A systematic review of therapeutic enoxaparin dosing in obesity.

Enoxaparin is a hydrophilic drug with obesity having little effect on its apparent volume of distribution, therefore patients with obesity receiving standard 1 mg/kg dosing may be at a higher risk of supratherapeutic dosing. Conversely, dose reducing patients with obesity could place already at risk patients at higher risk of a thrombotic event. Data and recommendations are variable for the most appropriate weight-based dose of therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients, particularly those a weight > 100 kg or a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2. The purpose of this systematic review was to globally evaluate these data to surmise optimal dosing recommendations for patients with obesity. A systematic review of English language studies was conducted and identified articles via Pubmed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) searches. Studies were included if they reported therapeutic enoxaparin use in adult patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 or body weight > 100 kg and the percentage of patients achieving a therapeutic anti-Xa based on a weight-based dose or the weight-based dose required to produce a therapeutic anti-Xa level. Therapeutic attainment of anti-Xa levels were assessed across enoxaparin weight-based dosing categories including a very low dose group: < 0.75 mg/kg, low dose group: 0.75-0.85 mg/kg, and standard dose group: ≥ 0.95 mg/kg. Rates of bleeding and thrombosis were also evaluated. A total of eight studies were included. For anti-Xa level assessment, 682 patients were included. A total of 62% of anti-Xa levels were therapeutic in the very low dose group, 66% in the low dose group, and 42% in the standard dose group. Overall rates of total bleeding and thrombosis were assessed in 798 patients. A total of 29 bleedings (3.6%) occurred, and 27 reported a relationship to dose. Most bleedings, 85.2% (n = 23/27), occurred with doses in the standard dose group (≥ 0.95 mg/kg). Thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (0.6%). Utilization of a reduced weight-based dosing strategy for therapeutic enoxaparin in obese patients may increase the percentage of patients with a therapeutic anti-Xa level.

Does Switching Norepinephrine to Phenylephrine in Septic Shock Complicated by Atrial Fibrillation With Rapid Ventricular Response Improve Time to Rate Control?

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently develops during critical illness. In septic shock complicated by rapid AF, the use of phenylephrine may be advantageous secondary to its ß-1 sparing properties. However, evidence supporting this strategy is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical effect on rate control of transitioning norepinephrine to phenylephrine in septic shock patients who develop AF with a rapid ventricular response (RVR). METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of septic shock patients admitted to the medical or surgical intensive care unit (ICU) who developed AF with RVR (heart rate >110 beats per minute [bpm]). Patients who were switched to phenylephrine were compared to those who remained on norepinephrine. The primary end point was sustained achievement of rate control. A time-varying Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients were included in the study, of which 28 were switched to phenylephrine. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The unadjusted hazard ratio for achieving rate control was significant at 1.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-3.34; P < .01) for the phenylephrine group. The adjusted hazard ratio was 1.75 (95% CI: 0.86-3.53; P = .12). There were no statistically significant differences in mortality or ICU length of stay. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests a potential clinical effect on achieving rate control when switching to phenylephrine cannot be excluded. It remains unclear if there is a benefit on mortality or length of stay outcomes in critically ill patients.

Safety and feasibility of crushing sevelamer tablets for enteral feeding tube administration.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Sevelamer is an insoluble polymer indicated for the management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The package inserts for both tablet formulations recommend the tablets be administered whole. Due to whole tablets being sometimes inadvertently crushed and the significantly increased cost of sevelamer packets, we evaluated the safety and feasibility of crushed sevelamer tablets for enteral feeding tube administration. METHODS: A single-centre retrospective chart review was performed. All adult ICU patients prescribed sevelamer carbonate between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2019 were included if they received at least one dose of a sevelamer tablet or packet, whereas they had an enteral feeding tube in place. The primary outcome was the incidence of an obstructed enteral feeding tube or need for replacement, as defined as the number of occurrences over the total numbers of doses administered. The secondary outcome was the change in phosphorus levels from time of sevelamer initiation to discontinuation or patient discharge. RESULTS: A total of 14 obstructions were reported, four in the tablet arm and ten in the packet arm (0.4% tablet arm, 0.5% packet arm; P = .5931). Of these, four (29%) required tube replacement and were followed by sevelamer discontinuation. Two (14%) were documented to be due to increased tube feeds and esomeprazole. Six (43%) cases required tube replacement, but no issues arose upon continuation. Only one of the obstructions resulted in a recurrent tube occlusion. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Sevelamer tablets may be crushed and administered via enteral feeding tubes, provided clear instruction on tablet preparation is included. Oral administration in dysphagic patients requires further evaluation with clear protocols for preparation and administration.

Evaluation of Safety Outcomes of Undiluted Levetiracetam Intravenous Push Compared to Intravenous Piggyback.

BACKGROUND: Breakthrough seizures and status epilepticus require urgent management. Administration of intravenous push (IVP) levetiracetam has been demonstrated to be safe as compared to intravenous piggyback (IVPB). This transition can potentially offer faster time to administration and reduced drug and material cost. The objective of this study was to observe safety of administration in patients receiving levetiracetam via IVP compared to IVPB in acute care settings. METHODS: This is a multi-center, observational, retrospective cohort study of 1214 adult patients who received levetiracetam pre- and post-implementation of IVP over a 6 month timespan. Primary outcome was time from order verification to administration of urgent first-time doses. Secondary outcomes included time to administration of loading doses and cost. Safety outcome was infusion site related reactions. RESULTS: Time from order verification to administration of urgent first-time doses pre- and post-implementation of IVP administration was reduced from 61 minutes to 47 minutes (P=0.0002). Infusion site related reactions were observed in 6 out of 5432 doses in the IVPB arm and in 5 out of 4700 doses in the IVP arm (P=1). Total estimated cost was $76,171.96 for the 5449 IVPB total doses and $11,484.33 for the 4721 IVP total doses. CONCLUSIONS: Transition from IVPB to IVP administration reduced time from order verification to administration of urgent first-time doses with both administrations having similar incidence of infusion site related reactions. Cost savings and improved workflow were observed. Levetiracetam administered via IVP may be considered as a safe alternative method of administration in the acute care setting.

Analgosedation: The Use of Fentanyl Compared to Hydromorphone.

BACKGROUND: The 2018 Society of Critical Care Medicine guidelines on the "Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU" advocate for protocol-based analgosedation practices. There are limited data available to guide which analgesic to use. This study compares outcomes in patients who received continuous infusions of fentanyl or hydromorphone as sedative agents in the intensive care setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients admitted into the medical intensive care unit, the surgical intensive care unit, and the cardiac intensive care unit from April 1, 2017, to August 1, 2018, who were placed on continuous analgesics. Patients were divided according to receipt of fentanyl or hydromorphone as a continuous infusion as a sedative agent. The primary endpoints were ICU length of stay and time on mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 177 patients were included in the study; 103 received fentanyl as a continuous infusion, and 74 received hydromorphone as a continuous infusion. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in the hydromorphone group had deeper sedation targets. Median ICU length of stay was eight days in the fentanyl group compared to seven days in the hydromorphone group (p = 0.11) and median time on mechanical ventilation was 146.47 hours in the fentanyl group and 122.33 hours in the hydromorphone group (p = 0.31). There were no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints of ICU length of stay and time on mechanical ventilation between fentanyl and hydromorphone for analgosedation purposes. CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found in the primary endpoints studied. Patients in the hydromorphone group required more tracheostomies, restraints, and were more likely to have a higher proportion of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) scores > 2.

Descriptive analysis of the unwarranted continuation of antipsychotics for the management of ICU delirium during transitions of care: A multicenter evaluation across New Jersey.

PURPOSE: Nearly half of intensive care unit (ICU) patients will develop delirium. Antipsychotics are used routinely for the management of ICU delirium despite limited reliable data supporting this approach. The unwarranted continuation of antipsychotics initiated for ICU delirium is an emerging transitions of care concern, especially considering the adverse event profile of these agents. We sought to evaluate the magnitude of this issue across 6 centers in New Jersey and describe risk factors for continuation. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study examined adult ICU patients who developed ICU delirium from June 2016 to June 2018. Patients were included in the study if they received at least 3 doses of antipsychotics while in the ICU with presence of either a clinical diagnosis of delirium or a positive Confusion Assessment Method score. Patients were excluded if they were on an antipsychotic before ICU admission. RESULTS: Of the 300 patients included and initiated on antipsychotics for ICU delirium, 157 (52.3%) were continued on therapy upon transfer from the ICU to another level of inpatient care. The number of patients continued on newly initiated antipsychotics further increased to 183 (61%) upon discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSION: The continuation of antipsychotics for the management of delirium during transitions of care was a common practice across ICUs in New Jersey. Several risk factors for continuation of antipsychotics were identified. Efforts to reduce unnecessary continuation of antipsychotics at transitions of care are warranted.

Prolonged Anaphylaxis to Pfizer Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine: A Case Report and Mechanism of Action.

BACKGROUND: In response to the devastating effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, several vaccine prototypes have been developed, with the Pfizer/BioNTech (BNT162b2) platform being the first to receive emergency use authorization. Although taken to market on an unprecedented timeline, the safety profile of the drug during clinical trials was shown to be favorable. Shortly after release, reports from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention demonstrated a higher-than-average rate of anaphylaxis to the vaccine that has been the cause for concern for safety officials and the general public alike. Here, we present a unique case of protracted anaphylaxis in a recipient of the BNT162b2. CASE SUMMARY: The patient is a 55-year-old female with a history of multiple allergic reactions who presented with respiratory distress and hives after receiving the first dose of the BNT162b2, despite premedication with IV steroids and diphenhydramine. The refractory nature of her reaction was demonstrated by edema of her tongue (visualized on nasolaryngoscopy), requiring an epinephrine infusion for nearly 3 days. She was discharged from the hospital with instructions not to receive the second dose of the vaccine. CONCLUSION: Although the exact etiology of anaphylaxis secondary to this messenger RNA-based vaccine is not completely clear, our literature search and review of the patient's course support either polyethylene glycol versus other excipient-related allergy as a possible cause. Based on the protracted nature to our patient's anaphylaxis, critical care management for patients with a true anaphylactic reaction to BNT162b2 may require monitoring for an extended period of time.