RESUMO
Panniculus morbidus (PM) is a presentation of severe chronic abdominal lymphoedema associated with obesity resulting in oedema and chronic fibrosis. It is a multifaceted condition with significant clinical and psychosocial implications. A 29-year-old female weighing 260 kg with a body mass index of 95 kg/m2 had recurrent infections and sepsis associated with an abdominal pannus extending to her knees and an area of ulceration. The pannus was indurated with extensive fibrosis that significantly affected her quality of life (QOL) requiring assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). A panniculectomy was performed with a negative pressure skin dressing over the skin wound. She was discharged after two days. Two months postoperatively, she reported significant improvement in QOL and can now mobilise and perform ADLs independently with no recurrent admissions. The global prevalence of obesity is reaching pandemic proportions and so will its complications. It can be functionally debilitating and worsen obesity. Surgical resection is indicated to restore mobility and function, prevent recurrent infections, improve QOL, and reduce economic burden. Patients report high satisfaction rates following surgery. Panniculectomy is an effective treatment to alleviate morbidity in severe obesity and should be considered in patients with recurrent infections and a significant impact on QOL.
RESUMO
Introduction: Consistent delineation of the breast conserving surgery (BCS) tumour bed (TB) for breast cancer remains a challenge for radiation oncologists. Accurate delineation allows for better local control and reduces toxicity when planning partial breast or TB boost radiation therapy (RT). Methods: In the operating theatre (OT) breast surgeons inserted stabilised hyaluronic acid (sHA) gel as small drops approximately one cm into the walls surrounding the resection cavity. Surgical feasibility was determined by the rate of successful sHA gel insertion procedure, the ease of insertion as rated by surgeons, the time required for insertion procedure, the quantity used, and any adverse events (AE) relating to sHA gel insertion. Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled. All patients underwent sHA gel insertion successfully. The procedure added a median of 2.8 min to the OT time and was rated as 'easy' in 89 % of patients. There were no immediate AE in OT. Five (14 %) patients experienced a grade 2 or higher AE. Three of the five patients were prescribed oral antibiotics for breast infection. Two of the five patients experienced a grade 3 AE - haematoma which required evacuation in OT day 1 post-BCS, and infected seroma which required drainage and washout in OT 2 months post-BCS. All five patients recovered and underwent the planned adjuvant therapies for their BC. The AE data reflects common risks with standard BCS and are not clearly attributed to sHA gel insertion alone. Conclusion: We show that sHA gel is surgically feasible as a marker to help define the TB cavity for post-BCS adjuvant MRI-based RT planning.