Laparoscopic vs Open Treatment for Gastric and Non-Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: a Two-Center Experience.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 109 patients who underwent curative laparoscopic or open resection for different types of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Only primary GIST patients who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy or oral imatinib treatment were included in the analysis. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to the surgical approach:a laparoscopic group (LAP) and a laparotomic group (OPEN). Our aim was to confirm the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic surgery for GISTs that differed in size and location, and to assess its long-term oncologic outcome in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Furthermore, we performed a surgical short-term outcome analysis. The two groups did not differ with respect to age at operation, gender, BMI or comorbidities. Even the NIH and AFIP risk classifications were not significantly different between the two groups. Furthermore, in our analysis, there was no significant difference in mean tumor size or location between the two groups. Wedge resection was the most frequently performed procedure. The conversion rate was 7.8%. The operative time was 194.75 (60- 350) min for the open group and 181.70 (57-480) min for the laparoscopic group. Our data clearly indicated that the long-term oncologic outcome and DFS of laparoscopic resection were not inferior to those of traditional open operations and laparoscopic resection was still feasible in cases with large tumors: the median size of the tumor was 4.5 cm (3-25) and the tumor was larger than 4.5 cm in 47.7% of the cases in the LAP group. With regard to short-term outcomes, our study demonstrated that the LAP group had fewer complications, faster gastrointestinal recovery, reduced use of analgesic drugs and shorter postoperative hospital stay (each p<0.05). In conclusion, our experience confirms that GISTs are very uncommon cancers for which the prognosis is closely related to size, localization and class of risk. In light of our clinical data, laparoscopic resection for gastric and non-gastric GISTs is a safe, feasible and oncologically correct procedure. The most important advantage of this technique is that it ensures a better postoperative outcome compared with open surgery, without worsening the prognosis.

Structured and shared CT radiological report of gastric cancer: a consensus proposal by the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) and the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM).

OBJECTIVES: Written radiological report remains the most important means of communication between radiologist and referring medical/surgical doctor, even though CT reports are frequently just descriptive, unclear, and unstructured. The Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) and the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) promoted a critical shared discussion between 10 skilled radiologists and 10 surgical oncologists, by means of multi-round consensus-building Delphi survey, to develop a structured reporting template for CT of GC patients. METHODS: Twenty-four items were organized according to the broad categories of a structured report as suggested by the European Society of Radiology (clinical referral, technique, findings, conclusion, and advice) and grouped into three "CT report sections" depending on the diagnostic phase of the radiological assessment for the oncologic patient (staging, restaging, and follow-up). RESULTS: In the final round, 23 out of 24 items obtained agreement ( ≥ 8) and consensus ( ≤ 2) and 19 out 24 items obtained a good stability (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The structured report obtained, shared by surgical and medical oncologists and radiologists, allows an appropriate, clearer, and focused CT report essential to high-quality patient care in GC, avoiding the exclusion of key radiological information useful for multidisciplinary decision-making. KEY POINTS: • Imaging represents the cornerstone for tailored treatment in GC patients. • CT-structured radiology report in GC patients is useful for multidisciplinary decision making.

Development of the PERI-Gastric (PEritoneal Recurrence Index) and PERI-Gram (Peritoneal Recurrence Index NomoGRAM) for predicting the risk of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: A model that quantifies the risk of peritoneal recurrence would be a useful tool for improving decision-making in patients undergoing curative-aim gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: Five Italian centers participated in this study. Two risk scores were created according to the two most widely used pathologic classifications of GC (the Lauren classification and the presence of signet-ring-cell features). The risk scores (the PERI-Gastric 1 and 2) were based on the results of multivariable logistic regressions and presented as nomograms (the PERI-Gram 1 and 2). Discrimination was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating curves. Calibration graphs were constructed by plotting the actual versus the predicted rate of peritoneal recurrence. Internal validation was performed with a bootstrap resampling method (1000 iterations). RESULTS: The models were developed based on a population of 645 patients (selected from 1580 patients treated from 1998 to 2018). In the PERI-Gastric 1, significant variables were linitis plastica, stump GC, pT3-4, pN2-3 and the Lauren diffuse histotype, while in the PERI-Gastric 2, significant variables were linitis plastica, stump GC, pT3-4, pN2-3 and the presence of signet-ring cells. The AUC was 0,828 (0.778-0.877) for the PERI-Gastric 1 and 0,805 (0.755-0.855) for the PERI-Gastric 2. After bootstrap resampling, the PERI-Gastric 1 had a mean AUC of 0.775 (0.721-0.830) and a 95%CI estimate for the calibration slope of 0.852-1.505 and the PERI-Gastric 2 a mean AUC of 0.749 (0.693-0.805) and a 95%CI estimate for the slope of 0.777-1.351. The models are available at www.perigastric.org . CONCLUSIONS: We developed the PERI-Gastric and the PERI-Gram as instruments to determine the risk of peritoneal recurrence after curative-aim gastrectomy. These models could direct the administration of prophylactic intraperitoneal treatments.

Enterotomy Closure after Minimally Invasive Distal Gastrectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis: A Multicentric Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite progressive improvements in technical skills and instruments that have facilitated surgeons performing intracorporeal gastro-jejunal and jejuno-jejunal anastomoses, one of the big challenging tasks is handsewn knot tying. We analysed the better way to fashion a handsewn intracorporeal enterotomy closure after a stapled anastomosis. METHODS: All 579 consecutive patients from January 2009 to December 2019 who underwent minimally invasive partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer were retrospectively analysed. Different ways to fashion intracorporeal anastomoses were investigated: robotic versus laparoscopic approach; laparoscopic high definition versus three-dimensional versus 4K technology; single-layer versus double-layer enterotomies. Double-layer enterotomies were analysed layer by layer, comparing running versus interrupted suture; the presence versus absence of deep corner suture; and type of suture thread. RESULTS: Significantly lower rates of bleeding (p = 0.011) and leakage (p = 0.048) from gastro-jejunal anastomosis were recorded in the double-layer group. Barbed suture thread was significantly associated with reduced intraluminal bleeding and leakage rates both in the first (p = 0.042 and p = 0.010) and second layer (p = 0.002 and p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Double-layer sutures using barbed suture thread both in first and second layer to fashion enterotomy closure result in lower intraluminal bleeding and anastomotic leak rates.

Should Negative Pressure Therapy Replace Any Other Temporary Abdominal Closure Device in Open-Abdomen Management of Secondary Peritonitis?

AIM: To clarify the advantages of negative pressure therapy (NPT) compared to other methods of temporary abdominal closure (TAC) in the management of secondary peritonitis. METHODS: We retraced the history of known methods of TAC, and analyzed their advantages and disadvantages. We evaluated as the NPT mechanisms, both from the macroscopic that bio-molecular point of view, well suits to manage this difficult condition. RESULTS: The ideal TAC technique should be quick to apply, easy to change, protect and contain the abdominal viscera, decrease bowel edema, prevent loss of domain and abdominal compartment syndrome, limit contamination, allow egress of peritoneal fluid (and its estimation) and not result in adhesions. It should also be cost-effective, minimize the number of dressing changes and the number of surgical revisions, and ensure a high rate of early closure with a low rate of complications (especially entero-atmospheric fistula). For NPT, the reported fistula rate is 7%, primary fascial closure ranges from 33 to 100% (average 60%) and the mortality rate is about 20%. With the use of NPT as TAC, it may be possible to extend the window of time to achieve primary fascial closure (for up to 20-40 days). CONCLUSION: NPT has several potential advantages in open-abdomen (OA) management of secondary peritonitis and may make it possible to achieve all the goals suggested above for an ideal TAC system. Only trained staff should use NPT, following the manufacturer's instructions when commercial products are used. Even if there was a significant evolution in OA management, we believe that further research into the role of NPT for secondary peritonitis is necessary.

An Improved Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve-Monitoring Device: Technical Note for Nim Vital™.

A new device for monitoring the laryngeal nerves during thyroid surgery has been developed. NIM Vital™ (Medtronic Xomed, Inc., Jacksonville, FL, USA) incorporates (a) a new wireless design, (b) NIM NerveTrendTM (Medtronic Xomed) EMG reporting, (c) intelligent noise-reduction technology that suppresses artifacts, (d) smart troubleshooting pop-up alerts, and (e) NIM Nervassure ™ (Medtronic Xomed) for continuous monitoring. This device offers enhanced stability and flexibility for both intermittent and continuous laryngeal nerve monitoring. The new NIM NerveTrend ™ EMG reporting makes it possible to track the recurrent laryngeal nerve condition throughout a procedure, even when using intermittent nerve monitoring. During both continuous and intermittent monitoring, green, yellow and red status bars provide visual information and associated tones provide audible cues, making it easy to monitor nerve function and interpret EMG trends. This new tool for laryngeal nerve monitoring has the potential to augment nerve dissection during surgery. Measurements of long-term outcome are needed to establish their efficacy.

Ratio-based staging systems are better than the 7th and 8th editions of the TNM in stratifying the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The current and the previous editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) system for gastric cancer (GC; TNM8 and TNM7) have a high risk of stage-migration bias when the node count after gastrectomy is suboptimal. Hence, they are possibly not the optimal staging systems for GC patients. This study aims to compare the TNM with two systems less affected by the stage-migration bias, namely, the lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), to assess which one is the best in stratifying the prognosis of GC patients. METHODS: The sample study included 1221 GC patients. Two 7-cluster staging systems based on the combination of pT categories and LNR and LODDS categories (TLNR and TLODDS) were compared with the two last editions of TNM, using the Akaike information criteria, the Bayesian information criteria, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve graphs. Further validation on an independent sample of 251 patients was carried out. RESULTS: The univariable and multivariable analyses and the ROC curves detected an advantage of the TLNR and TLODDS systems over the TNM. The TLNR and TLODDS showed the best accuracy both in the subgroup of patients with ≥16 nodes examined. The results were confirmed in the validation analysis. CONCLUSIONS: TLNR and TLODDS staging systems should be considered a valid implementation of the TNM for the prognostic stratification of GC patients. If these results are confirmed in further studies, the future implementation of the TNM should consider the introduction of the LNR or the LODDS along with the number of metastatic nodes.

Association Between Compliance to an Enhanced Recovery Protocol and Outcome After Elective Surgery for Gastric Cancer. Results from a Western Population-Based Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The association between compliance to an enhanced recovery protocol (ERAS) and outcome after surgery for gastric cancer has been poorly investigated, particularly in Western patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the rate of adherence to the ERAS program was correlated with outcome and time of discharge. METHODS: A prospective, observational, multicenter study was designed to be performed at Italian referral centers for gastric surgery. The protocol was discussed and approved by the Italian Research Group on Gastric Cancer. Twenty-three ERAS domains were applied. A multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between ERAS compliance and overall and major complication rates. The Poisson regression model (measured as mean ratios) was used to assess the association of ERAS compliance rate and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Eight centers participated and 290 subjects with a median age of 73 years were enrolled. The overall rates of adherence to pre-, intra-, and postoperative ERAS items were 69.8%, 60.3%, and 82.5%, respectively. At the multivariate model, there was an association between overall rate of morbidity and an overall ERAS compliance rate greater than 70% (OR 0.413; 95% CI 0.235-0.7240; P 0.002). A similar association was found for major complications (OR 0.328; 95% CI 0.151-0.709; P 0.005). The Poisson regression showed that in patients with ERAS compliance rate >70%, LOS was reduced of approximately 20% (mean ratio 0.812; 95% CI 0.694-0.950; P 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a moderate compliance to an ERAS program and a significant association between adherence and outcomes.

Prognostic Indicators in Stage IV Surgically Treated Gastric Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Study.

INTRODUCTION: The role of gastric resection in treating metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma is controversial. In the present study, we reviewed the short- and long-term outcomes of stage IV patients undergoing surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted that assessed patients undergoing elective surgery for incurable gastric carcinoma. Short- and long-term results were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 122 stage IV gastric cancer patients were assessed. Postoperative mortality was 5.7%, and the overall rate of complications was 35.2%. The overall survival rate at 1 and 3 years was 58 and 19% respectively; the median survival was 14 months. Improved survival was observed for the factors age less than 60 years (p = 0.015), site of metastases (p = 0.022), extended lymph node dissection (p = 0.044), absence of residual disease after surgery (p = 0.001), and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis showed that residual disease and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that surgery combined with systemic chemotherapy in selected patients with stage IV gastric cancer can improve survival.

