Bafilomycin 1A Affects p62/SQSTM1 Autophagy Marker Protein Level and Autophagosome Puncta Formation Oppositely under Various Inflammatory Conditions in Cultured Rat Microglial Cells.

Regulation of autophagy through the 62 kDa ubiquitin-binding protein/autophagosome cargo protein sequestosome 1 (p62/SQSTM1), whose level is generally inversely proportional to autophagy, is crucial in microglial functions. Since autophagy is involved in inflammatory mechanisms, we investigated the actions of pro-inflammatory lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and anti-inflammatory rosuvastatin (RST) in secondary microglial cultures with or without bafilomycin A1 (BAF) pretreatment, an antibiotic that potently inhibits autophagosome fusion with lysosomes. The levels of the microglia marker protein Iba1 and the autophagosome marker protein p62/SQSTM1 were quantified by Western blots, while the number of p62/SQSTM1 immunoreactive puncta was quantitatively analyzed using fluorescent immunocytochemistry. BAF pretreatment hampered microglial survival and decreased Iba1 protein level under all culturing conditions. Cytoplasmic p62/SQSTM1 level was increased in cultures treated with LPS+RST but reversed markedly when BAF+LPS+RST were applied together. Furthermore, the number of p62/SQSTM1 immunoreactive autophagosome puncta was significantly reduced when RST was used but increased significantly in BAF+RST-treated cultures, indicating a modulation of autophagic flux through reduction in p62/SQSTM1 degradation. These findings collectively indicate that the cytoplasmic level of p62/SQSTM1 protein and autophagocytotic flux are differentially regulated, regardless of pro- or anti-inflammatory state, and provide context for understanding the role of autophagy in microglial function in various inflammatory settings.

Primary microglia cell cultures in translational research: Strengths and limitations.

Microglia are the resident macrophages in the central nervous system, accounting for 10-15% of the cell mass in the brain. Next to their physiological role in development, monitoring neuronal function and the maintenance of homeostasis, microglia are crucial in the brain's immune defense. Brain injury and chronic neurological disorders are associated with neuroinflammation, in which microglia activation is a central element. Microglia acquire a wide spectrum of activation states in the diseased or injured brain, some of which are neurotoxic. The investigation of microglia (patho)physiology and therapeutic interventions targeting neuroinflammation is a substantial challenge. In addition to in vivo approaches, the application of in vitro model systems has gained significant ground and is essential to complement in vivo work. Primary microglia cultures have proved to be a useful tool. Microglia cultures have offered the opportunity to explore the mechanistic, molecular elements of microglia activation, the microglia secretome, and the efficacy of therapeutic treatments against neuroinflammation. As all model systems, primary microglia cultures have distinct strengths and limitations to be weighed when experiments are designed and when data are interpreted. Here, we set out to provide a succinct overview of the advantages and pitfalls of the use of microglia cultures, which instructs the refinement and further development of this technique to remain useful in the toolbox of microglia researchers. Since there is no conclusive therapy to combat neurotoxicity linked to neuroinflammation in acute brain injury or neurodegenerative disorders, these research tools remain essential to explore therapeutic opportunities.

Nimodipine inhibits spreading depolarization, ischemic injury, and neuroinflammation in mouse live brain slice preparations.

Nimodipine is used to prevent delayed ischemic deficit in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Spreading depolarization (SD) is recognized as a factor in the pathomechanism of aSAH and other acute brain injuries. Although nimodipine is primarily known as a cerebral vasodilator, it may have a more complex mechanism of action due to the expression of its target, the L-type voltage-gated calcium channels (LVGCCs) in various cells in neural tissue. This study was designed to investigate the direct effect of nimodipine on SD, ischemic tissue injury, and neuroinflammation. SD in control or nimodipine-treated live mouse brain slices was induced under physiological conditions using electrical stimulation, or by subjecting the slices to hypo-osmotic stress or mild oxygen-glucose deprivation (mOGD). SD was recorded applying local field potential recording or intrinsic optical signal imaging. Histological analysis was used to estimate tissue injury, the number of reactive astrocytes, and the degree of microglia activation. Nimodipine did not prevent SD occurrence in mOGD, but it did reduce the rate of SD propagation and the cortical area affected by SD. In contrast, nimodipine blocked SD occurrence in hypo-osmotic stress, but had no effect on SD propagation. Furthermore, nimodipine prevented ischemic injury associated with SD in mOGD. Nimodipine also exhibited anti-inflammatory effects in mOGD by reducing reactive astrogliosis and microglial activation. The results demonstrate that nimodipine directly inhibits SD, independent of nimodipine's vascular effects. Therefore, the use of nimodipine may be extended to treat acute brain injuries where SD plays a central role in injury progression.