RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of sonothrombolysis delivered pre and post primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) on infarct size assessed by cardiac MRI, in patients presenting with STEMI, when compared against sham procedure. BACKGROUND: More than a half of patients with successful pPCI have significant microvascular obstruction and residual infarction. Sonothrombolysis is a therapeutic use of ultrasound with contrast enhancement that may improve microcirculation and infarct size. The benefits and real time physiological effects of sonothrombolysis in a multicentre setting are unclear. METHODS: The REDUCE (Restoring microvascular circulation with diagnostic ultrasound and contrast agent) trial is a prospective, multicentre, patient and outcome blinded, sham-controlled trial. Patients presenting with STEMI will be randomized to one of 2 treatment arms, to receive either sonothrombolysis treatment or sham echocardiography before and after pPCI. This tailored design is based on preliminary pilot data from our centre, showing that sonothrombolysis can be safely delivered, without prolonging door to balloon time. Our primary endpoint will be infarct size assessed on day 4±2 on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR). Patients will be followed up for 6 months post pPCI to assess secondary endpoints. Sample size calculations indicate we will need 150 patients recruited in total. CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre trial will test whether sonothrombolysis delivered pre and post primary PCI can improve patient outcomes and is cost-effective, when compared with sham ultrasound delivered with primary PCI. The results from this trial may provide evidence for the utilization of sonothrombolysis as an adjunct therapy to pPCI to improve cardiovascular outcomes in STEMI. ANZ Clinical Trial Registration number: ACTRN 12620000807954.
Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Microcirculação , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Humanos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Microcirculação/fisiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Terapia por Ultrassom/métodos , Circulação Coronária/fisiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Análise Custo-BenefícioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are no current standardized and accepted methods to characterize the surgical complexity of a laparoscopic hysterectomy. This leads to challenges when trying to understand the relationship between the patient and the surgical features and outcomes. The development of core feature sets for laparoscopic hysterectomy studies would enable future trials to measure the similar meaningful variables that can contribute to surgical complexity and outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a core feature set for the surgical complexity of a laparoscopic hysterectomy. STUDY DESIGN: This was an international Delphi consensus study. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify the features that were reported in studies on laparoscopic hysterectomy complexity. All the features were presented for evaluation and prioritization to key experts in 3 rounds of online surveys. A priori consensus criteria were used to reach agreement on the final outcomes for inclusion in the core feature set. RESULTS: Experts represented North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Asia, and Oceania. Most of them had fellowship training in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Sixty-four potential features were entered into round 1. Experts reached a consensus on 7 features to be included in the core feature set. These features were grouped under the following domains: 1) patient features, 2) uterine features, and 3) nonuterine pelvic features. The patient features include obesity and other nonobesity comorbidities that alter or limit the ability of a surgeon to perform the basic or routine steps in a laparoscopic hysterectomy. The uterine features include the size and presence of fibroids. The nonuterine pelvic features include endometriosis, ovarian cysts, and adhesions (bladder-to-uterus, rectouterine pouch, and other adhesions). CONCLUSION: Using robust consensus science methods, an international consortium of experts has developed a core feature set that should be assessed and reported in all future studies that aim to assess the relationship between the patient features and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Leiomioma , Consenso , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Leiomioma/cirurgia , ÚteroRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The classical linear model is widely used in the analysis of clinical trials with continuous outcomes. However, required model assumptions are frequently not met, resulting in estimates of treatment effect that can be inefficient and biased. In addition, traditional models assess treatment effect only on the mean response, and not on other aspects of the response, such as the variance. Distributional regression modelling overcomes these limitations. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate its usefulness for the analysis of clinical trials, and superior performance to that of traditional models. METHODS: Distributional regression models are demonstrated, and contrasted with normal linear models, on data from the LIPID randomized controlled trial, which compared the effects of pravastatin with placebo in patients with coronary heart disease. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and the biomarker midregional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) were analysed. Treatment effect was estimated in models that used response distributions more appropriate than the normal (Box-Cox-t and Johnson's Su for MR-proADM and SBP, respectively), applied censoring below the detection limit of MR-proADM, estimated treatment effect on distributional parameters other than the mean, and included random effects for longitudinal observations. A simulation study was conducted to compare the performance of distributional regression models with normal linear regression, under conditions mimicking the LIPID study. The R package gamlss (Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape), which implements maximum likelihood estimation for distributional regression modelling, was used throughout. RESULTS: In all cases the distributional regression models fit the data well, in contrast to poor fits obtained for traditional models; for MR-proADM a small but significant treatment effect on the mean was detected by the distributional regression model and not the normal model; and for SBP a beneficial treatment effect on the variance was demonstrated. In the simulation study distributional models strongly outperformed normal models when the response variable was non-normal and heterogeneous; and there was no disadvantage introduced by the use of distributional regression modelling when the response satisfied the normal linear model assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Distributional regression models are a rich framework, largely untapped in the clinical trials world. We have demonstrated a sample of the capabilities of these models for the analysis of trials. If interest lies in accurate estimation of treatment effect on the mean, or other distributional features such as variance, the use of distributional regression modelling will yield superior estimates to traditional normal models, and is strongly recommended. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The LIPID trial was retrospectively registered on ANZCTR on 27/04/2016, registration number ACTRN12616000535471 .
Assuntos
Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Biomarcadores , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There are limited data from retrospective studies regarding whether survival outcomes after laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (minimally invasive surgery) are equivalent to those after open abdominal radical hysterectomy (open surgery) among women with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: In this trial involving patients with stage IA1 (lymphovascular invasion), IA2, or IB1 cervical cancer and a histologic subtype of squamous-cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma, we randomly assigned patients to undergo minimally invasive surgery or open surgery. The primary outcome was the rate of disease-free survival at 4.5 years, with noninferiority claimed if the lower boundary of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the between-group difference (minimally invasive surgery minus open surgery) was greater than -7.2 percentage points (i.e., closer to zero). RESULTS: A total of 319 patients were assigned to minimally invasive surgery and 312 to open surgery. Of the patients who were assigned to and underwent minimally invasive surgery, 84.4% underwent laparoscopy and 15.6% robot-assisted surgery. Overall, the mean age of the patients was 46.0 years. Most patients (91.9%) had stage IB1 disease. The two groups were similar with respect to histologic subtypes, the rate of lymphovascular invasion, rates of parametrial and lymph-node involvement, tumor size, tumor grade, and the rate of use of adjuvant therapy. The rate of disease-free survival at 4.5 years was 86.0% with minimally invasive surgery and 96.5% with open surgery, a difference of -10.6 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.4 to -4.7). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with a lower rate of disease-free survival than open surgery (3-year rate, 91.2% vs. 97.1%; hazard ratio for disease recurrence or death from cervical cancer, 3.74; 95% CI, 1.63 to 8.58), a difference that remained after adjustment for age, body-mass index, stage of disease, lymphovascular invasion, and lymph-node involvement; minimally invasive surgery was also associated with a lower rate of overall survival (3-year rate, 93.8% vs. 99.0%; hazard ratio for death from any cause, 6.00; 95% CI, 1.77 to 20.30). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was associated with lower rates of disease-free survival and overall survival than open abdominal radical hysterectomy among women with early-stage cervical cancer. (Funded by the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center and Medtronic; LACC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00614211 .).
