[Enhanced quality of documentation for biologic therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis through structured digital reporting and indication?] / Qualitätssteigerung der Dokumentation zur Biologikatherapie der chronischen Rhinosinusitis durch digitale, strukturierte Befunderhebung und Indikationsstellung?

BACKGROUND: With targeted inhibition of type 2 inflammation, biologics represent the standard add-on therapy for inadequately controlled severe forms of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Despite standardization with paper-based checklists, the documentation of medical history and current findings pertinent to indication criteria are a significant challenge for physicians. Through development of an application based on structured reporting, the current study aimed to improve documentation quality and simplify the decision-making process. Previously available paper checklists served as a comparison. METHODS: For this study, a digital incremental tool was programmed to record current findings and check for fulfilment of indication criteria. The tool was compared with other checklists in terms of completeness, time required, and readability. RESULTS: A total of 20 findings were collected for each of the three documentation options and included in the analysis. Documentation with the two paper-based checklists had comparable information content: 17.5 ± 5.1/21.7 ± 7.6 points out of a maximum of 43 points; p > 0.05. Documentation using the digital application led to a significant increase in information content compared to all paper-based documentation. The average score was 38.25 ± 3.7 (88.9% of maximum; p < 0.001). On average, user satisfaction was high (9.6/10). Use of the digital application was initially more time consuming, but as more cases were documented, the time taken improved significantly. CONCLUSION: In the future, structured reporting using apps could replace paper-based reporting for the indication of biologic therapy in CRSwNP patients and offer additional benefits in terms of data quality and traceability of results. The increasing volume of documentation in the future, the progress of digitalization, and the possibility of networking between individual centers make introduction of the app in the near future both likely and economical.

Serum and urinary NGAL but not KIM-1 raises in human postrenal AKI.

BACKGROUND: We examined the value of the novel acute kidney injury (AKI) markers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in acute postrenal impairment. These biomarkers have been evaluated in prerenal and intrarenal AKI so far, but not in human acute postrenal kidney injury. With regard to multimorbid and critically ill patients the discrimination of different AKI origins often remains a challenge. As the trend goes towards a diagnostic panel of AKI markers, we hereby aim to contribute to evaluate further options of discrimination in an observational case-control study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood and urine samples were obtained from 53 patients with acute obstructive nephropathy secondary to ureteral calculi and 52 age-matched healthy controls. Serum NGAL (sNGAL), urinary NGAL (uNGAL) and urinary KIM-1 (uKIM-1) levels were determined using a commercially available ELISA kit, creatinine applying the Jaffé's method. RESULTS: While urinary levels of KIM-1 were not significantly different between patients with obstructive nephropathy and controls, a striking increase in sNGAL (P < 0·001) and uNGAL (P < 0·01) levels was detected in the obstructive nephropathy group. Within the obstructive nephropathy group, sNGAL (P = 0·01) and uNGAL (P = 0·049) but not uKIM-1 correlated positively with the white blood cell count and uNGAL correlated positively (P = 0·002) with the extent of leucocyturia. CONCLUSIONS: High levels of sNGAL and uNGAL observed in stone-induced acute obstructive nephropathy may represent a valuable marker of postrenal AKI. Low uKIM-1 levels may help to discriminate postrenal AKI events using a panel of markers in this setting.

The role of structured reporting and structured operation planning in functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Computed tomography (CT) scans represent the gold standard in the planning of functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS). Yet, radiologists and otolaryngologists have different perspectives on these scans. In general, residents often struggle with aspects involved in both reporting and operation planning. The aim of this study was to compare the completeness of structured reports (SR) of preoperative CT images and structured operation planning (SOP) to conventional reports (CR) and conventional operation planning (COP) to potentially improve future treatment decisions on an individual level. In total, 30 preoperative CT scans obtained for surgical planning of patients scheduled for FESS were evaluated using SR and CR by radiology residents. Subsequently, otolaryngology residents performed a COP using free texts and a SOP using a specific template. All radiology reports and operation plannings were evaluated by two experienced FESS surgeons regarding their completeness for surgical planning. User satisfaction of otolaryngology residents was assessed by using visual analogue scales. Overall radiology report completeness was significantly higher using SRs regarding surgically important structures compared to CRs (84.4 vs. 22.0%, p<0.001). SOPs produced significantly higher completeness ratings (97% vs. 39.4%, p<0.001) regarding pathologies and anatomical variances. Moreover, time efficiency was not significantly impaired by implementation of SR (148 s vs. 160 s, p = 0.61) and user satisfaction was significantly higher for SOP (VAS 8.1 vs. 4.1, p<0.001). Implementation of SR and SOP results in a significantly increased completeness of radiology reports and operation planning for FESS. Consequently, the combination of both facilitates surgical planning and may decrease potential risks during FESS.

Upper and lower urinary tract infections can be detected early but not be discriminated by urinary NGAL in adults.

PURPOSE: We investigated whether the recently established biomarkers of acute kidney injury, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), may help to diagnose acute urinary tract infections (UTI) in adults and are able to distinguish between upper or lower localization. METHODS: NGAL levels were measured in blood and urine, and KIM-1 concentrations in urine of 97 subjects. We recruited age- and gender-matched groups of 30 patients with acute upper UTI and 29 patients with acute lower UTI as well as 38 healthy controls. NGAL and KIM-1 were determined by ELISA, serum and urine creatinine applying the Jaffé's method. RESULTS: Urinary NGAL (uNGAL) was significantly increased in patients with upper as well as with lower UTI compared with the healthy controls (P < 0.01; P < 0.05). Accordingly, uNGAL normalized on urinary creatinine (uNGAL/uCrea) was markedly higher in patients with lower UTI compared with the control group (P < 0.05), and uNGAL/uCrea levels were still raised in patients with upper UTI, though not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.07). However, neither uNGAL nor uNGAL/uCrea levels displayed significant differences between patients with upper or lower UTI (P = 0.75; P = 0.97). uKIM-1 levels were close to the detection limit and too low to reliably reveal differences between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: While uKIM-1 seems not to serve as a helpful biomarker in this setting, increased levels of uNGAL indicate inflammatory processes in the urinary tract in adults. However, the determination of uNGAL levels does not allow to differentiate between upper and lower UTI.