Development and Implementation of a New Model of Care for Patients With Stroke, Acute Hospital Rehabilitation Intensive SErvices: Leveraging a Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Team.

ABSTRACT: The optimal timing and intensity of early rehabilitation remain uncertain. The literature has stated that too early high-intensity mobility within 24 hours can result in poor outcomes as compared with the 24- to 48-hour poststroke (Stroke 2012;43:2389-94. Stroke 2004;35:1005-9). However, few studies have shown that mobilizing patients a few times per day can have positive results (Stroke 2004;35:1005-9. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:352-60). In addition to mobility impairments, many patients after stroke have dysphagia, aphasia, and cognitive-linguistic deficits. To date, there is limited literature on early rehabilitation in these areas. Here, we describe a program of enhanced rehabilitation in the acute care hospital. In this enhanced model of care, our team delivers up to six sessions of therapy per day focused on the patient's deficits. A patient can receive up to two sessions of each discipline daily to include physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech language pathology. The model emphasizes team collaboration between therapy disciplines, physiatry, nursing, and neurology accomplished through a daily therapy schedule, rehabilitation huddle, and direct communication before and after therapy sessions. With this model, we aim to enhance coordination of care resulting in improved patient satisfaction and, ultimately, recovery.

Feasibility of an Enhanced Therapy Model of Care for Hospitalized Stroke Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of an enhanced therapy model for hospitalized stroke patients. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental cohort study of acute stroke patients from a single hospital. In the intervention group, all hospitalized patients on the acute stroke service were seen by at least two therapy disciplines daily in addition to routine stroke care. The comparison group consisted of all patients admitted to the same stroke service 1 year before who received the standard of care. The primary endpoint was the number of completed therapy sessions. Exploratory endpoints compared the length of hospital stay, hospital readmission rates, and degree of disability measured by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. RESULTS: A total of 1110 records were analyzed with 553 subjects in the intervention group and 557 in the control group. The intervention group received a significantly higher number of therapy sessions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay. However, 30-day readmission rates were lower, and the percentage of patients who achieved a good functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale was higher during the intervention period. CONCLUSION: Increasing exposure to intensive multidisciplinary therapy comparable with that of acute inpatient rehabilitation in the hospital setting is feasible and may reduce both readmission rates and disability.