Discriminative SKP2 Interactions with CDK-Cyclin Complexes Support a Cyclin A-Specific Role in p27KIP1 Degradation.

The SCFSKP2 ubiquitin ligase relieves G1 checkpoint control of CDK-cyclin complexes by promoting p27KIP1 degradation. We describe reconstitution of stable complexes containing SKP1-SKP2 and CDK1-cyclin B or CDK2-cyclin A/E, mediated by the CDK regulatory subunit CKS1. We further show that a direct interaction between a SKP2 N-terminal motif and cyclin A can stabilize SKP1-SKP2-CDK2-cyclin A complexes in the absence of CKS1. We identify the SKP2 binding site on cyclin A and demonstrate the site is not present in cyclin B or cyclin E. This site is distinct from but overlapping with features that mediate binding of p27KIP1 and other G1 cyclin regulators to cyclin A. We propose that the capacity of SKP2 to engage with CDK2-cyclin A by more than one structural mechanism provides a way to fine tune the degradation of p27KIP1 and distinguishes cyclin A from other G1 cyclins to ensure orderly cell cycle progression.

Differential Regulation of G1 CDK Complexes by the Hsp90-Cdc37 Chaperone System.

Selective recruitment of protein kinases to the Hsp90 system is mediated by the adaptor co-chaperone Cdc37. We show that assembly of CDK4 and CDK6 into protein complexes is differentially regulated by the Cdc37-Hsp90 system. Like other Hsp90 kinase clients, binding of CDK4/6 to Cdc37 is blocked by ATP-competitive inhibitors. Cdc37-Hsp90 relinquishes CDK6 to D3- and virus-type cyclins and to INK family CDK inhibitors, whereas CDK4 is relinquished to INKs but less readily to cyclins. p21CIP1 and p27KIP1 CDK inhibitors are less potent than the INKs at displacing CDK4 and CDK6 from Cdc37. However, they cooperate with the D-type cyclins to generate CDK4/6-containing ternary complexes that are resistant to cyclin D displacement by Cdc37, suggesting a molecular mechanism to explain the assembly factor activity ascribed to CIP/KIP family members. Overall, our data reveal multiple mechanisms whereby the Hsp90 system may control formation of CDK4- and CDK6-cyclin complexes under different cellular conditions.

Structural diversity of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulatory subunit in Caenorhabditis elegans.

The cAMP-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase A, PK-A) plays a key role in the control of eukaryotic cellular activity. The enzymology of PK-A in the free-living nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans is deceptively simple. Single genes encode the catalytic (C) subunit (kin-1), the regulatory (R) subunit (kin-2) and an A-kinase anchor protein (AKAP) (aka-1); nonetheless, PK-A is able to facilitate a comprehensive array of cAMP-mediated processes in this model multicellular organism. We have previously demonstrated that, in C. elegans, as many as 12 different isoforms of the C-subunit arise as a consequence of alternative splicing strategies. Here, we report the occurrence of transcripts encoding novel isoforms of the PK-A R-subunit in C. elegans. In place of exons 1 and 2, these transcripts include coding sequences from novel B or Q exons directly linked to exon 3, thereby generating isoforms with novel N-termini. R-subunits containing an exon B-encoded N-terminal polypeptide sequence were detected in extracts prepared from mixed populations of C. elegans. Of note is the observation that R-subunit isoforms containing exon B- or exon Q-encoded polypeptide sequences lack the dimerisation/docking domains conventionally seen in R-subunits. This means that they are unlikely to participate in the formation of tetrameric PK-A holoenzymes and, additionally, they are unlikely to interact with AKAP(s). It is therefore possible that, in C. elegans, in addition to tetrameric (R(2)C(2)) PK-A holoenzymes, there is also a sub-population of dimeric (RC) PK-A enzymes that are not tethered by AKAPs. Furthermore, inspection of the N-terminal sequence encoded by exon B suggests that this isoform is a likely target for N-myristoylation. Although unusual, a number of similarly N-myristoylatable R-subunits, from a range of different species, are present in the databases, suggesting that this may be a more generally observed feature of R-subunit structure. The occurrence of R-subunit isoforms, without dimerisation/docking domains (with or without N-myristoylatable N-termini) in other species would suggest that the control of PK-A activity may be more complex than hitherto thought.

Asymmetric mode of Ca²âº-S100A4 interaction with nonmuscle myosin IIA generates nanomolar affinity required for filament remodeling.

Filament assembly of nonmuscle myosin IIA (NMIIA) is selectively regulated by the small Ca²âº-binding protein, S100A4, which causes enhanced cell migration and metastasis in certain cancers. Our NMR structure shows that an S100A4 dimer binds to a single myosin heavy chain in an asymmetrical configuration. NMIIA in the complex forms a continuous helix that stretches across the surface of S100A4 and engages the Ca²âº-dependent binding sites of each subunit in the dimer. Synergy between these sites leads to a very tight association (K(D) ∼1 nM) that is unique in the S100 family. Single-residue mutations that remove this synergy weaken binding and ameliorate the effects of S100A4 on NMIIA filament assembly and cell spreading in A431 human epithelial carcinoma cells. We propose a model for NMIIA filament disassembly by S100A4 in which initial binding to the unstructured NMIIA tail initiates unzipping of the coiled coil and disruption of filament packing.

Structural variability of the ubiquitin specific protease DUSP-UBL double domains.

USP4, 11 and 15 are three closely related paralogues of the ubiquitin specific protease (USP) family of deubiquitinating enzymes. The DUSP domain and the UBL domain in these proteins are juxtaposed which may provide a functional unit conferring specificity. We determined the structures of the USP15 DUSP-UBL double domain unit in monomeric and dimeric states. We then conducted comparative analysis of the structural and physical properties of all three DUSP-UBL units. We identified structural features that dictate different dispositions between constituent domains, which in turn may influence respective binding properties.