Assuntos
Histerectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidade , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of premorbid ß-blocker exposure on mortality and organ dysfunction in sepsis. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: ICUs in Australia, the Czech Republic, and the United States. PATIENTS: Total of 4,086 critical care patients above 18 years old with sepsis between January 2014 and December 2018. INTERVENTION: Premorbid beta-blocker exposure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One thousand five hundred fifty-six patients (38%) with premorbid ß-blocker exposure were identified. Overall ICU mortality rate was 15.1%. In adjusted models, premorbid ß-blocker exposure was associated with decreased ICU (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97; p = 0.025) and hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; p = 0.033) mortality. The risk reduction in ICU mortality of 16% was significant (hazard ratio, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.71-0.99; p = 0.037). In particular, exposure to noncardioselective ß-blocker before septic episode was associated with decreased mortality. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score analysis showed that premorbid ß-blocker exposure had potential benefits in reducing respiratory and neurologic dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that ß-blocker exposure prior to sepsis, especially to noncardioselective ß blockers, may be associated with better outcome. The findings suggest prospective evaluation of ß-blocker use in the management of sepsis.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , APACHE , Adolescente , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , República Tcheca , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/fisiopatologia , Estados UnidosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Intrauterine levonorgestrel (LNG-IUD) is used to treat patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma (EAC) and endometrial hyperplasia with atypia (EHA) but limited evidence is available on its effectiveness. The study determined the extent to which LNG-IUD with or without metformin (M) or weight loss (WL) achieves a pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with EAC or EHA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with histologically confirmed, clinically stage 1 FIGO grade 1 EAC or EHA; a body mass index > 30 kg/m2; a depth of myometrial invasion of less than 50% on MRI; a serum CA125 ≤ 30 U/mL. All patients received LNG-IUD and were randomized to observation (OBS), M (500 mg orally twice daily), or WL (pooled analysis). The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients developing a pCR (defined as absence of any evidence of EAC or EHA) after 6 months. RESULTS: From December 2012 to October 2019, 165 patients were enrolled and 154 completed the 6-months follow up. Women had a mean age of 53 years, and a mean BMI of 48 kg/m2. Ninety-six patients were diagnosed with EAC (58%) and 69 patients with EHA (42%). Thirty-five participants were randomized to OBS, 36 to WL and 47 to M (10 patients were withdrawn). After 6 months the rate of pCR was 61% (95% CI 42% to 77%) for OBS, 67% (95% CI 48% to 82%) for WL and 57% (95% CI 41% to 72%) for M. Across the three treatment groups, the pCR was 82% and 43% for EHA and EAC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Complete response rates at 6 months were encouraging for patients with EAC and EHA across the three groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U.S. National Library of Medicine, NCT01686126.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Metformina/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Redução de Peso , Programas de Redução de Peso/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Incomplete revascularisation is common and prognostically important. The degree to which incomplete revascularisation (IR) is associated with adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with diabetes and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is unknown. METHODS: Late outcomes (3.6 years) were evaluated in 589 consecutive STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention in this observational study. Associations between incomplete revascularisation, and diabetes were assessed. A residual SYNergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) Score (rSS) >8 defined IR. The primary endpoint studied was cardiac death, myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident. RESULTS: Incomplete revascularisation occurred in 36% of patients with diabetes (46/127) and 32% of patients without diabetes (147/462); p=0.329. The primary endpoint occurred in 27% of patients with diabetes compared to 18% of patients without diabetes (p=0.042); and in 28% with a rSS>8 compared to 16% of patients with a rSS≤8 (p<0.001). The primary endpoint occurred in 35% of patients with both diabetes and a rSS>8, 27% without diabetes with a rSS>8, 22% with diabetes and a rSS≤8, and 14% of with patients neither factor (p<0.001), with cardiac death rates respectively of 22%, 9%, 6%, 2% (p<0.001). Patients with both IR and diabetes accounted for only 8% of STEMI patients but 30% of all cardiac deaths. On multivariable analyses diabetes and IR were independently associated with cardiac death, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular accident; both p<0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes and IR contribute independently to late outcomes in STEMI patients. The prognostic impact of diabetes was not due to IR alone. Diabetes acts synergistically with incomplete revascularisation to worsen prognosis.
Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Diabetes Mellitus , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST , Angiografia Coronária , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/cirurgia , Fatores de Risco , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/cirurgia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 LACC trial and a subsequent population-level review, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was shown to be associated with worse disease-free survival and higher recurrence rates than was open radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Here, we report the results of a secondary endpoint, quality of life, of the LACC trial. METHODS: The LACC trial was a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial done in 33 centres worldwide. Eligible participants were women aged 18 years or older with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion, IA2, or IB1 adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, who were scheduled to have a type 2 or 3 radical hysterectomy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive open or minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. Randomisation was done centrally using a computerised minimisation program, stratified by centre, disease stage according to FIGO guidelines, and age. Neither participants nor investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint of the LACC trial was disease-free survival at 4·5 years, and quality of life was a secondary endpoint. Eligible patients completed validated quality-of-life and symptom assessments (12-item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cervical [FACT-Cx], EuroQoL-5D [EQ-5D], and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI]) before surgery and at 1 and 6 weeks and 3 and 6 months after surgery (FACT-Cx was also completed at additional timepoints up to 54 months after surgery). Differences in quality of life over time between treatment groups were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who had surgery and completed at least one baseline (pretreatment) and one follow-up (at any timepoint after surgery) questionnaire, using generalised estimating equations. The LACC trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00614211. FINDINGS: Between Jan 31, 2008, and June 22, 2017, 631 patients were enrolled; 312 assigned to the open surgery group and 319 assigned to the minimally invasive surgery group. 496 (79%) of 631 patients had surgery completed at least one baseline and one follow-up quality-of-life survey and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (244 [78%] of 312 patients in the open surgery group and 252 [79%] of 319 participants in the minimally invasive surgery group). Median follow-up was 3·0 years (IQR 1·7-4·5). At baseline, no differences in the mean FACT-Cx total score were identified between the open surgery (129·3 [SD 18·8]) and minimally invasive surgery groups (129·8 [19·8]). No differences in mean FACT-Cx total scores were identified between the groups 6 weeks after surgery (128·7 [SD 19·9] in the open surgery group vs 130·0 [19·8] in the minimally invasive surgery group) or 3 months after surgery (132·0 [21·7] vs 133·0 [22·1]). INTERPRETATION: Since recurrence rates are higher and disease-free survival is lower for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy than for open surgery, and postoperative quality of life is similar between the treatment groups, gynaecological oncologists should recommend open radical hysterectomy for patients with early stage cervical cancer. FUNDING: MD Anderson Cancer Center and Medtronic.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Histerectomia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/psicologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/psicologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment of early cervical cancer involves a radical hysterectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The existing evidence on the incidence of adverse events after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer is either nonrandomized or retrospective. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of adverse events after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: The Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Cervix trial was a multinational, randomized noninferiority trial that was conducted between 2008 and 2017, in which surgeons from 33 tertiary gynecologic cancer centers in 24 countries randomly assigned 631 women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 stage IA1 with lymph-vascular invasion to IB1 cervical cancer to undergo minimally invasive (n = 319) or open radical hysterectomy (n = 312). The Laparoscopic Approach to Carcinoma of the Cervix trial was suspended for enrolment in September 2017 because of an increased risk of recurrence and death in the minimally invasive surgery group. Here we report on a secondary outcome measure: the incidence of intra- and postoperative adverse events within 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: Of 631 randomly assigned patients, 536 (85%; mean age, 46.0 years) met inclusion criteria for this analysis; 279 (52%) underwent minimally invasive radical hysterectomy, and 257 (48%) underwent open radical hysterectomy. Of those, 300 (56%), 91 (16.9%), and 69 (12.8%) experienced at least 1 grade ≥2 or ≥3 or a serious adverse event, respectively. The incidence of intraoperative grade ≥2 adverse events was 12% (34/279 patients) in the minimally invasive group vs 10% (26/257) in the open group (difference, 2.1%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3 to 7.4%; P=.45). The overall incidence of postoperative grade ≥2 adverse events was 54% (152/279 patients) in the minimally invasive group vs 48% (124/257) in the open group (difference, 6.2%; 95% confidence interval, -2.2 to 14.7%; P=.14). CONCLUSION: For early cervical cancer, the use of minimally invasive compared with open radical hysterectomy resulted in a similar overall incidence of intraoperative or postoperative adverse events.
