The development of a geriatric postgraduate education assessment instrument using a modified Delphi procedure.

There is currently wide variation in the structure and content of higher medical training in geriatric medicine across Europe and no common framework within which existing efforts can be compared. We set out to develop an audit tool to compare training between countries. An initial review of indexed and grey literature was used to develop an audit tool which was used as the basis of an Internet-based modified Delphi process incorporating the views of 14 expert geriatricians from across Europe. Items in the audit tool were included or excluded when supported by ≥75% or <50% of respondents, respectively. Items supported by 50-74% of respondents were carried forward with additional suggestions and modifications included following Round 1. Thirteen experts representing 12 countries responded to both rounds. 40/45 items were supported at Round 1. Five items were carried forward. A further 13 elements were introduced for consideration at Round 2. Consensus was gained after the second round. The final tool describes 52 items across four domains: general considerations, topics referring to knowledge in patient care, different roles that should be considered in medical training and topics regarding assessment. The resulting tool can be used as a basis for comparing higher medical training programmes in geriatric medicine between countries. Individual countries can use this to audit current practice. At an European Union level, the insights gained through such audit will form the basis of future work to develop an agreed postgraduate curriculum in the specialty.

European postgraduate training in geriatric medicine: data of a systematic international survey.

INTRODUCTION: High-quality education and training standards in geriatric medicine are important to develop the profession of geriatric medicine. The objective of the study was to give a structured update on postgraduate specialty training in geriatric medicine throughout Europe to assess the need for further developments in postgraduate education. METHODS: The study was performed as a cross-sectional structured quantitative online survey with qualitative comments. The survey content covered organization, content and educational aspects of specialty training in geriatric medicine in European countries. After piloting, the questionnaire was sent to experts in geriatric medicine with a special interest in postgraduate training who are members of one of the following organizations; European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS), European Academy for the Medicine of Aging (EAMA), and European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). RESULTS: Respondents to the survey represented 31 European countries. Geriatric medicine is recognized as an independent postgraduate specialty in 61.3 % (19/31) and as a subspecialty in 29.0 % (9/31) of the countries. In 5 of the 31 countries geriatric medicine is not recognized at all. Nearly all countries offering postgraduate training in geriatric medicine have written, competence-based curricula covering different learning domains. 20/31 countries (64.5 %) have some kind of specialist assessment. DISCUSSION: The survey tries to give an actual condensed picture of postgraduate specialty training in geriatric medicine across Europe. Results show a consistent improvement in the recognition of geriatric medicine as independent specialty over the last decade. Continuous development of specialty training in geriatric medicine is required to medical address the public health needs of an aging population. Competence-based educational models including adequate forms of assessment should be targeted throughout Europe. To emphasize the importance of postgraduate geriatric training, it should be a mission to harmonize training standards across Europe.

Relationship between fluid management, changes in serum sodium and outcome in hypernatraemia associated with gastroenteritis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the relationship between fluid management, serum sodium and outcome in critically ill children with hypernatraemic gastroenteritis. METHODS: A retrospective study of 57 children with hypernatraemic gastroenteritis admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit in Cape Town, South Africa. Data were collected on fluid management, serum electrolytes and adverse outcome (seizures, new neurological deficit and mortality) and analysed using univariate and multivariate statistics. RESULTS: Median admission sodium was 165 mmol/L (145-199). Median volume of intravenous rehydration fluid was 6 mL/kg/h (144 mL/kg/day), with sodium concentration of 61 mmol/L (0-154 mmol/L), resulting in a median fall in sodium of 0.6 mmol/L/h (14.4 mmol/L/day). Fourteen children (25%) had seizures during rehydration, four children (7%) died and five children (9%) developed neurological deficit. Median admission sodium in children with adverse outcome was 172 mmol/L, with rate of fall of 0.63 mmol/L/h, compared with median admission sodium of 163 mmol/L and rate of fall of 0.48 mmol/L/h, in children with good outcome (P=0.068 and P=0.08, respectively). Median sodium content of intravenous solution was 61 mmol/L in both groups (P=0.68). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neither sodium content of intravenous solution (P=0.59), nor rate of fall of sodium (P=0.31), was independently associated with adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Rehydration in hypernatraemic gastroenteritis using intravenous solutions containing 61 mmol/L sodium would be expected to correct serum sodium at a rate of approximately 0.6 mmol/L/h. Neither sodium content of the intravenous solution, nor rate of correction of sodium, was independently associated with adverse outcome.