Relation of endothelial and cardiac autonomic function with left ventricle diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for left ventricle (LV) diastolic dysfunction. Aim of this study was to investigate whether endothelial and/or autonomic dysfunction are associated with LV diastolic dysfunction in DM patients. METHODS: We studied 84 non-insulin-dependent type 2 DM (T2DM) patients with no heart disease by assessing: 1) LV diastolic function by echocardiography; 2) peripheral vasodilator function, by measuring flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediate dilation (NMD); 3) heart rate variability (HRV) on 24-h Holter electrocardiographic monitoring. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (29.8%) had normal LV diastolic function, while 47 (55.9%) and 12 (14.3%) showed a mild and moderate/severe diastolic dysfunction, respectively. FMD in these 3 groups was 5.25 ± 2.0, 4.95 ± 1.6 and 4.43 ± 1.8% (p = 0.42), whereas NMD was 10.8 ± 2.3, 8.98 ± 3.0 and 8.82 ± 3.2%, respectively (p = 0.02). HRV variables did not differ among groups. However, the triangular index tended to be lower in patients with moderate/severe diastolic dysfunction (p = 0.09) and a significant correlation was found between the E/e' ratio and both the triangular index (r = -0.26; p = 0.022) and LF amplitude (r = -0.29; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients an impairment of endothelium-independent, but not endothelium-dependent, dilatation seems associated with LV diastolic dysfunction. The possible role of cardiac autonomic dysfunction in diastolic dysfunction deserves investigation in larger populations of patients.

Electrocardiographic findings at presentation and clinical outcome in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

AIMS: The main severe complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection are pneumonia and respiratory distress syndrome. Recent studies, however, reported that cardiac injury, as assessed by troponin levels, is associated with a worse outcome in these patients. No study hitherto assessed whether the simple standard electrocardiogram (ECG) may be helpful for risk stratification in these patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 324 consecutive patients admitted to our Emergency Department with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Standard 12-lead ECG recorded on admission was assessed for cardiac rhythm and rate, atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction, abnormal Q/QS wave, ST segment and T wave changes, corrected QT interval, and tachyarrhythmias. At a mean follow-up of 31 ± 11 days, 44 deaths occurred (13.6%). Most ECG variables were significantly associated with mortality, including atrial fibrillation (P = 0.002), increasing heart rate (P = 0.002), presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB; P < 0.001), QRS duration (P <0 .001), a QRS duration of ≥110 ms (P < 0.001), ST segment depression (P < 0.001), abnormal Q/QS wave (P = 0.034), premature ventricular complexes (PVCs; P = 0.051), and presence of any ECG abnormality [hazard ratio (HR) 4.58; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.40-8.76; P < 0.001]. At multivariable analysis, QRS duration (P = 0.002), QRS duration ≥110 ms (P = 0.03), LBBB (P = 0.014) and presence of any ECG abnormality (P = 0.04) maintained a significant independent association with mortality. CONCLUSION: Our data show that standard ECG can be helpful for an initial risk stratification of patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infectious disease.

Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular outcome in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but risk stratification of asymptomatic T2DM patients remains a challenging issue. We conducted a pilot study to assess whether endothelial dysfunction might help identify, among asymptomatic T2DM patients, those at increased risk of cardiovascular events. METHODS: We studied 61 consecutive T2DM patients with no evidence of cardiovascular disease and no insulin therapy. Endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the right brachial artery. The primary endpoint was a combination of major cardiovascular events (MACE: cardiovascular death, acute coronary events, coronary interventions, and acute cerebrovascular accidents). FMD was repeated at follow-up in 48 patients (79%). RESULTS: A total of 10 MACE (16.4%) occurred during a mean follow-up of 48 months, including three acute myocardial infarctions, five coronary revascularizations for stable angina, and two acute ischaemic strokes. FMD at enrolment was lower in patients with compared with patients without MACE (3.78 ± 0.97% vs 4.70 ± 1.33%, respectively; P = .04). No other clinical or laboratory variables (age, diabetes duration, glycated haemoglobin, cardiovascular risk factors, drug therapy, and nitrate-mediated dilation) were associated with MACE. FMD at follow-up was also lower in patients with (n = 10) compared with those without (n = 38) MACE (3.66 ± 1.29 vs 4.85 ± 1.92; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that assessment of FMD might be helpful to identify patients at increased risk of MACE among individuals with asymptomatic T2DM; accordingly, a large study is warranted to adequately define the clinical utility of FMD assessment in the management of T2DM patients.

A New Clinical Prediction Rule for Infective Endocarditis in Emergency Department Patients With Fever: Definition and First Validation of the CREED Score.

Background Infective endocarditis (IE) could be suspected in any febrile patients admitted to the emergency department (ED). This study was aimed at assessing clinical criteria predictive of IE and identifying and prospectively validating a sensible and easy-to-use clinical prediction score for the diagnosis of IE in the ED. Methods and Results We conducted a retrospective observational study, enrolling consecutive patients with fever admitted to the ED between January 2015 and December 2019 and subsequently hospitalized. Several clinical and anamnestic standardized variables were collected and evaluated for the association with IE diagnosis. We derived a multivariate prediction model by logistic regression analysis. The identified predictors were assigned a score point value to obtain the Clinical Rule for Infective Endocarditis in the Emergency Department (CREED) score. To validate the CREED score we conducted a prospective observational study between January 2020 and December 2021, enrolling consecutive febrile patients hospitalized after the ED visit, and evaluating the association between the CREED score values and the IE diagnosis. A total of 15 689 patients (median age, 71 [56-81] years; 54.1% men) were enrolled in the retrospective cohort, and IE was diagnosed in 267 (1.7%). The CREED score included 12 variables: male sex, anemia, dialysis, pacemaker, recent hospitalization, recent stroke, chest pain, specific infective diagnosis, valvular heart disease, valvular prosthesis, previous endocarditis, and clinical signs of suspect endocarditis. The CREED score identified 4 risk groups for IE diagnosis, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.874 (0.849-0.899). The prospective cohort included 13 163 patients, with 130 (1.0%) IE diagnoses. The CREED score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.881 (0.848-0.913) in the validation cohort, not significantly different from the one calculated in the retrospective cohort (P=0.578). Conclusions In this study, we propose and prospectively validate the CREED score, a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of IE in patients with fever admitted to the ED. Our data reflect the difficulty of creating a meaningful tool able to identify patients with IE among this general and heterogeneous population because of the complexity of the disease and its low prevalence in the ED setting.

Incidence and Predictors of Thrombotic Complications in 4742 Patients with COVID-19 or Other Acute Infectious Respiratory Diseases: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: A prothrombotic state, attributable to excessive inflammation, cytokine storm, hypoxia, and immobilization, is a feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Up to 30% of patients with severe COVID-19 remain at high risk of thromboembolic events despite anticoagulant administration, with adverse impact on in-hospital prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 4742 patients with acute infectious respiratory disease (AIRD); 2579 were diagnosed to have COVID-19 and treated with heparin, whereas 2163 had other causes of AIRD. We compared the incidence and predictors of total, arterial, and venous thrombosis, both in the whole population and in a propensity score-matched subpopulation of 3036 patients (1518 in each group). RESULTS: 271 thrombotic events occurred in the whole population: 121 (4.7%) in the COVID-19 group and 150 (6.9%) in the no-COVID-19 group (p < 0.001). No differences in the incidence of total (p = 0.11), arterial (p = 0.26), and venous (p = 0.38) thrombosis were found between the two groups after adjustment for confounding clinical variables and in the propensity score-matched subpopulation. Likewise, there were no significant differences in bleeding rates between the two groups. Clinical predictors of arterial thrombosis included age (p = 0.006), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.034), peripheral artery disease (p < 0.001), and previous stroke (p < 0.001), whereas history of solid cancer (p < 0.001) and previous deep vein thrombosis (p = 0.007) were associated with higher incidence of venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with heparin do not seem to show significant differences in the cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events as well as in the incidence of arterial and venous thrombosis separately, compared with AIRD patients with different etiological diagnosis.

Postexercise troponin I levels in patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Previous studies showed that troponin blood levels may increase after exercise. In this study, we assessed whether, among patients with suspected of having stable angina, the increase in troponin I (TnI) levels after exercise stress test (EST) might help identify those with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and myocardial ischemia. METHODS: We performed maximal treadmill EST in 50 patients (age 64 ±â€Š9 years; 38 men) admitted to our Cardiology Department to undergo elective coronary angiography because of a suspicion of stable angina. TnI was measured before and 12 h after EST. RESULTS: TnI increased after EST compared with baseline in the whole population (from 0.44 ±â€Š0.76 to 0.84 ±â€Š1.12 ng/dl, P < 0.001). No difference in TnI increase was observed between patients with obstructive CAD (n = 29; 0.61 ±â€Š0.90-1.13 ±â€Š1.33 ng/dl) and no obstructive CAD (NO-CAD; n = 21; 0.21 ±â€Š0.46-0.44 ±â€Š0.54 ng/dl; P = 0.51). There was also no significant difference in post-EST TnI increase between patients with positive EST (n = 34; 0.56 ±â€Š0.89-1.05 ±â€Š1.28 ng/dl) or negative EST (n = 16; 0.19 ±â€Š0.26-0.39 ±â€Š0.43 ng/dl; P = 0.16). Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the post-EST TnI increase among groups of patients with positive EST and obstructive CAD, positive EST and NO-CAD, negative EST and obstructive CAD and negative EST and NO-CAD (P = 0.12). No clinical or EST variable was associated with post-EST TnI increase, although there was a tendency for a greater increase in those achieving a heart rate more than 85 vs. less than 85% of maximal predicted heart rate during EST (P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: TnI increase after EST in patients with suspected stable angina is largely independent of the results of coronary angiography and EST.

Electrocardiographic Findings and Clinical Outcome in Patients with COVID-19 or Other Acute Infectious Respiratory Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac involvement in coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has been reported in a sizeable proportion of patients and associated with a negative outcome; furthermore, a pre-existing heart disease is associated with increased mortality in these patients. In this prospective single-center case-control study we investigated whether COVID-19 patients present different rates and clinical implications of an abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to patients with an acute infectious respiratory disease (AIRD) caused by other pathogens. METHODS: We studied 556 consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department of our hospital with symptoms of AIRD; 324 were diagnosed to have COVID-19 and 232 other causes of AIRD (no-COVID-19 group). Standard 12-lead ECG performed on admission was assessed for various kinds of abnormalities, including ST segment/T wave changes, atrial fibrillation, ventricular arrhythmias, and intraventricular conduction disorders. RESULTS: ECG abnormalities were found in 120 (37.0%) and 101 (43.5%) COVID-19 and no-COVID-19 groups, respectively (p = 0.13). No differences in ECG abnormalities were found between the 2 groups after adjustment for clinical and laboratory variables. During a follow-up of 45 ± 16 days, 51 deaths (15.7%) occurred in the COVID-19 and 30 (12.9%) in the no-COVID-19 groups (p = 0.39). ST segment depression ≥ 0.5 mm (p = 0.016), QRS duration (p = 0.016) and presence of any ECG abnormality (p = 0.027) were independently associated with mortality at multivariable Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalized because of AIRD, we found no significant differences in abnormal ECG findings between COVID-19 vs. no-COVID-19 patients. The ECG on admission was helpful to identify patients with increased risk of death in both groups of patients.

Coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute coronary syndrome and no obstructive coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Between 10 and 15% of patients admitted for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) show no obstructive coronary artery disease (NO-CAD) at angiography. Coronary microvascular spasm is a possible mechanism of the syndrome, but there are scarce data about coronary microvascular function in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess coronary microvascular function in patients with NSTE-ACS and NO-CAD. METHODS: We studied 30 patients (67 ± 10 years, 19 female) with NSTE-ACS and NO-CAD. Specific causes of NSTE-ACS presentation (e.g., variant angina, takotsubo disease, tachyarrhythmias, etc.) were excluded. Coronary blood flow (CBF) velocity response to IV ergonovine (6 µg/kg up to a maximal dose of 400 µg) was evaluated before discharge by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. CBF response to IV adenosine (140 µg/kg/min) and cold pressor test (CPT) was also assessed after 1 month. Ten age- and sex-matched patients with non-cardiac chest pain served as controls. Vasoactive tests were repeated after 12 months in 10 NSTE-ACS patients. RESULTS: The ergonovine/basal CBF velocity ratio was 0.79 ± 0.09 and 0.99 ± 0.01 in patients and controls, respectively (p < 0.001). The adenosine/basal CBF velocity ratio was 1.46 ± 0.2 and 3.25 ± 1.2 in patients and controls, respectively (p < 0.001), and the CPT/basal CBF velocity ratio was 1.36 ± 0.2 and 2.43 ± 0.3 in the 2 groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In 10 patients assessed after 12 months, CBF velocity responses to ergonovine, adenosine, and CPT were found to be unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSTE-ACS and NO-CAD exhibit a significant coronary dysfunction, which seems to involve both an increased constrictor reactivity, likely mainly involving coronary microcirculation, and a reduced microvascular dilator function, both persisting at 12-month follow-up.

Exercise test predictors of severe coronary artery disease: Role of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR.

BACKGROUND: The role of exercise stress test (EST)-induced ST-segment elevation (STE) in electrocardiographic lead aVR in predicting severe coronary artery disease (CAD) is controversial. HYPOTHESIS: Assessment of lead aVR during EST can be helpful to identify patients with severe CAD. METHODS: We performed maximal EST in 200 patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspect of CAD. Four angiographic findings of severe CAD were considered: (1) left main (LM) disease; (2) LM or equivalent LM (LM/EQLM) disease; (3) LM or proximal left anterior descending (LAD) artery (LM/proxLAD) disease; and (4) LM or 3-vessel (LM/3V) disease. RESULTS: LM, LM/EQLM, LM/proxLAD, and LM/3V disease were shown in 6 (3%), 13 (6.5%), 33 (16.5%), and 27 (13.5%) patients, respectively. EST-induced STE in aVR occurred in 41 patients (20.5%). ST-segment depression (STD) in ≥5 leads was the only predictor of LM stenosis (odds ratio [OR]: 6.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-32.2, P = 0.03) and the most significant variable associated with LM/proxLAD stenosis (OR: 4.73, 95% CI: 2.0-11.2, P = 0.0001); maximal STD ≥3 mm was the most significant variable associated with LM/EQLM (OR: 7.58, 95% CI: 2.31-24.9, P = 0.001) and LM/3V (OR: 3.86, 95% CI: 1.47-10.1, P = 0.006) CAD. EST-induced STE in aVR was associated with LM/proxLAD disease only (OR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.44-7.24, P = 0.004). At multivariate analysis, STD in ≥5 leads was the only independent predictor of LM/proxLAD disease (OR: 3.99, 95% CI: 1.58-10.1, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: EST-induced STE in lead aVR does not significantly increase the prediction of severe CAD compared with severity and extension of STD as assessed in the other electrocardiographic leads.