Assuntos
Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/classificação , Laparoscopia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: D-dimer, a degradation product of cross-linked fibrin, is a marker for hypercoagulability and thrombotic events. Moderately elevated levels of D-dimer are associated with the risk of venous and arterial events in patients with vascular disease. We assessed the role of D-dimer levels in predicting long-term vascular outcomes, cause-specific mortality, and new cancers in the LIPID trial (Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease) in the context of other risk factors. METHODS: LIPID randomized patients to placebo or pravastatin 40 mg/d 5 to 38 months after myocardial infarction or unstable angina. D-dimer levels were measured at baseline and at 1 year. Median follow-up was 6.0 years during the trial and 16 years in total. RESULTS: Baseline D-dimer levels for 7863 patients were grouped by quartile (≤112, 112-173, 173-273, >273 ng/mL). Higher levels were associated with older age, female sex, history of hypertension, poor renal function, and elevated levels of B-natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and sensitive troponin I (each P<0.001). During the first 6 years, after adjustment for up to 30 additional risk factors, higher D-dimer was associated with a significantly increased risk of a major coronary event (quartile 4 versus 1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.74), major cardiovascular disease (CVD) event (HR, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.71) and venous thromboembolism (HR, 4.03; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-7.03; each P<0.001). During the 16 years overall, higher D-dimer was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (HR, 1.59), CVD mortality (HR, 1.61), cancer mortality (HR, 1.54), and non-CVD noncancer mortality (HR, 1.57; each P<0.001), remaining significant for deaths resulting from each cause occurring beyond 10 years of follow-up (each P≤0.01). Higher D-dimer also independently predicted an increase in cancer incidence (HR, 1.16; P=0.02).The D-dimer level increased the net reclassification index for all-cause mortality by 4.0 and venous thromboembolism by 13.6. CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer levels predict long-term risk of arterial and venous events, CVD mortality, and non-CVD noncancer mortality independent of other risk factors. D-dimer is also a significant predictor of cancer incidence and mortality. These results support an association of D-dimer with fatal events across multiple diseases and demonstrate that this link extends beyond 10 years' follow-up.
Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/sangue , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Neoplasias/sangue , Tromboembolia Venosa/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Doença das Coronárias/diagnóstico , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Pravastatina/uso terapêutico , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Regulação para Cima , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidadeRESUMO
A correction to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine associations of low superior vena cava (SVC) flow (≤55 ml/kg/min) and low right ventricular output (RVO) (≤150 ml/kg/min) in preterm infants. DESIGN/METHODS: An observational study in infants <30 weeks gestation randomized to receive immediate (<10 s) or delayed cord clamping (DCC) (≥60 s). RESULTS: The study enrolled 265 infants with a mean (SD) gestation 28 (2) weeks. Eighty-six (33%) infants had low SVC flow and 81 (31%) infants had low RVO. In multivariate analysis, low SVC flow was associated with gestation; low RVO was associated with DCC, gender and 5-minute Apgar; whereas mean RVO was negatively associated with both FiO2 and mean airway pressure (MAP) at 9 h and 24 h. Low SVC flow was associated with ductus arteriosus (DA) treatment. Infants with low RVO had higher mortality on univariate analysis, but this was not significant after adjusting for gestation. CONCLUSIONS: SVC flow was associated with gestation, whilst RVO was associated with placental transfusion, gender, condition at birth, and early respiratory adaptation. Compared to infants with normal values, more infants with low SVC flow were treated for DA, but infants with low RVO had no significant difference in mortality or morbidity.
Assuntos
Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Hemodinâmica , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Cordão Umbilical/fisiologia , Veia Cava Superior/fisiologia , Austrália , Transfusão de Sangue , Constrição , Canal Arterial/fisiologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro/fisiologia , Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Placenta/fisiologia , Gravidez , Pressão , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Participant recruitment to diabetes prevention randomised controlled trials is challenging and expensive. The T4DM study, a multicentre, Australia-based, Phase IIIb randomised controlled trial of testosterone to prevent Type 2 diabetes in men aged 50-74 years, faced the challenge of screening a large number of prospective participants at a small number of sites, with few staff, and a limited budget for screening activities. This article evaluates a high-volume, low-cost, semi-automated approach to screen and enrol T4DM study participants. METHODS: We developed a sequential multi-step screening process: (1) web-based pre-screening, (2) laboratory screening through a network of third-party pathology centres, and (3) final on-site screening, using online data collection, computer-driven eligibility checking, and automated, email-based communication with prospective participants. Phone- and mail-based data collection and communication options were available to participants at their request. The screening process was administered by the central coordinating centre through a central data management system. RESULTS: Screening activities required staffing of approximately 1.6 full-time equivalents over 4 years. Of 19,022 participants pre-screened, 13,108 attended a third-party pathology collection centre for laboratory screening, 1217 received final, on-site screening, and 1007 were randomised. In total, 95% of the participants opted for online pre-screening over phone-based pre-screening. Screening costs, including both direct and staffing costs, totalled AUD1,420,909 (AUD75 per subject screened and AUD1411 per randomised participant). CONCLUSION: A multi-step, semi-automated screening process with web-based pre-screening facilitated low-cost, high-volume participant enrolment to this large, multicentre randomised controlled trial. Centralisation and automation of screening activities resulted in substantial savings compared to previous, similar studies. Our screening approach could be adapted to other randomised controlled trial settings to minimise the cost of screening large numbers of participants.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/métodos , Idoso , Austrália , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Correio Eletrônico , Humanos , Internet , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/economia , Projetos de PesquisaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Organ transplant recipients (OTR) have an increased risk of skin cancers compared with the general population. METHODS: A prospective study of renal (RTR) and liver transplant recipients (LTR) was conducted in a single New South Wales tertiary referral centre over 60 months. Initial and subsequent visit data were recorded in our transplant database. Only patients with a minimum of 11 months follow up were included. RESULTS: Altogether 142 RTR and 88 LTR were included in the analysis. Compared with RTR, the median age of liver transplant recipients was higher (64 vs 57 years), more men were patients (73 vs 60%) and there were higher rates of high-risk skin types (54 vs 33%) and heavy sun exposure (43 vs 30%). RTR developed 304 non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) with a squamous cell carcinoma:basal cell carcinoma ratio of 1.7:1. LTR developed 205 NMSC with a squamous cell carcinoma:basal cell carcinoma ratio of 1.6:1. The odds ratio of developing NMSC in LTR:RTR was 1.8:1 (95% CI: 1.02-3.11, P = 0.044) on univariate analysis but there was no difference on multivariate analysis. A previous history of NMSC, age, time from transplant from first visit, skin phenotype and previous sun exposure were significant risk factors for developing NMSC. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients are not at a lower risk of NMSC than RTR. Our study supports routine and regular post-transplant skin surveillance of all LTR, like other OTR.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiologia , Transplante de Rim/estatística & dados numéricos , Transplante de Fígado/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New South Wales/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether delayed cord clamping improves systemic blood flow compared with immediate cord clamping in very preterm infants in the first 24 hours. STUDY DESIGN: Women delivering at <30 weeks' gestation at 5 tertiary centers were randomized to receive immediate cord clamping (<10 seconds) or delayed cord clamping (≥60 seconds). Echocardiography and cardiorespiratory data were collected at 3, 9, and 24 hours after birth. The primary outcome was mean lowest superior vena cava (SVC) flow. RESULTS: Of 266 infants enrolled, 133 were randomized to immediate cord clamping and 133 to delayed cord clamping. The 2 groups were similar at baseline, including mean gestation (immediate cord clamping 28 weeks vs delayed cord clamping 28 weeks) and birth weight (immediate cord clamping 1003 g vs delayed cord clamping 1044 g). There was no significant difference between groups in the primary outcome of mean lowest SVC flow (immediate cord clamping 71.4 mL/kg/min [SD 28.1] vs delayed cord clamping 70.2 mL/kg/min [SD 26.9]; P = .7). For secondary outcomes, hemoglobin increased by 0.9 g/dL at 6 hours in the group with delayed cord clamping (95% CI 3.9, 14.4; P = .0005, adjusted for baseline). The group with delayed cord clamping had lower right ventricular output (-21.9 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -39.0, -4.7; P = .01). Rates of treated hypotension, ductus arteriosus size and shunt direction, and treatment of the ductus arteriosus were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cord clamping had no effect on systemic blood flow measured as mean lowest SVC flow in the first 24 hours in infants <30 weeks' gestation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12610000633088.
