Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cardiol Young ; 33(3): 337-341, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36650739

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures are commonly used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments. CHD remains the most common congenital malformation. There has been a gradual shift in evaluating the outcome of surgery for CHD from mortality to morbidity and now to self-reported outcomes. AIMS: We aimed to review studies assessing patient-reported outcome measures as a useful marker of outcome for patients, both children and adults, who underwent surgery for CHD. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted of original articles that explored the application of patient-reported outcome measures in the CHD surgical setting in PubMed and SCOPUS from inception to February 2022. RESULTS: Our search yielded 1511 papers, of which six studies were included in this review after screening abstract and full-text, with a total sample size of 5734 patients. The main areas of discussion were the utility of patient-reported outcome measures, determinants of patient-reported outcome measures, and the need for a congenital cardiac surgery-specific patient-reported outcome measure for paediatric patients and their parents/guardians and adult patients. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reports the use of patient-reported outcome measures to be a useful indicator to gain insight into the patients' perspective to provide holistic and patient-centred management. However, further studies are required to assess the utility of patient-reported outcome measures in a congenital cardiac surgical setting.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Cardiopatias Congênitas , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente
2.
Br J Hosp Med (Lond) ; 82(6): 1-7, 2021 Jun 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34191570

RESUMO

Temporary epicardial pacing wires are used after cardiothoracic surgery to maintain a stable cardiac rhythm. They must be distinguished from the more commonly encountered transvenous temporary pacing wires, which are often used in coronary care units for the same purpose. Patients with temporary epicardial pacing wires may be transferred to hospital wards where these wires are not usually encountered, such as COVID wards, the general intensive care unit, the coronary care unit or general surgical wards if a laparotomy was required in the early period following cardiac surgery. Serious complications may arise in managing patients with temporary epicardial pacing wires, which are well known in the cardiothoracic unit but not so well known elsewhere in the hospital. This article discusses the dangers associated with the management of temporary epicardial pacing wires in adult patients, some of which are common to temporary transvenous pacing wires and others are unique to temporary epicardial pacing wires.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Marca-Passo Artificial , Adulto , Estimulação Cardíaca Artificial , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Coração , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa