Localizing Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: CT Angiography Versus Tagged RBC Scintigraphy.

OBJECTIVE: Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage is a common cause of hospitalization and has substantial associated morbidity and financial cost. CT angiography (CTA) is emerging as an alternative to (99m)Tc-labeled RBC scintigraphy (RBC scintigraphy) for the localization of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB); however, data on comparative efficacy are scant. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of CTA compared with RBC scintigraphy in the overall evaluation and management of acute LGIB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed images from all CTA examinations performed for suspected acute LGIB at our tertiary care hospital from January 2010 through November 2011. The comparison group was determined by retrospective review of twice the number of RBC scintigraphic scans consecutively obtained from June 2008 to November 2011 for the same indication. All CTA and RBC scintigraphic scans were reviewed for accurate localization of the site and source of suspected active LGIB. RESULTS: In total, 45 CTA and 90 RBC scintigraphic examinations were performed during the study period. Seventeen (38%) CTA scans showed active gastrointestinal bleeding compared with 34 (38%) RBC scintigraphic scans (p = 1.000). However, the site of bleeding was accurately localized on 24 (53%) CTA scans. This proportion was significantly greater than the proportion localized on RBC scintigraphic scans (27 [30%]) (p = 0.008). There were no significant differences between the two groups in average hospital length of stay, blood transfusion requirement, incidence of acute kidney injury, or in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: Both CTA and RBC scintigraphy can be used to identify active bleeding in 38% of cases. However, the site of bleeding is localized with CTA in a significantly higher proportion of studies.

Comparison of artifacts on coronal reformation and axial CT pulmonary angiography images using single-detector and 4- and 8-detector multidetector-row helical CT scanners.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the degree of stair-step artifact on coronal reformation computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography images obtained using single-detector helical CT (SDCT), four-detector (4-MDCT), and eight-detector multidetector-row CT (8-MDCT) and compare the degree of motion artifact on the corresponding axial CT images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of consecutive patients imaged by means of CT angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus were retrospectively identified by using CT records at our institution: (1) group A (n = 38), SDCT; (2) group B (n = 36), 4-MDCT; and (3) group C (n = 74), 8-MDCT. For each case, coronal multiplanar volume reformation maximal intensity projection images were created by using a standard technique. All images were reviewed in a randomized fashion by two thoracic radiologists who were blinded to the type of CT scanner. Stair-step artifact of pulmonary arteries on coronal reformation images was graded by consensus agreement using a four-point scale (0 = no artifact to 3 = severe artifact). Axial images were assessed for six parameters of motion artifact. The sum of these grades resulted in a total motion score, with a potential range of 0 (no motion) to 12 (severe motion). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Stair-step artifacts were significantly higher for SDCT (mean, 2.9; median, 3) compared with 4-MDCT (mean, 2.2; median, 2; P < .0001) and 8-MDCT (mean, 1.5; median, 1; P < .0001). Total motion scores were significantly higher for SDCT (mean, 9.3) compared with 4-MDCT (mean, 8.4; P = .03) and 8-MDCT (mean, 6.8; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: Stair-step artifacts are significantly higher with SDCT compared with MDCT. For MDCT, eight-detector scanners produce images with significantly less artifact than four-detector scanners.