Impact of brodalumab treatment on psoriasis symptoms and health-related quality of life: use of a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis symptoms have a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life, impairing physical functioning and well-being. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of brodalumab, a human anti-interleukin-17R monoclonal antibody, on psoriasis symptom severity as measured by a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory, and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life as measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (n = 198) treated with brodalumab or placebo. This analysis assessed Psoriasis Symptom Inventory scores and DLQI scores over time. Analyses were conducted on all patients who were randomized and received one or more injections of the study drug according to intention to treat using last observation carried forward to impute missing data. RESULTS: At week 12, subjects in the brodalumab groups had significant improvements in mean Psoriasis Symptom Inventory total scores [8.5 (70 mg), 15.8 (140 mg), 16.2 (210 mg) and 12.7 (280 mg)] compared with placebo (4.8). Mean improvements in DLQI were clinically meaningful (≥ 5.7) in the brodalumab groups (6.2, 9.1, 9.6 and 7.1, respectively) and significantly greater than placebo (3.1). Improvements in Psoriasis Symptom Inventory were observed as early as week 2 and in DLQI by week 4. All eight Psoriasis Symptom Inventory item scores improved significantly among the brodalumab groups by week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Results were from a single randomized clinical trial and may not generalize to broader patient populations. However, treatment with brodalumab provided significant improvement in psoriasis symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

United States Value Set for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Eight Dimensions (FACT-8D), a Cancer-Specific Preference-Based Quality of Life Instrument.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a value set reflecting the United States (US) general population's preferences for health states described by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) eight-dimensions preference-based multi-attribute utility instrument (FACT-8D), derived from the FACT-General cancer-specific health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) questionnaire. METHODS: A US online panel was quota-sampled to achieve a general population sample representative by sex, age (≥ 18 years), race and ethnicity. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was used to value health states. The valuation task involved choosing between pairs of health states (choice-sets) described by varying levels of the FACT-8D HRQL dimensions and survival (life-years). The DCE included 100 choice-sets; each respondent was randomly allocated 16 choice-sets. Data were analysed using conditional logit regression parameterized to fit the quality-adjusted life-year framework, weighted for sociodemographic variables that were non-representative of the US general population. Preference weights were calculated as the ratio of HRQL-level coefficients to the survival coefficient. RESULTS: 2562 panel members opted in, 2462 (96%) completed at least one choice-set and 2357 (92%) completed 16 choice-sets. Pain and nausea were associated with the largest utility weights, work and sleep had more moderate utility weights, and sadness, worry and support had the smallest utility weights. Within dimensions, more severe HRQL levels were generally associated with larger weights. A preference-weighting algorithm to estimate US utilities from responses to the FACT-General questionnaire was generated. The worst health state's value was -0.33. CONCLUSIONS: This value set provides US population utilities for health states defined by the FACT-8D for use in evaluating oncology treatments.

Validation of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R): measuring satisfaction with acute migraine treatment in clinical trials.

This study was aimed to evaluate in clinical trial settings the psychometric properties of the revised Patient Perception of Migraine Questionnaire (PPMQ-R), a satisfaction measure for acute migraine treatment. The PPMQ-R was administered 24 h post dosing in 1304 migraineurs randomized to two identical Phase 3, single-attack trials. Reliability, concurrent and construct validity and known-groups validity were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha, Pearson correlations and analysis of variance, respectively. PPMQ-R scale and Total scores (Efficacy, Functionality and Ease of use) showed very good internal consistency reliability (alpha 0.84-0.99). Efficacy, Functionality and Total PPMQ-R scores showed large, inverse relationships with migraine pain severity, number of migraine symptoms and work ability (r = -0.62 to -0.75; all P < 0.0001). All scales discriminated among migraine pain severity levels (all P < 0.001). The PPMQ-R has sufficient evidence of validity and reliability for measuring patient satisfaction, an important benchmark of quality and effective care.

