Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Spinal Cord ; 61(4): 260-268, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36797477

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective case-control study. OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors of lower extremity (LE) long bone fracture-related amputation in persons with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI). SETTING: US Veterans Health Administration facilities (2005-2015). METHODS: Fracture-amputation sets in Veterans with tSCI were considered for inclusion if medical coding indicated a LE amputation within 365 days following an incident LE fracture. The authors adjudicated each fracture-amputation set by electronic health record review. Controls with incident LE fracture and no subsequent amputation were matched 1:1 with fracture-amputation sets on site and date of fracture (±30 days). Multivariable conditional logistic regression determined odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for potential predictors (motor-complete injury; diabetes mellitus (DM); peripheral vascular disease (PVD); smoking; primary (within 30 days) nonsurgical fracture management; pressure injury and/or infection), controlling for age and race. RESULTS: Forty fracture-amputation sets from 37 Veterans with LE amputations and 40 unique controls were identified. DM (OR = 26; 95% CI, 1.7-382), PVD (OR = 30; 95% CI, 2.5-371), and primary nonsurgical management (OR = 40; 95% CI, 1.5-1,116) were independent predictors of LE fracture-related amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Early and aggressive strategies to prevent DM and PVD in tSCI are needed, as these comorbidities are associated with increased odds of LE fracture-related amputation. Nonsurgical fracture management increased the odds of LE amputation by at least 50%. Further large, prospective studies of fracture management in tSCI are needed to confirm our findings. Physicians and patients should consider the potential increased risk of amputation associated with non-operative management of LE fractures in shared decision making.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal , Humanos , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/complicações , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/epidemiologia , Traumatismos da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/cirurgia , Fraturas Ósseas/complicações , Amputação Cirúrgica , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38028907

RESUMO

This project surveyed Veterans' COVID-19 vaccination beliefs and status. 1,080 (30.8%) Veterans responded. Factors associated with being unvaccinated, identified using binomial logistic regression, included negative feelings about vaccines (OR = 3.88, 95%CI = 1.52, 9.90) and logistical difficulties such as finding transportation (OR = 1.95, 95%CI = 1.01, 3.45). This highlights the need for education about and access to vaccination.

3.
Nat Hum Behav ; 1(12): 873-880, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31024188

RESUMO

Clusters of unvaccinated children are particularly susceptible to outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease 1,2 . Existing messaging interventions demonstrate short-term success, but some may backfire and worsen vaccine hesitancy 3 . Values-based messages appeal to core morality, which influences the attitudes individuals then have on topics like vaccination 4-7 . We must understand how underlying morals, not just attitudes, differ by hesitancy type to develop interventions that work with individual values. Here, we show in two correlational studies that harm and fairness foundations are not significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy, but purity and liberty foundations are. We found that medium-hesitancy parents were twice as likely as low-hesitancy parents to highly emphasize purity (adjusted odds ratio: 2.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.27-3.40). High-hesitancy respondents were twice as likely to strongly emphasize purity (adjusted odds ratio: 2.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.39-3.31) and liberty (adjusted odds ratio: 2.19; 95% confidence interval: 1.50-3.21). Our results demonstrate that endorsement of harm and fairness-ideas often emphasized in traditional vaccine-focused messages-are not predictive of vaccine hesitancy. This, combined with significant associations of purity and liberty with hesitancy, indicates a need for inclusion of broader themes in vaccine discussions. These findings have the potential for application to other health decisions and communications as well.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Princípios Morais , Pais/psicologia , Recusa de Vacinação/psicologia , Vacinação/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Liberdade , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa