"I couldn't connect the wires in my brain." Young adult cancer survivors' experience with cognitive functioning.

OBJECTIVE: There is a dearth of literature describing young adult (YA) cancer survivors' experiences with cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI). We aimed to elucidate CRCI among YA cancer survivors and identify potentially modifiable risk factors. METHODS: We conducted individual qualitative interviews with YA cancer survivors aged 18-30 years at study enrollment and used applied thematic analysis to identify themes across three topics (i.e., affected cognitive abilities, risk and protective factors influencing the impact of CRCI, and strategies for coping with CRCI). RESULTS: YA cancer survivors (N = 20) were, on average, 23 years old at diagnosis and 26 years old when interviewed. Diverse cancer types and treatments were represented; most participants (85%) had completed cancer treatment. Participants described experiences across three qualitative topics: (1) affected cognitive abilities (i.e., concentration and attention, prospective memory, and long-term memory), (2) Risk factors (i.e., fatigue, sleep problems, mood, stress/distractions, and social isolation) and protective factors (i.e., social support), and (3) coping strategies, including practical strategies that helped build self-efficacy (e.g., writing things down, reducing distractions), beneficial emotion-focused coping strategies (e.g., focus on health, faith/religion), strategies with mixed effects (i.e., apps/games, medications/supplements, and yoga), and "powering through" strategies that exacerbated stress. CONCLUSIONS: YA cancer survivors experience enduring cognitive difficulties after treatment. Specific concerns highlight the importance of attention and executive functioning impairments, long-term memory recall, and sensitivity to distractions. Future work is needed to improve assessment and treatment of CRCI among YA cancer survivors.

Surgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Stage I Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 25-Year Experience.

OBJECTIVES: Small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is usually a wide-spread, highly-lethal malignancy but occasionally presents as localized, limited stage cancer amenable to local treatment. We reviewed our experience using surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to assess safety, survival rates and treatment toxicity in clinical stage I SCLC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic medical records of patients with clinical stage I lymph node-negative SCLC who underwent surgical resection or SBRT between 1996 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. A multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards model was constructed. RESULTS: Of 96 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 77 underwent resection and 19 underwent SBRT. Surgical patients were younger (mean 68.4 ± 9.2 years surgery versus 74.3 ± 6.6 years SBRT, P = .005) and had better pulmonary function (81.5 ± 19.6 FEV1% of predicted surgery versus 44.0 ± 20.9% SBRT, P < .001). SBRT patients had significantly more comorbidities. For both cohorts, 59 tumors were pure SCLC and 37 were mixed SCLC/NSCLC histology. Median survivals were 21 months versus 31 months for SBRT and surgery patients respectively (P = .07). There were no treatment-related mortalities. Mean length of hospital stay for surgical patients was 5.4 ± 5.7 days. Survival was longer in lymph node-negative surgery patients (median 48 months node-negative versus 19 months node-positive, P = .04). For node-negative-surgery patients, the estimated 2- and 5-year survival rates are 60% and 48%. CONCLUSIONS: Our single-institutional experience over 25 years demonstrates that local treatment with surgery or SBRT for clinical stage I SCLC is safe and effective, with survivals lower than similar stage non-small-cell carcinoma patients. However, our results compare favorably with prior small-cell surgical series and far better than reported results of chemoradiotherapy for similar stage patients, thereby validating current recommendations for employing surgery or SBRT for stage I SCLC.

Identification of ATP-Competitive Human CMG Helicase Inhibitors for Cancer Intervention that Disrupt CMG-Replisome Function.

The human CMG helicase (Cdc45-MCM-GINS) is a novel target for anti-cancer therapy. Tumor-specific weaknesses in the CMG are caused by oncogene-driven changes that adversely affect CMG function, and a requirement for CMG activity during recovery from replicative stresses such as chemotherapy. Here, we developed an orthogonal biochemical screening approach and identified CMG inhibitors (CMGi) that inhibit ATPase and helicase activities in an ATP-competitive manner at low micromolar concentrations. Structure-activity information, in silico docking, and testing with synthetic chemical compounds indicate that CMGi require specific chemical elements and occupy ATP binding sites and channels within MCM subunits leading to the ATP clefts, which are likely used for ATP/ADP ingress or egress. CMGi are therefore also MCM complex inhibitors (MCMi). Biological testing shows that CMGi/MCMi inhibit cell growth and DNA replication using multiple molecular mechanisms distinct from other chemotherapy agents. CMGi/MCMi block helicase assembly steps that require ATP binding/hydrolysis by the MCM complex, specifically MCM ring assembly on DNA and GINS recruitment to DNA-loaded MCM hexamers. During S-phase, inhibition of MCM ATP binding/hydrolysis by CMGi/MCMi causes a 'reverse allosteric' dissociation of Cdc45/GINS from the CMG that destabilizes replisome components Ctf4, Mcm10, and DNA polymerase-a, -d, -e, resulting in DNA damage. CMGi/MCMi display selective toxicity toward multiple solid tumor cell types with K-Ras mutations, targeting the CMG and inducing DNA damage, Parp cleavage, and loss of viability. This new class of CMGi/MCMi provides a basis for small chemical development of CMG helicase-targeted anti-cancer compounds with distinct mechanisms of action.

Poverty, race, ethnicity, and survival in pediatric nonmetastatic osteosarcoma: a Children's Oncology Group report.

BACKGROUND: Children living in poverty and those of marginalized race or ethnicity experience inferior disease outcomes across many cancers. Whether survival disparities exist in osteosarcoma is poorly defined. We investigated the association between race, ethnicity, and proxied poverty exposures and event-free and overall survival for children with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma receiving care on a cooperative group trial. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of US patients with nonmetastatic, osteosarcoma aged 5-21 years enrolled on the Children's Oncology Group trial AOST0331. Race and ethnicity were categorized to reflect historically marginalized populations, as Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Other, and non-Hispanic White. Poverty was proxied at the household and neighborhood levels. Overall survival and event-free survival functions of time from trial enrollment were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hypotheses of associations between risks for event-free survival, death, and postrelapse death with race and ethnicity were assessed using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Among 758 patients, 25.6% were household-poverty and 28.5% neighborhood-poverty exposed. Of the patients, 21% of children identified as Hispanic, 15.4% non-Hispanic Black, 5.3% non-Hispanic Other, and 54.0% non-Hispanic White. Neither household or neighborhood poverty nor race and ethnicity were statistically significantly associated with risks for event-free survival or death. Postrelapse risk for death differed statistically significantly across race and ethnicity with non-Hispanic Black patients at greatest risk (4-year postrelapse survival 35.7% Hispanic vs 13.0% non-Hispanic Black vs 43.8% non-Hispanic Other vs 38.9% non-Hispanic White; P = .0046). CONCLUSIONS: Neither proxied poverty exposures or race and ethnicity were associated with event-free survival or overall survival, suggesting equitable outcomes following frontline osteosarcoma trial-delivered therapy. Non-Hispanic Black children experienced statistically significant inferior postrelapse survival. Investigation of mechanisms underlying postrelapse disparities are paramount.

Pediatric Leukemia Roadmaps Are a Guide for Positive Metastatic Bone Sarcoma Trials.

ALL cures require many MRD therapies. This strategy should drive experiments and trials in metastatic bone sarcomas.