Assuntos
Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro/fisiologia , Cordão Umbilical/cirurgia , Veia Cava Superior/fisiologia , Austrália , Velocidade do Fluxo Sanguíneo , Constrição , Ecocardiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Recém-Nascido Prematuro/sangue , Nova Zelândia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The disparity between the demand for and supply of kidney transplants has resulted in prolonged waiting times for patients with kidney failure. A potential approach to address this shortage is to consider kidneys from donors with a history of common cancers, such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers. METHODS: We used a patient-level Markov model to evaluate the outcomes of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with a perceived history of breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer characterized by minimal to intermediate transmission risk. Data from the Australian transplant registry were used in this analysis. The study compared the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) from the perspective of the Australian healthcare system between the proposed practice of accepting these donors and the conservative practice of declining them. The model simulated outcomes for 1500 individuals waitlisted for a deceased donor kidney transplant for a 25-y horizon. RESULTS: Under the proposed practice, when an additional 15 donors with minimal to intermediate cancer transmission risk were accepted, QALY gains ranged from 7.32 to 20.12. This translates to an approximate increase of 7 to 20 additional years of perfect health. The shift in practice also led to substantial cost savings, ranging between $1.06 and $2.3 million. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed practice of accepting kidneys from deceased donors with a history of common cancers with minimal to intermediate transmission risk offers a promising solution to bridge the gap between demand and supply. This approach likely results in QALY gains for recipients and significant cost savings for the health system.
Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Transplante de Rim , Cadeias de Markov , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Doadores de Tecidos , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/economia , Masculino , Feminino , Doadores de Tecidos/provisão & distribuição , Austrália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Mama/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/economia , Adulto , Sistema de Registros , Seleção do Doador/economia , Fatores de Risco , Listas de Espera , Modelos Econômicos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of testosterone vs placebo treatment on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and psychosocial function in men without pathologic hypogonadism in the context of a lifestyle intervention. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Secondary analysis of a 2-year randomized controlled testosterone therapy trial for prevention or reversal of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, enrolling men ≥ 50 years at high risk for type 2 diabetes from 6 Australian centers. INTERVENTIONS: Injectable testosterone undecanoate or matching placebo on the background of a community-based lifestyle program. MAIN OUTCOMES: Self-reported measures of HR-QOL/psychosocial function. RESULTS: Of 1007 participants randomized into the Testosterone for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T4DM) trial, 648 (64%) had complete data available for all HR-QOL/psychosocial function assessments at baseline and 2 years. Over 24 months, while most measures were not different between treatment arms, testosterone treatment, compared with placebo, improved subjective social status and sense of coherence. Baseline HR-QOL/psychosocial function measures did not predict the effect of testosterone treatment on glycemic outcomes, primary endpoints of T4DM. Irrespective of treatment allocation, larger decreases in body weight were associated with improved mental quality of life, mastery, and subjective social status. Men with better baseline physical function, greater sense of coherence, and fewer depressive symptoms experienced greater associated decreases in body weight, with similar effects on waist circumference. CONCLUSION: In this diabetes prevention trial, weight loss induced by a lifestyle intervention improved HR-QOL and psychosocial function in more domains than testosterone treatment. The magnitude of weight and waist circumference reduction were predicted by baseline physical function, depressive symptomology, and sense of coherence.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Qualidade de Vida , Testosterona , Redução de Peso , Humanos , Masculino , Testosterona/uso terapêutico , Testosterona/administração & dosagem , Testosterona/análogos & derivados , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Redução de Peso/efeitos dos fármacos , Idoso , Funcionamento Psicossocial , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The aim of this study was to compare overall survival between open and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy with participants followed for 4.5 years. The primary objective was to evaluate whether minimally invasive surgery was noninferior in disease-free survival (DFS) to abdominal radical hysterectomy. Secondary outcomes included overall survival. Sample size was based on DFS of 90% at 4.5 years and 7.2% noninferiority margin for minimally invasive surgery. A total of 631 patients were enrolled: 319 assigned to minimally invasive and 312 to open surgery. Of these, 289 (90.6%) patients underwent minimally invasive surgery and 274 (87.8%) patients open surgery. At 4.5 years, DFS was 85.0% in the minimally invasive group and 96% in the open group (difference of -11.1; 95% CI, -15.8 to -6.3; P = .95 for noninferiority). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower rate of DFS compared with open surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 3.91 [95% CI, 2.02 to 7.58]; P < .001). Rate of overall survival at 4.5 years was 90.6% versus 96.2% for the minimally invasive and open surgery groups, respectively (HR for death of any cause = 2.71 [95% CI, 1.32 to 5.59]; P = .007). Given higher recurrence rate and worse overall survival with minimally invasive surgery, an open approach should be standard of care.