Ropinirole regulates emotionality and neuronal activity markers in the limbic forebrain.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are movement disorders usually accompanied by emotional and cognitive deficits. Although D3/D2 receptor agonists are effective against motor and non-motor deficits in RLS and PD, the exact behavioral and neurochemical effects of these drugs are not clearly defined. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of acute ropinirole (0, 0.1, 1 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.), a preferential D3/D2 receptor agonist, on intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), spontaneous motor activity, anxiety- and depression-like behaviors, spatial reference and working memory in rats as well as on certain markers of neuronal activity, i.e. induction of immediate early genes, such as c-fos and arc, and crucial phosphorylations on GluA1 subunit of α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptors and NA1, NA2A and NA2B subunits of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. Ropinirole decreased ICSS thresholds and induced anxiolytic- and antidepressive-like effects without affecting motor activity or spatial memory. The effects on emotionality were associated with a decrease in p-Ser897-NA1 and an increase in p-Tyr1472-NA2B in the ventral striatum as well as an increased induction of c-fos messenger RNA (mRNA) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and decreased expression of arc mRNA in the striatum and the shell of the nucleus accumbens. Our data indicate that ropinirole significantly affects emotionality at doses (1-10 mg/kg, i.p.) that exert no robust effects on locomotion or cognition. The data reinforce the use of D3/D2 receptor agonists in the treatment of RLS and PD patients characterized by emotional deficits and suggest that altered NMDA-mediated neurotransmission in the limbic forebrain may underlie some of ropinirole's therapeutic actions.

Behavioral and neurochemical changes in mesostriatal dopaminergic regions of the rat after chronic administration of the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55,212-2.

BACKGROUND: The endocannabinoid system interacts extensively with other neurotransmitter systems and has been implicated in a variety of functions, including regulation of basal ganglia circuits and motor behavior. The present study examined the effects of repeated administration of the nonselective cannabinoid receptor 1 agonist WIN55,212-2 on locomotor activity and on binding and mRNA levels of dopamine receptors and transporters and GABAA receptors in mesostriatal dopaminergic regions of the rat. METHODS: Rats received systemic injections of WIN55,212-2 (0, 0.1, 0.3, or 1mg/kg, intraperitoneally) for 20 consecutive days. Locomotor activity was measured on days 1, 10, and 20. Following the last measurement, rats were euthanized and prepared for in vitro binding and in situ hybridization experiments. RESULTS: Acutely, 0.3 and 1mg/kg of WIN55,212-2 produced hypolocomotion, which was sustained for the next 2 measurements, compared to vehicle. Repeated administration of WIN55,212-2 decreased the mRNA levels of the D2 autoreceptors in substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area and increased D1 receptor mRNA and binding in nucleus accumbens. Furthermore, both dopamine receptor and transporter binding and mRNA levels were decreased in substantia nigra. Moreover, repeated administration of WIN55,212-2 decreased GABAA receptor binding levels in dorsal striatum and substantia nigra. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that chronic WIN55,212-2 administration results in sustained effects on locomotor activity, similar to those observed after acute administration, and modulates the dopaminergic and GABAergic systems in a region-, dose-, and neurotransmitter-selective manner.

Biphasic effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on brain stimulation reward and motor activity.

Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC), the main psychoactive ingredient of marijuana, has led to equivocal results when tested with the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure or the open-field test for motor activity, two behavioural models for evaluating the reward-facilitating and locomotor stimulating effects of drugs of abuse, respectively. Therefore, in the present study, the effects of high and low doses of Δ(9)-THC were compared in the ICSS procedure and the open-field test. Moreover, the involvement of CB(1) receptors in tentative Δ(9)-THC-induced effects was investigated by pre-treating the animals with the CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A (rimonabant). The results obtained show that low doses of Δ(9)-THC induce opposite effects from high doses of Δ(9)-THC. Specifically, 0.1 mg/kg Δ(9)-THC decreased ICSS thresholds and produced hyperactivity, whereas 1 mg/kg increased ICSS thresholds and produced hypoactivity. Both effects were reversed by pre-treatment with SR141716A, indicating the involvement of CB(1) receptors on these actions. Altogether, our results indicate that Δ(9)-THC can produce acute activating effects in locomotion that coincide with its reward-facilitating effects in the ICSS paradigm. The present findings provide further support that Δ(9)-THC induces behaviours typical of abuse and substantiate the notion that marijuana resembles other drugs of abuse.