The content validity of the PSS in patients with plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the content validity of the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS), with a specific focus on understanding of the content of the PRO measure by conducting one-on-one interviews with patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This was a cross-sectional, qualitative study conducted with 20 patients with plaque psoriasis who participated in in-person, one-on-one interviews. Participants were asked to describe their psoriasis symptoms, completed the PSS, and were cognitively debriefed on its content. Interviews were conducted in two separate rounds. Following Round 1, the study data were examined to determine if modifications to the PSS were required. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected for sample descriptive purposes. RESULTS: The 20 study participants had a mean age of 50.2 ± 12.0 years (range: 25.0-73.0), and 55% were female. Thirty-five percent of the sample reported their psoriasis severity as moderate or severe. The average time since diagnosis of plaque psoriasis was almost 18 years, ranging from less than one to over 38 years. The most frequently reported symptoms and signs during the concept elicitation portion of the interviews included redness (N = 20, 100%), itching (n = 20, 100%), pain (n = 15, 75%), burning (n = 13, 65%), and flaking (n = 11, 55%). Overall, participants provided positive feedback on the PSS and felt that it was comprehensive and relevant to their experience with psoriasis. The item meaning and response options were well-understood for the majority of the items. Findings indicate that for the patient-reported symptom of redness, which is also a sign that can be reported by clinicians, redness or the perception of redness is most accurately captured by patient report. Study results did not support modifications to the instrument and no changes to the PSS were recommended. CONCLUSION: The evidence gained in this study provided support for the content validity of the PSS for use as clinical trial endpoint among patients with plaque psoriasis. This study found that the symptoms included in the PSS are important to and well-understood by patients with plaque psoriasis. The PSS is appropriate for inclusion in future studies designed to measure the effect of treatment on psoriasis-related symptoms.

Medical care and cost outcomes after pentoxifylline treatment for peripheral arterial disease.

We assessed the medical outcomes and costs associated with the pharmacologic treatment of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in a population-based historical cohort study of patients enrolled in a health maintenance organization. For up to 2 years, we compared 58 patients who used therapeutic amounts of pentoxifylline with a comparison group of 112 patients who received a minimal subefficacious trial of pentoxifylline. Medical records data were used to assess and control for the severity of PAD and other potentially confounding factors. Continuous use of a therapeutic amount of pentoxifylline during an initial 120-day period significantly reduced the incidence of PAD-related invasive therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in the first year of follow-up (adjusted relative risk, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.12 to 0.99). However, there were no significant differences in the risk of a PAD-related hospitalization or cost of PAD-related care between continuous pentoxifylline users and the comparison group. Pentoxifylline therapy may reduce the risk of vascular surgery while not increasing the total cost of PAD care.

Quality of life outcomes of combination zalcitabine-zidovudine, saquinavir-zidovudine, and saquinavir-zalcitabine-zidovudine therapy for HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 per cubic millimeter. PISCES (SV14604) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind study evaluated treatment with zalcitabine-zidovudine, saquinavir-zidovudine, or saquinavir-zalcitabine-zidovudine on the health-related quality of life of HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 cells/mm3. METHODS: Nine hundred and ninety-three HIV-infected male or female quality of life substudy patients aged 18 years or older, with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 cells/mm3 naïve to antiretroviral therapy or with less than 16 weeks of zidovudine therapy, were randomly assigned to one of three daily regimens: zalcitabine 0.75 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (ddC/ZDV); saquinavir 600 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (SQV/ZDV); or saquinavir 600 mg, zalcitabine 0.75 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (SQV/ddC/ZDV). The health-related quality of life was measured using the Medical Outcome Study HIV (MOS-HIV) Health Survey subscale and physical and mental health summary scores, and a global visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The primary health-related quality of life endpoints were the MOS-HIV physical and mental health summary scores. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed between the three treatment groups on physical health and mental health summary scores (global test P = 0.118). After 48 weeks of treatment, statistically significant differences among the groups were observed for physical health and mental health summary scores (global test P = 0.020); no change in physical health summary scores from the baseline were seen in the triple combination therapy, whereas the ddC/ZDV combination therapy group showed decreases from baseline in physical health summary scores (P = 0.008). Six of the 10 individual MOS-HIV subscale scores and the VAS scores showed results consistent with the physical health summary endpoints after 48 weeks of therapy. No statistically significant differences in baseline to 48 week changes in MOS-HIV subscale or summary scores were seen between the ddC/ZDV and SQV/ZDV groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on triple combination therapy maintained their quality of life over 48 weeks compared with significant decreases in the quality of life for ddC/ZDV combination therapy.

A randomized trial of the effect of ritonavir in maintaining quality of life in advanced HIV disease. Advanced HIV Disease Ritonavir Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The aim of treatment for HIV disease is prolonging survival and improvement in health-related quality of life. Ritonavir is a potent, orally bioavailable HIV protease inhibitor with demonstrated impact on surrogate endpoints, AIDS-defining disease, and mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of ritonavir combined with reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapy on patient functioning and well-being. METHODS: An international, multicenter randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial of ritonavir was conducted in HIV-infected patients with CD4 cell counts < or = 100 x 10(6)/l. A total of 1090 patients were randomized to ritonavir and continued treatment with as many as two nucleoside agents (n=543) or placebo and continued treatment with as many as two nucleoside agents (n=547). Health-related quality of life was measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment using the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) and HIV-related symptoms scale. MOS-HIV contains 10 subscales and two summary scores (physical health and mental health). RESULTS: The two treatment groups were comparable on baseline CD4 cell counts, demographic characteristics, and MOS-HIV and HIV symptom subscale scores. After 3 months, statistically significant differences (P < 0.03) favoring the ritonavir-treated patients were seen on the physical health summary, mental health summary, and general health perceptions, social function, mental health, and energy/fatigue subscales. After 6 months of ritonavir therapy, significant differences were observed on physical health and mental health summary scores (P < 0.001), and on measures of general health perceptions, physical function, role function, social function, cognitive function, mental health, health distress, energy/fatigue, and overall ratings of quality of life (P < 0.01). Ritonavir-treated patients reported fewer fever symptoms and neurologic symptoms than the placebo group after 6 months of treatment (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir therapy, combined with other antiretroviral treatments, significantly contributes to maintenance of functioning and well-being over at least 6 months in patients with advanced HIV disease.

Recombinant human erythropoietin and health-related quality of life of AIDS patients with anemia.

To evaluate the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on anemia and health-related quality of life in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), we initiated an observational study with an open-label multicenter treatment protocol that involved multiple academic and community physicians in the United States. Our subjects comprised 251 anemic (i.e., hematocrit < 30%) patients with a clinical diagnosis of AIDS using 1987 CDC criteria, age > or = 12 years, and serum erythropoietin level < or = 500 IU/L. The initial dosage of recombinant human erythropoietin was 4,000 units subcutaneously for 6 days each week. Based on the patient's response to therapy, the dosage was increased sequentially to 8,000 units subcutaneously for 6 days per week. Our measurements included changes in mean hematocrit and health-related quality of life. The interview included measures of energy/fatigue; physical, social, role and cognitive function; depression; health perceptions; and life satisfaction. Adverse experiences were also documented to assess safety. Changes in mean hematocrit level from a baseline of 27.9% to 33.6% at week 12 (p < .0001) and 34.5% at week 24 (p < .0001) were observed in patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin. Adverse experiences, not clearly associated with AIDS, were reported by 10% of patients. Increases in energy (p < .05) were observed after 12 and 24 weeks of drug therapy, and increases in health perceptions were seen after 24 weeks (p < .05). No statistically significant increases or decreases were observed on measures of physical functioning, cognitive functioning, depression, social functioning, or home management activities over the 24-week follow-up. Anemia correctors (defined as hematocrit > or = 38%) showed greater improvement in energy, health perceptions, home management, and role function than noncorrectors. Study dropouts and those who died had significantly worse scores for health-related quality of life at baseline compared to study completers. Thus, the AIDS patients with anemia and serum erythropoietin levels < or = 500 IU/L treated with recombinant human erythropoietin showed increased mean hematocrit and improved health perceptions and energy levels. The drug therapy was associated with increased feelings of energy, but it was not associated with other changes in health status and well-being in the AIDS patients completing the study. These observations need to be confirmed in randomized clinical trials.

Quality of life outcomes of saquinavir, zalcitabine and combination saquinavir plus zalcitabine therapy for adults with advanced HIV infection with CD4 counts between 50 and 300 cells/mm3.

BACKGROUND: Benefits in patient health-related quality of life (HRQL) have not yet been demonstrated for combination antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors and nucleoside analogues. This double-blind study evaluated zalcitabine or saquinavir monotherapy and combination saquinavir plus zalcitabine therapy on HROL of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults. METHODS: 940 HIV-infected patients (CD4 counts 50-300 cells/mm3) who had discontinued zidovudine therapy (for intolerance or treatment failure) were randomized to one of three regimens: zalcitabine 0.75 mg every 8 h; saquinavir 600 mg every 8 h; or combination zalcitabine 0.75 mg plus saquinavir 600 mg every 8 hours. HRQL was measured at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks using the Medical Outcome Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV). The primary endpoints were the physical and mental health summary scores (PHS; MHS) of the MOS-HIV as well as a global visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, the zalcitabine-treated patients demonstrated significantly greater decreases in PHS scores (-4.4 +/- 0.6; saquinavir: -1.3 +/- 0.6; zalcitabine plus saquinavir: -1.7 +/- 0.6; P < 0.0001) and MHS scores (-2.2 +/- 0.5; saquinavir: -1.0 +/- 0.5; zalcitabine plus saquinavir: -0.5 +/- 0.5; P = 0.032) compared to saquinavir and zalcitabine plus saquinavir treated patients. No differences were observed on the VAS (P = 0.172). Nine of 10 MOS-HIV subscales demonstrated results consistent with the primary endpoints. After 48 weeks, a statistically significant difference between the saquinavir-treated groups and the zalcitabine monotherapy group was observed for PHS scores (zalcitabine: -5.8 +/- 0.6; saquinavir: -4.1 +/- 0.6; zalcitabine plus saquinavir: -3.5 +/- 0.6; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Saquinavir monotherapy and combination saquinavir plus zalcitabine demonstrated a benefit in HRQL relative to zalcitabine monotherapy in patients with prior zidovudine therapy. The HRQL findings are concordant with improved survival and reduced clinical progression of HIV infection found in this study.

Olanzapine versus placebo and haloperidol: quality of life and efficacy results of the North American double-blind trial.

This double-blind study evaluated the impact of treatment with olanzapine compared with haloperidol, and placebo on improvements in symptomatology and quality of life in patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of schizophrenia. A total of 335 patients was randomized to five treatment groups; olanzapine 5 +/- 2.5 mg/day, olanzapine 10 +/- 2.5 mg/day, olanzapine 15 +/- 2.5 mg/day, haloperidol 15 +/- 5 mg/day, and placebo. Patients responding to treatment during the 6-week acute phase were eligible to enter a 46-week extension. Efficacy measures included the brief psychiatric rating scale total, scale for assessment of negative symptoms summary, and clinical global impressions severity scores. Quality of life was evaluated using the quality of life scale. Data analyzed after 24 weeks of therapy showed that olanzapine was significantly superior to placebo in reducing clinical severity and significantly superior to haloperidol in reducing negative symptoms in patients responding to acute treatment. Furthermore, improvement in quality of life was observed in olanzapine-treated responders.

