveys. Parents who chose interviewer-administered versus self-administered surveys had lower income, lower educational attainment, and children with uncontrolled asthma (p < .05). Bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that parents who chose interviewer-administered versus self-administered surveys tended to rate the PACCI-ED more favorably.Conclusions: EDs wishing to systematically use an asthma survey may need to plan appropriate resources for staff to administer them, particularly if they serve populations of lower socioeconomic status.

Asthma specialist care preferences among parents of children receiving emergency department care for asthma.

Objective: To learn factors associated with desire for asthma specialist care among parents of children seeking emergency department (ED) care for asthma, and if referral was indicated based on national asthma guidelines. Methods: We surveyed parents of children ages 0-18 years seeking pediatric ED asthma care, then comparisons were made according to parental level of interest in asthma specialist care, with regard to socio-demographics, asthma morbidity and care, by chi-squared and logistic regression. Results: Of 149 children, 20% reported specialist care, but 75% met guideline criteria for referral. About 80% of parents not seeing an asthma specialist expressed a desire to see one. Higher rates of prior urgent care visits (48% vs. 22%, p = 0.03), ED visits (82% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and oral steroid use (53% vs. 22%, p = 0.009) were reported by parents who desired an asthma specialist compared with parents who did not. 87% of parents not seeing a specialist attributed this to a perceived lack of necessity by their primary care provider. An ED visit within the prior 12 months was the most significant predictor in parental desire for specialist care (odds ratio 9.75; 95% CI 3.42-27.76) in adjusted logistic regression models. Conclusion: High rates of parental preference for asthma specialist care suggest that directly querying parents may be an efficient method to identify children appropriate for specialist care in the ED.

Predictors of prior asthma specialist care among pediatric patients seen in the emergency department for asthma.

Background: Asthma guidelines recommend specialist care for patients experiencing poor asthma outcomes during emergency department (ED) visits. The prevalence and predictors of asthma specialist care among an ED population seeking pediatric asthma care are unknown. Objective: To examine, in an ED population, factors associated with prior asthma specialist use based on parental reports of prior asthma morbidity and asthma care. Methods: Parents of children ages 0 to 17 years seeking ED asthma care were surveyed regarding socio-demographics, asthma morbidity, asthma management and current asthma specialist care status. We compared prior asthma care and morbidity between those currently cared for by an asthma specialist versus not. Multivariable logistic regression models to predict factors associated with asthma specialist use were adjusted for parent education and insurance type. Results: Of 150 children (62% boys, mean age 4.7 years, 69% Hispanic), 22% reported asthma specialist care, 75% did not see a specialist and for 3% specialist status was unknown. Care was worse for those not seeing a specialist, including under-use of controller medications (24% vs. 64%, p < 0.001) and asthma action plans (20% vs. 62%, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that lack of recommendation by the primary care physician reduced the odds of specialist care (OR 0.01, 95% CI <0.01, 0.05, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Asthma specialist care was infrequent among this pediatric ED population, consistent with the sub-optimal chronic asthma care we observed. Prospective trials should further investigate if systematic referral to asthma specialists during/after an ED encounter would improve asthma outcomes.

Predicting future emergency department visits and hospitalizations for asthma using the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument - Emergency Department version (PACCI-ED).

OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) are potential settings for interventions to improve asthma outcomes. Screening tools can identify children at risk of future morbidity. Our objective was to determine the predictive validity of the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument - Emergency Department version (PACCI-ED) for future asthma-related ED visits and hospitalizations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 108 children 1-17 years old who visited an ED for asthma and completed the PACCI-ED. The PACCI-ED queries parents about prior 12-month ED visits, hospitalizations, steroid use, perceived asthma morbidity and burden, and asthma control (over prior 1-2 weeks). The primary outcome was subsequent ED visits and hospitalizations within 1 year of enrollment. Poisson regression was used to model PACCI-ED questions for future ED visits controlling for age and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Reported ED visits predicted future ED visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-7.2) but not future hospitalizations. Reported hospitalizations predicted future ED visits (aIRR 3.3; 95% CI 1.7-6.3) and hospitalizations (aIRR 6.4; 95% CI 2.3-17.6). The remaining PACCI-ED questions did not predict future ED visits or hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The PACCI-ED risk domain was the only domain that predicted future asthma ED visits and hospitalizations. Questions about previous ED visits and hospitalizations are the most effective questions when screening children with asthma in EDs for the risk of future health-care use.

The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument for the Emergency Department (PACCI-ED) improves physician assessment of asthma morbidity in pediatric emergency department patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument for the Emergency Department (PACCI-ED), a 12-item questionnaire, can help ED attendings accurately assess a patient's asthma control and morbidity. METHODS: This was a randomized-controlled trial performed at an urban pediatric ED of children aged 1-17 years presenting with an asthma exacerbation. Parents answered PACCI-ED questions about their children's asthma. Attendings were randomized to view responses to the PACCI-ED (intervention group) or to be blinded to the completed PACCI-ED (control group). The two groups were compared on their empirical clinical assessment of: (1) chronic asthma control categories, (2) asthma trajectory (stable, worsening or improving), (3) patient adherence to controller medications, and (4) burden of disease for the patient's family. The validated PACCI algorithm was used as the criterion standard for these four outcomes. Accuracy of clinical assessment was compared between intervention and control groups using chi-squared tests and an intention-to-treat approach. RESULTS: Seventeen ED attendings were enrolled in the study and 77 children visits were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between the intervention and the control groups for child's gender, age, race, and asthma characteristics. Intervention group attendings were more accurate than control group attendings in assessing the category of chronic asthma control (43% versus 19%; p = 0.03), disease trajectory (72% versus 45%; p = 0.02), and the disease burden for families (74% versus 35%; p = 0.001) over the past 12 months. There was a trend towards more accuracy of intervention versus control attendings for estimating patient adherence to controller medications (72% versus 48%; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The PACCI-ED improves the assessment of asthma control, trajectory, and burden by ED attendings, and may help assessment of asthma medication adherence and prior asthma exacerbations. The PACCI-ED can be used to improve provider assessment of asthma morbidity during pediatric ED visits for asthma exacerbations, and to identify children who may benefit from interventions to reduce asthma morbidity.

Pediatrician qualifications and asthma management behaviors and their association with patient race/ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to understand if pediatrician characteristics and asthma assessment and treatment varied in association with the proportion of African-American and Latino children in the pediatrician's practice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 500 American Academy of Pediatrics members between November 2005 and May 2006. Standardized vignettes were used to test how different indicators of a patient's asthma status affect pediatrician asthma assessments and recommendations. Linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the association of pediatrician assessments and treatment recommendations for these vignettes, respectively, with the proportion of reported African-American and Latino children seen in their practice. RESULTS: There were 270 respondents (response rate = 54%). Based on pediatrician-reported percentage of minority patients, there were no differences in board certification status, recognition of poorly controlled asthma nor in the likelihood of appropriately increasing long-term controller medications to treat poorly controlled asthma (p > 0.05 for all analyses). CONCLUSIONS: Caring primarily for minority children by AAP pediatricians appears unrelated to training qualifications or in their reported knowledge of how to appropriately assess and treat asthma. Therefore, studies of asthma care disparities should focus on understanding the knowledge-base of non-AAP pediatric providers who care for minority populations and exploring other potential contributory provider-level factors (e.g. communication skills).

Impact of children's feeding/swallowing problems: validation of a new caregiver instrument.

The impact of caring for children with deglutition disorders is poorly understood and tools to measure the unique concerns of these caregivers are lacking. The aims of this investigation were to develop and validate The Feeding/Swallowing Impact Survey (FS-IS) as an instrument designed to measure and improve understanding of caregiver issues. Demographic, economic, and dysphagic data were provided by the primary caregivers of 164 children (median age: 14 months, male: 78, female: 86) presenting for initial outpatient feeding/swallowing evaluations. Caregivers completed the PEDS-QL™ Family Impact Module (PEDS-QL™ FIM) and the FS-IS. A principal component analysis was conducted on the FS-IS to identify appropriate subscales. Concurrent validity was assessed by examining correlations between the FS-IS and PEDS-QL™ FIM. Caring for children with feeding/swallowing problems adversely impacted the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of their caregivers. The FS-IS had a strong 3-factor solution to indicate 3 subscales: Daily Activities, Worry, and Feeding Difficulties. All three subscales and total score of the FS-IS correlated with PEDS-QL™ FIM. The FS-IS was validated as an instrument that may help clinicians detect specific factors that influence caregiver HRQoL, identify caregivers who might benefit from additional support, and ultimately improve the care of their children with feeding/swallowing disorders.

The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument asthma questionnaire: for use in diverse children of all ages.

BACKGROUND: National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines recommend questionnaires to assess asthma control, but these questionnaires are not useable across the entire pediatric age spectrum and have not been validated among significant numbers of minority or Spanish-speaking children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate a questionnaire designed to assess asthma control across a broad age range of minority and Spanish-speaking children cared for in an outpatient setting. METHODS: Between July 1, 2007, and September 30, 2010, we collected information using the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI), the Asthma Control Test (ACT; or the childhood ACT for children 4-11 years old), the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire, and lung function and clinicians' ratings of asthma status among a population of children presenting for routine asthma specialist care. The PACCI measure of asthma control was validated by evaluating accuracy, internal reliability, and concurrent, discriminative, and known-groups validity. RESULTS: We collected information on 265 English- and 52 Spanish-speaking children (mean age, 8.2 years; 58% male; 44% African American). Across all age groups and in both languages, PACCI control showed good internal reliability and strong concurrent, discriminative, and known-groups validity with ACT and Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire scores and clinicians' ratings of asthma control. The accuracy of the PACCI in classifying children with uncontrolled asthma was good (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: The PACCI accurately measures asthma control in English- and Spanish-speaking children. The PACCI should be useful to clinicians to assess and classify asthma according to National Institutes of Health asthma guidelines.

What Parents Want Doctors to Know: Responses to an Open-Ended Item on an Asthma Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Unstructured parental comments could solicit important information about children's asthma, yet are rarely captured in clinical asthma questionnaires. This mixed-methods study describes parents' written responses to an open-ended question in a validated asthma questionnaire. METHODS: The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI) asthma questionnaire was administered to parents of children with asthma symptoms presenting to 48 pediatric primary care offices (PPCP), 1 pediatric pulmonology office, and 1 emergency department (ED). Responses to the question, "Please write down any concern or anything else you would like your doctor to know about your child's asthma" were analyzed using a phenomenological approach until thematic saturation was achieved for each site. Logistic regressions tested whether sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with responding to the open-ended question. RESULTS: Of 7,988 parents who completed the PACCI, 954 (12%) responded to the open-ended question-2% in PPCP, 31% in the ED, and 50% in the pulmonary setting. More severe asthma was associated with higher odds of responding (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.84). Based on responses provided, we identified 3 communication types: 1) clarifying symptoms, 2) asking questions, and 3) communicating distress. Responses also covered 5 asthma-related themes: 1) diagnostic uncertainty, 2) understanding asthma etiology and prognosis, 3) medication management, 4) impact on child function, and 5) personal asthma characteristics. CONCLUSION: Parents of children with severe asthma provided clarifying details, asked questions, and relayed health concerns and distress. None of these topics may be easily captured by closed-ended asthma questionnaires.

Does higher body mass index contribute to worse asthma control in an urban population?

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic findings support a positive association between asthma and obesity. OBJECTIVE: Determine whether obesity or increasing level of body mass index (BMI) are associated with worse asthma control in an ethnically diverse urban population. METHODS: Cross-sectional assessment of asthma control was performed in patients with asthma recruited from primary care offices by using 4 different validated asthma control questionnaires: the Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI), the Asthma Control Test (ACT), the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (ATAQ). Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between obesity and increasing BMI level and asthma control. RESULTS: Of 292 subjects with a mean age of 47 years, the majority were women (82%) and African American (67%). There was a high prevalence of obesity with 63%, with only 15% normal weight. The mean score from all 4 questionnaires showed an average suboptimal asthma control (mean score/maximum possible score): ACCI (8.3/19), ACT (15.4/25), ACQ (2.1/6), and ATAQ (1.3/4). Regression analysis showed no association between obesity or increasing BMI level and asthma control using all 4 questionnaires. This finding persisted even after adjusting for FEV(1), smoking status, race, sex, selected comorbid illnesses, and long-term asthma controller use. CONCLUSION: Using 4 validated asthma control questionnaires, we failed to find an association between obesity and asthma control in an urban population with asthma. Weight loss may not be an appropriate strategy to improve asthma control in this population.

Psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian version of the pediatric asthma control and communication instrument.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of questionnaires capable of evaluating the clinical control of Brazilian children and adolescents with asthma over a wide age range. The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI) has been validated, but only with English- and Spanish-speaking children in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the PACCI questionnaire. METHODS: A cross-sectional psychometric study conducted with children and adolescents aged 01 to 19 years with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, and their respective parents/guardians. The following assessments were conducted: socioeconomic status; clinical control using the Childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma Control Test (ACT); caregiver quality of life using the Pediatric Asthma Caregivers Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ); and pulmonary function test (spirometry). Validity was evaluated as follows: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; Cronbach's alpha analysis (α); floor and ceiling effects; receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 128 participants were included, most of them male (54.7%). The Brazilian version of PACCI had adequate internal consistency (α = .76) and moderate floor and ceiling effects. The internal structure presented acceptable adjustment indices, considering the extraction of four factors. The factors presented adequate α values. Asthma control factor 1 correlated with c-ACT/ACT and PACQLQ. Control domain scores greater than four points (sum of score) and above 1 point (problem index) were indicative of uncontrolled asthma. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of PACCI was able to provide valid and reliable measures in evaluating the clinical control of asthma in Brazilian children and adolescents.

The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument: a clinical tool developed for ethnically diverse populations.

BACKGROUND: Lower levels of quality asthma care among racially diverse populations might be due to inaccurate disease status assessments. The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI) is a new tool that captures patient report of disease status during routine care. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the ACCI's psychometric properties in a racially diverse population. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study. Subjects were recruited from specialist and generalist urban outpatient clinics. The ACCI and measures of asthma control, quality of life, lung function, and specialist rating of asthma status were collected. Four ACCI domains were separately validated: Acute Care, Bother, Control, and Direction. Principal component analysis, internal consistency, concurrent, discriminative, known-groups validity, and accuracy were evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy asthmatic patients (77% female subjects, 55% black) participated. ACCI Control domain internal consistency was 0.80. ACCI Bother, Control, and Direction domains showed strong concurrent validity with asthma control and quality-of-life measures (all P < .001). ACCI Acute Care and Direction domains showed strong concurrent validity with individual validation items (all P < .001). The ACCI Control domain discriminated clinically important levels of disease status measured by asthma control, quality of life (both P < .001), and percent predicted peak expiratory flow rate (P = .005) and was associated with specialist rating of disease status (P < .001), confirming known-groups validity. The accuracy of the ACCI Control domain in classifying patients with uncontrolled asthma was very good (area under the curve, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.742-0.95870). Results were similar for both black and white subjects. CONCLUSION: The ACCI is a promising clinical tool that measures asthma disease status during routine health care and is valid for use in both black and white populations.

Validation of Asthma Control Assessment Among Urban Adolescents Using the Asthma Control and Communication Instrument.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health guidelines recommend questionnaires to assess asthma control, but there are few self-reported asthma morbidity surveys validated among urban, African American, Hispanic, and/or poor adolescents. The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI) is a 12-item self-reported questionnaire previously validated among a diverse adult population, but not among adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the ACCI to accurately describe asthma control in an urban adolescent population. METHODS: Between November 13, 2014, and March 2, 2017, we collected information using the ACCI, the Asthma Control Test, the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and lung function among adolescents enrolled in a school-based asthma intervention study. The ACCI measure of asthma control was validated by evaluating accuracy (on the basis of receiver operating characteristic curve), internal reliability, and concurrent and discriminative validity. RESULTS: We collected information on 280 adolescents (mean age, 13.4 years; 56% males; and 51% African American). ACCI control showed good internal reliability and strong concurrent and discriminative validity with the Asthma Control Test and the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. The accuracy of the ACCI in classifying adolescents with uncontrolled asthma was good (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88). CONCLUSION: The ACCI, a clinical tool developed to assist communication about asthma control, has demonstrated strong construct validity as a self-reported questionnaire within an urban, African American, and Hispanic sample of adolescents. It has the potential to assist in the assessment of asthma control in urban, minority, and/or poor adolescents.