Enhanced reward-facilitating effects of d-amphetamine in rats in the quinpirole model of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The underlying neurobiology of addictive or repetitive behaviours, such as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), involves dopaminergic dysregulation. While addictive behaviour depends strongly on mesolimbocortical dopaminergic responses, repetitive behaviours have been associated with dopaminergic dysregulation in the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuitry. The present study investigates differences in brain stimulation reward in rats with quinpirole-induced compulsive checking behaviour, in order to examine if deficits in reward processing are also relevant for OCD. Rats were tested in the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) paradigm, which targets reward-related responses. After phenotype induction, animals were implanted with a monopolar stimulation electrode in the left medial forebrain bundle and trained to press a lever to self-administer electric stimulation of varying frequency. The curve-shift method was used to assess the reward-facilitating effects of d-amphetamine and the reward-attenuating effects of haloperidol (a D(2) antagonist). Thresholds for ICSS were estimated before and after drug/saline injection. The reward-facilitating effects of d-amphetamine were enhanced in quinpirole-treated rats in comparison to controls. This finding suggests that chronic quinpirole-treatment induces changes within the reward circuitry relevant for compulsive behaviour in the rat.

Cannabidiol inhibits the reward-facilitating effect of morphine: involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal raphe nucleus.

Cannabidiol is a non-psychotomimetic constituent of Cannabis sativa, which induces central effects in rodents. It has been shown that cannabidiol attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking. However, to the best of our knowledge, its effects on brain stimulation reward and the reward-facilitating effects of drugs of abuse have not yet been examined. Therefore, we investigated the effects of cannabidiol on brain reward function and on the reward-facilitating effect of morphine and cocaine using the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) paradigm. Rats were prepared with a stimulating electrode into the medial forebrain bundle (MFB), and a guide cannula into the dorsal raphe (microinjection experiments), and were trained to respond for electrical brain stimulation. A low dose of cannabidiol did not affect the reinforcing efficacy of brain stimulation, whereas higher doses significantly elevated the threshold frequency required for MFB ICSS. Both cocaine and morphine lowered ICSS thresholds. Cannabidiol inhibited the reward-facilitating effect of morphine, but not cocaine. This effect was reversed by pre-treatment with an intra-dorsal raphe injection of the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635. The present findings indicate that cannabidiol does not exhibit reinforcing properties in the ICSS paradigm at any of the doses tested, while it decreases the reward-facilitating effects of morphine. These effects were mediated by activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the dorsal raphe. Our results suggest that cannabidiol interferes with brain reward mechanisms responsible for the expression of the acute reinforcing properties of opioids, thus indicating that cannabidiol may be clinically useful in attenuating the rewarding effects of opioids.

Use of cannabis enhances attentional inhibition.

OBJECTIVE: Orienting attention to an irrelevant location hampers the response to subsequent targets presented at that location in relation to novel, not previously attended, locations. This inhibitory effect has been named inhibition of return. We conducted an experiment to study the temporal course of inhibition of return in users of cannabis. METHOD: Twenty-five cannabis users who self-reported a regular frequency of cannabis use in joints per month, and 26 drug-free controls participated in the study. We employed a typical inhibition of return task with a single cue and manipulated the time interval between the onset of the cue and the target (150, 350, 550, 1500, and 2550 ms). Participants were asked to detect the onset of the target regardless of its location. RESULTS: The group of cannabis users showed a significantly greater overall inhibition relative to the group of nonusers. Furthermore, inhibition of return appeared earlier (at the 350 ms cue-target interval) in the user group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that attentional inhibition is enhanced in cannabis users. More research is needed to determine whether greater inhibition represents an advantage or disadvantage for visual search performance of cannabis users.

Efficacy of the atypical antipsychotic aripiprazole in d-amphetamine-based preclinical models of mania.

The atypical antipsychotic aripiprazole has been demonstrated to reduce symptoms of bipolar mania. To further profile the antimanic-like properties of aripiprazole in relevant preclinical models, we examined its efficacy in d-amphetamine-based behavioural models of acute mania in rats. The effects of acute and repeated administration of aripiprazole were assessed in the facilitation of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) and hyperlocomotion after acute d-amphetamine, and in the sensitized facilitation of ICSS function and hyperlocomotion after repeated d-amphetamine. Acutely, aripiprazole (0.75, 1.5 and 2.5 mg/kg i.p.) increased ICSS thresholds, attenuated the reward-facilitating effects of d-amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg i.p.), decreased motor activity and prevented d-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion. Co-administration of aripiprazole and d-amphetamine for 7 d resulted in aripiprazole counteracting the d-amphetamine-induced sensitization in facilitation of brain reward function and hyperlocomotion. These results indicate the efficacy of aripiprazole in d-amphetamine-based preclinical models of acute mania that are characterized by increased motivational drive and/or hyperfunction of brain reward.

Differential effects of chronic voluntary wheel-running on morphine induced brain stimulation reward, motor activity and striatal dopaminergic activity.

Physical exercise could be a protective factor against the development of substance use disorders; however, a number of preclinical studies report reward-enhancing effects of exercise for various drugs of abuse. We examined the effects of chronic wheel-running on brain reward sensitivity, reaction to novelty, reward-facilitating and locomotor-stimulating effects of morphine, using the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) and the open field test (OFT). Male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a sedentary or exercised group. For the ICSS procedure, rats were implanted with electrodes and trained to respond for electrical stimulation. Several indices were recorded in the training phase to estimate brain reward sensitivity. Once responding was stable, the animals of both groups received systemic injections of morphine and their ICSS thresholds were measured with the curve-shift paradigm. Employing the OFT, basal and morphine-induced locomotor activity was measured. Finally, basal and morphine-evoked tissue levels of dopamine and its metabolites were determined in the striatum using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Chronic wheel-running decreased brain reward sensitivity and subsequently increased the reward-facilitating effect of morphine. Exercised animals demonstrated a decreased reaction to novelty and reduced morphine-induced locomotion. Lastly, dopaminergic activity was decreased in the striatum of exercised animals under basal conditions, whereas morphine administration led to an increase in dopamine turnover. These findings indicate that chronic voluntary exercise exerts divergent effects on reward function, psychomotor activity and the reward-facilitating and locomotor-activating effects of opioids during adulthood. Our results provide insights into the increased non-medical use of opioids among young athletes reported in the literature.

Long-gap peripheral nerve repair through sustained release of a neurotrophic factor in nonhuman primates.

Severe injuries to peripheral nerves are challenging to repair. Standard-of-care treatment for nerve gaps >2 to 3 centimeters is autografting; however, autografting can result in neuroma formation, loss of sensory function at the donor site, and increased operative time. To address the need for a synthetic nerve conduit to treat large nerve gaps, we investigated a biodegradable poly(caprolactone) (PCL) conduit with embedded double-walled polymeric microspheres encapsulating glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) capable of providing a sustained release of GDNF for >50 days in a 5-centimeter nerve defect in a rhesus macaque model. The GDNF-eluting conduit (PCL/GDNF) was compared to a median nerve autograft and a PCL conduit containing empty microspheres (PCL/Empty). Functional testing demonstrated similar functional recovery between the PCL/GDNF-treated group (75.64 ± 10.28%) and the autograft-treated group (77.49 ± 19.28%); both groups were statistically improved compared to PCL/Empty-treated group (44.95 ± 26.94%). Nerve conduction velocity 1 year after surgery was increased in the PCL/GDNF-treated macaques (31.41 ± 15.34 meters/second) compared to autograft (25.45 ± 3.96 meters/second) and PCL/Empty (12.60 ± 3.89 meters/second) treatment. Histological analyses included assessment of Schwann cell presence, myelination of axons, nerve fiber density, and g-ratio. PCL/GDNF group exhibited a statistically greater average area occupied by individual Schwann cells at the distal nerve (11.60 ± 33.01 µm2) compared to autograft (4.62 ± 3.99 µm2) and PCL/Empty (4.52 ± 5.16 µm2) treatment groups. This study demonstrates the efficacious bridging of a long peripheral nerve gap in a nonhuman primate model using an acellular, biodegradable nerve conduit.

Neuropsychological functioning in buprenorphine maintained patients versus abstinent heroin abusers on naltrexone hydrochloride therapy.

RATIONALE: Methadone and buprenorphine are among the most widely employed pharmacological treatments currently available for opioid addiction. Cognitive effects of buprenorphine in abstinent heroin abusers are nevertheless far from being understood. METHODS: Neuropsychological performance of 18 buprenorphine-maintained patients (BMP) was evaluated relative to that of 32 currently abstinent heroin abusers on naltrexone hydrochloride therapy (FHAN), and 34 non-drug dependent controls. The three groups were demographically balanced. Clinical groups reported histories of similar patterns of drug use and had increased periods of abstinence from any illicit substance use including heroin. RESULTS: The BMP group performed poorer than controls on the RAVLT (encoding and delayed recall of verbal information), CTT (conceptual flexibility, executive functions) and the RBANS figure copy (visual perception) and delayed recall of visual information. There were no significant differences in any of the cognitive measures between the BMP and FHAN groups or between the FHAN group and controls. Furthermore, the non-differing percentage of abnormal cases between the two patient groups led us to infer that treatment with either BPM or FHAN is not accompanied by qualitative differences in the cognitive profiles of these patients. CONCLUSION: Overall, results suggest that treatment with naltrexone in abstinent heroin abusers may result in less impairment of cognitive functions compared to treatment with buprenorphine. These findings are relevant for improved prognosis and treatment strategies in opioid dependence.

Adolescent Female Cannabinoid Exposure Diminishes the Reward-Facilitating Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and d-Amphetamine in the Adult Male Offspring.

Marijuana is currently the most commonly abused illicit drug. According to recent studies, cannabinoid use occurring prior to pregnancy can impact brain plasticity and behavior in future generations. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether adolescent exposure of female rats to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) induces transgenerational effects on the reward-facilitating effects of Δ9-THC and d-amphetamine in their adult male offspring. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received Δ9-THC (0.1 or 1 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle during postnatal days 28-50. As adults, females were mated with drug-naïve males. We then assessed potential alterations of the Δ9-THC's (0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg, i.p.) and d-amphetamine's (0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg/kg, i.p.) reward-modifying effects using the curve-shift variant of the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure in their adult male F1 offspring. The reward-facilitating effect of the 0.1 mg dose of Δ9-THC was abolished in the F1 offspring of females that were exposed to Δ9-THC (0.1 or 1 mg/kg), whereas the reward-attenuating effect of the 1 mg dose of Δ9-THC remained unaltered. The reward-facilitating effects of 0.5 and 1 mg of d-amphetamine were significantly decreased in the F1 offspring of females that were exposed to Δ9-THC (1 mg/kg and 0.1 or 1 mg, respectively). The present results reveal that female Δ9-THC exposure during adolescence can diminish the reward-facilitating effects of Δ9-THC and d-amphetamine in the adult male offspring. These transgenerational effects occur in the absence of in utero exposure. It is speculated that Δ9-THC exposure during female adolescence may affect neural mechanisms that are shaping reward-related behavioral responses in a subsequent generation, as indicated by the shifts in the reward-facilitating effects of commonly used and abused drugs.

Effects of endocannabinoid neurotransmission modulators on brain stimulation reward.