The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) affects health-related quality of life. METHODS: We enrolled 533 adults with a history of heartburn symptoms for at least 6 months of moderate to severe heartburn in 4 of the 7 days before study entry. Patients were treated with ranitidine 150 mg twice a day for 6 weeks and Gelusil antacid tablets as needed. We measured physician-rated symptoms and the Medical Outcomes Study short-form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment. Baseline results were compared with normative data for the US population and for patients with selected chronic diseases. Treatment response was defined as no episode of moderate to severe heartburn for 7 days. Statistical significance was set at P <0.001. RESULTS: GERD patients reported significantly worse scores on all 8 SF-36 scales, physical function and well-being, and emotional well-being compared with the general population. Patients with GERD reported worse emotional well-being than patients with diabetes or hypertension. Treatment responders demonstrated significantly less pain and better physical function, social function, vitality, and emotional well-being compared with nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GERD experience decrements in health-related quality of life compared with the general population. The impact of GERD is most striking on measures of pain, mental health, and social function. Successful treatment for GERD results in improvements in health-related quality of life.

Complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Medical treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) vary in their ability to completely resolve heartburn and other symptoms. Although GERD reduces health-related quality of life (HRQL) little is known about the relationship between resolution of heartburn symptoms with medical therapy and HRQL. We evaluated the association between complete resolution of heartburn symptoms and functioning and well-being in three samples of patients with GERD. METHODS: We analysed baseline and follow-up assessments of heartburn symptoms and HRQL scores from three clinical trials (total n=1351) comparing omeprazole and ranitidine for acute symptomatic treatment of GERD. Heartburn symptoms were measured using patient diaries and/or patient self-report. HRQL was assessed using the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWB) in all three clinical trials and the SF-36 Health Survey in two clinical trials. Resolution of heartburn symptoms was defined as no heartburn reported during the assessment period. RESULTS: We observed statistically significant differences favouring patients with no heartburn symptoms on the PGWB total score (P=0.018 to P < 0.0001) and anxiety (P=0.002 to P < 0.0001), general health (P=0.05 to P < 0. 0001), positive well-being (P=0.028 to P < 0.0001) and vitality (P=0. 05 to P < 0.0001) sub-scale scores at 4-14 weeks. Patients with no heartburn reported better SF-36 pain (P=0.005 to P < 0.0001) and general health perceptions (P=0.032 to P < 0.0001) compared with patients still experiencing heartburn symptoms at 4-24 weeks. SF-36 physical component summary scores were significantly better in patients with no heartburn symptoms compared with patients with heartburn symptoms at 4-24 weeks (P=0.013 to P=0.009), while mental component summary scores were only significantly different at 24 weeks (P=0.0005) in one of the two studies where the SF-36 was utilized. CONCLUSIONS: Complete resolution of heartburn symptoms was consistently associated with improvement in HRQL; the greatest impact was observed on measures of psychological well-being and physical functioning and well-being. Effective treatment of GERD that completely resolves heartburn results in clinically significant improvement in patient HRQL.

Development and validation of a patient-assessed gastroparesis symptom severity measure: the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index.

BACKGROUND: Patient-based symptom assessments are necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of medical treatments for gastroparesis. AIM: To summarize the development and measurement qualities of the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI), a new measure of gastroparesis-related symptoms. METHODS: The GCSI was based on reviews of the medical literature, clinician interviews and patient focus groups. The measurement qualities (i.e. reliability, validity) of the GCSI were examined in 169 gastroparesis patients. Patients were recruited from seven clinical centres in the USA to participate in this observational study. Patients completed the GCSI, SF-36 Health Survey and disability day questions at a baseline visit and again after 8 weeks. Clinicians independently rated the severity of the patients' symptoms, and both clinicians and patients rated the change in gastroparesis-related symptoms over the 8-week study. RESULTS: The GCSI consists of three sub-scales: post-prandial fullness/early satiety, nausea/vomiting and bloating. The internal consistency reliability was 0.84 and the test-re-test reliability was 0.76 for the GCSI total score. Significant relationships were observed between the clinician-assessed symptom severity and the GCSI total score, and significant associations were found between the GCSI scores and SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores and restricted activity and bed disability days. Patients with greater symptom severity, as rated by clinicians, reported greater symptom severity on the GCSI. The GCSI total scores were responsive to changes in overall gastroparesis symptoms as assessed by clinicians (P = 0.0002) and patients (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that the GCSI is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring the symptom severity in patients with gastroparesis.

Cost effectiveness of the newer atypical antipsychotics: a review of the pharmacoeconomic research evidence.

A comprehensive evaluation of atypical antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia involves documentation of clinical effectiveness, quality of life and medical cost outcomes. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies assist psychiatrists, and other healthcare decision-makers, in identifying pharmacotherapies that provide the greatest benefit to patients at the most acceptable cost. The cost-effectiveness of the newer atypical antipsychotics has been examined using clinical decision-modeling studies and randomized clinical trials. The research evidence suggests that clozapine is a cost-effective treatment for neuroleptic refractory schizophrenia. Olanzapine and risperidone may be cost-neutral or, at best, slightly cost-saving compared with conventional antipsychotics, although they do improve clinical symptoms and quality of life outcomes. There is insufficient published data on pharmacoeconomic outcomes for sertindole, quetiapine and ziprasidone to make any conclusions about their cost-effectiveness in treating schizophrenia.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatments for refractory schizophrenia: clozapine-related studies.

Cost-effectiveness analyses determine whether a new therapy will find a place in clinical practice, based on the cost of its use and the health outcomes it produces, compared with other available therapies. Clozapine, indicated for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, has been evaluated in uncontrolled, mirror-image studies; clinical decision analysis models; and prospective, randomized clinical trials. Results from randomized trials demonstrate that clozapine controls symptoms of psychopathology and improves quality of life slightly more effectively than traditional neuroleptic medications. It has a lower incidence of extrapyramidal side effects than traditional medications, resulting in a lower drop-out rate. Beginning in the second year of treatment, clozapine may produce cost savings for the health care system, when its higher acquisition cost begins to be offset by reduced hospitalization. Mirror-image studies and clinical decision analysis models provide further support for these findings.

Cost-effectiveness of newer antidepressants compared with tricyclic antidepressants in managed care settings.

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of newer antidepressants compared with tricyclic antidepressants in managed care organization settings. METHOD: We employed cost-utility analysis based on a clinical decision analysis model derived from published medical literature and physician judgment. The model, which represents ideal primary care practice, compares treatment with nefazodone to treatment with either imipramine or fluoxetine or to a step approach involving initial treatment with imipramine followed by nefazodone for treatment failures. The outcome measures were lifetime medical costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs per QALY gained. RESULTS: The base case analysis found that nefazodone treatment had $16,669 in medical costs, compared with $15,348 for imipramine, $16,061 for the imipramine step approach, and $16,998 for fluoxetine. QALYs were greatest for nefazodone (14.64), compared with 14.32 for imipramine, 14.40 for the step approach, and 14.58 for fluoxetine. The cost-effectiveness ratio comparing nefazodone with imipramine was $4065 per QALY gained. The cost-effectiveness ratio comparing nefazodone with the step approach was $2555 per QALY gained. There were only minor differences in costs and outcomes between nefazodone and fluoxetine, with nefazodone resulting in $329 fewer costs and 0.06 more QALYs. The cost-effectiveness ratios comparing fluoxetine with imipramine and with the step approach were $6346 per QALY gained and $5206 per QALY gained, respectively. In the sensitivity analyses, the cost-effectiveness ratios comparing nefazodone and imipramine ranged from $2572 to $5841 per QALY gained. The model was most sensitive to assumptions about treatment compliance rates. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that nefazodone is a cost- effective treatment compared with imipramine or fluoxetine treatment for major depression. Fluoxetine is cost-effective compared with imipramine treatment, but is estimated to have slightly more medical costs and less effectiveness compared with nefazodone. The basic findings and conclusions do not change even after modifying key model parameters.

Patient outcomes with co-managed post-operative care after cataract surgery.

