Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs of Health Care Professionals.

Guidelines for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) recommend SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs (glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists) as second-line agents for patients with, or at risk for, cardiovascular disease. A better understanding of guideline implementation will further the provision of evidence-based health care to patients. Interviews and surveys of clinicians were conducted to understand providers' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs related to the 2019 American Diabetes Association Standards of Care for T2DM. There was a lack of widespread knowledge of the guidelines and comfort with their use. Clinicians require additional training and education on the efficacy of the new medications and accompanying clinical guidelines.

Impact of a Learning Collaborative Approach on Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization Rates in US Adults: A Mixed Methods Approach.

The objective of this research was to test the impact of a learning collaborative model (intervention) on adult vaccination rates for influenza and pneumococcal disease. A mixed methods approach was used to identify changes in adult vaccination rates over time and organizational factors contributing to successful programs. Provider-level propensity scores were used to match intervention to non-intervention providers to control for inherent selection bias of participating organizations. Comparative analyses were conducted between intervention and non-intervention sites on vaccination rates, using a difference-in-differences approach. Qualitative data (eg, semi-structured interviews) were analyzed using a constant comparison approach to identify themes related to successful strategies. From 2014-2016, intervention providers demonstrated greater improvement than their matched providers in pneumococcal vaccinations (PV) for patients aged 65 years and older (treatment effect: 4.3%, P < 0.05) and PV for high-risk patients (eg, with immunocompromising conditions) aged 19-64 years (2.7%, P < 0.001). Significant effects were also observed for PV for at-risk patients (eg, with diabetes) aged 19-64 years (1.7%, P < 0.05). Individual health systems demonstrated even greater improvements (eg, greater increase in PV rates for patients aged 65 years and older), with treatment effects as high as 20.4% (P < 0.05). A learning collaborative approach was demonstrated to be an effective approach to improve adult vaccination rates among participating integrated delivery systems and medical groups. Factors associated with success included organization type (ie, integrated delivery systems) and systems characterized by a positive learning climate and collaborative culture.

An Adult Immunization Best Practices Learning Collaborative: Impact, Scale Up, and Spread.

The research objective was to rapidly scale up and spread a proven learning collaborative approach (intervention) for adult vaccination rates for influenza and pneumococcal disease from 7 to 39 US health care organizations and to examine improvement in adult immunization rates after scale-up. Comparative analyses were conducted between intervention and nonintervention propensity score-matched providers on vaccination rates using a difference-in-differences approach. Qualitative data, collected during site visits and in-person and virtual meetings, were used to enhance understanding of quantitative results. In 2017-2018, an analysis of a subset of sites (n = 9) from 2 intervention cohorts (∼20 sites each) demonstrated greater improvement than their matched providers in pneumococcal vaccinations (PV) for patients ages ≥65 years (treatment effect range: 1.4%-3.7%, P < 0.01) and PV for high-risk patients (eg, with immunocompromising conditions) aged 19-64 years (0.8%-1.6%, P < 0.01). Significant effects were observed in one of the study cohorts for PV for at-risk patients (eg, with diabetes) aged 19-64 years (1.7%, P < 0.01), and influenza vaccination rates (2.4%, P < 0.001). Individual health systems demonstrated even greater improvements across all 4 vaccinations: 9.5% influenza; 8.7% PV ages ≥65 years; 11.8% PV high-risk; 16.3% PV at-risk (all P < 0.01). Results demonstrated that a 7-site pilot could be successfully scaled to 39 additional sites, with similar improvements in vaccination rates. Between 2014 and 2018, vaccination improvements among all 46 groups (7 pilot, 39 in subsequent cohorts) resulted in an estimated 5.5 million adult vaccinations administered or documented in 27 states.

Cost analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass practice using current Medicare reimbursement and practice costs.

BACKGROUND: We performed a formal cost analysis of a hypothetical bariatric practice consisting of a surgeon, dietitian, clinical coordinator/office manager, receptionist, and certified medical assistant to determine whether a bariatric practice would have a difficult time surviving financially with the current Medicare reimbursement. METHODS: The number of possible cases was calculated for the 2005 calendar year. Most of the costs and assumptions were taken from an actual bariatric practice. The malpractice insurance premium (but not physician salary and benefits) was calculated into the practice cost. RESULTS: With a total of 231 days available for clinical work in 2005, 300 scheduled laparoscopic gastric bypasses could have been performed to allow for appropriate clinic time for new patient visits, postoperative visits, and annual visits. The total reimbursement from Medicare would have been $516,158, with most of the reimbursement coming from procedure fees ($407,063). The total practice cost would have been $444,592. Most of the costs were clinic staff salary and benefits ($207,065) and the malpractice premium ($55,150). The net difference of $71,566 was left to pay the salary and benefits of the bariatric surgeon. CONCLUSION: The low reimbursement of Medicare for laparoscopic gastric bypass threatens the financial viability of a bariatric surgery practice. With the increasing cost of malpractice and the threatened decrease in Medicare physician reimbursement, Medicare recipients could see a decrease in the number of bariatric surgeons offering them service.