Negative Pressure Therapy (NPWT) for Management of Surgical Wounds: Effects on Wound Healing and Analysis of Devices Evolution.

Infection and wound dehiscence are common complications after surgery and open surgical wounds are difficult to manage. Usually surgical incisions are closed by fixing the edges together. However, in case of significant tissue loss, infected surgical field, or particular cases, wounds may be left open. In recent years, negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been widely used for management of various complicated wounds and to support postoperative tissue healing. Another emerging indication for NPWT, applied directly to the closed incisions, is to prevent infections or dehiscences in patients with increased risk of surgical-site complications (iNPWT). Furthermore, the combination of negative pressure with intermittent instillation of solution (NPWTi) seems to be effective in the treatment of a variety of complex wounds. Even if the role of NPWT in promoting wound healing has been largely accepted, there is a lack of evidence (few high-level clinical studies) regarding its effectiveness and further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of action. This article contains a review of recent scientific and clinical research related to indications, contraindications, and mechanisms of action of NPWT to clarify current knowledge, technological evolutions, and future perspectives of devices.

Effects of Time to Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Abdominal Infections After Colonic Perforation.

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure therapy (NPT) seems to improve surgical outcomes in open abdomen (OA) management of severe intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of immediate vs. delayed application of NPT on outcomes in patients with IAIs after colonic perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed 38 patients who received NPT during OA management for IAI after colonic perforation. The endpoints were treatment duration, definitive fascial closure and in-hospital mortality. We subdivided patients according to the timing of NPT application: immediate (at the end of the first OA procedure) and delayed (at I-II revision, at III revision, and after III revision). RESULTS: NPT was applied immediately in 15 cases (39.5%) and was delayed in 23 (60.5%): 14 (36.8%) at I-II revision, 7 (18.4%) at III revision, and 2 (5.3%) after III revision. Immediate NPT application was associated with the best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: NPT should be used as soon as possible in OA management for IAIs due to colonic perforation.

Early Gastric Cancer: Clinical Behavior and Treatment Options. Results of an Italian Multicenter Study on Behalf of the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group (GIRCG).

BACKGROUND: Early gastric cancer (EGC) generally has a good prognosis. However, the current definition of EGC includes various subgroups of patients with different pathological characteristics and different prognoses, some of whom have aggressive disease with a biological behavior similar to that of advanced carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 1,074 patients with EGC who had undergone surgery between 1982 and 2009. The cumulative incidence function of cancer-specific mortality and competing mortality were estimated using the Fine and Gray method. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 193 months (range 1-324). Five hundred and sixty-two (52.3%) patients died, 96 (8.9%) from EGC. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year cumulative incidence rates for mortality of all causes were 20.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18.0-22.9), 37.1% (95% CI 34.7-40.7), and 52.6% (95% CI 49.1-56.0), respectively; for cancer-specific mortality, 6.0% (95% CI 4.5-7.6), 9.9% (95% CI 7.9-11.9), and 11.1% (95% CI 8.8-13.3), respectively; and for mortality of other causes, 14.4% (95% CI 12.1-16.6), 27.2% (95% CI 24.2-30.2), and 41.5% (95% CI 38.1-43.3), respectively. A significant increase in the risk of cancer-specific mortality was observed for lesions >2 cm (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 1.44, 95% CI 1.07-1.94), Pen A-type disease (adjusted HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.15-2.61), and node-positive cancers (adjusted HR = 2.28, 95% CI 1.61-3.21). CONCLUSION: Patients with EGC with tumors >2 cm, Pen A-type disease according to Kodama, or lymph node metastases show a poorer prognosis and an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Early gastric cancer generally has a good prognosis, and some patients can be treated radically by endoscopic resection. However, the current definition of early gastric cancer includes subgroups of patients with an aggressive disease. In particular, patients with lymph node metastases and Pen A-type tumors according to Kodama's classification need a more invasive treatment, such as subtotal or total gastrectomy with an extended D2 lymphadenectomy, plus eventual adjuvant chemotherapy.

Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes including postoperative complications and prognosis between total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for proximal gastric cancer (GC). Propensity-score-matching analysis was performed to overcome patient selection bias between the two surgical techniques. METHODS: Among 457 patients who were diagnosed with GC between January 1990 and December 2010 from four Italian institutions, 91 underwent PG and 366 underwent TG. Clinicopathologic features, postoperative complications, and survivals were reviewed and compared between these two groups retrospectively. RESULTS: After propensity-score matching had been done, 150 patients (75 TG patients, 75 PG patients) were included in the analysis. The PG group had smaller tumors, shorter resection margins, and smaller numbers of retrieved lymph nodes than the TG group. N stages and 5-year survival rates were similar after TG and PG. Postoperative complication rates after PG and TG were 25.3 and 28%, respectively, (P = 0.084). Rates of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture were 12 and 6.6% after PG and 2.6 and 1.3% after TG, respectively (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). 5-year overall survival for PG and TG group was 56.7 and 46.5%, respectively (P = 0.07). Survival rates according to the tumor stage were not different between the groups. Multivariate analysis showed that type of resection was not an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: Although PG for upper third GC showed good results in terms of survival, it is associated with an increased mortality rate and a higher risk of reflux esophagitis and anastomotic stricture.

Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Time to source control plays a determinant prognostic role in patients having severe intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). Open abdomen (OA) management became an effective treatment option for peritonitis. Aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between time to source control and outcome in patients presenting with abdominal sepsis and treated by OA. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 111 patients affected by abdominal sepsis and treated with OA from May 2007 to May 2015. Patients were classified according to time interval from first patient evaluation to source control. The end points were intra-hospital mortality and primary fascial closure rate. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate was 21.6% (24/111), and the primary fascial closure rate was 90.9% (101/111). A time to source control ≥6 h resulted significantly associated with a poor prognosis and a lower fascial closure rate (mortality 27.0 vs 9.0%, p = 0.04; primary fascial closure 86 vs 100%, p = 0.02). We observed a direct increase in mortality (and a reduction in closure rate) for each 6-h delay in surgery to source control. CONCLUSION: Early source control using OA management significantly improves outcome of patients with severe IAIs. This damage control approach well fits to the treatment of time-related conditions, particularly in case of critically ill patients.

Functional outcomes of nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis: a prospective analysis using validated questionnaires.

PURPOSE: Radical eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is associated with a high risk of iatrogenic autonomic denervation and pelvic dysfunction. Our aim was to prospectively analyze peri-operative details and post-operative functional outcomes (in terms of pain relief and bladder, rectal, and sexual function) among women operated for DIE of the posterior compartment with nerve-sparing technique, using the visual analogue scale and validated questionnaires. METHODS: All women undergoing laparoscopic nerve-sparing eradicative surgery for DIE nodules of the posterior compartment ≥ 4 cm ± bowel resection were included. Pain scores [using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores] were collected before surgery and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Functional outcomes in terms of bladder, rectal, and sexual function, were evaluated using validated questionnaires (i.e., ICIQ-UISF, NBD score, and FSFI) administered pre-operatively and 6 months after surgery. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were included. Twenty-eight (82.4%) of them had already undergone a previous abdominal surgery for endometriosis. Bowel resection was performed in 16 (47.1%) patients. Median VAS score levels of pelvic pain were significantly decreased after surgery both at 6 (median 3, range 0-7 and 2, 0-7, respectively) and at 12 months (3, 0-8 and 2, 0-7), compared to pre-operative levels (9, 1-10 and 3, 0-7, respectively) (p < 0.0001). No differences were found in terms of urinary function between pre- and post-operative ICIQ-SF questionnaires. In no cases, bladder self-catheterization was needed at the 6-and 12-month follow-up. Median NBD score was 3.5 (0-21) pre-operatively and 2 (0-18) after 6 months (p = 0.72). The pre-operative total FSFI score was 19.1 (1.2-28.9) vs. 22.7 (12.2-31) post-operatively (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The nerve-sparing approach is effective in eradicating DIE of the posterior compartment, with satisfactory pain control, significant improvement of sexual function, and preservation of bladder and rectal function.