RATIONALE: The endogenous cannabinoid system is responsive to the neurobiological actions of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabinoid ligands. While numerous studies have focused on the behavioral and pharmacological effects of THC and cannabinoid agonists in experimental animals, most recent work focuses on compounds that modulate endocannabinoid neurotransmission. However, the relevant studies concerning the ability of endocannabinoid modulators to modify reward processes in experimental animals remain rather scarce. OBJECTIVES: The present study examined the effects of drugs modulating endocannabinoid neurotransmission on brain reward function using the rate-frequency curve shift paradigm of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS). METHODS: Animals were implanted with electrodes into the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). After brain stimulation reward thresholds stabilized, rats received intraperitoneal injections of the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitors phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) (0, 15, 30, and 60 mg/kg) and URB-597 (0, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) and the selective anandamide reuptake inhibitor OMDM-2 (0, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg). RESULTS: The highest dose of URB-597 and OMDM-2 significantly increased the threshold frequency required for MFB ICSS, while PMSF increased the threshold frequency in all doses tested. The cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor antagonist SR141716A reversed the actions of URB-597 and OMDM-2, but not PMSF, without affecting reward thresholds by itself. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that under the present experimental conditions endocannabinoid modulators do not exhibit reinforcing properties, but rather have inhibitory influence on reward processes. The anhedonic effects of URB-597 and OMDM-2, but not PMSF, observed at the highest doses in this study are probably mediated through direct CB1 receptor stimulation.

CB1 cannabinoid receptor agonists increase intracranial self-stimulation thresholds in the rat.

RATIONALE: Addictive drugs have a number of commonalities in animal behavioral models. They lower intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) thresholds, support self-administration, and produce conditioned place preference (CPP). However, cannabinoids appear atypical as drugs of abuse, since there are controversial data in the literature concerning their reinforcing properties. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of cannabinoids on brain reward using the rate-frequency curve shift paradigm of ICSS. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with electrodes into the medial forebrain bundle (MFB). Rate-frequency functions were determined by logarithmically decreasing the number of cathodal pulses in a stimulation train from a value that sustained maximal responding to one that did not sustain responding. After brain stimulation reward thresholds stabilized rats received intraperitoneal (IP) injections of the potent CB1 receptor agonists WIN 55,212-2 (graded doses 0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg), CP 55,940 (graded doses 10, 30, 56 and 100 microg/kg), or HU-210 (graded doses 10, 30, 100 microg/kg). RESULTS: With the exception of the highest dose of all cannabinoid agonists tested, which significantly increased the threshold frequency required for MFB ICSS, all other doses of the tested drugs did not affect ICSS thresholds. The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A reversed the actions of WIN 55,212-2 and CP 55,940, but not HU-210. However, the selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM 251 counteracted the effect of HU-210. Both CB1 receptor antagonists, at the doses used in the present study, did not affect reward thresholds by themselves. CONCLUSIONS: The present results indicate that cannabinoid agonists do not exhibit reinforcing properties in the ICSS paradigm, but rather have an inhibitory influence on reward mechanisms. The results suggest that the anhedonic effects of cannabinoids are probably mediated by cannabinoid CB1 receptors.

The effects of ventral tegmental administration of GABA(A), GABA(B), NMDA and AMPA receptor agonists on ventral pallidum self-stimulation.

The ventral pallidum (VP) is a basal forebrain structure that is interconnected with motor and limbic structures and may be considered as an interface between motivational and effector neural signals. Results from a considerable number of studies suggest that this structure is critically involved in reward-related behavior. The VP shares reciprocal connections with other reward-implicated regions, such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA). This anatomy predicts that drug-induced neuronal alterations in the VTA could profoundly alter the function of the VP. Here, using the curve-shift intracranial self-stimulation method, we studied the effects of muscimol (GABA(A) agonist), baclofen (GABA(B) agonist), NMDA and AMPA, microinjected bilaterally into the VTA on the rewarding efficacy of VP self-stimulation. Central injections of the highest dose of muscimol (0.128 microg) resulted in significant elevations in VP self-stimulation thresholds, indicating a reduction in the rewarding efficacy of the stimulation. Elevations in VP self-stimulation thresholds were also evident after intrategmental injections of higher doses of baclofen (0.12, 0.48 microg). By contrast, intrategmental activation of NMDA and AMPA receptors did not affect reward thresholds. These findings suggest that GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in the VTA activate different circuits that may mediate different functions. Thus, the VTA--VP projection activated by GABA modulates VP stimulation reward, while the projection activated by glutamate may be involved in reward-unrelated effects, rather than in the processing of reward. The decreased rewarding efficacy of VP self-stimulation following intrategmental injections of muscimol and baclofen may be due to GABAergic modulation of ventral tegmental dopaminergic and nondopaminergic neurons projecting to the VP.

