From Acute Infection to Prolonged Health Consequences: Understanding Health Disparities and Economic Implications in Long COVID Worldwide.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a growing number of patients experiencing persistent symptoms and physiological changes after recovering from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as Long COVID. Long COVID is characterized by recurring symptoms and inflammation across multiple organ systems. Diagnosis can be challenging, influenced by factors like demographics, comorbidities, and immune responses. Long COVID impacts various organ systems and can have neuropsychological effects. Health disparities, particularly related to race, contribute to a higher burden of infection and ongoing symptoms in minority populations. Managing Long COVID entails addressing a spectrum of symptoms that encompass physical, cognitive, and psychological aspects. The recovery period for patients with Long COVID can vary significantly, influenced by factors like the severity of the disease, hospitalization, comorbidities, and age. Currently, there are no universally effective treatments, although certain interventions show promise, necessitating further research. Self-management and rehabilitation programs can provide relief, but more research is needed to establish their effectiveness. Preventive measures such as vaccination and the use of antiviral medications and metformin. It is imperative to conduct further research to develop evidence-based guidelines and gain a better understanding of the long-term implications of COVID-19. Long COVID could have substantial economic impact on the labor market, productivity, healthcare expenditures, and overall economic growth. To address the challenges patients with long-term complications face, there is a focus on strategies like promoting telework and flexible work arrangements to accommodate diverse symptoms, particularly chronic fatigue and other Long COVID effects. In conclusion, this review emphasizes the multifaceted complexity of Long COVID and the ongoing need to address its potential long-term health and economic impacts.

HEPARIN-BINDING PROTEIN LEVELS PREDICT UNFAVORABLE OUTCOME IN COVID-19 PNEUMONIA: A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF THE SAVE TRIAL.

ABSTRACT: We aimed to evaluate heparin-binding protein (HBP) as a marker of prognosis of unfavorable outcome in COVID-19 pneumonia. This was a post hoc analysis of the SAVE clinical trial investigating anakinra treatment, guided by suPAR (soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor) levels ≥6 ng/mL, for the prevention of severe respiratory failure in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Baseline HBP plasma levels were measured in 534 patients by fluorescence dry quantitative immunoassay using the Jet-iStar 800 analyzer. Concentrations higher than 35 ng/mL predicted 30-day mortality with a moderate specificity of 53.3% and negative predictive value 78.1%; sensitivity was low (29.0%). After multivariate Cox analysis, HBP higher than 35 ng/mL was an independent predictor of 30-day unfavorable outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.06-2.94; P = 0.028) and these patients were also at greater risk of death after 90 days (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.25-2.74; P = 0.002). The cutoff was not predictive of development of severe respiratory failure, septic shock or acute kidney injury. Among patients with baseline HBP levels higher than 35 ng/mL, anakinra treatment was associated with decreased mortality (7.2%) versus comparators (18.1%; P < 0.001). Results confirm that HBP may be an early biomarker of poor outcome among preselected patients at risk from COVID-19 pneumonia.ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04357366.

Developing a Tool for Differentiation Between Bacterial and Viral Respiratory Infections Using Myxovirus Resistance Protein A and C-Reactive Protein.

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to assess the performance of a blood assay combining measurements of MxA (myxovirus resistance protein A) and CRP (C-reactive protein) to differentiate viral from bacterial respiratory infections. METHODS: In a prospective study, MxA and CRP were measured in the blood by the AFIAS panel in adults admitted with respiratory infection. Patients were split into discovery and validation cohorts. Final diagnosis was adjudicated by a panel of experts. Microbiology-confirmed cases comprised the discovery cohort, and infections adjudicated as highly probable viral or bacterial comprised the validation cohort. RESULTS: A total of 537 patients were analyzed: 136 patients were adjudicated with definitive viral infections and 131 patients with definitive bacterial infections. Using logistic regression analysis, an equation was developed to calculate the probability for bacterial infection using the absolute value of MxA and CRP. Calculated probability ≥ 0.5 and/or MxA to CRP ratio less than 2 applied as the diagnostic rule for bacterial infections. This rule provided 91.6% sensitivity and 90.4% negative predictive value for the diagnosis of bacterial infections. This diagnostic sensitivity was confirmed in the validation cohort. A MxA/CRP ratio less than 0.15 was associated with unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSION: The calculation of the probability for bacterial infection using MxA and CRP may efficiently discriminate between viral and bacterial respiratory infections.

Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Addition of macrolide antibiotics to ß-lactam antibiotics for the treatment of patients in hospital with community-acquired pneumonia is based on results from observational studies and meta-analyses rather than randomised clinical trials. We investigated if addition of the macrolide clarithromycin to treatment with a ß-lactam antibiotic in this population could improve early clinical response-the new regulatory endpoint for community-acquired pneumonia-and explored the possible contribution of modulation of the inflammatory host response to that outcome. METHODS: The ACCESS trial was a phase 3 prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial, in which adults in hospital with community-acquired pneumonia who had systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more, and procalcitonin 0·25 ng/mL or more were enrolled in 18 internal medicine departments of public Greek hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated block randomisation to standard of care medication (including intravenous administration of a third-generation cephalosporin or intravenous administration of ß-lactam plus ß-lactamase inhibitor combination) plus either oral placebo or oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. Investigators, staff, and patients were masked to group allocation. The primary composite endpoint required that patients fulfilled both of the following conditions after 72 hours (ie, day 4 of treatment): (1) decrease in respiratory symptom severity score of 50% or more as an indicator of early clinical response and (2) decrease in SOFA score of at least 30% or favourable procalcitonin kinetics (defined as ≥80% decrease from baseline or procalcitonin <0·25 ng/mL), or both, as an indicator of early inflammatory response. Participants who were randomly assigned and received allocated treatment were included in the primary analysis population. This trial is complete and is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (2020-004452-15) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04724044). FINDINGS: Patients were enrolled between Jan 25, 2021, and April 11, 2023, and 278 individuals were randomly allocated to receive standard of care in combination with either clarithromycin (n=139) or placebo (n=139). 134 patients in the clarithromycin group (five withdrew consent) and 133 patients in the placebo group (six withdrew consent) were included in the analysis of the primary endpoint. The primary endpoint was met in 91 (68%) patients in the clarithromycin group and 51 (38%) patients in the placebo group (difference 29·6% [95% CI 17·7-40·3]; odds ratio [OR] 3·40 [95% CI 2·06-5·63]; p<0·0001). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 58 (43%) patients in the clarithromycin group and 70 (53%) patients in the placebo group (difference 9·4% [95% CI -2·6 to 20·9]; OR 0·67 [95% CI 0·42 to 1·11]; p=0·14). None of the serious TEAEs was judged to be related to treatment assignment. INTERPRETATION: Addition of clarithromycin to standard of care enhances early clinical response and attenuates the inflammatory burden of community-acquired pneumonia. The mechanism of benefit is associated with changes in the immune response. These findings suggest the importance of adding clarithromycin to ß-lactams for treatment of patients in hospital with community-acquired pneumonia to achieve early clinical response and early decrease of the inflammatory burden. FUNDING: Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis and Abbott Products Operations.