Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Minerva Urol Nefrol ; 57(2): 99-107, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15951734

RESUMO

Surgical testicular sperm retrieval for intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) purposes is the only possibility of biological fathering in case of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Successful retrieval only correlates with histology, not with FSH values or testicular volume. Concurrent AZFa and AZFb microdeletion predict unsuccessful recovery. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) (mean of successful retrievals in literature: 52.7%) is the technique of choice: we had successful retrievals in 100% of cases of hypospermatogenesis with > 5 spermatids/tubule (spd/tub), 81.8% of cases of hypospermatogenesis with < 4 spd/tub, 50% of cases of maturation arrest, and 25% of cases of histologically pure Sertoli cell-only syndrome. Microsurgical TESE (mTESE) has been reported to increase successful retrievals: from 16.7-45% for standard TESE to 42.9-63.6% for mTESE, depending on the distribution of testicular histology in the various case studies; from 9 to 14 cases out of 22, respectively, in the only study in which TESE and mTESE were performed simultaneously on the same testis. Improvements in biological procedures for TESE retrievals can increase positive findings. TeFNA does not appear to be indicated in NOA, both because of its low success rates--which, in practice, are only positive in hypospermatogenesis--and because it is unable to detect any carcinomas in situ. Previous surgery of left varicocele in NOA could increase the chances of subsequent recovery. ICSI from TESE has lower birth rates in NOA than in obstructive azoospermia (OA) (19% vs 28%). Abortion rates are significantly higher following ICSI from NOA (11.5%) than from OA (2.5%) (P=0.001). Therefore, the prognostic fertility of a couple with an NOA male is quite lower than for a couple with an OA male.


Assuntos
Oligospermia , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Testículo/cirurgia , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/terapia , Masculino , Oligospermia/cirurgia
2.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 113 Suppl 1: S2-6, 2004 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15041121

RESUMO

Improvements in cancer survival raise infertility issues in young patients suffering from malignancies. The aim of the study is to review current knowledge on the effect of chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) for testis and hematological neoplasms on testicular function. Cisplatin-based regimens for testis neoplasm induce temporary azoospermia; permanent damage can occur with high doses (400-600 mg/m(2)). Alkylating agents are very effective for hematological neoplasm therapy but extremely dangerous to germinal epithelium. Damage can be irreversible. Spermatozoa cannot tolerate irradiation doses higher than 6 Gy. Leydig cells are damaged by doses higher than 15 Gy. A-Spermatogonia have been shown to survive after CT and RT and their recovery for post-treatment graft has been recently developed in animal models. Infertility counselling before treatment in young oncological patients is mandatory. Cryopreservation is the best option for fertility protection.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Infertilidade Masculina/etiologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Animais , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Criopreservação , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hematológicas/radioterapia , Humanos , Infertilidade Masculina/induzido quimicamente , Células Intersticiais do Testículo/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Intersticiais do Testículo/efeitos da radiação , Masculino , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Preservação do Sêmen , Aconselhamento Sexual , Espermatozoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Espermatozoides/efeitos da radiação , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Testiculares/radioterapia
3.
Minerva Ginecol ; 56(5): 469-78, 2004 Oct.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15531863

RESUMO

The only safe method of male contraception is vasectomy, with high reversibility secured by microsurgery. Italy, however, suffers from a lack of regulations on this subject. Hormonal treatment (testosterone plus progestational hormones) is far from providing reliability and safety, while some perspectives, theoretical only for the time being, are offered by studies on functional infertility induced by either speeding up (ganglioplegic, sympathomimetic, parasympatholytic, oxytocin, endothelin, angiotensin) or inhibiting (sympatholytic) the sperm transport through the epididymis, or altering the epididymal environment (alpha-chloridin, chlorodeoxyglucose).


Assuntos
Anticoncepção/métodos , Antiespermatogênicos/farmacologia , Preservativos , Humanos , Masculino , Espermatozoides/efeitos dos fármacos , Vasectomia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa