A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the single-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of sitagliptin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the single-dose pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of sitagliptin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind evaluation of sitagliptin in 35 patients 10 to 17 years old with T2DM at 7 clinical research sites. The safety, tolerability, PK, and PD (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibition and aspects of glucose metabolism) of single doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg were assessed. Appropriate transformations on the PK parameters were used and back-transformed summary statistics are reported. RESULTS: Adverse experiences were reported by eight study participants; all were of mild intensity except one (intravenous site pain of moderate intensity). PK characteristics in the young patients were comparable to reference adult data, with geometric mean ratios (youths/adults) for AUC0-∞ , Cmax , and C24hr of 0.82, 1.04, and 0.74, respectively. Single doses of 50, 100, and 200 mg sitagliptin inhibited 67.2%, 73.8%, and 81.2% of plasma DPP-4 activity over 24 hours, respectively. Least squares (LS) mean glucose concentrations 2 hours after an oral glucose tolerance test or a meal tolerance test decreased in study participants treated with sitagliptin, compared to placebo, while active LS mean glucagon-like peptide 1 concentrations increased significantly at all sitagliptin doses in both tests. CONCLUSIONS: Single doses of sitagliptin as high as 200 mg were generally well tolerated in 10- to 17-year-old male and female study participants with T2DM, and a daily sitagliptin dose of 100 mg is appropriate for evaluation in Phase III safety and efficacy studies in pediatric patients with T2DM. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00730275).

Optimizing the Use of Electronic Data Sources in Clinical Trials: The Landscape, Part 1.

BACKGROUND: TransCelerate BioPharma has created the eSource Initiative with the intent to facilitate the industry's movement toward optimal usage of electronic data sources. Although guidance and standards have been in place for some time, data collection methods and technology have not been utilized to their fullest capability, and transcription between electronic systems continues to be the norm. METHODS: The TransCelerate approach for the eSource Initiative is to understand the current landscape and highlight factors that are influencing the adoption of new technologies. As a preliminary step in this process, TransCelerate surveyed member companies regarding eSource usage and barriers. RESULTS: Literature review, stakeholder engagement, and the member survey have provided insight into the current landscape, which will help TransCelerate to develop proposals for best practices for industry utilization of electronic data collection tools and methods to benefit all stakeholders. CONCLUSIONS: Based on survey results, companies generally have taken steps to leverage current eSource technologies and prepare for optimal utilization of electronic data sources. The TransCelerate eSource Initiative will continue to evaluate the technology, regulatory, standards, and health care landscape to support the goal of improving global clinical science and global clinical trial execution. Forthcoming publications will focus on technology landscape, future vision, and demonstration projects.

A single supratherapeutic dose of vorinostat does not prolong the QTc interval in patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: This dedicated QTc phase I study, conducted in advanced-stage cancer patients, assessed the effect of a single supratherapeutic dose (800 mg) of vorinostat on the QTc interval. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A randomized, partially blind, placebo-controlled, two-period, crossover study was conducted. Patients (n = 25) received single doses of 800 mg vorinostat and placebo in the fasted state. Holter electrocardiogram monitoring was done before each treatment and for 24 h postdose. Blood samples for vorinostat concentration were collected through 24 h postdose following vorinostat treatment only. Prescribed electrocardiogram and blood sampling times were designed to capture the expected C(max) of vorinostat. RESULTS: Twenty-four of the 25 patients enrolled in the study were included in the QTc analysis. The upper bound of the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the QTcF interval for the placebo-adjusted mean change from baseline of vorinostat was <10 ms at every time point. No patient had a QTcF change from baseline value >30 ms. One patient had QTcF values >450 ms (seen after both vorinostat and placebo administration) and none had values >480 ms. Mean AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) values attained were on the order of approximately 1.93- and approximately 1.41-fold higher, respectively, compared with the 400 mg clinical dose. Based on assessment of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences, single doses of 800 mg vorinostat were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of a single supratherapeutic dose of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat is not associated with prolongation of the QTc interval. A dedicated QTc study in advanced cancer patients is a robust means for assessing risk for ventricular repolarization prolongation.