Patient Survival and Length of Stay Associated With Delayed Rapid Response System Activation.

The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in mortality and length of stay between patients who experienced a delay in rapid response system (RRS) activation and those who did not. A retrospective comparative cohort study investigated all adult inpatient cases that experienced an RRS activation from January 1, 2017, through January 1, 2018. Cases experiencing a delay in RRS activation were compared with cases without delay. During the study period a total of 3580 RRS activations that took place and 1086 RRS activations met inclusion criteria for analysis. Delayed RRS activations occurred in 325 cases (29.8%) and nondelayed RRS activations occurred in 766 cases (70.2%). The mean age was roughly the same for both groups (60 years old) and both groups consisted of approximately 60% males. Delay in activation was significantly associated with an increase in length of hospitalization (19.9 days vs 32.4 days; P < .001) and also a higher likelihood of not surviving hospitalization (hazard ratio = 2.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-3.71; P < .001). This study demonstrates that delayed RRS activation occurs frequently and exposes patients to higher mortality and longer length of hospitalization.

Clinical deterioration: A concept analysis.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To present a concept analysis of clinical deterioration and introduce an operational definition. BACKGROUND: Hospitalised patients who endure cardiopulmonary arrest and unplanned intensive care unit admissions often exhibit physiological signs preceding these events. Clinical deterioration not promptly recognised can result in increased patient morbidity and mortality. A barrier to recognising and responding to clinical deterioration stems from practice variations among healthcare clinicians. DESIGN: Concept analysis. METHODS: Eight-step method of concept analysis proposed by Walker and Avant. RESULTS: Defining attributes include dynamic state, decompensation and objective and subjective determination. Antecedents identified include clinical state, susceptibility, pathogenesis and adverse event. Increased mortality, resuscitation, implementation of higher level of care and prolonged hospital admission were the consequences identified. Defining attributes, antecedents and consequences identified led to an operational definition of clinical deterioration as a dynamic state experienced by a patient compromising hemodynamic stability, marked by physiological decompensation accompanied by subjective or objective findings. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical deterioration is a key contributor to inpatient mortality, and its recognition is often underpinned by contextual factors and practice variances. Variation in the uniformity of the concept of clinical deterioration causes a gap in knowledge and necessitated clarification of this phenomenon for nursing research and practice. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Identifying and intervening on clinical deterioration plays a vital role in the inpatient setting demonstrated by the dynamic nature of a patients' condition during hospitalisation. It is anticipated that this concept analysis on clinical deterioration will contribute to further identification of clinically modifiable risk factors and accompanying interventions to prevent clinical deterioration in the inpatient setting.

Nurses' Perceptions of Barriers to Rapid Response System Activation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The rapid response system (RRS) was designed to identify and intervene on patients exhibiting clinical deterioration in the non-critical-care setting but is not always effectively activated by nurses, leading to adverse patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to explore nurses' perceived barriers to RRS activation in the acute adult inpatient setting. METHOD: A systematic review was completed utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis checklist. Six different search terms were used in the following electronic databases: Academic Search Premier, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Healthsource: Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, and PubMed. Limiters applied to search methods included years 2007 to current, full text, scholarly (peer reviewed), and English language. This review was further limited to quantitative studies in the adult inpatient setting. RESULTS: The initial electronic database search yielded 149 articles. After duplicate exclusion, 87 article abstracts were reviewed for inclusion and eligibility, and a total of 8 articles were used for this systematic review. Themes to nurses' perceived barriers to RRS activation include RRS activator-responder interaction, physician influence, nurse education, and nurse experience. DISCUSSION: Nurses play a vital role in patient care by providing continuous surveillance and are the frontline for early detection including prompt intervention should a patient's condition deteriorate. Inconsistent RRS activation has been associated with negative patient outcomes. Exploring nurses' perceived barriers to RRS activation may contribute to interventions that lead to nurses appropriately activating the RRS and potentially decreasing adverse patient outcomes.