Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(2): 418-423, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30614991

RESUMO

The benefits of using a dedicated team for complex surgeries are well established for certain specialties, but largely unknown for others. The aim of this study was to determine whether management by a dedicated craniofacial team anesthesiologist would impact perioperative outcomes for children undergoing major surgery for craniosynostosis. Sixty-two children undergoing complex cranial vault reconstruction were identified. Fifty-four patients were managed by the craniofacial anesthesia team, while 8 patients were not. Primary outcome measures were calculated blood loss, red blood cell transfusion volume, blood donor exposures, extubation rate, and postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative opioid administration, crystalloid and colloid administration, intraoperative complication rate, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. Children cared for by the craniofacial team had significantly lower calculated blood loss, reduced red blood cell transfusion volume, fewer blood donor exposures, less crystalloid administration, higher rate of postoperative extubation, fewer postoperative complications, and decreased ICU and hospital length of stay than patients who were managed by noncraniofacial team anesthesiologists. There were no significant differences in demographics, opioid administration, colloid volume administration, or intraoperative complication rates between the 2 groups. Management by a craniofacial team anesthesiologist was associated with improved outcomes in children undergoing major craniofacial reconstructive surgery. While some variability can be attributed to provider-volume relationship, these findings suggest that children may benefit from a subspecialty anesthesia team-based approach for the management of craniofacial surgery, and potentially other similar high-risk cases.


Assuntos
Anestesiologia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Extubação , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestesia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica , Pré-Escolar , Coloides/administração & dosagem , Craniossinostoses/cirurgia , Soluções Cristaloides/administração & dosagem , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
A A Pract ; 15(10): e01527, 2021 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34606484

RESUMO

Anesthetic management of pediatric circumcisions typically involves intravenous access and advanced airway management. We explored the use of a minimally invasive anesthetic protocol for pediatric circumcisions akin to the anesthetic management for bilateral myringotomy and tympanostomy. Five pediatric circumcisions were performed under mask ventilation without intravenous access and evaluated for intraoperative anesthesia times, patient outcomes, and complications. The mean (standard deviation) intraoperative anesthesia time was 41.4 (5.7) minutes, and 1 patient experienced a mild intraoperative complication with emesis at induction. Pediatric circumcisions can be efficiently and safely performed with minimally invasive anesthesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia , Anestésicos , Circuncisão Masculina , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa