Strategies to optimize a pediatric magnetic resonance imaging service.

A pediatric MRI service is a vital component of a successful radiology department. Building an efficient and effective pediatric MRI service is a multifaceted process that requires detailed planning for considerations related to finance, operations, quality and safety, and process improvement. These are compounded by the unique challenges of caring for pediatric patients, particularly in the setting of the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In addition to material resources, a successful pediatric MRI service depends on a collaborative team consisting of radiologists, physicists, technologists, nurses and vendor specialists, among others, to identify and resolve challenges and to strive for continued improvement. This article provides an overview of the factors involved in both starting and optimizing a pediatric MRI service, including commonly encountered obstacles and some proposed solutions to address them.

Magnetic resonance imaging quality control, quality assurance and quality improvement.

Quality in MR imaging is a comprehensive process that encompasses scanner performance, clinical processes for efficient scanning and reporting, as well as data-driven improvement involving measurement of key performance indicators. In this paper, the authors review this entire process. This article provides a framework for establishing a successful MR quality program. The collective experiences of the authors across a spectrum of pediatric hospitals is summarized here.

Impact of a fast free-breathing 3-T abdominal MRI protocol on improving scan time and image quality for pediatric patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen can be especially challenging in pediatric patients because of image quality degradation from respiratory motion. Abdominal MR protocols tailored for free-breathing children can potentially improve diagnostic image quality and reduce scan time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a free-breathing 3-T MRI protocol for renal evaluation in pediatric patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single institution, Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective database query identified pediatric TSC patients who underwent a free-breathing 3-T MR abdominal protocol including radial and respiratory-triggered pulse sequences and who also had a prior abdominal MRI on the same scanner using a traditional MR protocol utilizing signal averaging and Cartesian k-space sampling. Scan times and use of sedation were recorded. MR image quality was compared between the two protocols using a semiquantitative score for overall image quality and sharpness. RESULTS: Forty abdominal MRI studies in 20 patients were evaluated. The mean scan time of the fast free-breathing protocol was significantly lower (mean: 42.5±9.8 min) compared with the traditional protocol (58.7±11.7 min; P=<0.001). Image sharpness was significantly improved for radial T2-weighted and T1-weighted triggered Dixon and radial T1-weighted fat-suppressed post-contrast images in the free-breathing protocol, while image quality was significantly higher on radial and Dixon T1-weighted sequences. CONCLUSION: A free-breathing abdominal MR protocol in pediatric TSC patients decreases scan time and improves image quality and should be considered more widely for abdominal MRI in children.

Evaluation of the Aggregated Time Savings in Adopting Fast Brain MRI Techniques for Outpatient Brain MRI.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical validation studies have demonstrated the ability of accelerated MRI sequences to decrease acquisition time and motion artifact while preserving image quality. The operational benefits, however, have been less explored. Here, we report our initial clinical experience in implementing fast MRI techniques for outpatient brain imaging during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Aggregate acquisition times were extracted from the medical record on consecutive imaging examinations performed during matched pre-implementation (7/1/2019-12/31/2019) and post-implementation periods (7/1/2020-12/31/2020). Expected acquisition time reduction for each MRI protocol was calculated through manual collection of acquisition times for the conventional and accelerated sequences performed during the pre- and post-implementation periods. Aggregate and expected acquisition times were compared for the five most frequently performed brain MRI protocols: brain without contrast (BR-), brain with and without contrast (BR+), multiple sclerosis (MS), memory loss (MML), and epilepsy (EPL). RESULTS: The expected time reductions for BR-, BR+, MS, MML, and EPL protocols were 6.6 min, 11.9 min, 14 min, 10.8 min, and 14.1 min, respectively. The overall median aggregate acquisition time was 31 [25, 36] min for the pre-implementation period and 18 [15, 22] min for the post-implementation period, with a difference of 13 min (42%). The median acquisition time was reduced by 4 min (25%) for BR-, 14.0 min (44%) for BR+, 14 min (38%) for MS, 11 min (52%) for MML, and 16 min (35%) for EPL. CONCLUSION: The implementation of fast brain MRI sequences significantly reduced the acquisition times for the most commonly performed outpatient brain MRI protocols.