Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb ; 37(1): 30-4, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20956868

RESUMO

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may occur during the natural history of neoplastic disease and is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. Major risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include surgery, immobilization, hospitalization, and the administration of granulopoietic and/or erythropoietic (stimulatory) agents. Chemotherapy is a supplementary independent risk factor for VTE and the use of central venous catheters (CVC) in clinical practice has increased the risk of thromboembolic events. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate CVC-related thrombosis and the VTE rate in 145 consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients. We observed only 2 cases of symptomatic CVC- related thrombotic events (1.38%) and 10 cases of thromboembolic events (6.9%) in our series. Only surgery for metastases was found to be significantly related to the development of VTE, with an incidence of 16.1% vs. 4.4 in patients who did not undergo surgery (p = 0.037). In addition, a history of VTE seems to be a supplementary risk factor for CVC-related thrombosis (p = 0.055).


Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/secundário , Trombose Venosa Profunda de Membros Superiores/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Pacientes Ambulatoriais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Palliat Med ; 23(9): 1227-1232, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31859582

RESUMO

Background: Delirium in advanced cancer inpatient ranges between 13% and 85%. Reasons for this variability on the reported data could be related to the setting where they are admitted. Methods: This is an observational, comparative, prospective study on delirium diagnosis and delirium course of advanced cancer inpatients in two different palliative care settings. Hospice (C1) versus palliative care supportive team (C2). Differences between delirium precipitants, delirium treatment, and delirium survival were observed. Results: From 582 consecutive admissions, 494 from C1 and 88 from C2, finally 227 patients met inclusion criteria, were entered in the study. Total population delirium rate at admission, if we add both centers, was 57 patients (25%), 46 (26%) from C1 and 11 (22%) from C2; no statistically significant differences between delirium rate at admission between the two centers were found (χ2). When delirium course between delirious patients admitted in C1 and C2 was analyzed, a significantly higher rate of delirium reversibility was found in C2 [11/14 (78%)] versus [9/65 (14%)] in C1 (χ2p ≤ 0.001). Conclusion: The frequency of delirium at admission and during the hospitalization in advanced cancer patients does not seem to be related to the setting, what seems to be related is the delirium course.


Assuntos
Delírio , Neoplasias , Delírio/epidemiologia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicações , Cuidados Paliativos , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
J Chemother ; 30(1): 53-58, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28641483

RESUMO

To evaluate efficacy and safety of platinum and etoposide combination in the treatment of advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and unknown primary (CUP) neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), we analysed the records of 21 consecutive patients treated with this regimen from 1999 to 2012. Objective responses were obtained in 11 patients (52%) and disease stability (DS) in 5 (24%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI, 5.33-8.66). Median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95% CI, 14.97-17.03). Patients with limited liver disease had a significantly (p = 0.002) better PFS than patients with extrahepatic disease at diagnosis with 9 months (95% CI, 7.14-10.85) vs. 4 months (95% CI, 1.60-6.40). Two patients experienced durable complete response (30 and 90 months). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (61%), anaemia (50%), nausea and vomiting (27%) and fatigue (22%). The platinum plus etoposide regimen has an acceptable toxicity profile and is effective in patients with GEP and CUP-NECs.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/tratamento farmacológico , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Etoposídeo/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Carboplatina/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/mortalidade , Carcinoma Neuroendócrino/patologia , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Etoposídeo/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Intestinais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Intestinais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Primárias Desconhecidas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa