RESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Surgical decompression is a cornerstone in the management of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI); however, the influence of the timing of surgery on neurological recovery after acute SCI remains controversial. This systematic review aims to summarize current evidence on the effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of early (≤24 hours) or late (>24 hours) surgery in patients with acute traumatic SCI for all levels of the spine. Furthermore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the evidence with respect to the impact of ultra-early surgery (earlier than 24 hours from injury) on these outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE database (PubMed), Cochrane database, and EMBASE. Two reviewers independently screened the citations from the search to determine whether an article satisfied predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. For all key questions, we focused on primary studies with the least potential for bias and those that controlled for baseline neurological status and specified time from injury to surgery. Risk of bias of each article was assessed using standardized tools based on study design. Finally, the overall strength of evidence for the primary outcomes was assessed using the GRADE approach. Data were synthesized both qualitatively and quantitively using meta-analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met inclusion and exclusion criteria and formed the evidence base for this review update. Seventeen studies compared outcomes between patients treated with early (≤24 hours from injury) compared to late (>24 hours) surgical decompression. An additional 4 studies evaluated even earlier time frames: <4, <5, <8 or <12 hours. Based on moderate evidence, patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 grades on the ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, moderate evidence suggested that patients receiving early decompression had an additional 4.50 (95% CI 1.70 to 7.29) point improvement on the ASIA motor score. With respect to administrative outcomes, there was low evidence that early decompression may decrease acute hospital length of stay. In terms of safety, there was moderate evidence that suggested the rate of major complications does not differ between patients undergoing early compared to late surgery. Furthermore, there was no difference in rates of mortality, surgical device-related complications, sepsis/systemic infection or neurological deterioration based on timing of surgery. Firm conclusions were not possible with respect to the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological, functional or safety outcomes given the poor-quality studies, imprecision and the overlap in the time frames examined. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides an evidence base to support the update on clinical practice guidelines related to the timing of surgical decompression in acute SCI. Overall, the strength of evidence was moderate that early surgery (≤24 hours from injury) compared to late (>24 hours) results in clinically meaningful improvements in neurological recovery. Further studies are required to delineate the role of ultra-early surgery in patients with acute SCI.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy following trauma is associated with poor outcomes. Traumatic brain injury has been associated with coagulopathy out of proportion to other body regions. We hypothesized that injury severity and shock determine coagulopathy independent of body region injured. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter observational study at three Level 1 trauma centers. Conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) and rapid thrombelastography (r-TEG) were used. Admission vital signs, base deficit (BD), CCTs, and r-TEG data were collected. The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were obtained. Severe injury was defined as AIS score greater than or equal to 3 for each body region. Patients were grouped according to their dominant AIS region of injury. Dominant region of injury was defined as the single region with the highest AIS score. Patients with two or more regions with the same greatest AIS score and patients without a region with an AIS score greater than or equal to 3 were excluded. Coagulation parameters were compared between the dominant AIS region. Significant hypoperfusion was defined as BD greater than or equal to 6. RESULTS: Of the 795 patients enrolled, 462 met criteria for grouping by dominant AIS region. Patients were predominantly white (59%), were male (75%), experienced blunt trauma (71%), and had a median ISS of 25 (interquartile range, 14-29). Patients with BD greater than or equal to 6 (n = 110) were hypocoagulable by CCT and r-TEG compared with patients with BD less than 6 (n = 223). Patients grouped by dominant AIS region showed no significant differences for any r-TEG or CCT parameter. Patients with BD greater than or equal to 6 demonstrated no difference in any r-TEG or CCT parameter between dominant AIS regions. CONCLUSION: Coagulopathy results from a combination of tissue injury and shock independent of the dominant region of injury. With the use of AIS as a measure of injury severity, traumatic brain injury was not independently associated with more profound coagulopathy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.