This study examined the practice of co-managed post-operative care and the visual acuity outcomes and complications associated with co-managed services. Data on service utilization and medical outcomes were collected for 2822 cataract surgery procedures performed in 5 ambulatory eye centers between January and July 1988. Average age of patients was 72.8 (SD = 10.4) and 63% were female. Eighty-seven percent of eyes were co-managed. Average number of post-operative visits within 90 days was 4.7 and 6.2 for co-managed cases with and without complications, respectively. Successful visual acuity outcomes (< 20/40) were experienced by 86% of all co-managed patients. There was evidence that patients with pre-existing ocular conditions (e.g. glaucoma, macular degeneration) and serious post-surgical complications were not referred for co-management. For co-managed patients without pre-existing medical or ocular conditions, 92% had successful vision outcomes, while 77-90% with these conditions had successful outcomes. Ninety-three percent of co-managed cases had no post-operative complications, and the rate of specific types of complications ranged from 0.04 to 2.0%. Using physician evaluations as the standard, sensitivity of optometrist detection of complications was 59% and specificity was 99.6%. Optometrists located in separate offices demonstrated 95.8% accuracy in assessing patients for post-operative complications.

Responsiveness and calibration of the General Well-Being Adjustment Scale in patients with hypertension.

We examined the discriminant ability and responsiveness of the General Well-Being Adjustment Scale in patients enrolled in a randomized clinical trial of antihypertensive therapy. We also tried to translate the effects of physical symptoms on general well-being. This secondary analysis used demographic, clinical, physical symptom, and general well-being data for 545 white, male hypertensive patients. General well-being was measured by the General Well-Being Adjustment Scale (GWB) collected on 2 occasions over 8 weeks of treatment. Patients with any one of 14 physical symptoms or problems, compared to those without symptoms, had lower GWB scores (p < 0.003 to p < 0.0001). Decreases of 2.83-8.76 points in GWB scores were observed in patients developing physical symptoms over the 8 week study period (p < 0.05 to p < 0.0001). These effects were demonstrated in patients developing cold sensitivity, sexual problems, chest pain, shortness of breath, loss of taste, nausea, hot or cold spells, numbness and tingling, dry mouth, blurred vision, and dizziness. We conclude that the GWB is responsive to clinically meaningful changes in symptoms and may provide a more complete evaluation of the effects of medical treatment. The GWB is a valid and responsive measure of health status outcomes in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment.

Integrating patient preferences into health outcomes assessment: the multiattribute Asthma Symptom Utility Index.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate a brief, easy-to-administer symptom assessment scale for use as a preference-based outcome measure in clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies in asthma. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with 2-week reproducibility assessment. SETTING: Ambulatory care: university asthma and allergy center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-one adults with asthma, 59% female, mean age 35+/-11 years. Mean FEV1 percent predicted was 86+/-17%. INTERVENTIONS: The 11-item Asthma Symptom Utility Index (ASUI). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Mean ASUI score for this sample was 0.71+/-0.23, with a range from 0.02 to 1.0. The ASUI was reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.74) and able to distinguish patients known to differ on disease severity according to clinician ratings (p < 0.001) and by an asthma disease severity scale score (p < 0.001). The instrument was also significantly correlated with FEV1 percent predicted (r = 0.27, p < 0.001), the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (r = 0.77, p < 0.001), and the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 (r = 0.36, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study support the reliability and validity of the ASUI, suggesting it will be a useful, complementary patient outcome measure for clinical trials and cost-effectiveness studies comparing treatment alternatives for persons with asthma.

Pharmacoeconomic studies of atypical antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia.

The pharmacoeconomic evaluation of atypical antipsychotics for patients with schizophrenia requires focus on both clinical and quality of life effects and impact on the cost of medical resources. The results of pharmacoeconomic studies help clinicians and health care decision makers identify treatments that provide the most benefit to patients at the most acceptable cost. The cost-effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs has been evaluated using noncontrolled, mirrorimage (i.e. retrospective/prospective) cohort study designs; clinical decision analysis models; and randomized clinical trials. The current pharmacoeconomic evidence suggests that clozapine is a cost-effective therapy for neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenia and that although olanzapine and risperidone therapy may be cost neutral, they improve outcome in patients treated for schizophrenia.