Risk factor analysis for involvement of resection margins in gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer: an Italian multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Resection margin (RM) involvement is associated with negative prognosis after gastrectomy. Intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis allows radical resection to be achieved in a single operation but is time-consuming and resource-consuming. The aim of this study was to assess risk factors associated with RM involvement to identify patients who would benefit from IFS analysis. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric or esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer from 2000 to 2014 in six Italian hospitals. RM status was assessed by IFS analysis and/or definitive histopathology examination. A set of 21 potential risk factors were compared in a multivariate analysis between patients with positive RMs on IFS analysis or definitive histopathology examination and a control cohort of similar patients with negative RMs, with the samples stratified into three subgroups (T1, T2-T4 Lauren intestinal pattern, T2-T4 Lauren diffuse/mixed pattern). RESULTS: One hundred forty-five patients had positive RMs. Survival was significantly worse in positive RM patients than in negative RM patients (89.5 months vs 28.9 months). Multivariate analysis showed that in T1 cancers a margin distance of less than 2 cm is a risk factor for RM involvement (odds ratio 15.7), in T2-T4 intestinal pattern cancers, serosa invasion (odds ratio 6.0), EGJ location (odds ratio 4.1), and a margin distance of less than 3 cm (odds ratio 4.0) are independent risk factors, and in T2-T4 diffuse/mixed pattern cancers, lymphatic infiltration (odds ratio 4.2), tumor diameter greater than 4 cm (odds ratio 3.5), EGJ location (odds ratio 2.8), and serosa invasion (odds ratio 2.2) are independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after gastrectomy is negatively affected by positive RMs. IFS analysis should be routinely used in patients with a high risk of positive RMs, especially in diffuse pattern cancers.

The Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (GIRCG) guidelines for gastric cancer staging and treatment: 2015.

This article reports the guidelines for gastric cancer staging and treatment developed by the GIRCG, and contains comprehensive indications for clinical management, including radiological, endoscopic, surgical, pathological, and oncological paths.

Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography during laparoscopic low anterior resection: results of a case-matched study.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal anastomoses after anterior resection for cancer carry a high risk of leakage. Different factors might influence the correct healing of anastomosis, but adequate perfusion of the bowel is highlighted as one of the most important elements. Fluorescence angiography (FA) is a new technique that allows the surgeon to perform real-time intraoperative angiography to evaluate the perfusion of the anastomosis and hence, potentially, reduce leak rate. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of FA of the bowel on postoperative complications and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). METHODS: FA was performed in all patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection with TME for cancer followed by colorectal or coloanal anastomosis. Results were compared to a historical controls group of 38 patients previously operated by the same surgeon for the same indication but without the use of FA. RESULTS: From October 2014 to November 2015, 42 patients underwent laparoscopic anterior resection with TME and FA of the bowel. The surgeon subjectively decided to change the planned anastomotic level of the descending colon due to hypoperfused distal segment in two out of 42 patients in the FA group (4.7 %). Anastomotic leakage, confirmed by postoperative CT scan and water-soluble contrast enema, was found in two cases of a historical controls group and none in the FA group. No adverse events (side effects or allergic reaction) related to FA were recorded. All the other postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In our experience, ICG FA was safe and effective in low rectal cancer resection, possibly leading to a reduction in the anastomotic leakage rate after TME.

Gastric Leaks after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Focus on Pathogenetic Factors.

As reported by The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity (IFSO) worldwide survey on bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy has become the second most performed bariatric/metabolic procedure in the world just after gastric bypass. If we consider complications, despite a recent systematic review and meta-analysis that reported a substantial decrease in sleeve gastrectomy complication rates, leaks after sleeve gastrectomy still rate between 0 and 18%. Unlike the leaks of other types of gastrointestinal surgery, leaks after sleeve gastrectomy are challenging in diagnosis and treatment and can lead to sepsis, multiple organ failure, and even death. A standardized algorithm of diagnosis and management is still lacking. Current classification of gastric leaks is based on the time of onset and clinico-pathological aspects. Nonetheless, none of the largest series in literature report the pathogenesis of gastric leaks. Given this paucity of evidence-based data and the lack of defined guidelines, we try to examine and consider the pathogenetic factors of gastric leak to implement better treatments and predict outcomes.