WIN 55,212-2 decreases the reinforcing actions of cocaine through CB1 cannabinoid receptor stimulation.

CB(1) cannabinoid receptor agonists show a different profile compared to other drugs of abuse on the basis of experimental data that reveal their reinforcing properties. Thus, there are controversial data in the literature concerning the ability of CB(1) receptor agonists to reinforce behavioral responses in experimental animals, i.e. to lower self-stimulation thresholds, and to support self-administration or conditioned place preference. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of WIN 55,212-2, a potent CB(1) receptor agonist (graded doses 0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg, i.p.), on the rewarding efficacy of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation and on the systemic cocaine-induced potentiation of brain-stimulation reward. WIN 55,212-2 did not affect lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation thresholds both in drug nai;ve rats and in rats pretreated with the drug, whereas it produced a significant, dose-dependent decrease in the maximal rate of responding, i.e. in the performance of the animals. Cocaine (5.0 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a significant reduction in self-stimulation threshold, without altering maximal rates of responding. Importantly, WIN 55,212-2 attenuated the effect of cocaine at the two higher doses tested. The effects of the CB(1) receptor agonist were reversed by pretreatment with the selective CB(1) receptor antagonist SR 141716A (0.02 mg/kg, i.p.) that did not by itself affect cocaine's action. These results indicate that acute stimulation of CB(1) receptors per se does not affect baseline self-stimulation, but reduces the reinforcing effects induced by cocaine. Taken together these findings suggest that cannabinoids may interfere with brain-reward systems responsible for the expression of acute reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse, such as cocaine, and provide evidence that the cannabinoid system could be an interesting drug discovery and development target for the treatment of drug addiction.

Cannabinoid Regulation of Brain Reward Processing with an Emphasis on the Role of CB1 Receptors: A Step Back into the Future.

Over the last decades, the endocannabinoid system has been implicated in a large variety of functions, including a crucial modulation of brain-reward circuits and the regulation of motivational processes. Importantly, behavioral studies have shown that cannabinoid compounds activate brain reward mechanisms and circuits in a similar manner to other drugs of abuse, such as nicotine, alcohol, cocaine, and heroin, although the conditions under which cannabinoids exert their rewarding effects may be more limited. Furthermore, there is evidence on the involvement of the endocannabinoid system in the regulation of cue- and drug-induced relapsing phenomena in animal models. The aim of this review is to briefly present the available data obtained using diverse behavioral experimental approaches in experimental animals, namely, the intracranial self-stimulation paradigm, the self-administration procedure, the conditioned place preference procedure, and the reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior procedure, to provide a comprehensive picture of the current status of what is known about the endocannabinoid system mechanisms that underlie modification of brain-reward processes. Emphasis is placed on the effects of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor agonists, antagonists, and endocannabinoid modulators. Further, the role of CB1 receptors in reward processes is investigated through presentation of respective genetic ablation studies in mice. The vast majority of studies in the existing literature suggest that the endocannabinoid system plays a major role in modulating motivation and reward processes. However, much remains to be done before we fully understand these interactions. Further research in the future will shed more light on these processes and, thus, could lead to the development of potential pharmacotherapies designed to treat reward-dysfunction-related disorders.

Effects of lithium and aripiprazole on brain stimulation reward and neuroplasticity markers in the limbic forebrain.

Bipolar disorder (BD) is a severe pathological condition with impaired reward-related processing. The present study was designed to assess the effects of two commonly used BD medications, the mood stabilizer lithium chloride (LiCl) and the atypical antipsychotic and antimanic agent aripiprazole, in an animal model of reward and motivation and on markers of neuroplasticity in the limbic forebrain in rats. We utilized intracranial self-simulation (ICSS) to assess the effects of acute and chronic administration of LiCl and aripiprazole on brain stimulation reward, and phosphorylation studies to determine their effects on specific cellular neuroplasticity markers, i.e., the phosphorylation of CREB and crucial phosphorylation sites on the GluA1 subunit of AMPA receptors and the NA1 and NA2B subunits of NMDA receptors, in the limbic forebrain. Chronic LiCl induced tolerance to the anhedonic effect of the drug observed after acute administration, while chronic aripiprazole induced a sustained anhedonic effect. These distinct behavioral responses might be related to differences in molecular markers of neuroplasticity. Accordingly, we demonstrated that chronic LiCl, but not aripiprazole, decreased phosphorylation of CREB at the Ser133 site and NA1 at the Ser896 site in the prefrontal cortex and GluA1 at the Ser831 site and NA2B at the Ser1303 site in the ventral striatum. The present study provides evidence for BD medication-evoked changes in reward and motivation processes and in specific markers of neuronal plasticity in the limbic forebrain, promoting the notion that these drugs may blunt dysregulated reward processes in BD by counteracting neuronal plasticity deficits.

Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin and bisdemethoxycurcumin differentially inhibit morphine's rewarding effect in rats.

RATIONALE: Recent animal studies reported that curcumin, the active constituent of Curcuma longa, has several central actions and may attenuate morphine tolerance. OBJECTIVES: In the present study, we utilized the intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) paradigm to examine the effects of the commercially available curcuminoid mixture and each one of its components, individually, on brain stimulation reward and on the reward-facilitating effect of morphine. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with an electrode into the medial forebrain bundle and trained to respond for electrical stimulation using a rate-frequency paradigm. In the first study, rats were injected with graded doses either of the curcuminoid mixture, or curcumin I, or II, or III. In the second study, we examined whether a low dose of the curcuminoid mixture or each individual curcumin analogue composing it could counteract the reward-facilitating effect of morphine. RESULTS: At low doses, both the curcuminoid mixture and curcumin I did not affect brain stimulation reward, whereas, higher doses increased ICSS thresholds. Curcumin II and curcumin III did not affect brain stimulation reward at any doses. Subthreshold doses of the curcuminoid mixture and curcumin I inhibited the reward-facilitating effect of morphine. CONCLUSION: Both the curcuminoid mixture and curcumin I lack hedonic properties and moderate the reward-facilitating effect of morphine. Our data suggest that curcumin interferes with brain reward mechanisms responsible for the expression of the acute reinforcing properties of opioids and provide evidence that curcumin may be a promising adjuvant for attenuating morphine's rewarding effects in patients who are under long-term opioid therapy.

5-HT2C receptor involvement in the control of persistence in the reinforced spatial alternation animal model of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The serotonergic system is implicated in the pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, the distinct role of serotonin (5-HT) receptor subtypes remains unclear. This study investigates the contribution of 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors in the modulation of persistence in the reinforced spatial alternation model of OCD. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were assessed for spontaneous and pharmacologically induced (by m-chlorophenylpiperazine: mCPP) directional persistence in the reinforced alternation OCD model. Systemic administration of mCPP (non-specific 5-HT agonist, 2.5mg/kg), M100907 (selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, 0.08 mg/kg), SB242084 (selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist, 0.5 mg/kg) and vehicle was used. Experiment 1 investigated M100907 and SB242084 effects in animals spontaneously exhibiting high and low persistence during the early stages of alternation training. Experiment 2 investigated M100900 and SB242084 effects on mCPP-induced persistence. RESULTS: Under the regime used in Experiment 1, 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptor antagonism did not affect spontaneous directional persistence in either high or low persistence groups. In Experiment 2, 5-HT2C but not 5-HT2A receptor antagonism significantly reduced, but did not abolish, mCPP-induced directional persistence. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that 5-HT2C but not 5-HT2A receptors contribute to the modulation of mCPP-induced persistent behaviour, raising the possibility that the use of 5-HT2C antagonists may have a therapeutic value in OCD.