RESUMO
Neurobiological studies of the model species, Aplysia californica (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euopisthobranchia), have helped advance our knowledge of the neural bases of different forms of learning, including sensitization, a non-associative increase in withdrawal behaviors in response to mild innocuous stimuli. However, our understanding of the natural context for this learning has lagged behind the mechanistic studies. Previous studies, which exclusively used artificial stimuli, such as electric shock, to produce sensitization, left open the question of which stimuli might cause sensitization in nature. Our laboratory first addressed this question by testing for short and long-term sensitization after predatory attack by a natural predator, the spiny lobster. In the present study, we tested for sensitization after attack by a very different predator, the predacious sea-slug, Navanax inermis (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Euopisthobranchia). Unlike the biting and prodding action of lobster attack, Navanax uses a rapid strike that sucks and squeezes its prey in an attempt to swallow it whole. We found that Navanax attack to the head of Aplysia caused strong immediate sensitization of head withdrawal, and weaker, delayed, sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal. By contrast, attack to the tail of Aplysia resulted in no sensitization of either reflex. We also developed an artificial attack stimulus that allowed us to mimick a more consistently strong attack. This artificial attack produced stronger but qualitatively similar sensitization: Strong immediate sensitization of head withdrawal and weaker sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal after head attack, immediate sensitization in tail-mantle withdrawal, but no sensitization of head withdrawal after tail attack. We conclude that Navanax attack causes robust site-specific sensitization (enhanced sensitization near the site of attack), and weaker general sensitization (sensitization of responses to stimuli distal to the attack site). We also tested for long-term sensitization (lasting longer than 24 h) after temporally-spaced delivery of four natural Navanax attacks to the head of subject Aplysia. Surprisingly, these head attacks, any one of which strongly sensitizes head withdrawal in the short term, failed to sensitize head-withdrawal in the long term. Paradoxically, these repeated head attacks produced long-term sensitization in tail-mantle withdrawal. These experiments and observations confirm that Navanax attack causes short, and long-term sensitization of withdrawal reflexes of Aplysia. They add site-specific sensitization as well as paradoxical long-term sensitization of tail-mantle withdrawal to a short list of naturally induced learning phenotypes in this model species. Together with previous observations of sensitization after lobster attack, these data strongly support the premise that sensitization in Aplysia is an adaptive response to sub-lethal predator attack.