RESUMO
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated mortality benefits for several medication classes in patients with heart failure (HF), especially with reduced ejection fraction (EF). However, the benefit of these traditional HF therapies in patients with HF from cardiac amyloidosis is unclear. our study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of traditional HF therapies in patients with cardiac amyloidosis and HF with reduced EF or HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF). We conducted a single-center retrospective study. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with cardiac amyloidosis and HF with reduced EF or HF with mid-range EF between January 2012 and 2022. The primary outcomes of interest were medication use patterns (for ß blockers [BB], angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI], angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs], angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors [ARNI], and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists [MRAs]); potential medication side effects (symptomatic bradycardia, fatigue, hypotension, lightheadedness, and syncope); hospitalization; and death. The associations of BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and MRA use with clinical outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 82 patients met study criteria. At time of cardiac amyloidosis diagnosis, 63.4% were on a BB, 51.2% were on an ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 43.9% were on an MRA. At last follow-up, 51.2% were on a BB, 35.4% were on an ACEI/ARB/ARNI, and 43.9% were on an MRA. There were no statistically significant differences in rates of potential medication side effects in patients on the medication class compared with those who were not. There was no association with hospitalization or mortality for baseline or follow-up BB, ACEI/ARB/ARNI, or MRA use. In conclusion, BBs, ACEI/ARB/ARNIs, and MRAs may be safely used in this population. However, their use does not appear to improve mortality or hospitalization.
Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda , Humanos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Volume Sistólico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/complicações , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/induzido quimicamente , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacologia , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/farmacologiaRESUMO
A 68-year-old woman presented for left shoulder pain, decreased range of motion (ROM) and fever 7 days following COVID-19 vaccination. Investigations showed a tender left deltoid mass, decreased shoulder ROM and elevated inflammatory markers. MRI demonstrated a large glenohumeral effusion with synovitis, and arthrocentesis confirmed septic arthritis (SA). She required subtotal bursectomy. Intraoperative joint cultures grew Streptococcus gordonii She completed 6 weeks of antibiotics and is undergoing physical therapy for post-infectious adhesive capsulitis. SA is most commonly due to Staphylococcus aureus and ß-haemolytic streptococci, and rarely due to viridans group streptococci including S.â¯gordonii To avoid inadvertent injection into the glenohumeral joint, vaccination should be performed posteriorly and inferiorly into the deltoid musculature. Progressive pain, fever or decreased passive ROM following vaccination should raise concern for SA. Given its rarity, however, concern for secondary SA should not affect the general population's consideration for vaccination.