Virtual triage from freestanding emergency departments: a propensity score-weighted analysis of short-term outcomes in emergency general surgery.

BACKGROUND: Freestanding emergency departments (FSEDs) have generated improved hospital metrics, including decreased ED wait times and increased patient selection. Patient outcomes and process safety have not been evaluated. This study investigates the safety of FSED virtual triage in the emergency general surgery (EGS) patient population. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective review evaluated all adult EGS patients admitted to a community hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 who either presented at a FSED and received virtual evaluation from a surgical team (fEGS) or presented at the community hospital emergency department and received in-person evaluation from the same surgical group (cEGS). Patients' demographics, acute care utilization history, and clinical characteristics at the onset of the index visit were used to build a propensity score model and stabilized Inverse Probability of Treatment Weights (IPTW) were used to create a weighted sample. Multivariable regression models were then employed to the weighted sample to evaluate the treatment effect of virtual triage compared to in-person evaluation on short-term outcomes, including length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission and mortality. Variables which occurred during the index visit (such as surgery duration and type of surgery) were adjusted for in the multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 1962 patients, 631 (32.2%) were initially evaluated virtually (fEGS) and 1331 (67.8%) underwent an in-person evaluation (cEGS). Baseline characteristics demonstrated significant differences between the cohorts in gender, race, payer status, BMI, and CCI score. Baseline risks were well balanced in the IPTW-weighted sample (SD range 0.002-0.18). Multivariable analysis found no significant differences between the balanced cohorts in 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality, and LOS (p > 0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo virtual triage have similar outcomes to those who undergo in-person triage for EGS diagnoses. Virtual triage at FSED for these EGS patients may be an efficient and safe means for initial evaluation.

Emergency general surgery transfers in the United States: a 10-year analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency general surgery (EGS) admissions account for more than three million hospitalizations in the US annually; and interhospital transfers (IHTs) are costly. We aimed to better understand the population of transferred EGS patients and their subsequent care in a nationally representative sample. METHODS: Using the 2002-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with an EGS noncardiovascular principal diagnosis who were transferred from another hospital with urgent or emergent admission status. Patient demographics, hospitalization characteristics, rates of operation, and mortality were identified. Procedure codes were classified into surgery and procedures based on the HCUP Surgery Flag. RESULTS: We identified an estimated 525,913 EGS admissions transferred from another acute care hospital. The mean age was 60 years, 51% were female, and >50% were Medicare patients. The rate of EGS IHTs increased while mortality decreased. Surgery was required for only 33% of transferred patients. The most common surgeries were laparoscopic cholecystectomy, lysis of adhesions, and wound debridement. The median length of stay was 4.4 days, 92% of patients were cared for in urban hospitals, and >50% in teaching hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The percent of patients with an EGS diagnosis requiring IHT is increasing, which may reflect a trend toward regionalization of EGS. Transfers require significant resources and may delay care. More than half of the EGS patients did not require surgical intervention. Future studies to identify populations who benefit from IHT and ideal timing of transfer can establish opportunities for optimizing resource utilization and patient outcomes.

Remote triage practices in general surgery patients from freestanding emergency departments: A 6-year analysis.

BACKGROUND: Freestanding emergency departments have risen in popularity as a means to expand access to care. Although some evaluation of freestanding emergency department utility in specific patient populations exists, management of surgical patients via remote triage and disposition has not been previously described. We report our experience with remote triage to discharge home, level I trauma center, or community hospital admission for general surgery patients who present to an affiliated freestanding emergency department. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients presenting to freestanding emergency departments requiring surgical consultation between 2016 and 2021 was conducted. Outcomes included disposition, length of stay, surgical intervention, 30-day mortality, and readmission. Undertriage and overtriage rates were calculated and defined as the following: (1) discharge undertriage-discharge home with 30-day emergency department visit/readmission; 2) transfer undertriage-transfers to community hospital requiring transfer to trauma center; and (3) overtriage-admissions <24 hours without surgery. RESULTS: Of 1,105 patients, 15% were discharged home, 27% were transferred to trauma centers, and 58% were transferred to community hospitals. Patients admitted to trauma centers were older and had higher acuity pathology, whereas patients admitted to community hospitals had higher operative rates with shorter lengths of stay, operating room time, 30-day readmission, and mortality. Transfer undertriage was 0.9% (n = 6), with only 1 patient requiring transfer from a community hospital to a trauma center for disease acuity. Discharge undertriage was 12% (n = 20) due to worsening or persistent pathology. Overtriage was 5.5% (n = 52), with most having a partial small bowel obstruction or ambiguous diagnostic imaging requiring observation. CONCLUSION: Remote surgery triage at freestanding emergency departments, without an in-person examination, demonstrated both low undertriage and overtriage rates, reflecting appropriate triage practices.

Implementation of a Gastrografin Order Set for Small Bowel Obstruction Across a Health System: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of Gastrografin (GG) in the management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) has been shown to decrease the length of stay and operative intervention. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined patients with an SBO diagnosis prior to implementation (PRE, January 2017-January 2019) and following implementation (POST, January 2019-May 2021) of a GG challenge order set made available across 9 hospitals within a health care system. Primary outcomes were utilization of the order set across facilities and over time. Secondary outcomes included time to surgery for operative patients, rate of surgery, nonoperative length of stay, and 30-day readmission. Standard descriptive, univariate, and multivariable regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: PRE cohort had 1746 patients and POST had 1889. The utilization of GG increased from 14% to 49.5% following implementation. Significant variability existed within the hospital system with utilization at each individual hospital from 11.5% to 60%. There was an increase in surgical intervention (13.9% vs 16.4%, P = .04) and decrease in nonoperative LOS (65.6 vs 59.9 hours, P < .001) following implementation. For POST patients, multivariable linear regression showed significant reduction in nonoperative length of stay (-23.1 hours, P < .001) but no significant difference in time to surgery (-19.6 hours, P = .08). DISCUSSION: The availability of a standardized order set for SBO can result in increased Gastrografin administration across hospital settings. The implementation of a Gastrografin order set was associated with decreased length of stay in nonoperative patients.

Emergency general surgery transfer to lower acuity facility: The role of right-sizing care in emergency general surgery regionalization.

BACKGROUND: Regionalization of emergency general surgery (EGS) has primarily focused on expediting care of high acuity patients through interfacility transfers. In contrast, triaging low-risk patients to a nondesignated trauma facility has not been evaluated. This study evaluates a 16-month experience of a five-surgeon team triaging EGS patients at a tertiary care, Level I trauma center (TC) to an affiliated community hospital 1.3 miles away. METHODS: All EGS patients who presented to the Level I TC emergency department from January 2020 to April 2021 were analyzed. Patients were screened by EGS surgeons covering both facilities for transfer appropriateness including hemodynamics, resource need, and comorbidities. Patients were retrospectively evaluated for disposition, diagnosis, comorbidities, length of stay, surgical intervention, and 30-day mortality and readmission. RESULTS: Of 987 patients reviewed, 31.5% were transferred to the affiliated community hospital, 16.1% were discharged home from the emergency department, and 52.4% were admitted to the Level I TC. Common diagnoses were biliary disease (16.8%), bowel obstruction (15.7%), and appendicitis (14.3%). Compared with Level I TC admissions, Charlson Comorbidity Index was lower (1.89 vs. 4.45, p < 0.001) and length of stay was shorter (2.23 days vs. 5.49 days, p < 0.001) for transfers. Transfers had a higher rate of surgery (67.5% vs. 50.1%, p < 0.001) and lower readmission and mortality (8.4% vs. 15.3%, p = 0.004; 0.6% vs. 5.0%, p < 0.001). Reasons not to transfer were emergency evaluation, comorbidity burden, operating room availability, and established care. No transfers required transfer back to higher care (under-triage). Bed days saved at the Level I TC were 693 (591 inpatients). Total operating room minutes saved were 24,008 (16,919, between 7:00 am and 5:00 pm). CONCLUSION: Transfer of appropriate patients maintains high quality care and outcomes, while improving operating room and bed capacity and resource utilization at a tertiary care, Level I TC. Emergency general surgery regionalization should consider triage of both high-risk and low-risk patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective comparative cohort study, Level II.

Updates in Mesh and Biomaterials.

Prior publications of the Surgical Clinics of North America have highlighted the technical challenges of abdominal wall reconstruction. This article provides an update on synthetic, biologic, and biosynthetic mesh research since the 2013 Surgical Clinics of North America hernia publication and highlights the future of mesh research. This update features research that has been conducted since the prior publication to guide surgeons to choose the best and most appropriate mesh for their patients.