Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 26(11): 2766-2769, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32731911

RESUMO

Using a novel recruitment method and paired molecular and antibody testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, we determined seroprevalence in a racially diverse municipality in Louisiana, USA. Infections were highly variable by ZIP code and differed by race/ethnicity. Overall census-weighted seroprevalence was 6.9%, and the calculated infection fatality ratio was 1.63%.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Betacoronavirus , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Coronavirus/mortalidade , Pneumonia Viral/mortalidade , RNA Viral/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus/genética , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/sangue , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Louisiana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/sangue , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(4): 633.e9-633.e16, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33421576

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: While many seroprevalence studies of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been performed, few are demographically representative. This investigation focused on defining the nature and frequency of symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in a representative, cross-sectional sample of communities in Louisiana, USA. METHODS: A sample of 4778 adults from New Orleans and Baton Rouge, Louisiana were given a survey of symptoms and co-morbidities, nasopharyngeal swab to test for active infection (PCR), and blood draw to test for past infection (IgG). Odds ratios, cluster analysis, quantification of virus and antibody, and linear modelling were used to understand whether certain symptoms were associated with a positive test, how symptoms grouped together, whether virus or antibody varied by symptom status, and whether being symptomatic was different across the age span. RESULTS: Reported anosmia/ageusia was strongly associated with a positive test; 40.6% (93/229) tested positive versus 4.8% (218/4549) positivity in those who did not report anosmia/ageusia (OR 13.6, 95% CI 10.1-18.3). Of the people who tested positive, 47.3% (147/311) were completely asymptomatic. Symptom presentation clustered into three groups; low/no symptoms (0.4 ± 0.9, mean ± SD), highly symptomatic (7.5 ± 1.9) or moderately symptomatic (4.0 ± 1.5). Quantity of virus was lower in the asymptomatic versus symptomatic group (cycle number 23.3 ± 8.3 versus 17.3 ± 9.0; p < 0.001). Modelling the probability of symptoms showed changes with age; the highest probability of reporting symptoms was 64.6% (95% CI 50.4-76.5) at age 29 years, which decreased to a probability of 49.3% (95% CI 36.6-62.0) at age 60 years and only 25.1% (95% CI 5.0-68.1) at age 80 years. CONCLUSION: Anosmia/ageusia can be used to differentiate SARS-CoV-2 infection from other illnesses, and, given the high ratio of asymptomatic individuals, contact tracing should include those without symptoms. Regular testing in congregant settings of those over age 60 years may help mitigate asymptomatic spread.


Assuntos
Ageusia/diagnóstico , Anosmia/diagnóstico , Infecções Assintomáticas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Louisiana/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa